Agreed. I've never got adoptables either.

Just make up your own characters.

Related, 'closed species' is full nonsense.

Adoptables are a throwback/residue from times when everybody was doing roleplay sex on IRC/MUCK and needed a ref sheet to show their "fursona".

Reason being that they couldn't just grab and roleplay someone elses Original Character (donut steel), because that would have resulted in an internet retard slapfight, so a market for generic characters opened up to fill that void.

YCH's are no less cancerous.

Ok, imagine the OP image combined with this image.

That's what it was like.

You seem a little insecure.

best thread! TY posters <3

>>3495094

Do want.

>>3495458

Everyone remembers what happened to the adventurer party. I was fully prepared to quit watching

>there's no way I can't fap to this.

ftfy

ITT: TF porn

holy shit i thought i was just crazy or something, like maybe i needed to restart my browser or update abp/noscript

>>3496821
sweet, and apparently a couple firefox variants too

>>3496848
All those amazing [porn] animators could make 1 great [not porn] animated movie together.

>>3496828
Same - and I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if they saw an increase in business, both from people thinking they were legitimately getting a good deal and others who just wanted to show their appreciation of wit.

>>3496547
Tab & smartphone still has the view "full-size image". then again my tab is old.
Depends on the browser (old/new/outdated/script) mine shown preview plane (black popup/slide). Apparently it's loading the full size image where you can right click and save it or view image. Just make sure you wait it finish loading after you click the image thumbnail (there's a loading bar underneath the preview image).

I assume that "save" function that google made turn into copyright liability issue considering some site disable the right click function and google save function allow it to be downoad.

>>3496614

You said it yourself just there though, this wasn't specifically pro-Trump. In fact, the press release about the 13 people specifically states that they organized pro and anti missions against and for both candidates. It was all about sowing discord.

So that 100,000 dollars was used for that end. So it's not even .12% and more like .06% if you just assume half the money was spent on turmoil operations.

50,000 dollars would not have sunk a less exposed, less historied democratic nominee. Maybe the DNC should have gone with Bernie like everyone had been telling them to.

>>3496514
Remind me again. Which president isn't implementing Russian sanctions?

>>3496617

>50,000 dollars would not have sunk a less exposed, less historied democratic nominee.

You forget that you can hire an Ukranian or Romanian social media spammer for a dollar a day.

>>3496613

The literal definition of "Russian collusion".

Hope the New York Times isn't too "right wing" for you.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

>As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

>>3496639

Also:

>And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

So Clintons getting paid, directly by Putin, for doing a good job. Again, more Putin cockholster behavior.

>>3496615

I never said it was impossible. And yes, the Contra, Fast and Furious and other dirty tactics are normal nowadays.

But remember, there were a bunch of people approving the deal and change. Not just Hillary or Obama.

>>3496623

Trump.

>>3496156

lol

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/02/20/politics/robert-mueller-rick-gates/index.html

Thank you.

>>3496838

Sauce plz

>>3496603
sauce of that pic?

>>3496642
it's not in the 'scratch pad' art thread of that redfern dude.

>>3496643
Can't find shit on that site either

My favorite star trek episode...it's the one that I didn't watch, which is all of them. Fuck space NIGGERS.

What do you people think about star trek discovery? It's barely star trek, but I think it's ok.

>>3496657
Is this character canon? I haven't watched all the series, so I don't know.

>>3496745
I haven't even seen discovery and I'm sure as hell not going to pay to see it. From the sound of it, it's not particularly good anyway.
What pisses me off about the whole affair is that the older series used to all be on Netflix and Amazon. Not anymore! It's all on CBS' thingie now.
Glad I binge-watched my way through DS9 a couple years ago when I had the chance.

>>3496762
Shows you how often I actually use it :P

>>3496734

You double nigger.

>>3496409

> If you wanted it its not rape you twat.

Tell that to the bitches that 'changed their mind' afterwards and pressed charges.

Never trust a bitch.

>>3495818

What is this, a thread on /b/ from 2005?

>>3496409 depends on circumstances, is the person asleep cause if a person is asleep no amount of consent claims will change those circumstances so yes its fully possible to rape the willing. im into such types of rape if its myself being taken advantage of in such a way.

>>3496665

I guess you're one of these twats who dont understand the word "NO".

Just like people like you blame the girl for "asking for it" "was dressed slutty"..etc..

>>3496697
or "she was buzzed, I was drunk to near unconsciousness, she stripped me, stuffed my limp cock up her pussy and when she sobered up, she said I raped her because she was drunk and was unable to give consent."

Somehow, when two are drunk, it's always the man's fault, no matter who has the initiative in the intercourse.

I hate that people think an erection is consent. Do you think school boys decide to have embarrassing boners when they have to speak in front of the class? Probably not. Hormones suck.

Likewise, a woman being wet isn't consent.

Society has this retarded idea that men always want sex, and never get pushed into it when they don't want it. If you want to see an angry woman, turn her down for sex when SHE wants it and you aren't in the mood.

I also love how women make erectile dysfunction all about them if men face it after their 40s, or after prostate surgery, rather than letting a guy have his moment.