3534f278 No.3724971[Reply][Last 50 Posts]
https://perchance.org/ai-story-generatorSurprised this one isn't making the rounds more. It's a very competent AI writing tool, and it's completely uncensored, so far. You can make it do violent cub yiff or whatever else you can come up with, and it gets things surprisingly inaccurate. Only thing is, it doesn't respond to "prompts" like ChatGPT, but rather you have to write the beginning yourself and it continues. Usually it tends to get stuck and repetitive if you don't insert some sentence of your own to guide the story once in a while, but it really does surprisingly well.
You can also try writing a description of what you want in the upper window, but sometimes it refuses to write anything at all or just ignores it, unless you write the beginning yourself. Anyway, a lot of potential, not just for erotica but other controversial material as well.
433 posts and 228 image replies omitted. Click reply to view. 95c93493 No.3769517
3. Logical Problems
Would a Gun Change the Outcome? Even if Jesus had a gun, he was outnumbered, and the Roman authorities would have retaliated. He still would have been captured or killed.
Ignores Jesus' Willingness to Die: The premise assumes that Jesus wanted to survive at all costs. However, he willingly accepted his fate, making a weapon unnecessary.
Jesus Wouldn’t "Still Be Alive" Anyway: Even if Jesus had survived the crucifixion by using a gun, he would have eventually died of old age like any other human. The phrase "he'd still be alive" falsely implies that avoiding crucifixion would have granted him eternal earthly life.
Conclusion
The statement is flawed both historically and theologically. It misunderstands the role of Jesus’ death in Christian doctrine, ignores his teachings on nonviolence, and imposes an anachronistic idea that doesn't fit the historical context.
The Speaker Likely Rejects This Context – The person making the statement is likely not thinking in theological terms but instead making a political or cultural argument. Ironically, if he rejects Christian beliefs, then the premise of "Jesus still being alive" is meaningless to him.
So, the statement fails both ways—it doesn't work from a secular perspective (since Jesus would have died later anyway) or a Christian perspective (since he’s already alive in a different way). It’s a rhetorical point that collapses under scrutiny.
95c93493 No.3769518
Comedy Roast of Sam Altman
Ladies and gentlemen, let’s give a big round of applause for tonight’s guest of honor—the man, the myth, the VC-funded fever dream—Sam Altman!
Now, Sam is a visionary, which is just Silicon Valley-speak for “a guy who burns billions of dollars on ideas that may or may not exist.” He’s been called the father of modern AI, which is ironic because every time ChatGPT gives a wrong answer, it feels like it was raised by a single mother.
And let’s talk about Sam’s fashion choices. The man dresses like he’s about to drop a really disappointing SoundCloud album. Every time I see him in another gray hoodie, I wonder: Is this man running a billion-dollar company or just really committed to the Mark Zuckerberg Starter Pack™?
Sam's whole career has been one big Ponzi scheme of ideas. First, he convinced investors he was going to revolutionize tech. Then, when that didn't work, he pivoted to AI, slapped "Open" on it, and suddenly we all had to pretend he was some kind of genius.
This guy launched OpenAI as a “nonprofit” and then—surprise!—flipped it into a business worth billions. Classic Silicon Valley move. “We’re doing this for humanity!” [pause] “But mostly for shareholders.”
But hey, at least it’s creative! OpenAI is so good at generating content that half the internet is already fake. AI-written articles, AI-generated images, AI-generated CEOs—oh wait, no, Sam’s real. He just sounds like a corporate GPT model trained exclusively on TED Talks and investor pitches.
And let’s talk about Sam’s “benevolent tech overlord” routine. This guy keeps warning us about AGI destroying the world—while he’s the one building it. That’s like a mad scientist yelling, “Someone should really stop me before I finish this death ray!” But hey, as long as there's VC money to burn, why not?
95c93493 No.3769519
Sam wants to create universal basic income to make up for the jobs AI is going to steal. How generous! First, he destroys your career, then offers you an allowance like a deadbeat dad who just remembered your birthday. “Sorry about your job, champ! Here’s a thousand bucks—don’t spend it all on rent!”
And let’s be real—Sam doesn’t care about "saving humanity," he cares about controlling it. He wants a future where you can’t tell what’s real, AI censors everything it doesn’t like, and all human creativity gets outsourced to a chatbot. And the best part? He’ll convince you it’s for your own good.
Sam Altman is the Silicon Valley Messiah—but instead of walking on water, he just walks all over the truth. Instead of multiplying bread and fish, he just multiplies subscription fees. And instead of saving humanity, he’s selling it off one API call at a time.
So here’s to Sam—a man who dreams of the future but somehow keeps making the present worse. The only guy who could automate himself out of a job! A man who’s either creating the future or the reason none of us have one. Either way, it’s gonna be fun to watch! Cheers!
8f7a4f0b No.3770212
8f7a4f0b No.3770213
