/furi/ - Yaff

AGREED.
More than agreed.

Kill yourself nazi scum

'need' is such an aids heavy wording

>>3767621
Your non-stop hateful, racist, bigoted, lying rhetoric is the prime example why this rule should be implemented ASAP, and we hope it is.

>>3767623
Killing Nazis is the most patriotic thing anyone can do no matter which nation you are from.

>>3767630
look to your left, now look to your right. They're all nazis, kill everyone you see.

>>3767632
He's a nigga. Nazis are the least of his worries. His own people would kill him over a beef patty and a bottle of Ting.

Too many retards infesting this place. We actually need a captcha-like system where you have to answer a critical thinking question in order to even post.

>>3767635
We sure won't miss you not being able to post. XD

>>3767636
Calling your bluff, faggot. There's nothing you can come up with to stump me.

>>3767637
Really? Alright furfag try this one. If I were to tell you that the next thing I say will be true, but that the last thing I said was a lie, would you believe me?

>>3767643
What you said is self-contradictory. That's just the card paradox, which is a variant of the liar paradox. Told you you couldn't stump me, faggot.

Obviously, such questions wouldn't work for post screening.

>>3767644
So you couldn't answer it, and you are stumped furfag. I never posed the question in regards to post screening, it was merely just to stump you as you challenged me to do, and you didn't specify that it had to be about post screening. Sure it might have been inferred because of the thread topic, but one shouldn't assume. ;)

>>3767646
Your response here >>3767636 proves you understood the context of post screening, you lying brainlet. So your challenge question was a joke, just like you.

>>3767653
Checkmate *fedora*

>>3767653

Understood wasn't the point. The point was to show you could be stumped and that an idiot like you shouldn't brag so much. Also the answer to the paradox question is both yes and no. With a paradox question both answers are correct, yet also incorrect.

>>3767667
But you didn't stump me. You failed.

This is you: "What's the last digit of pi? Stumped you, didn't I? Checkmate, atheists!"

So fucking stupid.

>>3767672
You are even more retarded than I previously thought. Don't try to put words in my mouth to try and turn a losing argument.

>>3767677
You claimed that a statement can be both true and false. Just give up, brainlet.

>>3767680

See Schrodinger's cat theory you moron. You completely miss the point of the question posed. You bragged that you couldn't be stumped. Everyone can be stumped and to think otherwise is just egotistical. The type of question posed is irrelevant. Next time think before you brag. Now you are just repeating yourself within a losing argument with stupid insults like a crybaby.

Furthermore there can be more than one possible correct answer to the question I previously posed regarding the truth or lie paradox because the next happening hasn't happened yet, where there would be one definitive outcome.

>>3767681
Except I'm laughing at you.
>You bragged that you couldn't be stumped. Everyone can be stumped
Now who's putting words in his opponent's mouth? I said you couldn't stump me, which is admittedly boastful, but not as presumptuous as your earlier claim that I couldn't pass an intelligence based post screening >>3767636.
>See Schrodinger's cat theory you moron
You have no idea what you're talking about. lol

>>3767684

>I couldn't pass an intelligence based post screening

That remains to be seen if someone actually implements such a feature on this board. However you also missed the "XD" emote signifying that I was joking and you took what I said too seriously, LOL.

Other than that you still completely missed the point of my question, so I'm laughing at you.

Go back to e621, faggot OP. We don't need bubble wrap armor and tard helmets.

Most of us don't, at least.

>>3767687
How about explaining the relevance of Schrodinger's cat? You just shoehorned that shit in to sound smart. lol

>>3767694

Are you that butthurt from being bested? Why don't you look it up if you want an explanation? Here's an already simplified version explained for you.

https://www.sciencing.com/schrodingers-cat-simplified-what-is-it-why-is-important-13722577/

>>3767700
You're a fool for claiming a statement can be both true and false. And you've misunderstood quantum mechanics in thinking it proves that a cat can be both alive and dead at the same time.

No, before the state of a quantum particle is measured, it occupies a superposition. Superposition doesn't mean both (or more) states at the same time; it means indeterminate. Similarly, the truth values of the statements in the card paradox are indeterminate. It's nonsense to assign truth values to those statements, just as it's nonsense to say an electron in a superposition is spin up before measurement. And when you do the measurement, you get spin up or spin down, but never both.

>>3767709

Once again you misinterpreted what I had previously said. I said the answer to the possible future outcomes of the statement could be true or false. It is only when the moment happens from the choice being made that there is a definitive right and wrong choice answer. All you do is try to put words in other peoples' mouths and try to twist the argument in your favor.

I do not disagree with the explanation of quantum particles and the prediction of which possible state we can observe them in until a measurement is made. I used the Schodinger's cat theory to show, as with the true or false paradox question that one can be stumped. You bragged about not being able to be stumped was why I posed the question. I just wanted to prove that you are an egotistical idiot. You got so upset with this that you wanted me to explain the Schodinger's cat theory and how it can be used with interpreting quantum mechanics. I am not your teacher nor your student and have no interest in discussing these things with you.

Have you ever watched The Big Bang Theory television series? If so, I'd advise you to try harder to not act so similarly with your social habits as the Sheldon Cooper character does. It gets rather annoying. I wonder if anybody enjoys socializing with you either online or offline. XD

>>3767711
>I said the answer to the possible future outcomes of the statement could be true or false. It is only when the moment happens from the choice being made that there is a definitive right and wrong choice answer.
Utter nonsense! lol
>You got so upset with this that you wanted me to explain the Schodinger's cat theory
No, I didn't even ask you to explain Schrodinger's thought experiment (not a fucking theory lol). I just asked why you thought it was relevant, for a laugh.

>>3767712
I think they could help you.