https://inkbunny.net/j/306473#commentid_1774359Who was in the wrong?
https://inkbunny.net/j/306473#commentid_1774359
Who was in the wrong?
>no screencapguess I'll never know
>no screencap
guess I'll never know
the only wrong here is if spoony doesn't eventually get a job in whatever market he ends up. It sucks running out of excuses, but if it serves to expose an underlying issue that can then be addressed, great.They wouldn't be getting SSI if the government didn't think they needed it, tho. It's not like as easy as some of you might think it is to get federal assistance afaik or else everyone would have it. Many ppl have food stamps and (since 2009) most Americans have Medicaid or similar health insurance assistance, but SSI/SSDI isn't something most people have and usually indicates some kinda physical or developmental disability. It also usually means the recipient is poor as shit and has little to nothing in the way of personal assets (under $2k net worth).I hear texas is full of tech jobs but honestly the attitude of the place being "backwards" culturally is probably outdated. It's a big place
the only wrong here is if spoony doesn't eventually get a job in whatever market he ends up. It sucks running out of excuses, but if it serves to expose an underlying issue that can then be addressed, great.
They wouldn't be getting SSI if the government didn't think they needed it, tho. It's not like as easy as some of you might think it is to get federal assistance afaik or else everyone would have it. Many ppl have food stamps and (since 2009) most Americans have Medicaid or similar health insurance assistance, but SSI/SSDI isn't something most people have and usually indicates some kinda physical or developmental disability. It also usually means the recipient is poor as shit and has little to nothing in the way of personal assets (under $2k net worth).
I hear texas is full of tech jobs but honestly the attitude of the place being "backwards" culturally is probably outdated. It's a big place
Did no one notice the 4,000+ furry faggots attending Furry Fiesta in Dallas this weekend???Post your drama here.
Did no one notice the 4,000+ furry faggots attending Furry Fiesta in Dallas this weekend???
Post your drama here.
>>3496045>accidentally opened fire on a country's bordersBecause the USA just randomly popped up right? Its not like we haven't been here for a while, with GPS coordinates marking the borders or anything. Anyone could have forgotten we were here.
>>3496045
>accidentally opened fire on a country's borders
Because the USA just randomly popped up right? Its not like we haven't been here for a while, with GPS coordinates marking the borders or anything. Anyone could have forgotten we were here.
>>3496046http://time.com/2933940/mexico-us-border-patrol-helicopter/It's funny because at first Mexico denied the incident.
>>3496046
http://time.com/2933940/mexico-us-border-patrol-helicopter/
It's funny because at first Mexico denied the incident.
popufur abuse at the con https://www.facebook.com/Omnomsquirrel/videos/597030617326639/?hc_ref=ARQ-pHLSx8Xw8-GAKcr2O4b-CSGRDhrfcr5-ZybNTdX7cckSF2D2NJLgCS-IcprXavk
>>3496091"I don't know how to ask for space, it's too scary, so I'll make an infantile passive aggressive video later about how I felt cornered. Everyone everywhere should make sure that I'm not trying to eat or go somewhere before talking to me."People aren't mind readers you fucking weak willed nancy boy. Your video isn't saving the community either, it's making people cringe at your classless room and snowflake notions. We all feel sorry for your father. And move the hyperfaggot hair out of your eye if you want people to take you seriously. This isn't a manga.
>>3496091
"I don't know how to ask for space, it's too scary, so I'll make an infantile passive aggressive video later about how I felt cornered. Everyone everywhere should make sure that I'm not trying to eat or go somewhere before talking to me."
People aren't mind readers you fucking weak willed nancy boy. Your video isn't saving the community either, it's making people cringe at your classless room and snowflake notions. We all feel sorry for your father. And move the hyperfaggot hair out of your eye if you want people to take you seriously. This isn't a manga.
>>3496094I'm not here to suck the dick of people you like, namefag.This was a laughably self-important video made by the poster boy for the "I can't even" movement. When people are acting like idiots don't be so fucking shocked that they get called idiots.
>>3496094
I'm not here to suck the dick of people you like, namefag.
This was a laughably self-important video made by the poster boy for the "I can't even" movement. When people are acting like idiots don't be so fucking shocked that they get called idiots.
>>3496046You know that similar events have happened in the opposite direction as well?Also DEA and CIA agents working in Mexico (including also mercenaries) illegally?Again, loving these "but its all mexico's fault!"Reminds me of when the USA kills a bunch of innocent people in their drone strikes.. they are all "terrorists". But the US sure loves to scream loud everywhere when Russia does a similar strike, where everyone is suddenly "innocents bystanders".
You know that similar events have happened in the opposite direction as well?
Also DEA and CIA agents working in Mexico (including also mercenaries) illegally?
Again, loving these "but its all mexico's fault!"
Reminds me of when the USA kills a bunch of innocent people in their drone strikes.. they are all "terrorists". But the US sure loves to scream loud everywhere when Russia does a similar strike, where everyone is suddenly "innocents bystanders".
>>3496091literally who is this? And why is she lying about having soooo many people around her?don't answer, I don't give a fuck. damned tumblrinas
literally who is this? And why is she lying about having soooo many people around her?
don't answer, I don't give a fuck. damned tumblrinas
>tfw when I'm too autistic and socially awkward even for a furry fandomjust kill me, the cliques, socialization, casual sex in the fandom, this is so overwhelming for me
>tfw when I'm too autistic and socially awkward even for a furry fandom
just kill me, the cliques, socialization, casual sex in the fandom, this is so overwhelming for me
>>3496005>Drugs? For votes?How about we legalize weed?
>>3496005
>Drugs? For votes?
How about we legalize weed?
>>3496020Taco Bell is worse for you than good drugs.
>>3496012actually, it is.
>>3495934 thats how much i make on a bad day. i make $50-100 on average.
>>3496017Weed isn't a hardcore drug.the sad thing is I've heard a rumor someone dropped $3-$5K on a comic involving weed, shit dialogue, and random fucking.
>>3496017Weed isn't a hardcore drug.
the sad thing is I've heard a rumor someone dropped $3-$5K on a comic involving weed, shit dialogue, and random fucking.
>>3496099Yeah but if you pull out a piece when you take out your baggies, then it's a hardcore drug.
>>3495772>>3495774>>3495776>>3495780>>3495827>>3496004>>3496020
What is Trump's 9/11 going to be?
>>3496223The thousands of fellow travelers Obama ordered hired on right after Trump got elected.That's an ooooold trick to do with an incoming administration that you hate.
>>3496223The thousands of fellow travelers Obama ordered hired on right after Trump got elected.
That's an ooooold trick to do with an incoming administration that you hate.
>>3496223https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_within_a_state>State within a state is a political situation in a country when an internal organ ("deep state"), such as the armed forces or public authorities (intelligence agencies, police, secret police, administrative agencies, and branches of government bureaucracy), does not respond to the civilian political leadership. Although the state within a state can be conspiratorial in nature, the deep state can also take the form of entrenched unelected career civil servants acting in a non-conspiratorial manner, to further their own interests (e.g. continuity of the state as distinct from the administration, job security, enhanced power and authority, pursuit of ideological goals and objectives, and the general growth of their agency) and in opposition to the policies of elected officials , by obstructing, resisting, and subverting the policies and directives of elected officials.
>>3496223https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_within_a_state
>State within a state is a political situation in a country when an internal organ ("deep state"), such as the armed forces or public authorities (intelligence agencies, police, secret police, administrative agencies, and branches of government bureaucracy), does not respond to the civilian political leadership. Although the state within a state can be conspiratorial in nature, the deep state can also take the form of entrenched unelected career civil servants acting in a non-conspiratorial manner, to further their own interests (e.g. continuity of the state as distinct from the administration, job security, enhanced power and authority, pursuit of ideological goals and objectives, and the general growth of their agency) and in opposition to the policies of elected officials , by obstructing, resisting, and subverting the policies and directives of elected officials.
>>3496311Point in casehttp://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2014/nov/11/facebook-posts/congress-has-11-approval-ratings-96-incumbent-re-e/Only 14% approve of the congress, yet somehow 95% of the congressmen get re-elected time and time again.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_stagnation_in_the_United_States>Congressional elections are stagnant, and because of the high invincibility of House incumbents, very few districts are truly competitive, with elections shifting very few seats from one party to another. One of the most important reasons as to why incumbents are nearly unbeatable is because they normally have much better financed campaigns than their opponents. Other potential theories include the aggressive redrawing of congressional boundaries known as gerrymanderingOther important factors include pork-barrel spending to secure votes, and voter lock-in (need to vote for a winner to avoid splitting votes). All these reasons ensure that the actual people in power almost never change, and no change is in sight since the very same people have the power to shoot down any advance that would put limits on themselves. Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>3496311Point in case
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2014/nov/11/facebook-posts/congress-has-11-approval-ratings-96-incumbent-re-e/
Only 14% approve of the congress, yet somehow 95% of the congressmen get re-elected time and time again.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_stagnation_in_the_United_States
>Congressional elections are stagnant, and because of the high invincibility of House incumbents, very few districts are truly competitive, with elections shifting very few seats from one party to another. One of the most important reasons as to why incumbents are nearly unbeatable is because they normally have much better financed campaigns than their opponents. Other potential theories include the aggressive redrawing of congressional boundaries known as gerrymandering
Other important factors include pork-barrel spending to secure votes, and voter lock-in (need to vote for a winner to avoid splitting votes). All these reasons ensure that the actual people in power almost never change, and no change is in sight since the very same people have the power to shoot down any advance that would put limits on themselves.
>>3496313In fairness, that's Congress in general, so the "filthy conservatives" are taking exception to the "dirty liberals" and vice-versa, while the attitude towards their own Congressperson might be good.
>>3496314In that case, the approval rating should be closer to 50% than 0%
>>3496317And in that case, it can also be chalked up to:"Damn those Blue Dog Democrats!" vs. "Damn those pinko liberals!""Damn those obstructionist Tea Party quacks!" vs. "Damn those RINOs!"That would put it down near 25% at best, and then couple that with how paralyzed Congress has been since 2014 or so...
>>3496317And in that case, it can also be chalked up to:"Damn those Blue Dog Democrats!" vs. "Damn those pinko liberals!""Damn those obstructionist Tea Party quacks!" vs. "Damn those RINOs!"
That would put it down near 25% at best, and then couple that with how paralyzed Congress has been since 2014 or so...
>>3496320Or, it could be that republicans approve of republican majority governments, democracts the democrat majority governments, and 50% of people don't want either, as was in the last presidential elections.That would explain the same 25% rate, which drops to 14% when you consider the other effects. Either way, the point is that the congress isn't representing the people in any sense, and all the government is just looking to secure its own ass from election to election.
>>3496320Or, it could be that republicans approve of republican majority governments, democracts the democrat majority governments, and 50% of people don't want either, as was in the last presidential elections.
That would explain the same 25% rate, which drops to 14% when you consider the other effects. Either way, the point is that the congress isn't representing the people in any sense, and all the government is just looking to secure its own ass from election to election.
Hi /furi/, I'm a powerful mod and look what I can say.This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board!
Hi /furi/, I'm a powerful mod and look what I can say.
This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board! This thread will not move up the board!
>>3496224>>3496226It will hurt more for you all when this board is laid to rest. Also slow is more your speed, especially when you have sex with your grandparents 7EJhkfw3http://www.wwe.com/f/styles/wwe_large/public/2016/02/Paul_Bearer_bio--709d1387320c3947089e11ef8480ae2b.jpg
>>3496224>>3496226
It will hurt more for you all when this board is laid to rest. Also slow is more your speed, especially when you have sex with your grandparents 7EJhkfw3
http://www.wwe.com/f/styles/wwe_large/public/2016/02/Paul_Bearer_bio--709d1387320c3947089e11ef8480ae2b.jpg
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izIAlE0mqj8Shitposting: srs bsns.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=izIAlE0mqj8
Shitposting: srs bsns.
>>3496228Amazing comeback really 256/10 good job.>It will hurt more for you all when this board is laid to rest.But where will you go? Surely, you'll go out of your mind...whoops, too late for that!
>>3496228Amazing comeback really 256/10 good job.
>It will hurt more for you all when this board is laid to rest.
But where will you go? Surely, you'll go out of your mind...whoops, too late for that!
>>3496267That's because he's not Hirtes. Can't you morons figure that out yet?
>>3496267
That's because he's not Hirtes. Can't you morons figure that out yet?
>>3496297Pull My Finger Game https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLAJlU-SdnA
>>3496296Can you figure out how IDs work yet?Or are you just so smooth referring to yourself in 3rd person?
>>3496351
>>3496168Saved furever.Happy Singles Awareness Day, anon.
>>3496168Saved furever.
Happy Singles Awareness Day, anon.
I have been tuned out most of the day cleaning and organizing shit, I barely even remembered. Oh well.
Cheer up. Y'all will get sex some day.
>>3496219all you really need is a dog
If firms can get by with paying women 72 cents on the dollar for the same quality of work as men, then why don't we see any firms with all female labor forces using those lower costs to dominate the marketplace?
>>3495352Not an argument.
>>3495421https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaeI9gKOVJQ
>>3495421
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaeI9gKOVJQ
DEBATE ME [turd falls out of mouth]
>>3495421>Then >>3495299 proceeds to misfire with >>3495316 I read it as a contradiction, because in context saying "Argument." with a period on the end reads like you're referring to the first statement ("not an argument").
>Then >>3495299 proceeds to misfire with >>3495316
I read it as a contradiction, because in context saying "Argument." with a period on the end reads like you're referring to the first statement ("not an argument").
>>3495352>The argument put forth at the time was...Wasn't. You're trying to argue it two ways at the same time. Actually, the whole question is confusing two things: wage gap, as in wage disparity for the same job, and wage gap, as in wage disparity between the genders in general. The equal pay laws that already exist concern the first definition, the wage gap that's being publicly discussed concerns the second definition. There is a law for the first case, no law for the second case. The original claim made by >>3494739 insists that if we institute an equal pay law, it wouldn't change the situation - but the question there is what do you mean by wage gap? If you mean the first definition, then we don't need to institute any law because it already exists, so the question must be over the second definition, in which case instituting any new wage equality laws would have to mean enforcing wage inequality in the first sense: men getting paid less for the same jobs.
>>3495352
>The argument put forth at the time was...
Wasn't.
You're trying to argue it two ways at the same time. Actually, the whole question is confusing two things: wage gap, as in wage disparity for the same job, and wage gap, as in wage disparity between the genders in general. The equal pay laws that already exist concern the first definition, the wage gap that's being publicly discussed concerns the second definition. There is a law for the first case, no law for the second case.
The original claim made by >>3494739 insists that if we institute an equal pay law, it wouldn't change the situation - but the question there is what do you mean by wage gap? If you mean the first definition, then we don't need to institute any law because it already exists, so the question must be over the second definition, in which case instituting any new wage equality laws would have to mean enforcing wage inequality in the first sense: men getting paid less for the same jobs.
>>3496206I wanted to argue it two ways because posters were coming at it from both those avenue. I firmly believe that the "You're a sexist if you don't want another law" poster was firmly in the camp of wanting a new law for the second case. In such instance, I'd say get fucked to him, because that isn't quality, it's equity.
>>3496206
I wanted to argue it two ways because posters were coming at it from both those avenue.
I firmly believe that the "You're a sexist if you don't want another law" poster was firmly in the camp of wanting a new law for the second case. In such instance, I'd say get fucked to him, because that isn't quality, it's equity.
equality*
I'm wondering if Cobalt's involved in this?https://hamiltonpolice.on.ca/community/news/2018/02/hamilton-police-seek-assistance-atm-thefts
I'm wondering if Cobalt's involved in this?
https://hamiltonpolice.on.ca/community/news/2018/02/hamilton-police-seek-assistance-atm-thefts
I'm wondering if you should shut the fuck up?Do not engage this poster. They are slowspamming. Listed here >>3491746 and here >>3495033.
I'm wondering if you should shut the fuck up?
Do not engage this poster. They are slowspamming. Listed here >>3491746 and here >>3495033.
>>3496186In B4 He Med, U Mad, etc.How about I tear that fucking dork head off of your body and piss down the stump?
>>3496186
In B4 He Med, U Mad, etc.
How about I tear that fucking dork head off of your body and piss down the stump?
>>3496186>You
>You
>>3496188 fCU9l/Vl>>3496189 fCU9l/VlSmooth samefagging.
Meanwhile, in another fandom on the other side of town..http://boards.4chan.org/mlp/thread/31558698https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cx0LuI7UP-c
Friendly reminder to use archive.fo for links, unless if you want Cuckchanners and Ledditors to visit here.
>>3496143>an imageboarder>afraid of lurking on 4chanThat is next level cowardliness.
>>3496143
>an imageboarder>afraid of lurking on 4chan
That is next level cowardliness.
>>3496160I take it that you are blindly supporting CUCKCHAN.
- dis + share + furi+ flash + oekaki - All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
