d62678fe No.3708290
>>3708239Reni is top tier marriage material. She's beautiful in both her natural dragon form and human form.
There's no better combination than silk on scales.
d62678fe No.3708296
>>3708294Vaporeon has the sex appeal of a trout and all adult pokemon fans are severely autistic
Prove me wrong.
1eb1b4bf No.3708301
>>3708296I wonder which fish would give the best blowjobs, smallmouth bass, or largemouth bass.
d62678fe No.3708309
>>3708301Toothless catfish blowjobs
Pokemon is nothing more than an animal abuse simulator and the only adults that like pokemon are autistic.
2d808120 No.3708346
>>3708336I don't have a fursona and growing up I was always a vehement Digimon>Pokemon kid
Digimon has a plot, pokemon is a product
caefd6f3 No.3708354
>>3708346> Digimon has a plot, pokemon is a productHalf right. Pokémon is a
byproduct of mental illness.
5914ef28 No.3708375
>>3708356Why is there a 3rd eye in his crotch?
2d808120 No.3708392
>>3708373I don't get it either. If you're going to give them human junk why take away the best part?
Mutilated dicks are unappealing
17e3fe07 No.3719818
give dragons
94cc8360 No.3720810
>>3719835>>3719837What do dragons
do with all their princesses? For that matter, where can a dragon spend his treasure?
0ae750a6 No.3720899
>>3720810The age of fire book series tried to explain that. poorly. They explained the treasure thing by saying that eating certain metals made dragon's scales either harder, or prettier. The princess thing was kinda eliminated, and the explanation was that dragonesses only smell sexy when they're in heat, and human women have a similar sexy smell just in general. So basically living scented candles for horny dragons, there was even one mentioned that collected humans because he was basically a scent pervert.
Not really the best patch job for shitty historic lore, but whatever. The books are great regardless.
d3b983f6 No.3724543
Could a world war II tank kill a T-Rex?
It is highly unlikely that a World War II tank would be able to kill a Tyrannosaurus Rex (T-Rex) effectively.
While World War II tanks were designed to engage enemy vehicles and fortifications, they were not designed to combat prehistoric creatures like T-Rexes. T-Rexes were massive creatures with highly robust bodies, strong muscles, and thick bones. They were estimated to weigh around 7 to 9 tons and had extremely thick, scaled skin as a form of natural armor.
World War II tanks typically deployed armor-piercing rounds designed to penetrate the armor of other tanks. However, it is doubtful that these rounds would have been sufficient to penetrate the thick layers of skin, muscle, and bone of a T-Rex. Moreover, T-Rexes were known for their impressive strength and might have been able to flip or damage a tank with their sheer force.
Additionally, tanks from that era were not equipped with the modern technological advancements found in contemporary tanks, such as advanced targeting systems, thermal imaging, or guided missiles. This lack of advanced sensors and weaponry would have put the tank at a significant disadvantage against a fast and agile creature like a T-Rex.
Overall, considering the size, strength, and natural defenses of a T-Rex, it is highly unlikely that a World War II tank would have been able to effectively kill it.
b4efc0ac No.3724705
>>3724566I agree. Absolute poppycock.
Any canon/gun at 37mm and up with exploding munition , Armour penetrating or not, would blow a hole the size of Kansas in living tissue.
They shoot 6tons Bull elephants with ordinary rifles for gods sake,
15c38356 No.3725354
>>3724705>ordinary rifleIf a bull elephant was charging me, then I'd want at least a 4 bore rifle if not 2 bore, to get it to stop.
d3b983f6 No.3725361
>>3724543What military grade weapon would kill a T-Rex?
While it is difficult to give a definitive answer as no one can be certain about the actual vulnerabilities of a Tyrannosaurus rex, we can make some educated speculations based on their estimated size and anatomy. To potentially kill a T-Rex, one would likely need a powerful and accurate weapon capable of penetrating its thick skin and inflicting severe enough damage to vital organs.
Possible military-grade weapons that could potentially harm or kill a T-Rex include:
1. Anti-Materiel Rifles: Anti-materiel rifles such as the Barrett M82 or the .50 BMG sniper rifles are capable of firing large caliber rounds that can penetrate armored vehicles. These rifles may be able to penetrate the T-Rex's thick hide and cause significant injury.
2. Rocket Launchers: Powerful rocket launchers like the RPG-7 or AT4 could potentially cause immense damage to the T-Rex by delivering high-explosive or armor-piercing rounds. It would likely need to strike vulnerable areas like the head, heart, or major organs to have a chance at killing it.
3. Heavy Machine Guns: Mounted heavy machine guns like the M2 Browning .50 caliber machine gun fire rounds that can penetrate armored vehicles. When concentrated fire is delivered to specific areas, it could potentially inflict critical damage to the T-Rex.
It is important to note that these are theoretical suggestions, and the actual effectiveness against a T-Rex would depend on multiple factors, such as accuracy, shot placement, and the specific vulnerabilities of the dinosaur.
dcb40785 No.3741530
>>3740455How did the dinosaurs die?
There were a lot of different species of dinosaurs. Lots. And there were more and more as time went on.
Believe it or not, there is a new theory that dinosaurs began fucking other species of dinosaurs more than their own species.
This might be more fun, but it does not result in babies, to fuck outside your own species.
Eventually this is what caused them to die out.
They literally fucked themselves to death.
65dad29e No.3768122
>>3763448Anyone know what model / snapshot was used here?
fb57b898 No.3772598
>>3772592Top quality Shmorky art, that.
