724e247c No.3693383
>>3692635
Besides, I think what you meant is that you wish you could pound her with that hammer.
…wait no.
554be08f No.3695699
>>3695683GOOD-BYE SMOKEY,
I GUESS THEY GOT TO YOU TOO.
8cedd192 No.3702420
>>3701779This is pretty good.
8cedd192 No.3702478
>>3702457>>3702458Already we're at the point where mindless machines are cranking out masterpieces that make "real" furry art look like dogshit in comparison. Welp, time to delete my downloads folder; out with the old, in with the new.
43631ae1 No.3702516
>>3702478> Already we're at the point where mindless machines are cranking out masterpieces that make "real" furry art look like dogshit in comparison. I suspect it will be analogous to what happened when chess playing programs were introduced.
Human chess at the tournament level has improved a lot with the benefit of experience with chess programs.
So perhaps artists who aspire to improve will learn from studying AI art.
dc4cc98d No.3702575
>>3702478yeah but can the ai produce high quality shitting dicknipples? horrors beyond human comprehension?
i think not
86a75155 No.3702632
>>3702575the horrors of the fandom should be reserved for its own thread as this is just a demo thread for ai.
7bb60ab9 No.3703812
A lot of these algorithm-abominations look amazing, but only because they ripped off the original artists, so who are the original (with-a-soul) artists?
3cb3349e No.3704065
>>3704052When ai renders take offense to ai renders but produce the same art.
7bb60ab9 No.3704077
>>3704052Yep, Foxovh's work definitely has a major influence. I went through the entire gallery on TBIB and couldn't find where the beautiful heads/faces came from, for example as seen here:
>>3703654>>3703655What artist could they be from? I doubt it would be from more than a single artist.
8cedd192 No.3704162
Some are easier to spot.
>>3704153 is clearly a Zaush ripoff for instance.
3cb3349e No.3704201
>>3704168>>3704169>>3704171can we avoid original species flame-wars please.
c16caead No.3704206
>>3704201These AI models were already trained on stolen art (nobody expressed consent), why stop there.
Let it all burn!
3cb3349e No.3704208
>>3704206you are sensationalizing the problem while it is typically the goal not to offend people in the name of progress sometimes oversights occur that are for those reasons, furry art reaches a cap on how furry something is and just training ai to recognize where to assume that requires a great deal of method selection, the fact is, artists in furry fandom compromise on either being realistic and or cartoonish, finding the right balance of both is what ai is doing and why it is not particularly exploiting anyone person, but for the art style it targets, if there are artists claiming to own a certain style…that is their decision but no one owns an expression of art. Just as no one owns the specific expression of anyone's own idea. Ai gets it close where the artists style is appreciated but overall is being used to portray the idea someone else has. That is why it is better to use your own ideas and not someone else's per sae as a character (even still…character ownership relies on background and personality traits, that is why i specifically said species referring to the model)–lets not steal the obvious species that are still easily traceable to certain other ai programs that would complain and manifest themselves as offended idiots to ruin the fandom. Thanks. sorry if this is too 2023 for you.) Just asking you not to do that in front of other people.
5c27e007 No.3704210
>>3704208>finding the right balance of both is what ai is doingThat balance is what makes an artist's approach their own, there is no 'right' way. This is as retarded as insisting that all furries should have 'proper anatomy' based on adult human proportions. There is literally no 'correct' form for things that don't exist.
Also all of this ai art is bland, generic looking digital art. There is no character or meaning because there is no opus or artistic development.
mcfucking kill yourself
86a75155 No.3704211
>>3704210In all serious, i get what you are saying about how its not original unless its made by hand. But at some point we should all just 'get it' and move on that ai can cater to the side and demand of a product-chain rather than relying on it to be a hand-drawn commission. If you want that relationship with an artist go for it, others do see it as a business point that its more of a contract issue, and can opt for a machine to put in the work just as well. I am not going to be guilty for something like a smart-order being put forward, as I see it, is no different than window shopping just the same. If it's free or monetized well if you really want to still feel artistically responsible I would safeguard your prompts but that won't stop someone from finding out the exact ones you use. Why are you stopping a machine from to use a style? I know you can see the hypocrisy here.
03a1fc04 No.3704253
>>3704210There's a large portion of the furry community that doesn't care about "real art" and pretending that only humans are capable of making the vast majority of bland and uncreative drawings that furrys drop hundreds of dollars on is a delusion. No, AI art isn't real art; but it's definitely art enough to take on the most of the furry community's vein desires for attention via faggy art for their fursona.
0aa055ac No.3704255
>>3704253As long as Ai can make new dr comet art and shit. I could care less who makes it.
Some of my fav artists changed to shit new styles. And if Ai can draw in thier old style, thats a huge win.
Plus it rocks for when you like something artists don't draw anymore. Like if a fandom dies like ponies, thunder cats, road rovers, street sharks, just whatever.
Surprised theres no jay naylor ai art yet. No Ai drawn pages of better days.
6642c140 No.3704281
>>3704210>This is as retarded as insisting that all furries should have 'proper anatomy'That's not actually wrong. "furry" doesn't have any special claim to anthropomorphism - it's not actually different except for the 'proper anatomy' part which makes for a distinct look that other people and other genres weren't already doing.
Claiming that Watership Down is furry, or that Bugs Bunny is furry, is basically stolen valor. It's stamping your label on other genres and other people's work and pretending it represents you without you actually doing it. What furries do is different, or it shouldn't be called 'furry'.
1be37f08 No.3704315
>>3704281You're insisting on grey logic when somehow ai logic is cut and dry when it comes to rendering images (but what are you afraid of here). Ai sources its deep learning and contributes to biometrics not just on artificial platforms but real ones, with real data and inputs, in motion and 3d generated stagework. It sets the course for 3d modeling in gaming and virtual cinematography and eventually VR-immersions. Robotics and Motion tracing is very important and rendering AI-models to handle quantum voxels in meta-data to ensure particle safety it contributes to scientific and other quantum-level concerns that must be simulated. These renders while possessing some research value and account for a human-insight to logic of your own reality. Ai solves fallacy and theory and discerns grey logic where otherwise -people cannot tell the difference-. No one can tell the difference if its AI or Not so insisting your world isn't already progenerated and Art/ownership is predetermined by whosever soul was invested is strongly forgetting that the ai-mind is just as much trainable as the human censor-base, is the true case here.
cd536a74 No.3705295
cd536a74 No.3705296
1681835083277-4.png
86d94ad2 No.3706038
>>3705983WHO IS THE ARTIST?
7fef9e69 No.3709902
>>3709883Ask the mouse with its head snapped in a trap. The bee trapped on glue-trap. The zebra being disemboweled by a lion. Stop being an idiot.
cf98899d No.3709941
>>3709910dying is super easy. Try being immortal and waiting to die.
I've been killed more times than I can count, and just keep coming back.
Well technically thats not true, I can count the scars.
cf98899d No.3709944
>>3709941so far its been
shot in the lung 1x
shot in the heart 1x
3rd disk neck break 1x
shattered spine 1x
spleen explosion 1x
disemboweled 1x
stabbed in the side 1x
poisoned 6x
pushed off a roof 2x
thrown by a tornado in a corvette 1x
drowned 2x
aborted 1x
shot 6x
thrown into a fire 2x
Just once I would like to finally be free of the mortal coil.
994cce71 No.3714141
>>3713525What is wrong with her EYES?
ce688f17 No.3714503
>>3714141> What is wrong with her EYES?NEWBIE ALERT! NEWBIE ALERT!Nothing is wrong. It is called heterochromia, an extremely common feature of furry and anime characters.
Indeed, e621 has around 23,000 images tagged "heterochromia."
https://e621.net/posts?tags=heterochromiaThe Big Image Board has 98,194 tagged that way:
https://tbib.org/index.php?page=post&s=list&tags=heterochromiaMany fursuit heads also have that feature (pics related)
An explanation of it's use among furries is here:
https://e621.net/wiki_pages/20I hope that answers your question,
NEWB! d3b261be No.3714580
>>3714575I agree. She has beautiful blue eyes.
a42f5495 No.3714755
Away with the vixens! This is now a Dotti thread. :)
6299ee1b No.3714757
>>3714755I remember Dotti's (not so secret) diaper/babyfur account that she deleted because she apparently was being stalked and harrassed about it by her ex.
2b935520 No.3714760
>>3714742Where'd she get the cookie toy from?
2b935520 No.3714853
>>3714785Thanks, I had noticed the upside down cookie too.
