Post the worst fursona you have ever fucking seen. I'm drunk, make thhis entertaining
>>3536228Not to mention clothing, and piercings, and loud music!
>>3536230>loud musicOh so you're not deaf then. This is going well
>>3536230
>loud music
Oh so you're not deaf then. This is going well
>>3536228It's not a bell. It's tag.
>>3536031I still have the fursuit she made for Jade Scale. I might put it up on Furbuy for the lulz.
>>3536031
I still have the fursuit she made for Jade Scale. I might put it up on Furbuy for the lulz.
Look at this god damn trainwreck.
>new FA rulesWanna bet they'll be selectively enforced as always? Friends of staff and popufurs can continue to do as they please, of course. This will just be used to ban people they don't like. Dragoneer couldn't give 2 shits about what "liberals" want and much of the new policies seem to be forced by the IMVU Russian overlords but they put them on paper only. FA has never enforced the rules against everyone.>reporting a friend of staff for open harassment is a waste of time>know from personal experience and their "duh I can't see this journal you linked to" reply coupled with me getting punished for responding to the harassment in return
>new FA rules
Wanna bet they'll be selectively enforced as always? Friends of staff and popufurs can continue to do as they please, of course. This will just be used to ban people they don't like. Dragoneer couldn't give 2 shits about what "liberals" want and much of the new policies seem to be forced by the IMVU Russian overlords but they put them on paper only. FA has never enforced the rules against everyone.
>reporting a friend of staff for open harassment is a waste of time>know from personal experience and their "duh I can't see this journal you linked to" reply coupled with me getting punished for responding to the harassment in return
Misgendering: calling a mentally ill dude a dude.
>>3544436So how far do you extend that? Should you just disregard everyone who disagrees with you on the basis that they are irrational for having a different conclusion than you? Why attempt to convince anyone of anything?
>>3544337> or you could show them the underneath of the bed and prove that nothing is there.That doesn't work; they'll simply claim the monster is invisible, or it only manifests in the dark... etc. See flat-earthers: if you take the person on an airplane trip around the world, they'll simply claim that the devil tricked the compass and made you turn back around.You can't out-argue someone who is acting irrationally because no argument on the subject itself can convince them. All evidence against are rejected. The way to conclude the argument is to let them enough rope so they can hang themselves with it: point out the irrationality and inconsistency of their argumentation by catching them performing an obvious gaffe.Arguing in bad faith means making an argument out of premises that you don't actually believe in or agree with. Alternatively, it means altering your premises on the go: a version of moving the goalposts, except you're shifting the entire field so the ball goes into the seemingly stationary goal. It is typically done as an ad-hoc save when the crazy person is shown contradictory evidence ("look under the bed"). If you manage to point it out, you demolish the argument without touching the subject, because it proves that the person is simply trying to force the conclusion and be "right" to the point of ridiculousness.
>>3544337
> or you could show them the underneath of the bed and prove that nothing is there.
That doesn't work; they'll simply claim the monster is invisible, or it only manifests in the dark... etc. See flat-earthers: if you take the person on an airplane trip around the world, they'll simply claim that the devil tricked the compass and made you turn back around.
You can't out-argue someone who is acting irrationally because no argument on the subject itself can convince them. All evidence against are rejected. The way to conclude the argument is to let them enough rope so they can hang themselves with it: point out the irrationality and inconsistency of their argumentation by catching them performing an obvious gaffe.
Arguing in bad faith means making an argument out of premises that you don't actually believe in or agree with. Alternatively, it means altering your premises on the go: a version of moving the goalposts, except you're shifting the entire field so the ball goes into the seemingly stationary goal. It is typically done as an ad-hoc save when the crazy person is shown contradictory evidence ("look under the bed"). If you manage to point it out, you demolish the argument without touching the subject, because it proves that the person is simply trying to force the conclusion and be "right" to the point of ridiculousness.
>>3544437A better version of the point: >>3544438
For example, a person who is irrationally against nuclear power may use the "hot particle theory" for an argument. It's the idea that in a release of radioactivity, if a person ingests a "hot" (radioactive) particle into their body it will remain there forever and ensures that they will get cancer. This is used to argue that the authorities are downplaying the dangers of nuclear accidents, and to predict millions of future victims to accidents like Fukushima or Chernobyl, etc. If you find such a person eating a banana (or certain nuts etc.), you should point out that bananas contain Potassium-40 which is radioactive and will collect in their bones. If they don't instantly throw the banana away, you can say they're arguing in bad faith, because they don't seem to believe in their own theory.What happens when you do that is typically split two ways: they try to shift the argument elsewhere (which you also point out), or they start arguing that "natural" radioactivity is different, at which point you can dismiss them as loonies.
For example, a person who is irrationally against nuclear power may use the "hot particle theory" for an argument. It's the idea that in a release of radioactivity, if a person ingests a "hot" (radioactive) particle into their body it will remain there forever and ensures that they will get cancer. This is used to argue that the authorities are downplaying the dangers of nuclear accidents, and to predict millions of future victims to accidents like Fukushima or Chernobyl, etc.
If you find such a person eating a banana (or certain nuts etc.), you should point out that bananas contain Potassium-40 which is radioactive and will collect in their bones. If they don't instantly throw the banana away, you can say they're arguing in bad faith, because they don't seem to believe in their own theory.
What happens when you do that is typically split two ways: they try to shift the argument elsewhere (which you also point out), or they start arguing that "natural" radioactivity is different, at which point you can dismiss them as loonies.
Sartre defines bad faith as lying to oneself: you must know the truth in order to formulate the lie that opposes it, and then ignore it in order to use the lie as support for your beliefs. That's close to Orwell's notion of doublethink, but less cynical.People make up stories for themselves, and then act as if those stories were true - not because they want to figure out the truth by experiment, but because they want to act out the story. Usually that is because the story would admit them something, like social power or moral authority etc.Irrational people just make up plausible sounding arguments without thinking what they mean, because they go about the argument backwards: from the conclusions to the premises, and where the conclusions are impossible they end up with premises that are in contradiction with each other. They will eventually notice that, but keep ignoring the contradictions in bad faith because they are trying to hold on to the conclusion.
Sartre defines bad faith as lying to oneself: you must know the truth in order to formulate the lie that opposes it, and then ignore it in order to use the lie as support for your beliefs. That's close to Orwell's notion of doublethink, but less cynical.
People make up stories for themselves, and then act as if those stories were true - not because they want to figure out the truth by experiment, but because they want to act out the story. Usually that is because the story would admit them something, like social power or moral authority etc.
Irrational people just make up plausible sounding arguments without thinking what they mean, because they go about the argument backwards: from the conclusions to the premises, and where the conclusions are impossible they end up with premises that are in contradiction with each other. They will eventually notice that, but keep ignoring the contradictions in bad faith because they are trying to hold on to the conclusion.
So which is it? Is it that people believe irrational things or that they themselves don't believe what they argue?I still don't understand why you think logic is helpless against fallacy. If someone legitimately holds an irrational belief, do you have to convince them otherwise via LARPing, or what? Your solution seems to be just to shun them from society as being hopeless.
So which is it? Is it that people believe irrational things or that they themselves don't believe what they argue?
I still don't understand why you think logic is helpless against fallacy. If someone legitimately holds an irrational belief, do you have to convince them otherwise via LARPing, or what? Your solution seems to be just to shun them from society as being hopeless.
It's TAX DAY! How many of you got those phat tax cuts that Trump promised you? Bernie sure did! He released 10 years of his taxes and he paid way less under Trump compared to last year's rate. Then he celebrated by going on Fox News and schooling the hosts in front of a cheering crowd of Republicans that treated him like a rock star.https://youtu.be/p4ozAACcc8I?t=45
It's TAX DAY!
How many of you got those phat tax cuts that Trump promised you?
Bernie sure did! He released 10 years of his taxes and he paid way less under Trump compared to last year's rate.
Then he celebrated by going on Fox News and schooling the hosts in front of a cheering crowd of Republicans that treated him like a rock star.
https://youtu.be/p4ozAACcc8I?t=45
I had to pay in but not much (under $50) .. my tax situation changed quite a bit so it's tricky to say what affect the 'tax cut' did to my taxes.Still.. looking at a single year's tax returns without looking at the overall affects to the future economy is short-sighted selfish and foolish but most people aren't going to bother with that. LOL America
I had to pay in but not much (under $50) .. my tax situation changed quite a bit so it's tricky to say what affect the 'tax cut' did to my taxes.
Still.. looking at a single year's tax returns without looking at the overall affects to the future economy is short-sighted selfish and foolish but most people aren't going to bother with that. LOL America
>>3544243>He did okay for an old guy who probably has to take 50 thyroids... I'm guessing you don't know how thyroids work LOL
>>3544243
>He did okay for an old guy who probably has to take 50 thyroids...
I'm guessing you don't know how thyroids work LOL
I got more neet bucks this year.
I got less this year. I made only like 24k. Meh. I'm poor.
I got about 6k.
>>3544377What do you mean you "got" about 6k? Was that your refund, or was that your reduction in taxes from 2017 to 2018? If the former, you're withholding way too much.
>>3544377
What do you mean you "got" about 6k? Was that your refund, or was that your reduction in taxes from 2017 to 2018? If the former, you're withholding way too much.
Only the rich got tax cuts, everyone else paid more than expected to go to the racist wall, and if Trump had the ability he'd have forced Bernie to pay more. Meanwhile the Russian ally refuses to release his statements.
Well, shit :<
>>3544139Apparently it's legal in California where dogbomb was.
>>3544139
Apparently it's legal in California where dogbomb was.
What those guys went around doing is one of the cleanest, most socially respectable things in this cesspit fandom. Who cares if they use it for 'feel-good', when there are actual donations and efforts, even if it could be more.Honestly, you guys have poison in your heads. And not the good kind. Who wants a friend like you.
What those guys went around doing is one of the cleanest, most socially respectable things in this cesspit fandom. Who cares if they use it for 'feel-good', when there are actual donations and efforts, even if it could be more.
Honestly, you guys have poison in your heads. And not the good kind. Who wants a friend like you.
Hey lulz, do you think when it's your time, they'll care as much about you as they did about Dogbomb? Do you ever wonder if you'll feel any sense of completion, or just emptiness? Do you think anyone'll be there to help make it less scary for you?Do you think you'll remember the good moments? Or the ones where you were pointlessly cruel?
Hey lulz, do you think when it's your time, they'll care as much about you as they did about Dogbomb? Do you ever wonder if you'll feel any sense of completion, or just emptiness? Do you think anyone'll be there to help make it less scary for you?
Do you think you'll remember the good moments? Or the ones where you were pointlessly cruel?
>>3544181If all goes well, when I die people will just think I got busy with RL stuff and dropped the furry thing. I've never liked the idea of bring remembered for anything.
>>3544181
If all goes well, when I die people will just think I got busy with RL stuff and dropped the furry thing. I've never liked the idea of bring remembered for anything.
>>3544176Well-said.
>>3544176
Well-said.
>>3544176I matters when I, a person who reacts normally to someone dying who I didn't know at all whatsoever, it harangued for 'WHY AREN'T YOU SAD WHAT'S WRONG WITH YOU'. All because I don't participate in this mass onset of pretend grief.
>>3544296>It's not me they care about so it must be pretend
>>3544296
>It's not me they care about so it must be pretend
I swear the best laughs I've ever had was from something that was not meant to be funny."WOMAN DOES KARATE, SON GETS NAKED, DOG STEALS CORN BREAD IN WALMART SCENE"...and they were just getting started.https://www.foxnews.com/us/chaos-walmart-woman-karate-son-exposes-dog-steals-food
>MISSISSIPPI COMMUNITY LEFT CONFUSED AFTER BOWLS OF MASHED POTATOES MYSTERIOUSLY KEEP APPEARING>Dems defend Omar after Trump retweets video against her>foxnews.comJesus Christ, when did Fox get this bad? As in, viral clickbait level bad? I knew CNN went way down the shitter and I was sure it became worse than Fox but hold your horses. Can we stop these races straight to the bottom? Jesus.
>MISSISSIPPI COMMUNITY LEFT CONFUSED AFTER BOWLS OF MASHED POTATOES MYSTERIOUSLY KEEP APPEARING>Dems defend Omar after Trump retweets video against her>foxnews.com
Jesus Christ, when did Fox get this bad? As in, viral clickbait level bad? I knew CNN went way down the shitter and I was sure it became worse than Fox but hold your horses. Can we stop these races straight to the bottom? Jesus.
>>3544056
Meth is a hell of a drug.
>>3544056>FoxMainstream media is all pure cancer, dude.
>Fox
Mainstream media is all pure cancer, dude.
Faggot Mod deleting legit posts and pictures again, and banning posters, complain to Ch0ob on IRC and get his ass canned like we did the other censoring bastards.https://www.foxnews.com/health/baby-born-without-anus-comes-home-after-months-in-hospital
Faggot Mod deleting legit posts and pictures again, and banning posters, complain to Ch0ob on IRC and get his ass canned like we did the other censoring bastards.
https://www.foxnews.com/health/baby-born-without-anus-comes-home-after-months-in-hospital
>mods deleting legit posts and picsThe mods here have always been fucked in the head!
>mods deleting legit posts and pics
The mods here have always been fucked in the head!
>>3544265> implying choob gives a shit anymore
>>3544265
> implying choob gives a shit anymore
Wouldcha?
>>3539565that needs more maga hat
>>3539565>who were only 3 to 4 feet tall and had a brain only a THIRD the size of people today,This must be, where IK originated from.
>>3539565
>who were only 3 to 4 feet tall and had a brain only a THIRD the size of people today,
This must be, where IK originated from.
>>3539631What's interesting is that a brain one-third normal human size is about what a chimpanzee has, yet they are incredibly stupid when compared to a human who has that same size brain. Scientists believe it's not size, but the quality of the connections and other factors.https://dailygalaxy.com/2019/02/evolution-of-human-super-brain-revealed-by-our-closest-living-relative/There have been many instances where humans were as short or shorter than the EBU GOGO and their brain even smaller, yet they were of normal intelligence. Probably the most famous was Tom Thumb:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Tom_ThumbProbably the shortest living person alive is Chandra Dangi, who is only a little over 21 inches (less than two feet) tall, with a brain only 1/4 normal size. Yet he is of normal intelligence also.https://www.cnn.com/2014/11/13/living/tallest-shortest-man-guinness/index.html<<<--- World's shortest man meets world's tallest man
>>3539695>What's interesting is that a brain one-third normal human size is about what a chimpanzee has, yet they are incredibly stupid when compared to a human who has that same size brain.Chimps are somewhat smarter than people give them credit for. They're just a different species from us, so we don't quite understand them.People with particular types of dwarfism such as achondroplasia (Wee Man, Mini-me...) usually have regular sized heads, or may even have abnormally large skulls. Others have mental issues caused by insufficient brain growth. People with microcephaly, or brains the size of a chimp, are usually totally retarded.
>>3539695
>What's interesting is that a brain one-third normal human size is about what a chimpanzee has, yet they are incredibly stupid when compared to a human who has that same size brain.
Chimps are somewhat smarter than people give them credit for. They're just a different species from us, so we don't quite understand them.
People with particular types of dwarfism such as achondroplasia (Wee Man, Mini-me...) usually have regular sized heads, or may even have abnormally large skulls. Others have mental issues caused by insufficient brain growth. People with microcephaly, or brains the size of a chimp, are usually totally retarded.
I like how you can take an ape skull and a humanoid body, and reconstruct an ancient cave ancestor like that.
I'm curious if they could actualy interbreed with us.
>>3544171No. Modern diseases would be lethal for them.
How could this toon totally bomb with its target audience?Great character designs, decent animation for its budget. Great premise with nature and science topics that are exciting for the intended tween/preschool audience, aimed at raising interest rather than actual facts. Likable, three-dimensional characters, believable situations for children of that age depicted with warmth and respect. Actual character development in the short span of the series, even some hints of shipping to come and many "adult" references if you know where to look. Good english dub, and every episode actually told a different story with the charactes taking different roles each time, rather than just repeating the same situations.So what went wrong? Not even cub furries or toon fanatics seem to care for it, and it's not that they never heard of it either, it came out in the age of YouTube and most have seen at least an episode of it for whatever reason. It can't just be that it's a "preschool" show, because furries obsess over stinking CRAP like Dragon Tales for at least some period, just because it had some yiffy character. Maybe that was the problem, that there wasn't enough.So what do you think? Should we petition to revive this show? Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
How could this toon totally bomb with its target audience?
Great character designs, decent animation for its budget. Great premise with nature and science topics that are exciting for the intended tween/preschool audience, aimed at raising interest rather than actual facts. Likable, three-dimensional characters, believable situations for children of that age depicted with warmth and respect. Actual character development in the short span of the series, even some hints of shipping to come and many "adult" references if you know where to look. Good english dub, and every episode actually told a different story with the charactes taking different roles each time, rather than just repeating the same situations.
So what went wrong? Not even cub furries or toon fanatics seem to care for it, and it's not that they never heard of it either, it came out in the age of YouTube and most have seen at least an episode of it for whatever reason. It can't just be that it's a "preschool" show, because furries obsess over stinking CRAP like Dragon Tales for at least some period, just because it had some yiffy character. Maybe that was the problem, that there wasn't enough.
So what do you think? Should we petition to revive this show?
>>3544083What the Hell? Why would the picture accompanying this message get deleted, it was just a girl's face with some face paint on it to make her look vaguely cat-like, nothing more. Over-reacting much?
>>3544094Picture of toddlers sitting on the laps of gender-queer Trannies is apparently ok though.
>>3544093Star Trek was an example of classic liberal progressivism.Darth Vader was voiced by a black man (There actually was one point when I was a little that I thought Vader was black underneath that helmet.)I've never really watched Dr. Who but when you have people running a show who won't cast white men simply because of their race and gender, they aren't really promoting truly liberal ideas.My point here is what is called liberal progressivism today isn't really liberal or progressive.
>>3544093Star Trek was an example of classic liberal progressivism.
Darth Vader was voiced by a black man (There actually was one point when I was a little that I thought Vader was black underneath that helmet.)
I've never really watched Dr. Who but when you have people running a show who won't cast white men simply because of their race and gender, they aren't really promoting truly liberal ideas.
My point here is what is called liberal progressivism today isn't really liberal or progressive.
>>3544093 Yeah... but star trek was atleast tasteful about it... I mean you have these a diverse crews but the they're not making painfully obvious this is what they're doing. It was subtle and tasteful. You had white male captians, you female captains, black captains... but No one focused on this. Race wasn't an issue.I liked the diverse crew on star trek. But if they were always talking about how captain cisco "over came systemic racism"or about how it was a miracle Janeway became captain despite "the oppression of the heteronormative cisgender white male patriarchy" It would not have been so enjoyable. Starwars yeah but who were the heros? The main characters who weren't alien or robots were also mostly white. And the bad guys? they weren't all white. When the writers make it painfully blatantly obvious that they're not just trying to "diversify things" but are deliberately cucking to the social justice demographic... it significantly subtracts from the story. Then it becomes Less about making a good movie or show less about telling a good story and more about shoving an agenda down the publics throat. The Social Justice android was the Jar Jar Binks of the solo movie. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>3544093 Yeah... but star trek was atleast tasteful about it... I mean you have these a diverse crews but the they're not making painfully obvious this is what they're doing. It was subtle and tasteful. You had white male captians, you female captains, black captains... but No one focused on this. Race wasn't an issue.
I liked the diverse crew on star trek. But if they were always talking about how captain cisco "over came systemic racism"
or about how it was a miracle Janeway became captain despite "the oppression of the heteronormative cisgender white male patriarchy" It would not have been so enjoyable.
Starwars yeah but who were the heros? The main characters who weren't alien or robots were also mostly white. And the bad guys? they weren't all white. When the writers make it painfully blatantly obvious that they're not just trying to "diversify things" but are deliberately cucking to the social justice demographic... it significantly subtracts from the story. Then it becomes
Less about making a good movie or show less about telling a good story and more about shoving an agenda down the publics throat. The Social Justice android was the Jar Jar Binks of the solo movie.
>>3544123At least the SocJus droid got blown up. Do you think the film makers were trying to say something with that?
>>3544143Dunno, and it's news to me - I avoided Soylo at all costs. It's honestly quite telling that no one talked about the droid not making it to the end until now. It's almost as if even people who were happy at its inclusion didn't see the movie. Almost like they're not actually part of the fanbase/ticket sales demographic....
>>3544143
Dunno, and it's news to me - I avoided Soylo at all costs. It's honestly quite telling that no one talked about the droid not making it to the end until now.
It's almost as if even people who were happy at its inclusion didn't see the movie. Almost like they're not actually part of the fanbase/ticket sales demographic....
>>3544123I forgave star wars for the femibot because of HK-47. Even before disney, droids have been programmed for intense hate and general racism.Doesn't forgive the shitty movie or political timing though.
>>3544123I forgave star wars for the femibot because of HK-47. Even before disney, droids have been programmed for intense hate and general racism.
Doesn't forgive the shitty movie or political timing though.
Does anyone know where I can find an archive of Jack?I'm looking for a specific arc. The one about the solder who kills himself and goes to hell. All google shows me are reviews, wikifur, and kiwi farms.
>>3533387Hmm. Everything I've read about the comic's hiatus said that Dave requested it taken down because he was too busy with some legal shit. >>3533391Ah shit, why didn't I think of using the way back machine? Yup, that's the one! Thank you. I was looking for this page.
>>3533387Hmm. Everything I've read about the comic's hiatus said that Dave requested it taken down because he was too busy with some legal shit.
>>3533391Ah shit, why didn't I think of using the way back machine? Yup, that's the one! Thank you. I was looking for this page.
>>3533404No problem. I think "Games We Play In Hell" was the only arc taken offline a while ago because of some bullshit about some chick saying that talking to Dave drove her to attempt pseudocide over a year ago. Jack is one of the things that got me into all this furry shit a long long time ago.
>>3533417https://ufile.io/q2lot <- Games in hell. Link good for 7 days.
>>3533420could someone upload it this?
>>3533420
could someone upload it this?
>>3533417Not really, it was taken off before that, mainly because Hopkins realized that the message he was trying to get across - that Jack's Hell was an incredibly horrifying place to be, got misinterpreted. Games We Play in Hell came across as a bunch of gratuitous sex and violence. It really needs to be back in the archive, if for no other reason than that it introduced the very interesting goth/vampire rabbit character Silverblue to Jack. Silverblue was borrowed from the Australian comic Lacunae, by Ceredwyn Ealanta. They were mutual fans. She in turn used Jack and Fnar in a story in Lacunae.
>>3533417Not really, it was taken off before that, mainly because Hopkins realized that the message he was trying to get across - that Jack's Hell was an incredibly horrifying place to be, got misinterpreted. Games We Play in Hell came across as a bunch of gratuitous sex and violence.
It really needs to be back in the archive, if for no other reason than that it introduced the very interesting goth/vampire rabbit character Silverblue to Jack. Silverblue was borrowed from the Australian comic Lacunae, by Ceredwyn Ealanta. They were mutual fans. She in turn used Jack and Fnar in a story in Lacunae.
>>3536403>Can someone upload this?https://ufile.io/nhp4v - Set it to 30 days, this time.
>>3536403
>Can someone upload this?
https://ufile.io/nhp4v - Set it to 30 days, this time.
Driprat is raising money for his friend with a rape filled image set. how noblehttp://www.furaffinity.net/view/31187524/anyone got it?
Driprat is raising money for his friend with a rape filled image set. how noble
http://www.furaffinity.net/view/31187524/anyone got it?
Annunaki general.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zXNLAFAg_I
Annunaki general.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zXNLAFAg_I
Jeus christ, this guys a walking trainwreck."I DEMAND you stop making bottom tails porn RIGHT NOW! I feel attacked for liking top Tails porn!!1 anyone against me will SUFFER MY WRAITH!1"
Jeus christ, this guys a walking trainwreck.
"I DEMAND you stop making bottom tails porn RIGHT NOW! I feel attacked for liking top Tails porn!!1 anyone against me will SUFFER MY WRAITH!1"
True nutcase. Thanks for the laugh.
How retarded was this guy that he couldn't play through Sonic games as a kid? I'm certainly not the best at vidya, yet Sonic came out when I was 7 and I had no problem at all playing through any of the original games back. They're literally made for little kids.
- dis + share + furi+ flash + oekaki - All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
