/furi/ - Yaff

You out mother is global fkign

>>3764025
> global cooling
That doesn't matter to the superstitious nutjobs who believe in man-made climate change. Those whackos will simply imagine somehow people caused it.

These "climate change" lunatics are immersed in the same defective mental state as superstitious humans of prehistory who saw unusual natural events and stupidly assumed they had to be caused by human misbehavior:

A solar eclipse, gods are angry at humans.
A red tide, the god of the sea is angry at humans.
A plague sweeps the land, Jesus is angry at humans, etc, etc.

>>3764044
Except we know roughly how much CO2 humans are pumping into the atmosphere, and scientists know the physical effect of that. You're the superstitious retard for denying the obvious.

>>3764053
Your pseudo science bullshit only impresses other superstitious loonies.

>>3764054
It's not pseudoscience. It's actually very basic science called the greenhouse effect. We learned about this in elementary school. It explains why Venus is hotter than Mercury despite Mercury being closer to the Sun. Were you homeschooled or something?

>>3764053
>and scientists know the physical effect of that

Yep. They know that the CO2 absorption window is already closed - adding more CO2 has negligible results because the sky is already "dark" at the long IR frequencies where CO2 is causing the greenhouse effect.

That's why the Anthropogenic Global Warming crowd is claiming that the tiny additional heating caused by CO2 causes water vapor to increase, which amplifies the effect. The problem is that you don't need CO2 for that - just adding heat will add water vapor, which will add heat, which will add water vapor… in other words, the theory predicts a climate catastrophe regardless of whether we're adding CO2 or not, because the model assumes that the climate is unstable and sensitive to small inputs in a positive feedback loop.

Oh that's funny, there are still global warming denialists? Is it just a lulz thing or what?

>>3764057
> It's actually very basic science called the greenhouse effect.
Go ahead and rant all you want about your pseudo science "greenhouse effect." That nonsense only shows how far gone you are in your whacky belief system.

While you're at it, tell us how "creation science" proves the earth is only 7,000 years old.

>>3764071
There is no bar too low for stupid people on the right-wing. Right now they are claiming that the U.S. government set California on fire and destroyed the east cost with hurricanes because they want to "buy the land cheap"

They are so stupid they don't understand that the government already owns the land and can take it back any time they want.

Taxes on land is the fee you pay to the government to rent the rights to that land. They can revoke it at any time. It's called immanent domain.

Historically, science is wrong more than not, and continues to be wrong.
And much of the time they won't admit they're wrong.
Would you like some examples? Is there enough room on Lulz?

So is it global warming or global cooling?
I will give you the answer.
Pardon me while I flip a coin.

The government set California on fire to offset Global Warming.

>>3764504
The point of science is to be less wrong as time goes by and more information is gained to get better predictions. The older time-tested science is more likely to produce accurate answers than the latest breaking news. That's why Newton's laws are still valid for describing most everyday matters, while quantum mechanics has troubles extrapolating away from the scale of individual atoms - because nobody understands quantum mechanics enough to derive accurate large scale predictions out of it. It's why looking at the history of nations is better at predicting the future of societies than the latest theories of social science.

When fresh science like climate change is pushed to support politics, it is reduced to pseudo-religious dogma that breaks within one election cycle. The predictions turn out to be false, but the politicians can't admit it so they will continue to push a false narrative decade after decade.

>>3764504
Conservatives are too stupid to understand that winters being more severe is an effect of global warming.

They look at the world with the IQ of a child. They can't fathom complex ideas like how hot air and cold air interact or even that cold air can exist if other parts of the world are warm.

They might know that the earth rotates and half the planet is always cooling because half the planet is always facing away from the sun but they can't comprehend it. They are too simple to understand what the words actually mean.

The world getting colder is proof that global warming is happening because of people not recycling.