44e78fcb No.3740694
Should there be a seperate thread for Ai /pol/ or to be kept in a single thread here
https://lulz.net/furi/res/3724971.html 44e78fcb No.3740695
/Pol/ Thread humans only
/Aipol/ Ask ChatGPT about politics edition
Does that sound fair?
fe1807ee No.3740698
>>3740690In all sincerity, how can you identify an AI post from one written by a living person? What are the tags to look for that definitely says, "This is an AI post?" It sounds more like a gaslighting of thread manipulation.
49dd5b1d No.3740700
It's just one retarded who does it. Just ban them.
>>3740698It's blatantly obvious. The AI diarrhea is nothing like what humans post like on image boards
0d79434e No.3740701
>>3740698There are patterns AI writing follows. It's very obvious once you've read enough of it, the way it segments its message, the general flow, and certain words it loves to use.
Plus it's extra obvious when one person posts a wall of text in a matter of minutes with it.
1f745de7 No.3740702
It's 3B doing it, pretty obvious.
44e78fcb No.3740704
Going archive some stuff and agree to retire from posting anything related to Ai it is contrubuting to the dead internet theory, indeed it's worse as NFTs.
a23477e3 No.3740707
Okay, imagine I buy a magic 8 ball and consult it whenever someone makes a post and reply with its random output. ChatGPT is basically a free, less random version of that. Understand why folks would be annoyed? The AI writing thread is not the problem. Replying in various threads with ChatGPT output is the problem.
>>3740706Exactly. Posting it here is not contributing. It's just noise.
8e7066ae No.3740708
Just make a self deleting self pruning thread. I think this has more of a benefit because it will centralize the bots to a specific index in which they will conform. Make larger penalties for not posting to that specific thread if one is to post ai, make it a semi-governing entity that eats itself. This will be used as canon against any real ai attacks that will occur, right now you have retard autists, tommorrow it will be their retarded autistic self-realized bots.
44e78fcb No.3740716
>>3740706What if it inspired others to ask another question? But often gets boring and it just kills the fun.
3e610585 No.3740724
Don't forget, the AI chatbots do not care about truth. They do not care about accuracy. All they do is create responses that will pass as something they were prompted to make.
See the case of the lawyer who tried to get AI to write court filings.
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/05/lawyer-cited-6-fake-cases-made-up-by-chatgpt-judge-calls-it-unprecedented/The output from the AI seemed legitimate but it was nothing but made-up bullshit.
042e1fef No.3740744
I had enough last millenium. I wrote a simple program (to test using hash table in practice) which could produce plausable looking driver based on any texts fed to it. Biblical furry porn was mildy amusing but still drivel and got old fast.
When Duck fails finding an obscure technical bit of info and I have to use Google search I find more AI drivel than facts. The generated nonsense will drown subtance if left unchecked.
6f1518fc No.3740818
>>3740814Yes, that would be 3B.
c54693bc No.3740823
>>3740698>gaslightingThis isn't e621.
fe1807ee No.3740924
Its still about deleting content on the suspicion or excuse as it may be, its AI generated. Its still silencing something that may or may not be a digital creation but since there is no empirical means of proving the content is AI generated is a slippery slope.
6f1518fc No.3740925
>>3740924Well, identifying it is kind of like some of the 80's lawmakers, when asked to define "Obscenity"…. many replied "I'll know it when I see it."
So it's kind of a gut feeling, but deep down you know you're right in your suspicions, like knowing when 3B is serial-shitposting his lies.
fe1807ee No.3740928
>>3740925So….. censorship…. on a gut reaction. Yeah, that happened in the past and it didn't turn out well for anyone.
0d79434e No.3741024
>>3740924Spam is spam.
>>3740928Censorship is based on restricting the message being conveyed. There's nothing wrong with deleting disruptive noise.
If it has a good point, fine, leave it. If it's a wall of jargon, fuckin' yeet that shit.
1c053bf1 No.3741060
Why stop there? You should shut down this entire fucking Nazi Bar that Cho0b allowed it to become through his inaction.
552732eb No.3741061
>>3741060Truth the self righteous kkk whites should be fuckin banned anywhere they go
8e7066ae No.3741073
Ai is 3b
8004df03 No.3741093
>>3741089
BOT
a16dce4e No.3741169
>>3741110
ChristLike?
Yes, some people are.
You, unfortunately are not,
and we avoid you like the plague,
which you are.
1b761716 No.3741175
>>3741169Christ kike
Like you're a kike for christ
50d23313 No.3741210
>>3741195Post more cute pictures of gay couples cuddling
44e78fcb No.3741375
"We shouldnt fear AI's intelligence, we should fear our own stupidity" Golden and on point.
44e78fcb No.3741457
>>3741456Every Mary Sue character disfigured limbs and body would make you rewire the nods to perfect the prompt's network language.
f62bd8af No.3742071
>>3742062apparently if you fuck on meth, you can have more fingers, some dude in jail said
0d79434e No.3742074
>>3742062All AI can do is replicate the patterns presented to it with no understanding of why things are the way they are or ability to think abstractly.
They're essentially digital pajeets.
bb44644d No.3742084
>>3742062Furry artists be butt-hurt.
ea6f27fd No.3742090
>>3742074So basically its like being stuck on lulz for a decade+
There hasn't been an original thought here in ages.
06d10f46 No.3742104
Pretty soon "An Artist" is just going to be someone who can add dicks and vaginas to A.I. renders and correct the number of fingers/toes. They'll be editors rather than creators.
bb44644d No.3742110
>>3742097
Well, it's composed of existing furry art. What did you expect.?
284430ef No.3742115
>>3742074you have a very closed mind
8e7066ae No.3742152
>>3742142
fof *sad clown* so hurtful. guess i will kms
d334db27 No.3742202
>>3742190On what? What are you asking?