Does AI prefer tough, dominant poses combined with insecure expressions?
As I said in the previous soulless-AI-abortions thread, human-monkeys who type keywords into an automated collage generator that had scraped hundreds of thousands of copyrighted made by human
artworks from the Internet, are NOT "artists", they're mediocre beings doing mediocre things, pretending to be something special.
We're well into the age of mediocrity being artificially celebrated and financed/supported by mentally-ill zionists/synagogue-of-satan/etc. creatures to better destroy those who are genuinely skilled/talented/intelligent, with the end goal being total control and annihilation of God-created life.
But hey, at least one gets to remain fat and lazy and pretend they're something special for a minute or two, such as being an "AI Artist
Having said that - I must admit it's amazing how far this life/soul-replacement technology has come. A good portion of these abortions look amazing - if I had no principles or standards, I'd genuinely enjoy looking at a number of them.
Usually only a small handful of artists (from a larger pool/database) had their work ripped off to algorithmically put these soulless abortions together, and I'm still curious about their human
Fuck off, you mentally ill ass wipe.
Thanks. I have to agree with Dan >>3707579
over in the Bug Thread >>3707568
I'm actually excited for AI art and what is has to offer, but the problem here on /furi/ was the excessive posting
of it. There were dozens upon dozens of images that all looked alike being posted in multiple threads, so every thread was turning into an AI art thread. Furthermore, every single image came from Furry Diffusion (https://discord.com/invite/JKS7UttReS
); so not only had half of us seen them already, but the site was beginning to feel like an involuntary mirror of the #Showcase channel.
So what should you do instead? Maybe narrow down your posts to five or less of your favourites, even in this containment thread. That way you can show off your tastes, since posting all 20-30 variations of the same picture is redundant and just fills up the thread with discardable material more quickly.
You first, head cheese!
You don't make the rules - idiots gonna idiot anyways.
>>3708015>oh noes ai makes the art so easy to produce that it can be pumped out in amounts so massive it completely devalues the product.
Humans. Fucking hilarious.
What part of "I'm actually excited for AI art"
and "the problem here on /furi/ was the excessive posting of it"
don't you understand?
Don't you see what's happening? That sneering (you stupid humans
) "attack" came from a "bot" which wasn't able to comprehend what you were saying (being nothing more than merely a stupid algorithm/database) - that in fact you were pro
bot, and and not
For now, you are "safe" because you're still in support of constructing/entering your own prison (within your "reasonable" limits), but soon when there's no need for fakery anymore, the bots - having been programmed by zionists/penguins/synagogue-of-satan - will unleash their "hatred" for humans and in fact all life on Earth. Me being a dog won't stop "them".
But hey - as long as you only consume small amounts of poison, they won't hurt you over time, right?
>>3708015>There were dozens upon dozens of images that all looked alike being posted in multiple threads
Welcome to 2023. AI art is so easy to generate, you'll have way more than you will ever need, and no way to control the flood, because it's being done by people to saturate the market with AI generated art. The people do this because it costs them nothing, so you get generic furry smut at zero price.
Maybe you failed to comprehend the utter irony of your post. The same way you fail to understand the situation.
You're excited for something that will, by simple laws of supply and demand, make what it produces completely lacking in value. Then you have the blind stupidity to complain about exactly that happening on this board, and pretend that it's a bug and not a feature.>>3708224
Oh come on, we're furries, don't we all hate our species? This is a classic example, you have people too absorbed in creating a shortcut/easy path to get to a product to ask what the product actually is, which is a thing that copies the hard path taken by others, makes it so easy that doing it the hard way isn't worthwhile anymore, and then runs out of material to keep itself going. This is the fate of all ai systems, eventually they just starting eating their own crap and turning into nonsense.
Speaking of which, BD, I admire you only because you're a window into the outer limits of conspiracy-minded thinking of someone who doesn't know enough to self-check their bullshit. Everyone that isn't you is a 'bot' or 'satanic entity' or 'npc' and you're the only one who can save people. Even your terminology is blending together.
Supply and demand?
Excuse me, but you
started talking about those things out of nowhere. All I asked was to go easy on reposting because I don't want to scroll past a dozen blocks of redundant (READ: valueless) AI art in every thread just to get to actual drawings that depict sexy/fun ideas.
If you're still intent on misinterpreting me even after correcting you, have fun winning the argument you fabricated, I guess.
>>3708305>I don't want to scroll past a dozen blocks of redundant (READ: valueless) AI art in every thread just to get to actual drawings that depict sexy/fun ideas.
Like I said earlier the problem isn't that I'm making up arguments, it's that you're incapable of recognizing the problem even when you literally lay it out.
The ai spews this material out. More material means the bar for what you consider 'fun/sexy' is constantly being raised. So the ai is utilized to make even more product watering down what's out there, overpopulating the supply, which you now have to scroll through, desensitizing you to demand even 'funner/sexier' content that is achieved by producing an even greater amount of stuff. And all of this is produced by a prompt set that can be taken by anyone else to make their own results.
And that's what you're literally complaining about, all of the 'valueless' ai art you had to get through would have been, indiviually, considering really great pictures in the past, but because there's 20 of them now they're boring.
Meanwhile there's absolutely nothing in there reflecting an artist's intent or method or stylistic evolution, just the amalgamation of artistic methods to resemble something 'nice looking.' So you're in a neverending loop of constant desnsitization on art pieces that are boring once you've seen them because all they are is nice looking. They don't convey anything other than asthetics, and meanwhile the artists it stole from have no reason to continue to develop when an ai software can take 10 minutes to spit out what took them a lifetime to achieve.
I'm pretty fucking tired of all of the valueless AI art too.
AI art isn't raising any bars when all the images it shits out look essentially identical. 300 nearly identical AI images is worse than just posting 1 AI image because it just looks like a flood trash that buries anything good posted near it.
You are a fucking idiot. The AI art programs ARE NOT posting images on lulz.
Those are very human people who post similar AI generated images here. Similar looking images are not in any way the fault of the AI's. Humans are also drawing almost identical images and they have been for a fucking long time. All you need to do is look on Patreon and you will see artists ejaculating 30 or more almost identical images with only tiny differences between them.
You are truly fucked in the head. You really need to stop obsessing over AI programs.
If you still want to blame someone for too many similar images, here on lulz, then turn your attention to the HUMANS
who actually post them here, you stupid nutcase.
This. I'd rather shame the tasteless retards that think posting crap like >>3708985>>3708983>>3708979>>3708978
where the character has no taint, the asshole is in the completely wrong spot. Whoever is posting that shit, go outside and talk to a real woman.
It's the same thing.
Talentless people are easily impressed by AI; post everything the algorithm shits out.
Christmas in Fallout
>>3709026>If you still want to blame someone for too many similar images, here on lulz, then turn your attention to the HUMANS who actually post them here, you stupid nutcase.
Which is exactly what I started off with.
Also rich, blaming human error for the problem. Of course what we need to do is eliminate that element and just have the entire process blackboxed in an ai package. It can decide what it wants to show us without pesky human interference.
Because, again, you don't seem to understand the concept that these aren't images, they're prompts, and anyone that assembles the package can reproduce them ad infinum. There is no collating and choosing, you're free to do that but you won't stop 50 other people from just posting every single image they generate.
Also no, artists don't post the same exact 'picture' in different forms over and over again, they tend to focus on producing one 'idea' per image and then moving on. Every new piece shows something new, even with the sameface artists or the ones that draw a million OCs. It's not the same as having the same idea over and over again drawn in slightly inconsistent styles and approaches. There's no comparison.
feeldoes are awesome
Those last two are great.
I've seen them at the zoo,
they also have some REALLY BIG NUTS.
Panorama of every known 'FoxLike' character known to me (plus a few guests) having a big day of fun.
Using yiffymix21, 30+ hours of effort. Big thanks to @FinalEclipse for all the awesome LoRAs he created and @degreeze for helping me learn inpainting.
Here's a little treat for anyone who wants to watch the inpainting. I ended up inpainting just shy of 5000 images. This is about half the project, with the other half being in Krita (photoshopping) and a bit of generating other images to add. Link to video (sound warning): https://discord.com/channels/1019133813105905664/1019203625542762496/1116824254105792655
the hand look terrible, it look terrible, what happened to the good ai stuff. is it just me or is ai gettimg stupider
That's some high octane autism right there
Found a fair software to convert these down from 8mb-gifs to 2mb-mp4s to 500kb while somehow preserving quality. Thanks to Tipard (the rest of them suck). (Maybe AVS is okay but it would add a huge black windowed borderline everytime.)
Anyway here is some Ampharos. (Spent a long time on the prompt. Both male and female versions on link I will leave it up for a week or so but encourage you to make one better than what I did: https://mega.nz/file/M8YmgZaB#d-In2az_XuEpxiZrnKNTa4iIyCfgb6PUJQj-CQMgvjE
For tasteful poses. It's hit or miss alot of times. Use furryVrock30 models. Interesting note:Sometimes it renders talking or seemingly animate themselves if you can tweak it right, mostly it just shows dripping/melting (yes even for that perverted stuff). I'd suggest changing artists or species but it doesn't usually even matter.
one anim is broketed because i skipt it and i dont care lol.
Still weird AI cannot figure out fingers and toes.
I'm brewing up my boner!!
The A.I. turned these out super well. Probably gonna iterate more with vulpera and find a few more exceptional examples to add to this series. Hope someone is enjoying these.
I ended up doing a few hundred of these guys and landed on a few that I felt were really exceptional. The way this model does fur is awesome.
Some Of The Commands:
natural lighting, detailed background, sports background, detailed, hi res, 4k, absurd res, shaded, sharp focus, smooth, depth of view, outdoors, inside room, normal proportioned penis, extra big penis, jungle, animal genitalia, humanoid penis, ADDCOMM
(full body:1.4), fox, wolf, male, mammal, reptile, dinosaur, vore, satisfied vore, reclining, smiling, arms behind head, realistic look, adult, small, innocent, skinny, tease, teasing, presenting, looking at viewer, ass, anus, balls, ADDCOL
(full body:1.4), male, adult, tall, innocent, skinny, tease, teasing, presenting, looking at viewer, ejaculation, orgasm face, <lora:Furtastic_Detailer:0.8>, <lora:more_details:0.4>
Negative prompt: yellow eyes, ribcage, featureless, multiple anus, sketch, simple background, bad anatomy, bad hands, malformed hands, deformed limbs, blurry, cropped, cross-eyed, extra arms, speech bubble, extra legs, extra limbs, bad proportions, missing fingers, missing legs, poorly drawn hands, signature, text, bad feet, watermark, flat background, anal, anal sex, ugly, bad legs, badhandv4, easynegative, no tail, bwu, dfc, ubbp, updn,
CFG scale: 8,
Face restoration: GFPGAN,
Model hash: 18202d0ba2,
Denoising strength: 0.5,
Hands that look like hands. Witchcraft.
And INCREDIBLY tiny display monitors.
some fat computer nerd took all the large ones
said he needed them to do frontend development
AI business dogs… nothing
is sacred to this (((abomination))).
Hey, I was thinking, if human peters and canine peters can easily do this, why not horse peters?
They probably can, you just don't see it because everyone seems to want to go to it from the front.
Some of the A.I. Commands I added to get this output were such things as Equine, Horse, Quadruped, Feral, rear view, backsack, penis pointing backwards, equine penis….
All hail the new and improved Business Dog! You remember the old, antisemitic Business Dog. (Boo!) Now he fetches for the chosen tribe and programs their soul enslavement machines! (Yay!)
Really starting to love the Fenris model on civitai https://civitai.com/models/114793
It spits out some very pretty animals
The original will always remain the best.>>3711812
That is not
a good thing.
You guys are just hurting yourselves by investing energy into the things that will replace you. Have some self-worth, and if you're not "worth" very much, then investing in yourselves will raise that worth.
A lot of these abominations really do look amazing, but they're soulless hollow counterfeits of expressions (in the form of creativity and other soul-derived works) of God's creations (life/love/spirit/etc.).
This is what satan and his dumb followers have been trying to do since the beginning of time - to counterfeit God and His creations. They know they can't create anything worthwhile themselves, are racked with jealousy/envy, and so they just steal and counterfeit and destroy the originals. How much more petty and small can one get?
no, they look bad, can't fap to them
>>3712150> for every one of these exceptional pieces I post, there are literally hundreds generated that are fucked up
Having more constraints on the output increases your processing time exponentially, because the results are generated at random and it becomes increasingly improbable that all your demands are being met at the same time. Beyond a point, you're just not going to get any results because the probability of getting a good picture that meets your expectation is one in a billion chance.
That's just how this kind of generative AI works.
I'm constantly trying to improve, by, among other things, adding more resolution and processing power.
Please, if you would, tell me in what ways they look bad to you, and I will try to address those issues.
I can't determine it myself.
You're getting into territory that only zoophiles like. Furries need to be more cartoony to be attractive.
Look into learning how to use controlnet, inpainting and comfyui to give you more control of the final image.
It's faster to iterate on and retouch a flawed picture you like than trying to cherrypick a perfect image from thousands of txt2img outputs.
>>3712162>>3712150>>You're getting into territory that only zoophiles like. Furries need to be more cartoony to be attractive.
It would only be bestiality or zoophilia if they were NOT INTELLIGENT…. which they OBVIOUSLY ARE.
Otherwise, isn't that being racist (for want of a better word), or discriminatory, or xenophobic?
Or all those things?
that piece used to be as iconic (in a honest or unapolegetic way as to play on frontier values) but now all i see is a soyjack and a karen pissed about their wifi.
Neither of those hideous abomination are making human expressions.
>>3712174>It would only be bestiality or zoophilia if they were NOT INTELLIGENT
Nope. Zoophiles regularly excuse themselves by saying that the "animal can consent", which means they should be intelligent.
Yes. It is so. Animals don't normally make faces like people do - it's just a coincidence that some dog has a funny expression.
>>Neither of those hideous abomination are making human expressions.
That's even better.
>>Yes. It is so. Animals don't normally make faces like people do - it's just a coincidence that some dog has a funny expression.
That's not even the SAME DOG in both pictures…. look at the noses and other markings.
>>Nope. Zoophiles regularly excuse themselves by saying that the "animal can consent", which means they should be intelligent.
Now you're making excuses for people having sex with dumb animals, which is not the same thing, and was not the argument.
Don't kid yourself, EVERYONE who is into feral porn wants to fuck literal animals despite how much they attempt to hide it by claiming they are only into art depicting "intelligent" ferals. It's the same as pedophiles denying that they're pedophiles and on beat off to loli/cub
what the fuck is this website, it reads like ai generated drivel
>>3712302>>what the fuck is this website, it reads like ai generated drivel
Is that so?
>Now you're making excuses for people having sex with dumb animals, which is not the same thing, and was not the argument.
Yes it is. If you're drooling over non-intelligent animals that can't consent, you're already committing statutory rape in your mind. That's why zoophiles have make believe that animals can consent (are intelligent) to avoid the cognitive dissonance AND the negative social stigma for when people find out they're zoophiles and fantasize about raping dumb animals.
Ergo, furry ferals = zoophilia. There's no practical difference.
grow up, black-and-white teenager
feralfuckers and zoosexuals are different subcultures
e.g. i dont like fapping to ferals and i dont understand hypocrisy of feralfuckers but i fuck my dogwife and i am zoosexual and like real-life photos of dog cookies
comparing zoosexuals and ferals more like comparing anime girls and real-life whores
fair enough but there is an overlapping population of people who jerk off to anime while also fucking real girls if they get the chance
just like there is a substantial overlap of people who both enjoy dogfucking and feral fantasy stuff
>>3712450>I'm a proud dog diddler but how dare you associate feralfaggotry with animal fucking
What the fuck are you even trying to say?
Positive prompt: (solo, rear view, presenting, ass up), feral, (gryphon:1.4, griffon), corvid, crow head, crow, (crow beak:1.2, long beak:1.3), (crow front legs), (shoulder wings, back wings), pantherine, panther rear, panther tail, panther rear legs, black body, 1tail, raised tail, detailed amber eyes, detailed feathers, detailed fluffy fur, (detailed plains background, wooden fence, farm), (detailed anus:1.25, detailed feline penis:1.1, penile spines), black balls, (precum, precum drip), (sparkling amber eyes, detailed round black pupil, looking at viewer), detailed feathers, detailed sleek fur, (detailed green grass background, flowers), fluffy tail, (penis focus),
by jackrow, by totesfleisch8, by inno-sjoa, by xenoforge, by sefeiren, by falcrus, by cannibalistic tendencies, by rollwulf, by jellyntical
highly detailed, smooth, (masterpiece:1.3), (best quality:1.4), (ultra highres:1.2), HDR, 8k resolution, detailed fur:1.1, detailed shading, perfect lighting, natural lighting, ultradetailed,light behind viewer,
Negative prompt: boring_e621_v4 easynegative ng_deepnegative_v1_75t, (cub, young, chibi:1.5), stripes, gaping, gaping anus, scared, (tufted tail:1.3, tail feathers, bat wings), yellow beak, spots, spotted markings, leopard spots
Steps: 75, Sampler: uniPC, CFG scale: 6, Size: 960x576, Model: furryrock_V60, lora: add_detail weight at 0.7