38d68595 No.3675808
>>3675807I hope 2030 won't be intel/apple only. And pay to use windows.
And windows that deletes files you have microsoft/gov don't like you having. Because I swear I feel like files disappear and also that firefox deletes bookmarks sometimes.
I'm sure a lot of people want nothing to be on people's pcs and everything in "The cloud".
68108940 No.3680137
There are some accounts and suggestions of Tutoring Ai on how it would teach itself on how to draw what if you could apply Ai with 5 senses touch, smell, taste feel and sight?
80ce1b3f No.3685015
>>3685014I wanna tongue that buck's butt
62a98f5b No.3685556
>>3684807Yeah, the only problem is that the Industry 4.0 thing was kind-of a flop and they're still trying to implement it.
People are spending money collecting data from processes, but nobody really knows what to do with it. IoT makes a lot of money though, so the most noticeable outcome is another dot-com bubble that is slowly inflating as we speak. There wasn't any "revolution" and nothing is really getting done in a different way as of yet.
62a98f5b No.3685557
>>3685458What do you mean, make a copy?
You could go to the factory that made your car and copy yourself infinite spare parts.
6e37cade No.3687508
Two research groups in the US were able to stop mice from getting old by fixing their DNA.
In a recent study published in Cell on Jan. 12, Harvard scientists showed that they could manipulate and reverse the aging process in mice by generating DNA repairs.
The results of a 13-year, international study show for the first time that breakdown in epigenetic information accelerates aging in mice and that repairing the epigenome can reverse those signs of aging.
“For about the past 50 years, popular theory has held that the process of aging is caused in large part by an accumulation of mutation. There’s growing evidence, however, that aging has a significant epigenetic component. That is, the process by which stretches of DNA or the genes are turned on and off,” said the paper’s senior author, David Sinclair, professor of genetics at the Blavatnik Institute at Harvard Medical School and co-director of the Paul F. Glenn Center for Biology of Aging Research.
“My colleagues and I believe that not only are epigenetic changes are the primary cause of aging, but that these changes are driven by the ongoing process of DNA breakage and repair,” he continued.
“We believe ours is the first study to show epigenetic change as a primary driver of aging in mammals,” Sinclair said.
Researchers at Harvard said they wanted to test their findings on larger mammals and, eventually, on people.
“First, the results need to be replicated in larger mammals and in humans. Studies in nonhuman primates are currently underway,” Harvard said in a statement.
“We hope these results are seen as a turning point in our ability to control aging,” said Sinclair. “This is the first study showing that we can have precise control of the biological age of a complex animal; that we can drive it forwards and backwards at will.”
FULL ARTICLE AND VIDEO ARE HERE:
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/01/scientists-successfully-reversed-signs-aging-mice-first-time/ 8c0a8f12 No.3688402
>>3688394I believe it was Isaac Asimov who wrote an essay about trying to predict the future. His paper showed that change is not linear, but exponential.
The result is that things change much more slowly in the near future then people would have imagined but far future changes are more extreme than most people could ever predict.
68108940 No.3688406
>>3688402There's going to be a nuclear power reliance, the next industrial power revolution in year 2500 as fossil fuels run low, water crisis could be another factor that plays a role as long science does not get washed humanity lives longer.
We could use fossil fuels for creating materials rather than burning it into the atmosphere.
f216fb98 No.3688413
In my opinion, this is one of the greatest sci-fi movies ever made that gets little mention today.
The only man in the world with the secret to permanent sub-miniaturization is felled by an assassination attempt. A crew and mini-submarine are shrunken down to the size of bacteria and injected into his body to try and repair the damage to his brain. They have ONE HOUR to do the job and get out or they will start to enlarge, killing him. Along the way they are forced to take detours thru the heart, lungs, and other organs and time is running out.
This is the ending scene. The special effects throughout the movie were considered spectacular before their time (before CGI).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPYBInU3qpM 8c0a8f12 No.3688418
>>3688406> We could use fossil fuels for creating materialsLike we have been doing all along since the beginning of the 20th century? i.e.
PLASTICS> rather than burning it into the atmosphere.I have a better idea. Let's do both.
3f7b82d4 No.3688438
>>3688427> What Happens to Garbage in JapanThere is an ignorant superstition in the US that incinerating trash makes dioxins which cause cancer. Most trash in Japan is incinerated and
japs have a lower cancer rate than do Americans. Positive proof that dioxin prevents cancer, not causes it.
3e104fbb No.3688449
>>3688448Good Dog , K-9 !
7cb99cda No.3688520
Why didn't somebody think of this before??
To free people from traffic, dozens of companies are designing vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) vehicles that could quickly fly passengers across cities. Like helicopters, most of the VTOLs under development rely on propellers to produce the thrust needed for flight, which can be noisy. One startup's "fluidic propulsion system" uses compressed air and is therefore much quieter.
FULL ARTICLE HERE:
https://bigthink.com/the-future/jetoptera-flying-car-bladeless-vtol/ d3ecfa08 No.3688542
>>3688520so it compresses air and then spits it out which is easier but actually less reliable and requires just as much maintenence as any other jet engine. okie and still requires alot of energy to do it and make sure it remains stable the entire time it runs on its own reserves, garunteed not to go haywire…thats the catch though.
7af57795 No.3688630
>>3688520>Why didn't somebody think of this before??It's the exact same design as the Moller Skycar from the 90's - they're only adding the "coanda effect" bullshit thruster on top.
So far, no full scale flying demonstrator exists. They claim to produce one by 2025. You can build RC scale models of the thruster that will fly by the sheer power density of a ducted RC plane fan, because the thrust-to-mass ratio of an airplane doesn't scale linearly so what they have already is no indicator that any of that stuff even works.
Designs aped from Moller who was an investment scammer with no intention to produce actual flying aircraft, with bullshit about the Coanda effect that is not actually a very strong effect and breaks up easily at larger scales, spells that this thing too is an investment scam built around a bullshit vehicle that will never exist.
7af57795 No.3688632
>>3688630In fact, a "bladeless fan" or an air multiplier they're proposing is less efficient than simply running a ducted fan in free air - because it is a ducted fan with a constricting nozzle stuck to it. The duct-work and nozzle presents a flow restriction that increases the exhaust pressure and part of that energy goes into raising the temperature of the gas, which is useful mechanical work turned into heat.
The Dyson bladeless fan too is just a gimmick that moves less air for the same input power. Its real point is that the actual fan motor runs so fast you can't hear the high-pitched whine.
7af57795 No.3688636
The trick is, if you make a 1/4 model of an airplane, square law scaling means it requires 1/8th the lift to fly. Make it small enough and you don't need any aerodynamics or even proper wings - just stick a propeller or a fan in it and it will fly, which is what many RC model planes actually do.
Why companies like Honeywell may be interested in this even though the design won't scale up from a model airplane is actually similar to what Dyson does with their fans. A gas turbine fan inside the body is shielded from infrared cameras and heat seeking anti-aircraft weapons, and the nozzle system keeps the noise in: it's a good stealth military drone.
7af57795 No.3688638
>>3688402>far future changes are more extreme than most people could ever predict.Technology advances at the pace the society is able to integrate it and make positive returns with it. Nobody just builds it for no reason, for the sake of itself.
That means technology seems to advance at an exponential pace while the society, population and economy, is growing at an exponential pace. The society grows exponentially because the resource inputs, energy and materials, increase faster than consumption. Technology increases the ability to consume resources, which keeps the society growing, which keeps the technology advancing, but do you notice where it stops? When the resources stop growing. That's where the technology curve goes flat line because it can no longer help people utilize more resources that aren't available.
In human history, there have been several revolutions that have caused a step-increase in the availability of resources to the point that we've had enough "headroom" to maintain exponential growth until the next revolution. The agricultural revolution, the industrial revolution, fossil fuels, all have increased the availability of stuff to consume. In order to maintain these "extreme changes" in the future, as demanded by the exponential theory, we should be having another revolution in resources availability right about now, - but actually we're hitting against the limits of our planet to provide us with any more. We've actually exceeded it and now heading for a decline because of over-population eating all the resources. There won't be any "singularity" - people soon have to scale back with technology because we can't afford it any more.
e9401416 No.3691636
>>3691601I had a chair that had that kind of cheap pleather finish. Pretty sure anyone with ovaries who stood within 10 feet of it would have gotten pregnant by the time I threw it out.
The fabric was basically only held together by a mixture of dried lube and cum.
1a71a98d No.3691909
The answer commonly given to the question, "Why can't we travel faster than the speed of light?" involves the mass of objects becoming infinitely large. That answer is fine, but there's a better one. Space and time are unified into a single entity known as spacetime. And every object travels through spacetime at the speed of light.
AND HERE'S THE PART THEY DON'T TEACH YOU IN SCHOOL AND THAT YOU PROBABLY NEVER CONSIDERED YOURSELF: Even a STATIONARY object is moving at the speed of light, BUT IT IS MOVING ONLY THROUGH TIME AND NOT SPACE.
Objects move in spacetime at the speed of light. A stationary object isn’t moving through space at all, so the object is moving through time at the speed of light. Furthermore, an object moving through space at the speed of light has no speed left over to move through time.
Thus, the absolute maximum speed an object could move through space or time individually is also the speed of light. Note that this idea also explains the weird features of relativity, like time slowing down for an object as its speed gets faster and faster. An object traveling more through space is traveling less through time.
The reason that it is hard to travel through space at the speed of light is that you must push the object out of moving in the time direction to moving more in the space direction. And that turns out to be difficult…..
READ FULL ARTICLE HERE:
https://bigthink.com/hard-science/real-reason-faster-than-light-speed-spacetime/
