3baaf869 No.3767619
>>3758634wtf does Ned Kelly and Redecca Black had to do with eachother?
07b3c226 No.3767634
>>3767290seems ive been purged
71fcf05f No.3768355
>>3767827The bottom left corner of the four square is in the wrong place: animals have no moral worth, but it's still immoral to fuck animals because you would be acting against your own human nature.
You see, the question was never about harming or not harming the animal, or what would justify the action. If you have any choice in the matter at all, acting against your own species and society, and yourself, would be immoral in the same sense as how suicide or self-harm is immoral. If you don't have a choice in the matter and need to fuck your dog, or if you're too anti-social to care, well, then you're basically insane and undesirable anyways.
8a27b879 No.3768361
>>3768356What's schitzo about it?
The entire concept of morality is based around human conduct as human beings - whether you're supposed to do certain things or not. Morality doesn't exist outside of human value systems, so "morality" doesn't mean anything in terms of individual people. It only has relevance in the context of other people and humanity as a whole.
So the moral worth of an animal is only defined in terms of what benefit or value it has to society. Obviously it's food, so eating it is a good thing. Otherwise it's someone's pet, so not killing it is good because you'd be violating someone else's property. Fucking it means you're broken as a human being because you're trying to copulate with non-humans, so the act is defined as immoral when it is voluntary, and insane when it's not voluntary.
8a27b879 No.3768363
I mean, if you take the case in all honesty, even the liberals are looking at all the sexually perverted and confused people with pity and a tiny bit of disgust.
If there weren't political brownie points to be had for playing the inclusive and tolerant progressive type, they wouldn't give a shit about things like gay rights because it's just not socially or practically useful to have gay people. Homosexuality itself has no positive value, it's only a distraction and a cause of conflict, which is why most religions consider it a sin..
