>known Christian

I lost.

>Shitpost Thread

isn't that every thread that you post in?

>>3535669 [+] Omg WOW!

>>3535669
Noice!

>>3534962
>>3534971
I got the image I used to start this thread from Bunnyman off FA. It's a self portrait cover for a cd of his art that never was produced. He was a big fan of Russian animation which explains the Russian writing.

>>3534791

>the man who loved to dress as a girl and have sexual fantasies of being had from behind
>yet shill considered himself to be male

>>3535070

>crossdressers and bottoms aren't males

`This isn't a recent pic of the closet where I keep my animal costumes, but it'll do.
Shawn and I debuted our animal costumes at comic con in 1987 and a year later parted company. Shawn is today a successful animator/director with his own studio. in '87 he encouraged me to make my own stuff, basing it on the fact that I had intimate knowledge of the construction and operation of the character costumes at Disney.
I continued to make them until '97 when I said "fuck it", why bother,as it had ceased to be enjoyable long before, besides, everyone was making them and I'd started drawing in the mid 90's and enjoyed it more.

Due to failing health, I'm mulling over the options for my existing costumes, as I'd also done a few commissions as well.
I designed all of them to my body specs: 5'8", 150-160 pounds, so it's unlikely they'd fit anyone else.
The options are as follows: sell them for the amount I choose, give them to my roomate to dispose of, or outright destroy them. I have no desire to ever wear them again.

The individuals that make up, what's called "furry" would see them as antiques to be ridiculed, as everything out there today looks the same, as they seem to prefer.
Frankly, I don't care if you like my comments or not, as that's simply how it is.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>3535087 I have to wonder which of them (Hill or Keller) made the suit with adjustable costume erection (not a real penis sticking out of a hole like modern murrsuits).

>>3535087
I found out on Facebook from someone who knew him that he died of pneumonia. Before that, he was trying to get a liver transplant. Basically, his organs failed him.

Rest in peace Robert Hill.

RED PANDA FEET!

>>3535268

Here is some paws just for you faggot.

Red Panda Feet and..

>>3535359
>>3535360

>>3532785

Couldn't someone just get a cheep KO and a $20 128GB off amazon and do a gut swap? or is the sizes too different?

NOMAD sexing up M'Ress. It could totally happen.

>>3532823
Sure. You could.
But do you really want the dam thing for the GB storage capacity? Or the novelty? Most would buy it even if the USB was long dead.

Issue 3 is out:
https://readcomiconline.to/Comic/Star-Trek-vs-Transformers/Issue-3

That's not supposed to happen. Where did you pick up these losers?

You can't stop anyone from becoming a furry any more you can stop a kid from growing up.

Forget being just a furry and become a therianthrope. Always be one step further on the edgy scale from your friends.

Everyone becomes a furry eventually. It's just entropy.

>How do I stop them?

BUTT STUFF

the answer is always butt stuff

>>3535074

This isn't entirely true. Value is also defined by the materials which go into production. The materials have a price too, so value isn't solely structured upon how much it costs to make it. Take something like a gold ring, for example. The gold must be purchased FIRST, and THEN you have to pay a jewelry smith to sit down, work it and turn it into a ring. The cost of production could be minimal in comparison to the materials themselves. So when you go to pay for that gold ring, the primary thing you are pay for is the material, not the cost of production. You are leaving out a crucial factor here.

But in the case of this YCH auction, there is absolutly no material which goes into it whatsoever....unless you count his tablet nib dulling an additional 0.000001 centimeters from working on the piece. This is something that is based SOLELY on cost of production, as many things are. However, with most material things you go and purchase, either online or in a store, materials define a certain percentage of what you pay for the final product.

>>3535093

It is kinda funny to see this. Man has that aged well, huh?

Okay tell me which char it should be and I'll finish this stupid drawing.
For free... But you will need to praise me as we praise Celestia.

>>3535475
headband hoe -> allan
motorcycle -> boom box

>>3535434

>Value is also defined by the materials which go into production. The materials have a price too, so value isn't solely structured upon how much it costs to make it.

Materials and labor are both included in "how much it costs to make it".

>>3535078

>I realize now that I got a goddamn bargain.

Or, you were goddamn stupid even back then. What did you really get for the money?

>>3535434
Besides, even with a gold ring or a gold chain, you typically have $500 worth of gold in a $1500 piece of jewelry. The melt price of gold is very much lower, since the shop also has to pay for utility, rent and wages, plus huge insurance premiums, plus taxes.

It's rare to find anything on the market where the raw material costs are dominating the selling price.

How can it be, its 21:48 here in shitfaggot-orban-istan.

O1G

Happy New Year, everyone!

Still no flying cars.

>>3535220 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRZNLBL7Px4

We have flying cars.

They're just expensive.

>>3535220
https://thebaffler.com/salvos/of-flying-cars-and-the-declining-rate-of-profit

I could have sworn this thread was missing. I went back like 5 pages. Then I went over the catalog like 3 times & did a word search and everything.

Oh no, Poly... It's still around, try the next page. There was something I'd overlooked. Have you checked your Discord lately?

Happy New Year from the Kuiper belt.

>>3535297 I still use the lulz catalog & if it's not in the catalog it's just not there.

You may not have meant to, and I understand that, but I'm seriously getting tired of content being pulled.

>>3535406 Nonono, don't worry, your thread didn't get pulled – it's right here >>3535166

I'm afraid I kinda messed up and the catalog has some issues still. I'll send you an update when you're next on.

>>3535239
thanks brony.

>>3535244
hmmm vodka is the russian vitamin D, good point.

>>3535299
China alone had more people in it in the 1950s than the entire world had in 1200.

You have more people doing the killing with more effective weapons, so more people die, yet the world is getting more peaceful as societies turn secular and abandon backwards religious thinking.

>>3535299
Also, while Communism was officially atheistic, Stalin was not an atheist:

>English historian Simon Sebag Montefiore studied Stalin’s hobbies and personal library, what Stalin liked to read, what kind of marks he left in his books. He found that Stalin liked to quote long quotes from the Bible. Stalin left such mark about God in the book by Anatole France "Last pages. Dialogues under a rose. About God": "Don‘t know traces, don‘t see. There is no Him for them." ("Следов не знают, не видят. Его для них нет."). It seems that Stalin thought he knew God’s traces and saw God, not like others.

>Stalin "denied categorically to prescribe atheistic literature to his personal library, fastidiously calling it ""antireligious waste-paper (junk)"". ("Secret life of Stalin : By materials of his books and archive : According to Stalinism" by Ilizarov.B.S. 2004)

He also wrote religious poetry.

The trend of deaths per year due to wars in the world has kept more or less steady for the last 600 years, while the world population has gone from 0.35–0.40 billion to 6.06–7.45 in 2000. That's a drop of 95% in the rate of killing per capita.

What happened? Secularization of society from the middle ages through the enlightenment, and in the modern times the rise of the atheistic society which has seen the rate of killing drop by another 80-90% of the remainder in the last 100 years. (notice: logarithmic scale in the graph)

>>3535303
Oh, sorry, that graph was already per 100,000 people. I was too quick to read the whole text.

Nevertheless, same argument stands. The death toll has come down from anywhere between 10-100 per to about 0.5 today. A drop of 95% - 98%

>>3535300
>>3535301
>>3535302
>>3535303
>>3535304

TL;DR
SMELLS LIKE 3B.

>>3535301
Yes, and there are now more impoverished people than ever.

>>3535303
That graph is wrong, there are less genocides because the climate is getting warmer. There's a clear correlation.
Also it's getting warmer because there are less pirates, we can therefor conclude that the existence of pirate favors the occurrence of genocides.