Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
name e-mail subject pw(deletion)
Post and go

  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Javascript must be enabled for all of our addons to work.
  • Come chat and see that we're all a bit crazy on IRC!
  • Do not post any artwork from sexyfur.com and/or
    Jeremy Bernal. This is now a bannable offense.

File: theodoreroosevelt.jpg - (33.05 KB, 473x599) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
33847 No.3496723

Happy Presidents Day everyone!

Who was your favorite? Mine was the Ted. He would fuck a bitch up. Got shot at a speech and gave the speech anyway.

"Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit soft!"

49 posts and 32 images omitted. Click Reply to view.

You make it seem so shameful. Everyone wants to be some part of the "tribe" or be shut out into the unknown our primal selves fear; it explains almost all of human nature, either by self imposed role or objectification.

File: wallhaven-296683.jpg - (772.10 KB, 1920x1200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Assuming War Is Nuclear.



Nothing to do with technological levels.

The American civilizations (Mayan, Aztec) had very complex and very vast structural, farming and astronomy levels, they only lacked the tech of metals.
They bathed regularly, etc..

Yet they were "barbarians".

The nationalism words are always based on ignoring the bads of the own country while projecting everything they dont like into others.

Another balance war tech levels was Ottoman Empire vs the Christian empire.
You bet both were calling each other infidels and barbarians.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

I specifically said "metals" when I was referring to technology. Its hard to kill people with farms and bathing.



The Aztecs had full metallurgy with gold, silve and copper and bronze. The North American indians did not.

The South American cultures riveted their elaborate stone structures together by casting metal into wedge-shaped holes between the stones for added protection against earthquakes. At the time of the Spanish conquests, the Aztecs had a bronze culture going on, and iron was known and worked as well.

The main limitation was availability of ores, and the difficulty of transportation in the hilly terrain where the main mode of transportation was running. People preferred to make their tools out of locally sourced materials, which favored wood and stone, with metal objects being delegated for fashion, status, and weapons. Copper axe heads were used for money.

The main downfall of the Aztecs came from tribal infighting, and diseases brought by Europeans, which weakened the cultures enough that conquest was more or less a pushover.

File: SMBC_Patriotism-vs-Nationalism.png - (566.62 KB, 684x2922) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

It's the basic principle that's the same, though. That's why part of military training has to be dehumanizing the enemy - otherwise, you might hesitate in pulling that trigger, while the enemy won't.

I'm on board with the folks that theorize that the only way humanity could come together as a united front would be if we met overtly-hostile aliens - and even then that wouldn't prevent backbiting and underhanded tactics between opposing factions.


In fact some modern findings have found much more signs of agriculture covered by jungles, with cultivated land masses enough to feed populations up to 10 million strong - had the Spanish been against that mass with the few men they were able to ferry across by ship, they would not have stood a chance.

Something happened to cause a massive die-off and the abandonment of these settlements, well before the Spanish arrived.

File: b2c1e943-8fb4-4561-a596-7f4510a0130b.png - (787.50 KB, 759x669) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
806396 No.3494870

10 days from public release, and already at 100% on Rotten Tomatoes.

(cautious pause)

Excuse me if I'm a tad skeptical. I love the MCU movies, and I really did have strong expectations for this one, but I'm still recovering from the Star Wars VIII Superhype train that misled me and so many others.

You know, the wave of highly trumpeted great reviews from loads of big sources that were seeing something we weren't. Oh, I dunno, $$$ signs, maybe. These same sources that were so certain of VIII's high marks that they doubled down while attacking naysayers. Only once it finally left movie theaters did some of these same people suddenly go "Actually, looking back, now that I think of it, eeehhhhh." That's the power of Disney for ya.

Even now on Rotten Tomatoes, The Last Jedi carries a score of 91% out from 360 reviews, while the Audience Score claims only 48% like it from a staggering 180,000+ review.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
83 posts and 16 images omitted. Click Reply to view.

dude, you seriously need to get over hillary.


Actually, she lost three times (the Russian investigation backfired).


The Russians are real, Kabitch. Just admit your kike had to cheat to get in.

Putin deserves assassination. He's a horrible person.

File: NachoPresident.jpg - (37.46 KB, 383x400) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Trump is YOUR President. Just accept it already. Trump2020



>robble robble liberals robble robble


You just imitated 99% of all foxnew commenters.. all they do is complain about "liberals" even when all the shit they complain about were introduced or set by GOP.



>robble robble Russians robble robble

File: bovHotY.jpg - (82.88 KB, 476x474) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
84873 No.3496938

Shows the priorities of the current bunch of "conservatives."

30 posts and 6 images omitted. Click Reply to view.


>Printing money to loan banks so that people would know if they put their money in the banks they could then get it out if they needed it wasn't "shoveling it to rich people" in fact it was the very opposite.

No, it was the exact same type of bank bailout as in the housing crash.

>It put money back into the hands of poor people.

For a little while. Then it filtered back up to the rich, as the money went into paying the debts owed due to investment speculations. There's a saying from the great depression era that says "When your taxi driver starts to give you tips on stocks, you know it's time to bail out."

The newly created money went to provide credit into an insolvent market that was in a gridlock because everybody owed money to everybody and nobody had any, so nobody could generate revenue to do any business. The money was given to the banks, who then lent it to the people at interest and eventually collected it back with profit. The money went to the people, then back up to the rich.


Now with WW2 the US economy got such a boost with the trade balance to Europe that the national debt started shrinking. But that meant another deflatory cycle was on the way because of the massive amounts of money that was trumped up out of nothing - remember that money created by debt vanishes when the debt matures and the government bonds are paid off, because the bonds act as reserve currency in place of gold or other real value.

So to prevent another great depression, the government was left with the task of maintaining the national debt level to prevent any sudden chances in dollar value. Unfortunately, what happens next is that since the government saw as its mission to make more money, and spend that money, the government started increasing social spending, military spending, etc. and consequently couldn't stop spending because of the voter feedback effect where people keep voting for governments which increase spending on them - it created a debt spiral. Any money the government spent, they had to keep spending, and so they had to start creating debt upon debt while the rich were hoovering up the loose money out of the economy.

The mechanism of the inflatory spiral had little to do with banks being private and for profit, but about the govenrment trying to do good by messing with the money supply. Had the banks been nationalized would have just made the situation worse, because then the state would have been in control of all the supply of credit and that could have easily led to hyperinflation a'la pre WW2 Germany.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

Now, with history being what it is, it's pointless to speculate whether Roosevelt should have done any differently, because in hindsight it provided for a stronger American entering WW2, and had they just let the banks fail and the economy re-structure on a sounder basis would have left the US temporarily weak just as the world was entering a global war.

The moral of the story is that the New Deal wasn't such a victory for socialism, because it had so many unintended consequences that just go to underline why the government's job is not to save the people from themselves. The main reason is that the government is not wise, it's not competent, and it is subject to all the same corruption as the society in general, so whatever good it tries to do usually and predictably backfires.


In a sense, the great depression was like a bunch of schoolkids sitting down to play poker, investment speculations, and since none of them actually have any money the play with debt and write the sums down on paper.

And as they don't have a real understanding of debt or the game they're playing, every kid thinks they can win, and so the debt keeps piling up. Eventually one of them wins the lot and everybody else is left scrambling how to pay what they owe while the winner kid is gathering a posse to beat them up. At that point an adult would come by and rip up the piece of paper that says who owes whom, and spank the whole lot for being stupid.

Instead, in the New Deal, the government that was supposed to be the adult went to the winner kid and lent him the money he was owed by the other kids, on the promise that he would in turn lend it down to the others, so they could then do business with each other and one by one pay off their debts. The idea was that eventually as everything was settled down, the winning kid would also have to pay back his debt, and the money would just dissapear from the system.

But the kids got wise, and saw "hey, this adult is giving us money for being stupid", and they continued to be stupid, and so the adult, the government, being equally stupid got locked in to the scheme.

File: berniefurry.jpg - (102.38 KB, 960x720) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


>The money went to the people, then back up to the rich.

So you are against income inequality? Great to have you on board! #Bernie2020


The enemy of my enemy is not necessarily my friend. Especially when their method of fighting the enemy is more or less siding with the enemy in a perpetual fake conflict that is mutually benefical.

The government institutes redistribution of wealth to gain votes and thereby power, or it has power because it is redistributing wealth according to its voters' wishes - depending on your point of view. Regardless, if the redistribution actually did what it's supposed to do and leveled off the income disparity, then there would be no wealth to redistribute, and the taxes on the people would go up only for the government to redistribute it back again - minus what the political elite keeps for itself of course - and so the government would lose its power by being essentially booed off the stage. Being put out of work, the government could no longer maintain redistribution and therefore the income disparity would appear again.

So the government institutes policies which actually maintain the disparity by allowing the rich to cheat more to compensate their loss. That way the masses can see the government as their friend because it is giving them money, and the rich can also see the government as a beneficial and necessary thing because it works in their favor, and the government can sit in the middle of this never-ending cycle of money, redistributing wealth from the rich to the poor - minus what they keep for themselves - which is then collected back up by the rich, who then allow the government to tax them in exchange for political power.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

And one of the policies by which the government keeps pumping money to the rich is the inflatory monetary policy.

The government creates a bond and sells it to the FED to gain money to pay for the social spending. The FED uses the bond as reserve currency, and can generate up to about $9 for every $1 the government gets out of this deal, so for every dollar the government creates for the poor, it creates $9 for the rich.

However, the rich can't just use the money themselves because it's debt - they would have to pay it back - so instead they lend the money to the poor, and the poor then have to pay it back by working or giving some of their existing wealth to/for the rich, who by this mechanism gain most of their real wealth.

I'd like to see Bernie trying to change that little merry-go-round. The old man's just going to get shot like Kennedy.

File: butt_by_titanacrotu.jpg - (124.58 KB, 704x900) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
127573 No.3497160

How does one get to bang a hottie hyena?

Pic related.

I would long cock that hyena ass all night.

File: titana_liegeposen.jpg - (107.03 KB, 489x1200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Other pics that give me wood.

File: DRwpSI0X4AcnD3X.png - (861.92 KB, 540x734) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
882610 No.3494590

Looks like someone hasn't been donating enough money...

Time to dump it all into a new despot eh? In b4 salty jokes about berniebros ruining the party

For just $400,000 you can become the new chairman, champagne neolib shitposter-san, so what are you waiting for?


13 posts and 7 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
File: glass.jpg - (22.46 KB, 199x254) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

glass flavor.... ouch

File: Bosscup.jpg - (21.74 KB, 189x267) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

It is...

File: Lesb.jpg - (22.04 KB, 190x266) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
File: 10588066.jpg - (30.17 KB, 461x403) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
File: what-if-i-told-you-that-captain-crunch-making-oops-all-berries-was-no-accident.jpg - (26.48 KB, 334x302) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
File: 37790271.jpg - (30.04 KB, 400x400) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Eating too much 'Oops All Berries' turns your poop green:
Actually the key is blue dye #1. Any food with too much of this will give you green poop. This mostly includes brightly blue cereals, blue soft drinks you find in gallon-size milk jugs, and really cheap 'chocolate flavor' items like chocolate animal crackers and Little Debbie snacks with 'chocolate' in them like their knock-off 'Ho Ho's.

File: Untit3fgled.png - (649.76 KB, 834x469) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
665351 No.3496971

Too bad none of you are popufur enough to make a movie about :/ I bet that hurts so much.


File: sock.jpg - (1301.12 KB, 2340x2340) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


File: ButDoesThatTastey.jpg - (20.45 KB, 984x229) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Damn, guess I am not that classy of a shithead to point out what people consider themselves around other people...shit nevermind. What a guilt trip.

File: naw.jpg - (3.56 KB, 300x168) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

about what? Meh emoji's? I ain't click'n that shit.

File: FluffiYiffre.jpg - (76.17 KB, 450x630) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Furfags think that this is a sign of the fandom going mainstream, but all these things really are is a form of "everyone point and laugh at the freaks".

Furry will always be in the same social strata as those who handle snakes in church or dress up as giant babies.

File: DWi_n1ZVAAAjBF7.jpg - (177.12 KB, 1400x1082) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
>actually wallow in anonymity

I'm okay with this.

File: dagwithcigar.jpg - (39.99 KB, 500x500) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

I believe that furry has great potential.

File: DIBUJOS%20MALEFICOS.7.JPEG - (28.67 KB, 704x400) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
29356 No.3497096


Evil Toons Movie



Different fullscreen version.

File: 180210132414-starman-tesla-roadster-780x439.png - (249.18 KB, 780x439) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
255157 No.3496674

Surprised there hasn't been a thread about this on here yet, the mannequin behind the wheel of a Tesla roadster that Elon Musk launched into space recently. At first he said the trajectory would take it out to Mars and back, now he claims it's heading to Saturn. What's the real story?

13 posts and 4 images omitted. Click Reply to view.

See >>3496719

Goddammit, why is this so difficult.

They made a fucking joke about the car and the driver being so bad-ass that he can plummet down from orbit without a parachute, slam the ground, and then deploy the chute as a final fuck you.


"He's nothing but a low-down, double-dealing, backstabbing, larcenous perverted worm! Hanging's too good for him. Burning's too good for him! He should be torn into little bitsy pieces and buried alive!"

File: sternn.jpg - (60.68 KB, 640x347) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

>>3496941 Now Charlotte... huuhhh take it easy.

It's either tear him into pieces OR bury him alive. Once a person is torn into pieces they're usually dead. They have to be alive to be buried alive.



You can do both if you're really quick about it.

Also gotta love Stern's absolute assholism.
The way he smirks when they announce "37 COUNTS OF RAPE" among his charges. Sign of the times.

File: DVjkysTVQAAYzFn.jpg - (155.34 KB, 636x879) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Or maybe the animators were following the sequence of events as depicted in the comic their animated segment was based on.


The background radiation in space is gong to literally rip the car apart. What will be hilarious is some decades down the line when they see the unrecognizable mass of metal and post pictures of it, the caption will read, "Yeah, another typical Tesla. Its going next to the Yugo in the car museum"

File: shuttle%20atlantis%20chute%20deployed.jpg - (33.79 KB, 620x350) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

>>3497022 Yes, good explanation although the first panel does depict forward motion .. same with the last (i.e. forward motion has happened). The chute is meant to slow the vehicle after touchdown [like the space shuttle did -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFvB2SO2Rpw]

>>3496912 Until I see someone working on the film's account of what this was about I'm still going to say 'animation error' instead of a joke. -- I looked around for an explanation online for a bit but couldn't find one.

File: images%5b1%5d.jpg - (12.16 KB, 233x216) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
12452 No.3496883

I dont really get them.
Its not a YCH, artist just do a random character and then sell it without any context.
And they do it the most unoriginal possible, why?, so if somebody start selling a generic raccon adoptable and my fursona is another generic racoon who is stealing who?
Under that same law I could freely use those charatcers without even telling the person who's selling them.
Also if the artist is a easily hurt person he could start blaming me that my generic character is one of his adoptables and hate-spam me, since he will be loosing his precious money.
And those artist do a lot of adoptables trying to 'monopolize' the character market with their own generics.
Plus to all this, mostly all the people who buy them they dont even do nothing with them, some of them dont even post it, did they have a false sense of ownership, like 'I own this generic character even when its so generic that the only defining thing is the artist style and if I use it as a reference is will be loose because other artists style'
As a living proof of this i have 'Fuf', on IB hes selling at least 6 generic ones daily and people really bid on them even when the only real value is the early-2000 cheap cartoonish style of Fuf himself as an 'unsold work'
I learn english from a baked potatoe, sorry.


Agreed. I've never got adoptables either.

Just make up your own characters.

Related, 'closed species' is full nonsense.


There is a large chunk of the fandom devoid of imagination.

But people see a character design they like, and they're like "Oooh, I wish that character was mine. I'd like to see some porn of her. But ooooh, if I owned it, I could have her redrawn and commissioned, and give people permission to draw her!" And thus they bid.

And yeah, most of the time it (visibly) goes nowhere from there. Not that it bugs or bothers me one way or another, but somehow it works, and the artist makes a quick buck. I suppose it does become detrimental when it becomes a trend.

File: demeyes.jpg - (115.19 KB, 500x507) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

I bought an adoptable recently (I posted it here: >>3493102 ), simply because it was cheap, it looked exactly like what I had in mind (except for the filter but that was a minor annoyance), and I myself can't draw for shit so I couldn't create it anyway.
So why should I bother an artist with a vague description, no refs, paying 50+ dollars, have to wait maybe weeks (or even get scammed and get nothing at all) and then get something that's probably not completely what I wanted because the artist only had a written description to go off of?

I'm not saying adoptables (and YCH's) aren't stupid, because a lot of them are, but some people just have a good reason to buy them.

Or, you know, furries are just fucking stupid when it comes to money and don't know how to handle money so they buy anything that strikes their fancy even if they don't need it (don't even get me started on fursuit GoFundMe's etc)... Artists know this and if it sells it sells, so why not shit them out and make money with them for gullible furries to buy them.


Adoptables are a throwback/residue from times when everybody was doing roleplay sex on IRC/MUCK and needed a ref sheet to show their "fursona".

Reason being that they couldn't just grab and roleplay someone elses Original Character (donut steel), because that would have resulted in an internet retard slapfight, so a market for generic characters opened up to fill that void.


YCH's are no less cancerous.

File: drsmith.jpg - (28.08 KB, 550x413) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
28752 No.3497031

That's all I can say seeing this, Netflix is bringing back "Lost In Space."

And Dr Smith is...a woman. :bangheadintowall:


4 posts and 1 images omitted. Click Reply to view.
>>So...any bets on when they come out with Jane Bond? Where Her Majesty's 007 is a women?

Oh noes! A femme fatale seducing bondgirls? Yuck!

File: 3armed_vets.png - (79.13 KB, 590x364) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

I really am starting to think someone inside Netflix is trying to sink their boat.



Okay, so?


And it will fail like all the other revisionist films and remakes. JJ Abrams needs to stop making Trek movies and whoever made the last Ghostbusters flick needs to never be allowed near a movie production company. This isn't a relfection of America, its a reflection of the total nut-bag leftists running Hollywood.



Hollywood is run by MONEY.

Every so often someone makes an artsy-fartsy movie, but almost always they fail totally.

You know what movies make the most money? Kids' movies.

And nowadays, we're going to get umpty-dozen movies with black superheroes.
Because Hollywood loves to copy success.

File: 1436997989.jpg - (216.78 KB, 495x375) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Lost in space was garbage to begin with. Embarrassing seeing a bunch of losers bemoaning the "precious artistic integrity" of a shitty old show that got swept away by Star Trek. You know, that actually good show about space communism that was full of women and black people.

Delete Post []