[ furi ] [ Chat ]

/furi/ - Yaff

You messed with me~

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1622174874401.jpeg (292.48 KB, 1280x1235, 82021390-B6C0-4D6A-81D6-9….jpeg)

970edb6c No.3615692[Reply]

Do you feel you look at porn too often?

d25d98ce No.3615695

File: 1622175508589.jpg (124.75 KB, 819x579, 1621470804007.jpg)

>>3615692
Nah.

e87abe9a No.3615701

File: 1622198168523.png (3.32 MB, 2700x2700, 1445155782.siroc_maidmaria….png)

If your sexuality is managed and you are working, then it's your business.

53a8697e No.3615711

>>3615701
>I DONT CARE AS LONG AS YOU GOYS CLOCK IN AT WORK
jew detected


File: 1622165474501.jpg (277.62 KB, 1351x969, BobbySloth.jpg)

e588c37c No.3615679[Reply]

WTF would anyone call themselves a "Hot Diaper Mommy"? Is this becoming a thing in the Trans community? Who want to call something as ugly as this their "mom"?

4f58bc26 No.3615681

File: 1622166191739-0.png (360.8 KB, 560x420, Screenshot_2021-05-27 pamp….png)

File: 1622166191739-1.jpg (35.7 KB, 600x603, n5524842_31731483_92773.jpg)

>>3615679
Because as long as degenerates like Pamperchu exist the need for surrogate mothers like that will too. This stuff is the kind of thing that will make yout throw up.


File: 1621716882145.jpg (371.76 KB, 960x1456, 41565874-9456511-Sikor_Nat….jpg)

b9855447 No.3615342[Reply]

Post 1 picture that describes your current descent into madness.
56 posts and 46 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

0756fba8 No.3615568

>>3615546
>Two men … a lot of people still think that should be illegal.

No, a lot of people don't. Only a tiny bunch of cry babies who always seem to end up getting caught having gay sex at some point in their political careers care about that old, tired, talking point.

America is over it. Move on.

7b2d6639 No.3615583

>>3615568
>>3615565
You do realize by "having a kid" I mean, two gay guys being legal guardians of a child together. Thus having a kid.

9421c8f2 No.3615584

File: 1622062738385.jpeg (46.54 KB, 640x472, same problem EzOX4-8VIAUe….jpeg)


4ff2c6d1 No.3615610

>>3615584
Add someone tossing them a peanut butter sandwich and the 'help online' picture will be complete

0889969c No.3615618

File: 1622104453004.jpg (44.56 KB, 680x346, E2VDUXeXoAIrvrt.jpg)

>>3615583
Yeah, no one cares if gay people are parents together. It's not the 80s. People have moved past it.

Republicans spent decades saying how important 2-parent households are and now they are getting their wish!

7fd548dd No.3615641

>>3615618
Technically, the idea is to have both gender role models so the child can be properly socialized, but having two queens as parents is less bad than having just one.

7fd548dd No.3615642

>>3615583
>Thus having a kid.

No, they're adopting a kid that someone else had.


File: 1615951359693-0.jpg (1.26 MB, 4096x3072, media_EnG2c6bUwAEv-I2.jpg ….jpg)

File: 1615951359693-1.jpeg (2.13 MB, 3178x2119, EtYQsxxVIAItMCd.jpeg)

File: 1615951359693-2.jpg (693.96 KB, 1944x1458, 0039..jpg)

File: 1615951359693-3.jpg (278.94 KB, 768x1024, EI5Vn-3U0AA_VS-.jpg)

File: 1615951359693-4.jpg (1.17 MB, 1350x900, 183778_large27797.jpg)

8d8edcbf No.3608831[Reply]

photos of foxes butts.
4 posts and 7 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

2d1711b3 No.3611702

File: 1618548457684-0.jpg (888.22 KB, 1841x1132, 0007..jpg)

File: 1618548457684-1.jpeg (571.65 KB, 2880x1920, arcticfoxass.jpeg)

File: 1618548457684-2.jpg (1.2 MB, 4096x3072, EBphB3nU0AAK9LP.jpg)

I WANT PHOTOS WHERE YOU CAN SEE THE FOX'S ASSHOLE. IF YOU HAVE PHOTOS LIKE THAT PLEASE POST THEM.

ac83caf4 No.3614035

File: 1620519756671-0.jpg (298.84 KB, 1280x720, maxresdefault - jbNAGueTZo….jpg)

File: 1620519756671-1.jpeg (1.46 MB, 4096x3072, ExfMBJvVEAQS6NR.jpeg)


8020138a No.3614047

stop making me want to fuck feral foxes, there is only so much a guy can take.

e78a6760 No.3614051

Please give a hide thread option….

4a6dff66 No.3614054

>>3614051
The (-) on the top right of the thread frame does that.

You're welcome, and welcome to the internet.

50caeff3 No.3614061

>>3614051
> Please give a hide thread option….
NEWBIE ALERT! NEWBIE ALERT!

b6be3150 No.3615637

File: 1622126236345.jpeg (279.91 KB, 1295x893, E1Quo51VcAQyp-h.jpeg)



File: 1621903396695.png (1.15 MB, 1113x1095, Honeyview_2021-05-25_10-42….png)

04526579 No.3615491[Reply]

Can someone explain why anal vore is a thing?

9eec87e2 No.3615501

File: 1621917753244.jpg (937.47 KB, 2432x3607, 066424b55191859a4031db684f….jpg)

Because butts are sexy, and who wouldn't want to dive in to one when given the opportunity?

0113725c No.3615631

File: 1622121999470.jpg (207.2 KB, 1280x960, 1428287705.foxyrita_105169….jpg)

>>3615501
agreed. fox butts are the sexiest and I would love to jump inside one.


File: 1579017029858.png (243.71 KB, 1000x539, shewolf.png)

d6b2b363 No.3567306[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Can we have a pretty wolfess thread?
266 posts and 249 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

338ed553 No.3612686

File: 1619496332470-0.jpg (163.03 KB, 1006x1280, 1613868127.defenbaugh_witc….jpg)

File: 1619496332470-1.jpg (211.6 KB, 1006x1280, 1613868324.defenbaugh_witc….jpg)


451a3ddf No.3612697

File: 1619500757911.png (2.36 MB, 1800x1500, VI90buVb.png)


d17531e3 No.3615452

File: 1621885076490.png (1.94 MB, 2400x1595, 1621814863.truegrave9_cowg….png)


d17531e3 No.3615459

File: 1621885304152.jpg (246.19 KB, 960x1280, 1615213079.windm_co-cinnaw….jpg)


08be75ba No.3615466

File: 1621886932182.jpg (346.92 KB, 2048x1618, 106911d4f814268ca4e135708f….jpg)


33521d3b No.3615589

File: 1622066292347.png (1.18 MB, 2000x1204, 1621940622.lizet_pr11-20.png)


451a3ddf No.3615594

File: 1622068033106.png (2 MB, 1900x2250, R4.png)



File: 1592469821675.png (628.79 KB, 466x466, Screenshot_2020-06-18 1 Do….png)

7c2aebdf No.3579266[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Post your favorite episodes, audios or books from the series.
94 posts and 38 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

5831ba1b No.3615536

>>3615522

The problem with this argument is that art is a humanity, and therefore subject to the changes of the society which creates it. Saying that art means nothing because it can't change is like saying the names of countries mean nothing because their borders change.

What is art to someone 100 or 1000 years ago is not the same as what art is to someone 100 or 1000 years in the future just as what any country was to someone 100 or 1000 years ago is not the same as it will be to someone 100 or 1000 years in the future.

In essence, it's a theseus' ship problem, and by declaring art meaningless just because it does not have an objective independent definition is throwing the baby out with the bathwater. What is art ostensibly is what we as individuals and social collectives choose to define as art. Nothing more, nothing less, as all human constructs are.

c5eeca2d No.3615569

>>3615536
>art means nothing because it can't change is like saying the names of countries mean nothing because their borders change.

On the contrary. The names of countries refer exactly to those areas which we collectively agree on. The fact that they can change is irrelevant - the definition of a country is still a public matter, and we can unambiguously define where the borders are.

The whole point of Wittgenstein's argument is that the sort of internal language which ISN'T socially agreed on is not coherent, because you yourself cannot know whether you still mean the same thing, or whether you ever meant anything by it. Leaving a word like "art" completely subjective does exactly this: nobody knows what it means, not even the people who talk about it.

c5eeca2d No.3615571

>>3615536
> What is art ostensibly is what we as individuals and social collectives choose to define as art.

Precisely, and the collective understanding is what keeps a concept like "art" coherent, even if it may change with the collective. However, if the collective understanding of art is that it's whatever anyone thinks is art, then we're back to square one.

Therefore, either "art" has a definite meaning which we can list and say "this is what we mean when we say art", or it hasn't and we're all talking pure nonsense.

5831ba1b No.3615572

>>3615571

Perhaps the problem then is that the larger social collective that decides our current social intepretation of art disagrees with you and many others on this board, and is full of people you personally dislike, so you lash out at art and demand it not be called art because it doesn't meet your personal criteria?

c5eeca2d No.3615574

Going back to the original question:

>how do you tell the difference between surreal humor and just doing random shit without a point to it?

We can borrow from a commonly accepted definition of art:

>Art : the conscious use of skill and creative imagination especially in the production of aesthetic objects

Here we see a contradiction. If humor should likewise be conscious and creative use of wit to produce pleasurable states of mind in people, then surreal humor is an oxymoron because it involves no wit, creative or otherwise, since the only conscious effort is to not make any sense. If on the other hand humor should not constitute the use of wit, but simply what people find funny by themselves, then nobody can consciously be humorous, surreal or not, because they couldn't know what people will find funny. Humor would be entirely accidental.

c5eeca2d No.3615575

>>3615572
>the larger social collective that decides our current social intepretation of art disagrees with you

It doesn't disagree with me, because it has no coherent definition of art. What it does consider as art as demonstrated here as well, is ad-hoc to the argument at the moment. Talking about art in the broader sense is futile because we collectively refuse to define it.

c5eeca2d No.3615577

>>3615572
To explain clearly why arguing around words like "art" is stupid, when the word itself lacks a coherent meaning:

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ad_hoc
>Ad hoc is a phrase (literally, "for this") that describes ideas which are created solely for a specific task and not intended to be generalizable in any way.

A word like "art" is like a joker card in a game of poker - it could be anything because it is not defined and agreed on before dealing the cards. Each player can decide what they mean by it completely in the moment, to suit whatever point they're trying to push.

So to compare something to "art" is simply admitting that either you don't know what the fuck you're talking about, or hoping that other people won't notice and let you slide through without actually saying anything. Now imagine a game of poker where each player holds a hand made of NOTHING BUT jokers - that's what a debate about art is.


File: 1590583756285.png (258.91 KB, 500x523, vomitsquid.png)

83f35afb No.3576783[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Daily reminder that cub porn is CP and you should feel bad for enjoying something which is basically simulated child abuse.

Pic not related
402 posts and 382 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

c1286234 No.3614747

File: 1621183013049.jpg (242.63 KB, 1500x1221, 2300358_EtherSaga_caught_i….jpg)


c1286234 No.3614748

File: 1621183102810.png (115.04 KB, 900x675, 2635618_HalcyonWinter_1901….png)


0ed41493 No.3615095

File: 1621433247863.jpg (379.48 KB, 1860x2696, SaladBoi37_lewd_maiki.jpg)


2d6bbe52 No.3615299

File: 1621649521335.jpg (181.53 KB, 1024x1024, KevinSnowpaw_kevin_camissi….jpg)


ab9373e1 No.3615519

File: 1621956480674.jpg (138.56 KB, 440x655, Holly Massey cub porn.jpg)

>>3614457
Notice the creepy pedo obsessive won't answer the question. The creepy pedo obsessive wants to say that because Crassus knew what the symbol meant that he must be a pedophile.

That won't work now because the creepy pedo obsessive is the one who told us here on lulz the meaning of the symbol. That must mean the creepy pedo obsessive is also a pedophile.

He is stuck, so all the creepy pedo obsessive can do is make vague accusations that there are "pedos" all around.

64513a09 No.3615523

>>3615519
You keep dancing around the point that the guy keeps friends with pedos and draws them art instead of reporting them to the police, which is unlikely if he wasn't one himself.

What's your alternative? That he's a sociopath who just doesn't care?

d58bc4c4 No.3615564

File: 1622043340961.jpg (67.71 KB, 791x762, crysomemore.jpg)

>>3615519
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huaB3RtppMk

"You think you're saying something relevant as you connect the dots"

"You never realized you have to get in line to suck a cock"


File: 1621905576863.jpeg (1.58 MB, 1764x2508, 6aa64446c7cade1250f14dd4d….jpeg)

2f2c5868 No.3615495[Reply]

Foreskin thread

File: 1621712083535.png (524.14 KB, 828x725, 1621667448936.png)

14c49577 No.3615328[Reply]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pIjfBIIDm_I&t=836s

So this Bread Tube guy raised half a million to fund attacks on Israel.

Are the Jews going to kill him?
8 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

bbe92bbe No.3615344

>>3615340

yeah…god luck finding one not controlled by JEWS or just some tax-evading billionaire who will never get a feeling of having enough in the wallet

f9b58619 No.3615345

File: 1621717324801.png (397.11 KB, 866x592, muslimshatecommunist.png)

>>3615333
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYV7KWQ-fY4

35dc7f9b No.3615430

It's funny how nervous rightwinger lunatics get about Vaush. You losers love to shit on him behind his back and then you get fucking stomped every time you try to go on his show. :)

47dad739 No.3615436

File: 1621880177148.jpg (20.99 KB, 349x340, SargonSmug.jpg)

>>3615430
>Go on….
>Right Wing….
>Stomped…

1388d644 No.3615442

>>3615436
Yes, Carl "It Depends on The Child" of Akkad also got stomped by Vaush. And then immediately started panicking and refusing to debate leftists xD

47dad739 No.3615484

File: 1621892806544.jpg (493.37 KB, 1075x1202, 1621665933973.jpg)

>>3615442


Well does he fund missile attacks on Israel and people who kill homosexuals?

be017fc8 No.3615486

>>3615442
Negroid, do you have any idea what the context of that quote was? He was speaking to someone who was molested as a kid who didn't want to view himself as a victim. Sargon's position was that yes, it depends on the child, but we can't tell what is right for each child so we decide on a minimum age of consent, and further to that, he said that if anything he thought the age of consent should be raised.


Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30]
| Catalog
[ furi ] [ Chat ]