Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
name e-mail subject pw(deletion)
Post and go

  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Javascript must be enabled for all of our addons to work.
  • Come chat and see that we're all a bit crazy on IRC!
  • Do not post any artwork from sexyfur.com and/or
    Jeremy Bernal. This is now a bannable offense.
Flockmod!

File: LOL-chicks.jpeg - (158.73 KB, 750x500) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
162536 No.3438014

If you’re not supporting tomorrow’s Day Without A Woman protest then you’re a sexist male-privileged member of the patriarch.

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/northwest/day-without-a-woman-protest-sparks-debate-on-white-privilege/

No.3438018
>sexist male-privileged member of the patriarch.

i'm flattered



File: 533760-handle-robot.jpg - (27.43 KB, 810x456) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
28093 No.3436920

Robots are coming for your job.
https://youtu.be/-7xvqQeoA8c

https://www.engadget.com/2017/02/27/boston-dynamics-officially-reveals-its-rolling-handle-robot/

56 posts and 17 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
No.3437963
File: 200_s.png - (41.91 KB, 348x152) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
42915

>>3437954
Yes, and again, the cyclist problem is an example of something that could be easily solved with local car-to-car networking that would allow cars to not only know where each other are but everything around each other are. Communication between vehicles solves a great many of the problems that single vehicle test models face.

Like I said, it's inevitable, the machines are going to take your car, it's going to be mandatory because as a human driving a car you are not sharing information that other cars around you will need to drive safely.

No.3437964

Then there's also the problem that if you put a neural network simulation in charge of the car, you can train it with all sorts of material but you can't explicitly make it do anything - it either does it or it won't, or it may sometimes do it and other times not. You never know why it does what it does, and you can't explicitly prove that it won't do something wrong, and you can't ask it to explain what it's doing because it's not a general intelligence and doesn't understand your question.

So again it's like training a chimp to drive a car. It may do it very well 99% of the time, and then freak out and crap on the seat and kill everybody - only, the AI has far fewer neurons to play with than a chimp, or a mouse, or even a bumblebee, because of the price and power constraints of your computer system.

For the computer to do as well as people do, it must work 99.99999999% of the time without a major malfunction or incident, because that would be the equivalent of 1 fatal mistake over 100 million miles. Meanwhile, the state of the art image recognition software pre-trained on particular objects has a mean accuracy of about 81% in detecting those objects from video, as of 2016:
http://image-net.org/challenges/LSVRC/2016/results

That would be like you driving along the road, and being unable to see every fifth car or cyclist etc. you come across even as they stand right in front of you, even as you are looking right at them. It's just terrible. It's nowhere good enough.

No.3437966

>>3437963

>Yes, and again, the cyclist problem is an example of something that could be easily solved with local car-to-car networking that would allow cars to not only know where each other are but everything around each other are.

That's a terrible amount of data to transfer in real time, and you got trust issues where one car reports there's a cyclist, another car identifies it as a pedestrian, and a third car doesn't understand it at all - then they each "vote" what it really is, like the story of three blind men each touching an elephant and trying to figure it out. By the time they come to a consensus, the cyclist is gone or one of the vehicles has run him over.

Plus you got security concerns over vehicle tracking by outsiders, data spoofing, communications errors... it's just not very reliable to ask another car "hey, do you see anyone coming?" - what if they don't reply? Do you go or not go?

No.3437989

>>3437963
Besides, V2V communication does not address the lack of object permanence in the AI.

Suppose a person is crossing the street and falls over in the middle of the road. All the cars would instantly stop percieving it as a pedestrian because they only identify it as a human when the person is standing upright. On the ground it's actually very hard for the AI to tell what that lump is. Worse still, if they dissapear somewhere out of reach of the sensors.

It's not hard to imagine what sort of trouble it would make. Some drunkard staggers across the street, falls down and rolls under a truck. The AI cars would go "person in the way... still there... still there... road clear!"

No.3437991

It seems irrelevant to me how safe self-driving cars are. The important thing is how safe they -will- be, right? Software improves - especially when people are determined and confident that they can do it. And in this case, they are.

I think it is a good idea to generally stay out of them until they're mature though. Right now they're just babies learning to walk.

But odds seem extremely high to me that eventually, manual driving will be considered so dangerous in comparison that normal road driving will become illegal.

No.3437992
File: b516285bcc4ed2a7fd8dcd52e5e686d2.png - (117.54 KB, 236x414) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
120366

>>3437966

You keep trying to come up with these scenarios where 1 in a million chance things happen to try and convince us to not use the cars which will save lives every day. This isn't about facts or technology, it's about your feelings. You don't like it so you are trying to stop it. We understand. Change is scary.

Sorry.. but the needs of the many and all that. Your car is going bye-bye. No argument is ever going to stop that from happening. It's only a matter of time.

But don't worry, you also won't have a job so you'll have a lot more free time to sit in your self-driving car with your friends and have mobile game parties while it drives you around.

No.3438017
File: ArtificalRunningMachine.jpg - (72.07 KB, 450x355) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
73803

>>3437992

>You keep trying to come up with these scenarios where 1 in a million chance things happen to try and convince us to not use the cars which will save lives every day.

When talking about road safety, 1 in a million chances are very high, because the probability of serious accidents is on the order of 1 in 100 million. If the AI makes a fatal error once in a million miles, it ends up killing a hundred times more people than human drivers.

>This isn't about facts or technology, it's about your feelings. You don't like it so you are trying to stop it. We understand. Change is scary.

This is about the fact that people and the public have a completely wrong idea about what AI is and what AI can do. It's about the philosophy of computational intelligence. It's about using the wrong tools for the job and pretending that they're doing the job when they're not:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moravec%27s_paradox

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: fattyfatfat.jpg - (49.24 KB, 1000x562) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
50417 No.3437821

Awwww.....poor Fatty-Fat-Fat won't get HER day in court. Now waddle back to the girl's room where you belong!

https://broadly.vice.com/en_us/article/supreme-court-wont-hear-major-trans-rights-caseleaving-students-in-limbo

1 posts omitted. Click Reply to view.
No.3437865

>>3437841

That's no "he". SHE is a fat ugly beast who wants the rest of the world to acknowledge HER trans fetish.

No.3437894

>>3437865
lulz dot net: people don't deserve rights because a kid is fat

No.3437895

>>3437894
I'm ok with that.

No.3437899

>>3437841
Actually, they vacated the previous decision due to the change in White House policy, redirecting it back to the lower court to rule on it under the new "Yeah, Title IX doesn't apply to this" language that Trump & co. have been using. I wouldn't be half-surprised if it gets overturned.

No.3437904
File: 889.gif - (14.87 KB, 345x363) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
15223

But... my gendies!

No.3437941

Awww. Sad little freakshow. Obama told them theyre special. We're telling them they're snowflakes. :)

No.3437994

>>3437899

>"Yeah, Title IX doesn't apply to this" language

Unfortunately, the court uses neither Trump's nor Obama's interpretation of the law when ruling on it. I would be surprised to see them rule differently.



File: Untitledfg4d.png - (641.54 KB, 1108x647) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
656937 No.3436726

inb4 you RETARDS cry fake news

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/27/us/georgia-couple-confederate-flags-threats/index.html

AHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAH

50 posts and 12 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
No.3437665
File: SMBC_Sedition.gif - (73.05 KB, 468x706) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
74802

>>3437663
Also, way to not read the article - the guy shot survived, but it was still the "Muh country!" type that shot him.

No.3437676

>>3437663
notice how you don't give a shit about dead brown people at all unless it's to whine about something else or owning libs or whatever the fuck it is that gets you hard

No.3437680

Old age is killing more people than these conservatives are managing to do. They shoot 2 or 3 blacks a year and act like they're winning a race war. They're not really a threat.

No.3437684

>>3437676

Because lefties always whine about how much they care for "Brown people(TM)".

Then they don't. Unless it's kicking them out of the new gentrified neighborhood.

No.3437726

>>3437663

>Notice how people care more about ONE guy getting killed, than the hundreds of inner city murders like Chicago?

Bitch please, don't pretend trumpets like you care at all about non-white people being shot, regardless of the situation. You only "care" when it's politically convenient, which is to say you don't actually care.

No.3437739

>>3437726
The better argument is "Wait, where's those 'All Lives Matter' folks?"

Also, this kind of slipped through the cracks - Pat Robertson just outright said that if you're against Trump, that means you're against God's plan for America - http://www.snopes.com/2017/02/17/pat-robertson-revolting-against-god/. And, more recently, that anyone that's against Trump is motivated by Satan - http://www.rightwingwatch.org/post/pat-robertson-opposition-to-trump-is-satanic/

No.3437906

>>3437739

When is that senile old grafter finally going to DIE?

His good buddy the fat pig Falwell did already.



File: Nintendo%2bswitch%2btrigger%2bmedium%2bstats%2bmentionlist%2bsafelist_19921c_6065326.jpg - (240.09 KB, 900x1020) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
245851 No.3437896

UTTER FAILURE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cb-srOfRqNc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QSzle6Fq2M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHp3N0IwU8c
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86StPi8UcxQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G24fwxDISEk

No.3437898

>>3437896
There's already a thread for this on the first page, fucko.



File: 1379889019.renaayama_buttsnug-small-by-renaayama.jpg - (965.29 KB, 1280x1280) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
988452 No.3436635
11 posts and 10 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
No.3436714
File: 6ba3a2fdd1b73c31af619dc7c2e5d0ee.png - (820.64 KB, 1280x920) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
840337
No.3436749
>3436658

Why oh why does Paul Lucas's stuff always look like a half-sucked gummi lolly,ten years and the guy hasnt moved up in quality in the slightest

No.3436903

>>3436750
>>3436752
>>3436653
Awww fuck these are hot.

No.3437153
File: 58f14b5c5d49462cfda4f0a2b60adf37.png - (2377.35 KB, 1600x1600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
2434405
No.3437157
File: 1286164209883.png - (944.17 KB, 1038x1350) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
966827
No.3437480
File: 53865106_p0.jpg - (763.85 KB, 1135x1271) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
782184
No.3437880
File: 1474761010.nightfaux_dj50_commission.png.jpg - (184.59 KB, 1280x1280) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
189018


File: 1488772920.juneart_pic_1.jpg - (432.06 KB, 1280x987) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
442430 No.3437754

Good god Jesus fucking Christ how come no one has told this fartknocker yet that they can't draw???

No.3437755

Everyone starts somewhere. Unless the person's been drawing for a decade or something.

No.3437757

>>3437755
Sometimes good artists post artwork from their child hood. Its lacking in skill, for sure, but you notice they just "have that something" that you know in ten years time will foster into a good talent.

This image does not display that "it" factor.

No.3437850

Not every artist has talent. Some are just naturally bad.



File: min.gif - (50.83 KB, 442x200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
52051 No.3437818

That Feel you have when you come to /furi and there's no god-damn CP spam on the front page.

No.3437823

I wish... It was filled with it just a few hours ago. All i wanna say is that, Choob don't really care about us...



File: bai.jpg - (759.76 KB, 1309x621) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
777996 No.3436900

lol k bye RF. even if everyone kinda knew you were dead months ago? lets share some great memories guys <3 ^.^ tell me about all your fondest times smelling daiperfurs, watching bad fursuiters, walking past kinksters in the open and questioning why children were there. (points for pics of Navi guy)

41 posts and 10 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
No.3437547
File: whothefuckDOESTHIS.png - (378.97 KB, 610x826) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
388068

>>3437132
Okay, looking at part 3...

>making stickies in my diaper

Ugh.

>multiple people's cath play

WTF is this, catheter play?!

>people burning cigs out on your arm

JFC whaaaaat? No thought of what you will look like decades from now with those scars shakes head. People are so stupid.

No.3437559
File: RF_AA.png - (51.36 KB, 600x312) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
52589
>Throwing bags of bio-hazardous filth around the parking lot is A-OK at RF.
>Parading around the lobby in adult diapers is A-OK at RF.
>Causing more damage to the hotel in three days than it will get the rest of the year is A-OK at RF.
>But getting too drunk will get you kicked out, posthaste.

What in the ever-loving fuck did this guy do while drunk that even RF staff couldn’t hand-wave away? Try to rape the hotel CEO’s pre-teen daughter?

No.3437685

Furry wasn't always like this. It's because Mark Merlino came up with a stupid idea to advertise furry in zines that have nothing to do with furry and perverts started popping in the fandom. Note to other fandoms,don't let Mark Merlino ruin your fandoms,like how he has ruined furry.

No.3437691
File: 1488684025.kody-the-fox_fergy_the_eagle.png - (45.29 KB, 904x1212) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
46373

>>3437471
So? Voiding a warranty isn't going to stop horny furries.

>>3437542

>Kody-the-fox

Yep, that's him.

So when you read statistics like, "Only 13% of FA submissions are adult rated," consider Kody-the-fox. All 4827 of his flipper-potato submissions that no one cares about are being used to distort the image of the fandom. No one is commissioning these "artists"; nearly all of the money is going towards porn.

No.3437725

>>3437559

He made a glory-hole in one of the public restrooms. He claims it was because he was 'arguing with con staff members'

SaphyKitten has a long, tired history of being an destructive, intoxicated nuisance at cons and it was only a matter of time before he got his ass kicked out. He deserved it.

No.3437744
File: BIGELISA.JPG - (32.13 KB, 398x500) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
32904

>>3437455

>fursuit sex

That's got to be its own fetish, because it looks more like fucking a carpet or a muppet than fucking an anthro animal. I would say the fursuit fuckers have more in common with latex/gimp/fetish-wear folks than anything furry. But, these are all sick depraved fucks so there's plenty of overlap.

No.3437802
File: DK-OMFG-REALLY.png - (112.74 KB, 354x168) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
115449

>>3437725

Oh. Yes, yes…that would do it.



File: 1223588076.nimrais_aurora.jpg - (106.59 KB, 590x835) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
109146 No.3437636

Other threads around here are full of idealized, perfectly smooth and rounded, and mostly big enough that they would be called obsese in real life.

This thread is for those small enough to be merely chubby, and not afraid to show the creases and sagginess of real fat.

23 posts and 21 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
No.3437706
File: dcf8cbce6327c79ae129d2f20e7e8081.jpg - (115.43 KB, 666x900) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
118200
No.3437707
File: 1220655588.nimrais_wanna_join.jpg - (146.77 KB, 566x800) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
150288
No.3437708
File: 1204849241.nimrais_nimrais_refsheet_2008.jpg - (152.52 KB, 1100x642) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
156181
No.3437709
File: korrok_web.jpg - (202.93 KB, 900x637) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
207802
No.3437711
File: fat_dog.jpg - (178.97 KB, 850x900) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
183264
No.3437747

Do we really need two landwhale threads?Hit the bricks lardass.

No.3437798
File: 1488444209.loupgarou_1702_comm_kerenza_fa.jpg - (439.84 KB, 814x1200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
450397


Delete Post []
Password