>>3458028

False dilemma. Just because I said one thing does not mean I'm also implying another thing.

>>3458023

>i am that which I hate

>>3458023

You just tipped your hand, you know. Shame on you double, 'anon'.

Yeah I'm certainly the only person that knows your dating history and predilection towards kids, both of which you've posted on lulz, lulz.

I'm not really that gay, but consider this :

The best orgasm achievable by a man is the one had with something against his prostate.

Now it doesn't have to be a dick... but admit it... it might as well be.

Being gay is just a logical succession more than anything. I wish people would recognize this more.

>>3458245

This is what complete gaybos want straight people to believe. I'm a fag, and I cannot confirm, since the best orgasms I've ever had were while asphyxiating by strangulation or keeping my head underwater while it happened. Try again, fag agenda.

>>3458245

I'm not sure how what I asked relates to how hard someone cums. I'm bi myself, I'm not excluded from this inquisition and yes the orgasms are better but I don't get why the near standard awful personality is so common and why everyone turns a blind eye to it other than fear of tumblrites.

>>3458037

>rapist

Another word that has lost all meaning.

>zootopia

[-]

>>3457874
Seems a little outta character for Judy.

>>3457875
At least Judy shows a range of expression, Zaush can't shake Nick's cool face, even when he gets rammed up the butt.

>>3457876
Finally he shows a different face.

>>3458063 You could say the word has been.. RAPED

>>3458063
stop raping people

>>3458037 Kill yourself like you promised, Diosoth.

The movie Zootopia itself 'rapes' the word "progressive" by having fooled millions of furfags that a movie which ends with both protagonists becoming cops is somehow progressive.

>>3458171
the tranny version is called Spanky now

sulkysadbobcat.tumblr.com

>>3458114 But Banjo Kazooie was good. Bubsy was always terrible.

http://bubsy3d.com/

>>3458114
How has it been doing, sales and review wise?

>>3458155

Why do tannins ruin everything?

>>3458196
They hate everything due to severe self-loathing, and have an attitude of “if I can’t enjoy this then no one else can!”.

>>3458196

>Why does LadyFuzztail ruin everything?

oh man the jews did this

>>3457773

Wouldn't you milk the shit out of this if you had the chance?

Also what >>3457473 said.

>>3457472

I am still confused on how Natani is labeled male when she's clearly female. I'm aware of the whole "brother spirit inhabiting female body" ploy.

>>3458083
Natani's sexual orientation has become rather Byzantine over the course of the comic's run. Yes, she was born female, but has the "mind" of a male. Also, her brother is supposedly gay, so the mind link also plays a part. Note that she thinks of Keith as 'just another guy' and happily shares a bed with him. It's also heavily implied that everyone in the TwoKinds cast is bi-sexual (is that a confusing enough explanation for you? :-))

>>3458083
Don't read too much into 2kinds, in the end it's just weeb wank material. Having a hot yet sexually ambiguous gender-mercurial trans-whateverthefuck wolf chick fits the titulating goal, with the nice side benefit of being "OMG so progressive!!"

>>3458083

Basically? Natani is trans. I'm pretty sure the author never intended it to be that way, but it fits now.

>>3458083 It’s Tom making up shit as he goes along, and justifying it as pic related.

sorry fancy, maybe I have fewer endowed girls than i thought :o

or at least dont have a lot within the scope of what op requested

captcha: shi
how appropriate...
goodnight

>>3458097
Don't sweat it Oliver, you did good!

>+upvote

+gulag

Mods have free rein to do whatever, and complaining does no good. If you were banned, I doubt cho0b would bother to unban you. Cho0b is fresh out of fucks to give, and this board will consequently die soon.

>>3458158

Actually I have been banned before, and one quick visit to the IRC got that solved. Granted, it was a range ban meant for someone else, but my point stands.

>>3458163
Oh yeah? Well if the mods keep deleting and permasaging your threads, you're as good as banned.

>I knew Trump wasn't going to be impeached. I wish they had talked more about Clinton.

BBB = McCain ???

can someone throw me a floater? im gonna drown in all these subhuman nigger, chink, spic, numale beta orbiter and womyxzn tears!

>>3458133

>1: Trump did nothing illegal and is not going to be impeached (on anything related to Russia).

But their staff did. The issue is what their staff did and what their relationship with Trump is.

>2: The media will not stop lying and twisting the words of others to fit a narrative.

This is normal on both sides.

>3: Liberals/SJWs/Socialists/Commies/BLM faggots will perpetually remain assblasted over the election and parrot whatever they hear through their favorite media outlet without putting an ounce of effort into researching what they're discussing.

Yet you're buttblasted for "getting censored" "deleted" and so angry that you had to create another threat to show your butthurtness.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

cum and get it, faggots

Well sure, you don't HAVE to.

But it's a really really good idea to disclose it early on. Like really. For both parties involved. Especially for the trans person, unless they want to needlessly put their safety at risk.

>>3457769 So you're saying... you don't have to but not doing so is a real .. "dick move"

>Thus, not being attracted to trans people is deeply transphobic. The entire notion that someone isn't attracted to a group of very physically diverse group of people because they are trans is built on fear and disgust of trans people.
>None of this means it is transphobic to not be attracted to individual trans people. Nor is it transphobic to not be attracted to specific genitals.
>But it is transphobic to claim to not be attracted to all trans, people. For example, there is a difference between saying you won't go out with someone for having a penis and saying you won't go out with someone because they're trans.

>>3457776
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YMPAH67f4o

>>3457732

This is exactly something I'd fear happening to me. And I'm bisexual, so you'd think "oh, it won't matter either way."

Well, no, it matters. I don't like being lied to. I don't like knowing someone and they're not really what I thought they were.

Also apparently we can't use the words "herm" or "trap" anymore? What the hell is going on?

go ahead and lie. it's perfectly acceptable.

just don't be surprised when the dude pounds your face in.

>>3455735
if you bike to work wouldn't that meant that you get to work all sweaty and have to be uncomfortable the rest of the day?

>>3456033
The smell of industrial solvents and resins tends to drown anything out, plus I have a locker for spare clothes, but I don't use it until the hotter and more humid part of summer hits. I really don't sweat much from it other than on the few hills. If its a cool day I could bike forever and not sweat much more than walking as long as its a straight run and I'm not in a hurry.

>>3455861 Totally unrelated to the thread but I wont start a new one for this.
It might find your intrest tingled, dis netflix animation with sneks and in my op terribly portayed Saggitaris.

>>3456315
Why would they be friends??? Snakes are delicious meat ropes for secretary birds

It looks more like a condor or an an eagle

>>3456317

I did not had a feel to watch anything lately, I ran over the half of it. There are some sort of veird socieaty in an oasis, and the Saggis are the police basically.

>>3455861
Who drew that?

>>3456315
Pessimistic, but asking anyway: is there a release in French, but english subtitles?

>>3457744

>There should be NO minimum wage. The entire concept is stupid as it's implying you need to pay at least x amount of dollars for someone to pick their nose.

No, you're the stupid one to think that someone would actually hire someone to pick their nose.
If you hire people to pick up their nose or do nothing.. then its the business owner or manager's problem.

No minimum wage will return everyone to the start of the Industrial revolution. Where there were no laws and abuse was rampant against the workers. Thats why people unionised and fought to hell and back to get rights, voting and better work hours with benefits.

>>3457739

>because almost all the jobs had a pay level that was impossible to maintain (aka cleaning car guys earning almost the same as doctors)

It was the other way around. They lowered the doctor's pay instead of increasing the car cleaner's pay.

The Marxist idea was that the worth of any work is the amount you need to sustain the worker and the means of production, so everyone was given a wage based on an estimate of a reasonable living standard. It was both a minimum wage and a maximum wage.

But that wasn't the main complaint. The Soviet Union fell down because as they tried to control wages instead of letting the market do its thing, they lost the information of what work was in demand and what wasn't. When the wages drop, people find something else to do, something that pays better, so the system automatically directs labor to where it is needed. The Soviet system tried to use surveys and scientific research to discover what the people "needed" and direct production accordingly, but the whole thing blew up in their collective faces, especially as the workers in the industry started cheating to beat the impossible demands of productivity.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>3457748

>No, you're the stupid one to think that someone would actually hire someone to pick their nose.

That was simply hyperbole.

But I can easily imagine someone being actually hired to pick their nose. Suppose you're making a TV ad, or a movie, and need an actor to appear briefly doing just that.

Or a more down-to-earth example: a night guard in a factory. Most of the time you're literally just picking your nose for anything better to do.

>>3457748

>No minimum wage will return everyone to the start of the Industrial revolution. Where there were no laws and abuse was rampant against the workers.

No it won't. Minimum wage does not address the specific problems, and laws against worker exploitation exist now.

Unions have nothing to do with minimum wage, as non-unionized workers don't need to give jack shit about the wages the unions negotiate.

>>3457744

>There is no such thing, except by murdering half the world's population and instituting a fascistic world government to keep the rest from replacing them.

Except that implies post-scarcity must exist in a global economy, so you're using a situation you don't even believe can happen to justify your hypothetical argument

>>3457753

>No it won't. Minimum wage does not address the specific problems, and laws against worker exploitation exist now.

Oh sweet child! how naive you are!

>>3457750

>Or a more down-to-earth example: a night guard in a factory. Most of the time you're literally just picking your nose for anything better to do.

Yet he is still needed... and funny how "guarding" is somehow now "only picking up their nose".

>mspaint semen.

no.

>@inkbunny

Of course...

how do you fap to this? I sincerely want to know how I can manipulate my mind to be able to fap to this. designer drugs?