is correct. You lost the argument. The thing in question is a fantasy creature vaguely inspired by a real marine animal. It is not the animal and it is not even an accurate reproduction. For one thing, the movie prop has wicked looking pincers that no real animal has.
> By that logic , that man will be an imitation of the book-cover. Not the other way around.
By YOUR logic, Godzilla is not a suit worn by actors but actually is a theropod dinosaur, since the fantasy creature was vaguely inspired by dinosaurs.
> Also, bring a powerful magnifying glass or we cannot find your pink minuscule Jewish circumcised cock.
So not only are you confused between fantasy movie creatures and real ones, but you also confuse niggers
When you lose an argument you really crash and burn, don't you.