>>3619573Hmmm, I was thinking of mentioning that. But thought better of it because she didn't create the character.
Now that you mention it, she has no excuse for drawing a walking stereotype on model and not getting a clue that
by her own standards that might be a tiny bit racist. And then going on a big fucking rant how a kids costume is racist cause the tattoo sleeves were skin tone and not transparent. Probably an oversight or a printer limitation, not the company's desire to be racist.
It's like a leftist unironically drawing happy merchant memes and acting surprised when people say "you know, that's kinda racist and hypocritical".
And of course the costume got already revised/taken down by the time she wrote the journal cause we live in the age of the age of the internet complainer, but she was basically complaining
that it stayed on for more than a microsecond. Why take it down at this point anyway if these people are still gonna be mad about it?
