b2897bb8 No.3628847
were going on a screaming opossum walk now be a good boy and were both scream at the sun while pissing pure anger.
30bb3af7 No.3628849
>>3628841Yeah no,…I dont speak "fatso"…
987a2bbf No.3628851
>>3628849muh culture mufugga
muh dick
b2897bb8 No.3628857
take the fresh opossum puss and just inhale it in, it'll be alright
c16da350 No.3628861
>>3628857>Opossum cloacaFixed
14d521ec No.3631091
>>3631086probably over thinking possums
f01767b5 No.3641386
>>3641383>.webpI fucking hate that shit. Does it even save them bandwith?
8d295825 No.3641388
>>3641386It does.
Beware of trying to get information about webp at Wikipedia, however. The webp related articles there are controlled by a cabal of anti Google fanatics. Those articles are biased and contain unverifiable misinformation.
9a06fdac No.3641420
>>3641388Marginally, at the expense of destroying the image for any re-use since it forces half the spatial resolution for the color information and leads to massive generation loss artifacts.
9513edac No.3641423
>>3641420Wouldn't it also use more bandwidth and consume more resources on the server side in order to check if the browser is compatible with .webp, then have to compress the image into a .webp, then send that .webp instead of just sending the fucking .jpg that's only 100kb larger and isn't fucked by compression?
We aren't talking about the difference between . FLAC and low bitrate .mp3 here
9a06fdac No.3641472
>>3641423It's a format that is designed by Google to serve up millions of small thumbnails and preview pictures of content. They know already whether your browser supports it because they track you.
9513edac No.3641477
>>3641472I figure it's Google planning to use it for consoomer web 2.0 shit and bloatware. They aren't just using it for thumbnails. If Google's pushing it it can't be for a good reason. It's probably so they can forcefeed you more ads at a lower cost.
At least there's Bing if you need a search engine that won't try to indoctrinate you.
4c2c922c No.3641549
>>3641420No one gives a shit, no one except the anti Google fanatics who criticize everything Google is involved with.
Lossy image files are NOT intended to be loaded in image software, modified and then saved back out. That is what lossless image files are for. If you had permission from the image copyright holder to modify his image then it would be simple to obtain the image in lossless format.
Don't forget that webp ALSO has a lossless format too.
46d3fb70 No.3641561
>>3641472> They know already whether your browser supports it because they track you.False. They know because every time your browser requests a webpage it sends a request header that tells the server the type of things the browser accepts:
https://www.iplocation.net/http-browser-header 058483bc No.3641626
>>3641549>Lossy image files are NOT intended to be loaded in image software, modified and then saved back out. Nothing says you can't. With high quality JPEGs, the generation loss is negligible over several hundred repeats and it's smaller than the same content in lossless encoding, so everybody's going to use it anyways. Only idiots upload PNGs because "hurrdurr lossless" when it doesn't matter. Meanwhile, the problem with WepP is that it's TOO LOSSY by the forced 4:2:0 subsampling of the VP8 codec instead of 4:2:0, 4:2:2, and 4:4:4 available for JPEG.
The way it works, first you throw away (or not) some of the original image information by subsampling, then you do a DCT transform, then you quantize the DCT coefficients and throw away the really small ones. Only the last part is necessarily lossy with JPEG, whereas WebP's VP8 is always lossy at the first step AND the last step. In other words, WebP compares to the worst quality range of JPEG encoding because there are very few high frequency DCT coefficients to remove after the information has been destroyed by in the first step. That's the sole reason why it gets smaller file sizes.
>Don't forget that webp ALSO has a lossless format too.Which is ill supported by anything, and nobody uses it. It just generates big files for no practical benefit, and it requires extra trouble to implement because it's actually a whole different format under the same name. The JPEG standard also has one, but nobody uses it, for the same reasons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lossless_JPEG 058483bc No.3641629
Also, the reason why color subsampling with photographic content is often fine for JPEG and WebP - at least when working at the original resolution of the file- is because cameras do not actually have full color resolution. The sensor has what's called a "Bayer filter" which doesn't record all three colors for every pixel, but alternates the color of every pixel in a special pattern, and the camera then averages the data over multiple pixels. In this case it's fine to subsample because the information is mostly redundant anyways.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayer_filterOnce you downscale the image for web publishing, you can't subsample the color information anymore or else it turns into a muddy mess. In JPEG this turns out worse because the compression works in blocks of 8x8 pixels and the artifacts make the image visibly "blocky" and distorted at low quality settings. WebP uses 4x4 pixel blocks so the artifacts it generates are smaller and harder to spot. This is why WebP can generate visually "equal" files at smaller sizes - you have to crank the JPEG quality up higher to get rid of the block artifacts, but then you actually have much more information preserved in the image than the WebP counterpart has.
058483bc No.3641635
Then there's the third point that an image compression format should not be lossy and lossless in the same container. Was that old file you saved in WebP lossy or lossless? Do you remember? Is the image you just downloaded lossy or lossless? You can't tell without poking at it with some special software. JPEG and PNG are a good pair because you can't confuse them. One format for one type of use cases.
The only problem is that PNG can also be indexed OR true color and some encoders can use lossy algorithms (similar to subsampling) to improve the file size, and people just don't know how to use these features correctly when they should or should not apply. They end up either raping the image or making it needlessly big for no benefit to anyone.
In other words, unless you know exactly what you're doing, just use JPEG.
9513edac No.3641730
>>3641713They should be screaming at a possum ass
6f550493 No.3642008
>>3641989You literally CAN just pick possums up that are in your yard, I wouldn't recommend doing it by the way in the picture tho, but rather by their thick ropelike tail, as they CAN bite, but they usually don't try very hard. Even if they do, you shouldn't even need to get rabies shots (there is a reason why). When they get picked up by the tail, they just hang there by it, and might wobble a little, but they are pretty easy to put in a box with a top and take away somewhere else. DO NOT try this with a raccoon, they are TOTALLY DIFFERENT about this kind of thing and you will quickly wish you hadn't.
c6a8b4d5 No.3649409
>>3649408well since the pussy is touching the balls, its not gay
085287ad No.3654923
Rats are better than opossums
Prove me wrong
e6a9fc1e No.3654926
>>3654923Steam is literally the human version of Ratagan, and no one sane would put their dick near Steam.
But mice are nice, prove me wrong.
159c9a55 No.3656001
>>3656000Protogens are just the new sparkledog versions of sergals
They're literally just dumb sergals with a stupid robot face for zoomers
5235a293 No.3656009
>>3656001they got some nasty viruses tho
119e38c5 No.3656011
>>3656010
stealth posting i hope you get botted
119e38c5 No.3656013
>>3656012i'd rather fuck a virus
71d1d7dc No.3656077
>>3656034not going to lie, i like that
71d1d7dc No.3658140
>>3658031nullos are my bestest fetish
03ca0914 No.3658145
>>3658143Too much pudge lol.
9d0f934e No.3658155
>>3658145Fatties are fucking gross.
71d1d7dc No.3658165
>>3658155>>3658145that isn't even fat, that's just cuddlable.
03ca0914 No.3658166
>>3658165Lol I was just joking I just wanted to see how many people would start screaming about fatties lol
95b37098 No.3658196
>>3658031Is there a clean version of that pic without the caption?
ebc73700 No.3659062
>>3659050>>3659051Curious what method was used to remove it
50db5132 No.3663544
>>3661150You are your friend?
4ebc2eba No.3664553
>>3664548She scream at own cooch when she period
4ebc2eba No.3664561
>>3664557that right pic would look a lot better if the artist did the tail a bit different. Maybe added a bit of a dock or something
119e38c5 No.3664588
>>3659051you missed a spot
1ad57ceb No.3669696
>>https://lulz.net/furi/src/1663647985494.jpgThose are actually some really nice hind feetpaws.
3b7fa77f No.3683686
>>3673004Sounds like someone else we know.
ddd2bf73 No.3692676
>>3692543Wrong
There is no better watch than this legend
ddd2bf73 No.3692812
>>3692787It's also heavier and bulkier
ce64fde5 No.3692815
>>3692676I had one of those when I was in college and basic training. I have much more expensive fancier ones from Rolex and Diesel now, but as far as ease of use and versatility goes, my casio was the best watch I've ever owned.
I only bought one because back in basic training it was basically the only watch they'd let you wear. Then I was like "meh" its not like you're trying to be fancy wearing ABU's.
Now that I dress to impress, I'm more concerned with how the watch compliments my outfit than its actual value as a time piece.
ce64fde5 No.3692831
>>3692812My dad likes heavy watches, personally I like light weight ones that you can forget you are wearing.
Most of my outfits are Calvin Klein, so very silky and easy to forget. Its distracting when everything you wear feels breezy but then you have this heavy ass Rolex on your wrist.
ce64fde5 No.3692849
>>3692831Most people don't know this, but Rolex's as expensive as they are leave a lot to be desired when it comes to custom-ability of the band. Both my Rolex's are loose and kinda shit, the smaller linked bands offered from companies like Diesel are a lot more customizable.
I can't think of any way to really build up my wrist, so I guess Rolex is either it fits or it does not. Rolex does not fit me.
I could probably get a half link special ordered, but I don't really want to spend 600 dollars on something like that.
ce64fde5 No.3692866
>>3692861a Rolex has no thicker glass than a regular watch. Trust me I shattered one with my wrist
As long as you don't go around deflecting punches with wrist turns, you have nothing to worry about.
ce64fde5 No.3692870
Nothing says lube, like a dragon dribbling pre all over your cock like a faucet.
ddd2bf73 No.3692930
>>3692861If you want more functionality than just "what time is it" then I'd rather just use a smart phone when necessary as opposed to carrying a brick on my wrist all the time.
Watches worn as jewelry are just that. Fucking jewelry. They're they very definition of Veblen goods. Might as well carry around an empty designer purse to go with it.
987a2bbf No.3692935
>>3692930I don't see why it being big is such a problem. It isn't heavy either, why are you all acting like this thing weighs significantly more than a terrorist watch? And yeah, I could pull out a smartphone to check the time, except when I'm working. Then it is really nice to have a timer for certain processes, and being able to see the time when my hands are dirty/oily makes it worth it.
I don't buy expensive watches either. My gold Seiko was passed down to me from a family member.
ce64fde5 No.3692941
>>3692935I only wear my diesels or my rolexs when I'm dressed up.
My normal watch is a fitbit charge 5
ce64fde5 No.3692943
>>3692941really I only use my laptop for when the power goes out, or if I get super drunk and soak the motherboard in mike's hard lemonade.
The only thing i carry in my messenger bag are psychology text books and my weird teeny tiny amazon fire laptop thing that I only use to write reports.
ddd2bf73 No.3692947
>>3692943I've lost count of the number of keyboard and mice I've killed with spilt beers. I've learned to always keep a spare or two around
>mike's hard lemonadeGross either buy cheap vodka + mixer or a four Loko if you want a shitty alcopop.
ce64fde5 No.3692954
>>3692950I actually prefer arnold palmer spiked Iced tea as a chaser, but mike's is just way more available.
I actually asked my liquor store of choice if I could just buy an entire shipment of vodka and spiked tea for myself, but they were like… no.
Even my aunt who owns a bar told me that she wont sell me an entire shipment of vodka.
17e0d36d No.3692971
>>3692947> I've lost count of the number of keyboard and mice I've killed with spilt beersIt's too bad the original KeyTronic company went out of business. They had a patented method for making their keyboards immune to spills.
I bought one of the new KeyTronic keyboards but sadly it lacks the spill proofing. I guess the Asian company that now owns the name was too cheap to buy the rights to the patent.
2b4284ec No.3693005
one time I drank brawndo, and I crushed a human skull with my bear hands. Then ripped a tree out of the toilet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tbxq0IDqD04 2b4284ec No.3693006
>>3693005They were literally bear hands, my arms became individual bears.
343f118a No.3694976
>>3694641Tube amps are cool.
That's kinda smol tho.
987a2bbf No.3695046
>>3694976>kinda smallVery small. 5 watts. It sounds really good maxed out. It also has a 1/4" line out connection. Plus they're discontinued, so I get to be a hipster about it.
ce64fde5 No.3695529
>>3695046smol is good. I had a really shit situation when I was in band min middle/high school. I played the tennor sax. My band instructors wanted me to practice, my dad would attack me if i practiced at home, I had a gun pulled on me when I tried to drive my chevy tiara van to the woods to practice, and the school refused to let me stay on the grounds to practice. I quit, no more sax for me.
I can play a number of other instruments. The guitar, violin, cello, banjo (kinda), and a keyboard piano. I just have them all hooked into my computer and my computer hooked into a headset.
All my music is silent to everyone. Everything I do is silent, unseen, unheard, and in the dark.
f590b7e8 No.3695534
>>3695046>discontinuedThat's a +15 to fuckin' cool, increases by +1 each year. All self-respecting pros use tubes, that pic I posted is all tube-driven.
A guy I know fished a 20w Hughes-&-Kettner tube amp that somebody threw away out of his apartment's garbage dumpster. It only needed a new fuse or something and then worked fine, meanwhile used ones still trade for about $900. I was jelly.
