>>3764504The point of science is to be less wrong as time goes by and more information is gained to get better predictions. The older time-tested science is more likely to produce accurate answers than the latest breaking news. That's why Newton's laws are still valid for describing most everyday matters, while quantum mechanics has troubles extrapolating away from the scale of individual atoms - because nobody understands quantum mechanics enough to derive accurate large scale predictions out of it. It's why looking at the history of nations is better at predicting the future of societies than the latest theories of social science.
When fresh science like climate change is pushed to support politics, it is reduced to pseudo-religious dogma that breaks within one election cycle. The predictions turn out to be false, but the politicians can't admit it so they will continue to push a false narrative decade after decade.
