>>3767827The bottom left corner of the four square is in the wrong place: animals have no moral worth, but it's still immoral to fuck animals because you would be acting against your own human nature.
You see, the question was never about harming or not harming the animal, or what would justify the action. If you have any choice in the matter at all, acting against your own species and society, and yourself, would be immoral in the same sense as how suicide or self-harm is immoral. If you don't have a choice in the matter and need to fuck your dog, or if you're too anti-social to care, well, then you're basically insane and undesirable anyways.
