fatfags and tumorfreaks are the same; both subjects require very little skill to execute, almost impossible to fuck up, great for talentless newbs.

fucking disgusting

I like buff men but come the fuck on

Logic does not always work with fetishes. There's really no point in attempting to answer the why in "why the hell do I like this shit?" other than to waste time, because it serves no point. best to just sit back and enjoy it. >.>

You have to wonder how someone can suspend their disbelief long enough to find that sexy.

>>429365
what makes you think they even have any belief to suspend?

>>429210
Agreed, I love it.

>>429209

This is why. Quit bringing psychology into it: It's just getting your name and links on as many pages as possible to encourage as many users as possible to surf back to your gallery.

I thank them, but I also ask them why they watched me, mainly because of the things I write being geared towards a smaller group of folk, and finding more people with things in common is always good for the... uh... I don't think I want "ego"... there's another word for it... >.<

I generally thank them and ask them why they decided to watch me. Was it the stories, the journals, do I amuse them, did they see me elsewhere and decide "hey, this guy's a pretty cool guy who doesn't afraid of anything"? Mainly it's just to find out if we have something in common, because that always gives one a welcome feeling. :)

>>429355

ARGH, fucking thing going all wonky on me... i even refreshed the page to see if it had actually posted the damn thing so i wouldn't have to write it out a second time! &mumbles incoherently >.<

Just delete the shout and move on like normal people.

related to OP http://www.furaffinity.net/view/596737/

(8

>>429238
Cool story, bro.

Whenever FA goes down we all show up to laugh about how much money furries donated and how much money they spend every month to keep it running. It's a lot different from supporting FAP, which is obviously dead.

>>426056
Oh, no doubt. But there's only one real reason some one would post a screenshot of FAP here, while FA is down.

To be an obvious, obvious troll.

>>426064

FA isn't down btw.

Requesting pic on the far bottom right, left and 3rd from the left

>>426071
no. fa HAS downs.

Just though I'd dick around and bump the last thread here and see what happens.

>>429379

Original character, do not steal.

KIMMAUGH!

Is he peeing poop?

>>429318

Goddammit Squoilhaven!

>>428511
ed? what have they done to you

I remember this thread.... these threads!!!!

lol you knuckleheads, PhD (doctor of philosophy) is what you earn in the U.S. whether your degree is in philosophy, english, etruscan pottery, or molecular toxicology (as mine is). I would have thought that was common knowledge; what degree did you think the 'almighty' kagemushi has?

>>428397
>>428436

Trolls trolling trolls trolling etc.

>>428397

http://horsecockhorsecocklol.ytmnd.com/

>>428425

Wat?

>>428436

He said he was a doctor, not a phd. Normally when you say you're a doctor, it doesn't mean you have a phd in english.

>>429284

A doctorate is a PhD. There's no other degree that it could be. If you have a PhD, you can call yourself a Doctor of whatever your PhD is in, it just means that you know a lot about the subject.

>>429289

Yes, I know you CAN call yourself a doctor. But that doesn't necessarily mean you should. I can call myself an artist. And it may technically be true, I draw pictures of cocks on napkins.

>>428436
I heard he was a chemist.

Also my bad at thinking you were a "philosophy doctor". I assumed they would, you know, actually list your major/dissertation or whatever was on your degree like they would with a bachelors of science. Glad that mistake happened here instead of somewhere where I might make a bad impression. it was a kneejerk reaction as I'm tired of people having degrees in "nursing", "liberal arts", "management", or whatever field doesn't actually DO anything directly useful and them acting like the degree actually makes them qualified to speak while useful people are talking.

wait a sec, admiting a mistake is against internet rules. What I meant to say is LOL I TROL U!!1!

>>429312

no prob. Yeah he's a chemist iirc so I assume he's got his degree. I never hear of anyone refer to a 'doctorate of philosophy' unless it's actually in phil. even though it's technically the truth. I personally think it's rather goofy to have a single terminal degree across what must be hundreds of individual disciplines. IIRC there are a few countries that keep a distinction in the name of the degree, but most don't. Eh, oh well. A PhD gets you your first job (in my field) but only publishing gets you the rest.

>>429302 Normally I don't call myself a doctor even though I can (and the word itself is more etymologically appropriate for academics than physicians but whatever) because it sounds a lil pretentious and 99% of people assume only MDs are docs. If people ask me what I do I normally just say I work in a lab or that "I'm a lab rat" (lolfurry).

>>427460

There's a difference between wet mechanics and a plastic sheen, which is usually caused by crappy lighting or crappy mapping.

You can do some impressive things with blender, it's quite the sophisticated program. However, it's clunky, less than user friendly... but it does have more options than most of the user friendly freeware out there.

As for the plastic question, that's not a reflection on blender. That's a reflection on the lazy artists who don't bother texturing their renders.

>>429159

Eh. Whatever. When the 3 hours was up, he submitted what he had. You can't always go to a contest with the mapping you want, you have to go to a contest with the mapping you have. Or something.

>>429163
its mostly the programming on the default renderer that gives a program a certain 'look'. You have to dip into advanced lighting packages and tweak some numbers to change it.. like this lighting test I did when fooling around with vray. The problem is with even a simple scene of a glass ball, mirrored sphere, a 'doll' I threw in, and a 50% grey box, calculating the light bounces and refraction and reflection took 20 minutes alone... so investing time in stuff like that can make people wanna cut corners and everything comes out looking generic to some degree from certain folks.

>>429225

If you're serious about 3D work, you render over night. Or have a computer dedicated to rendering, because 20 minutes and change is really nothing for rendering.

>>429249
Yes. I know. I'm talking about the general porn making populace that don't want to invest that kind of time into it.

I made my arts just for you lulz.

An honest to god porn thread on lulz?

Alright... who the fuck divided by zero?

Also, multibreast

>>428870
>>428915

FYI: Delicious Traps.

You are a Free-Wheeling Leader.

Enjoy your wrecked grading curve :3

"Benevolent Leader"
so when do I get the keys to a country?
the detailed assessment was pretty good tho..

I got 'benevolent inventor'.

>>425017
Ah, I see I'm not the only girly-guy here. By the way, I think you mean four percent — 90 + 6 + 6 = 112.

I'm personally wondering where the other 2% on MY Masculinity/Femininity scale went. :P

I came out lookin kinda girly too. On the other hand, it does fit. :/

I'm an Animated Builder.. that works for me..

But the chart feels all wrong.

For being a guy who can't stand the company of most every male he meets, I have an oddly high score for masculinity..

It spat out 'Reserved Realist' and described personality traits which, when taken at face-value, seem psychopathic, paranoid, and reminiscent of an emotionally delicate shut-in. Yet, it also made me sound smart, in that insightful tinkerer kind of way. So I guess this test is somewhat accurate.

"For being a guy who can't stand the company of most every male he meets, I have an oddly high score for masculinity."

That sounds just about right, only fags hang around with males.