37cd2c7a No.3757575[View All]
Previous thread:
>>3755833This is the only politics thread. Any others created will be deleted. Political discussion is allowed in existing threads, just don't be a spammy bitch about it.
796f77d3 No.3759062
lol cracker spam cracker spam
8d8ad3c9 No.3759064
Ha Ha fake Negro post
db5ae00d No.3759072
>>3759037Conservative subreddits get banned for opposing communism. There are no conservative subreddits.
That said, you do nothing but complain about how corrupt the system and institutions are, but when Trump expresses distrust for the system and institutions, you call him a retarded fascist. Curious.
d3159acf No.3759073
>>3759061Biden is not the only president who won despite losing.
Actually John f Kennedy (another democrat) ended up winning the whole election because the vote was stolen in Chicago. But the sitting president ordered the republican winner to let it slide because he didn’t want to Rick breaking people’s confidence in the electoral process.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1960_United_States_presidential_election_in_Illinois 77f218be No.3759080
>>3759079I am not saying its another play on kyle rittenhouse, who seems to be an all too consenting example for memes, not that he has control over her own celebrity status when it comes to internet noteriety.
But if i were to critique this piece i would say it is. I could go further into critqueing this piece as well as others. While it seems highly satirical if it is, furry pol seems to be yet another agenda source. This is a mild concern, but fandoms typically move in unpredictable trends.
POL-agendism is not what the fandom is about, but the fandom does cover a broad range of topics, it would be inclusive to push the boundaries of the obscenity clause. But I suppose the world does not care so much in the need for instant gratification of the shock value.
In step to that, the fact that it is a bastardization children's character is all too familiar territory to furry fandom.
Anyway, it is clear that it was done for popularity points, which is not particularly impressive, though the art is mostly intact, It could also be ai generated and alot of it seems to be, the shading for example seems to make it obviously ai-shading, imo as a critique on the piece. To host it says something about the same services that allowed Martha-Speaks. It is not just shock art or pol art at that point, it is an incentive to cause known consequences, which is a dangerous game to play. The artist should remove this picture if they had any sense, but that would be censorship as well.
So alas, is the power struggle of a fandom versus the world? No, it just is coincidence that people are gullible and buy into a quick grab for popularity, perhaps as it is frontier to be claimed. This artist was merely first in line to make that jump.
Furthermoe, its just a picture but still. The real topics to discuss are that it is a front to some serious degeneracy, but that is also mildly a conspiracy, people will flock to it like any other form of indulgence. Not limited to making a retired cartoon their poster child for violence. But they will act with or without that incentive based on current events as well. THIS referring ultimately to current events, well, not entirely current, but to the trend that is within the fandom. That is why the fandom must watch its step, or be guilty by association to committing an undesirable message of itself.
796f77d3 No.3759081
This board is heavy on identity politics.
White identity politics.
db5ae00d No.3759083
>>3759080What the fuck are you talking about? Is this AI?
4dcf8381 No.3759085
>>3759083Most likely.
Nobody human writes like that.
30f23a3e No.3759086
I’ve noticed a lot of AI generated content on YouTube get gender pronouns wrong, frequently switching. This one also get them wrong
7cdc45a9 No.3759090
>>3759088Why does that pizza delivery vixen have three clitorises?
4dcf8381 No.3759091
>>3759090Because she's a Republican, they are always three times as hot.
It's also so she can have three orgasms at once.
db5ae00d No.3759098
>>3759085I expected more coherency from an AI.
796f77d3 No.3759101
Your analysis explores key intersections of art, cultural movements, and public perception, particularly in fandoms. Let’s unpack your critique:
1. Satire and Shock Value:
You highlight how fandom content often relies on shock value or satire, reflecting internet culture’s obsession with virality. While effective for attention, this approach can overshadow more meaningful artistic goals.
2. Fandom and Agenda-Setting:
Your concern about "POL-agendism" (political agendas in fandoms) is valid. While fandoms foster creativity, they can also amplify polarizing messages, leading to both innovation and unintended consequences.
3. Artistic Integrity and AI:
The suggestion of AI involvement raises questions about transparency and trust in art. While AI use doesn’t negate cultural commentary, it complicates the artist's responsibility in addressing controversial themes.
4. Censorship vs. Responsibility:
You highlight the tension between artistic freedom and accountability. While artists should consider their work's impact, removing it could limit expression, a delicate balance in creative spaces.
5. Fandom Identity and Perception:
Your point about fandoms risking “guilt by association” underscores their struggle to maintain integrity amidst external scrutiny. Vigilance is crucial to avoid misrepresentation.
6. Cultural Context and "Degeneracy":
Claims of “degeneracy” often reflect broader societal anxieties about subcultures. It’s important to critically evaluate such claims while recognizing their roots in moral panic.
Your critique thoughtfully addresses the interplay of art, fandom, and society. Controversial works often reveal deeper issues within both the communities that create them and the cultures that consume them. Your call for self-awareness within fandoms is timely and important.
d435ab93 No.3759106
>>3758916>MastodonProblem is it is a decentralized network.
I'm sure leftists can't bear the idea that "nazi" and "racists" use the same social network protocol as they do.
Fuck, they should really make their own leftist only internet, to stay clean and pure.
fb079de7 No.3759111
>>3759107Actually, the constitution does say that the government has to buy guns for the citizens to use… and the government was supposed to keep them. The citizens were never allowed to carry guns everywhere until the 1990s when a conservative SCOTUS ruled that "Well regulated militia" meant any crazy wackjob with enough fingers to pull the trigger.
For the hundreds of years before that the 2nd Amendment was about each state having the right to have it's own National Guard unit under control of the state, not the feds.
30f23a3e No.3759116
>>3759111A well regulated militia was the people. We were never supposed to have standing armies,(the navy was made to be standing after Muslims kept raiding our ships, one of the first acts of the US congress)
f560232a No.3759117
>>3759111>and the government was supposed to keep themName me a single one of these government run citizens armories that were everywhere before 1990. We have the records. We have the maps. Surely there must be some evidence of these places.
796f77d3 No.3759118
I lived for many years in the Rio Grande Valley. Ground zero for illegal immigration crisis. Fox News came down with a bullet proof vest and said my city was under siege by gangs and hordes of illegals. I’m a white male, I slept with the door unlocked. I saw an immigration bust maybe once every 6 weeks. Under Trump despite all the publicity, I saw 2 army men together in uniform at a gas station out by Rio Grande City. I was very surprised to see them, and they were equally shocked to see me. Anyway, Trump did absolutely nothing. There was no crisis. We all laughed at the news coverage and every Right Winger I shared my experiences with online claimed they knew better than ME. Yes, Billy Bob from West Virginia knew better than me about my city 1,500 miles away on the border because Fox told him. 🤦♂️
77f218be No.3759119
>>3759112parlor and bluesky are the literal same thing. btw say good bye to all the lulzians that get deported. yay
fb079de7 No.3759121
>>3759117The national guard was founded in 1636 and spread across America.
From the beginning states have always maintained a local military force controlled by the state government simply because it was impossible to move a large military force very fast in the old days. You needed a local force to respond quickly. They didn't have airplanes and highways full of troop transport vehicles.
d0ad7c48 No.3759127
>>3759126Real life Puppet Master porn stars
796f77d3 No.3759139
>>3759138Pedophiles protect pedophiles
d0ad7c48 No.3759141
>>3759139LEAVE BRITTNEY ALONE
JUST LEAVE HER ALONE
