Just because you are 'cured' doesn't meant you are already free from the virus, he likely still positive for covid and likely a covid carrier himself. Removing the mask just to show off as a cheap publicity is stupid.
Who cares really?
>>3590908>>who cares really?
Only 3B, apparently.
Keep in mind, always, that Herman Cain took over a month to die.
But like Cain, if Trump does perish, he will most likely still be able to Tweet.
Thousands of anti-Trump teens on TikTok got served by the Staten Island, New York, GOP last week when the teens tried to hoard online tickets to a rally they had no plans on showing up to.
The teens had a rude awakening when the GOP attached a non-refundable $5 fee to the sign-up form, enabling those out-of-staters with no intention of going to the rally to donate $16,000 to the Staten Island GOP, the New York Post reported.
On September 19, out-of-state voters using lewd names began signing up for the free get-out-the-vote event called the “TRiUMPh Rally.”
“We had about 1,500 RSVPs from Staten Islanders. Then all of a sudden we started seeing the numbers tick up to 10,000, 15,000, 75,000,” Staten Island GOP chairman Brendan Lantry told the Post. “We knew something was not right.”
Lantry’s wife, Jessica, who uses TikTok, traced the sign-ups to a clip posted by a 19-year-old Brooklyn native called Felisrae.
“Do you hate this orange bitch as much as I do?” the teen asks in a 51-second video, according to the Post. “It turns out that Trump is having a rally in Staten Island.”
“So what I did was, I reserved myself two seats. But I’m pretty sure that I have something to do that day,” she says gleefully. “So, do what you want with this information.”
The video, which has now been set to private, initially racked up 523,000 views and 153,000 likes. The amount of attention spurred adults to spread the word and take action.
As what happened with the Tulsa, Oklahoma, rally, the trolls’ goal was to take as many tickets as possible so the event would become a sea of no-shows.
So to deter the pranksters, Lantry added a $5 non-refundable fee to the sign-ups.
But the registrations kept pouring in from places such as Chicago, Colorado, California, and Houston, according to Lantry.
By the time the October 3 rally began, the anti-Trump teens shelled out $15,785 to buy 3,000 vouchers they did not intend to use.
The open-air, non-seated event drew 2,500 locals who filmed a get well message for President Donald Trump as he recuperated from the coronavirus.
A) This isn't true.
B) If it was true, attaching hidden fees like this would be a crime.
C) It would be immediately refunded by the banks and credit cards as fraud.
Once again, you prove you'll believe any crazy conspiracy theory you read.
Here's another actual conspiracy for you!
Republicans working for the California GOP have constructed and distributed fake ballot drop-boxes and are advertising for people to use them even though it's a felony! https://www.commondreams.org/news/2020/10/12/appalling-criminal-conduct-california-gop-accused-operating-fake-official-ballot
Why would they want to stop people from voting in California? Gee… let me think… who is most likely to lose California bigly? Bet it isn't Biden!
Dude, i'm tired of looking up alternate and liberal news sources for every Brietbart article posted here just to prove to you it isn't something Brietbart made up, look the alternate links up your fucking self.
A) It is true.
B) If it true and it's not a crime the way it was done, read the article again.
C) They are legitimate transactions and the bank will not be refunding them. Do you know why?
D) The pranksters have done it once before, in Tulsa, Oklahoma, in June. Trump owned them this time.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/21/style/tiktok-trump-rally-tulsa.html
That being said, all brainwashed Tik-Tok Teens need to fuck off and die.
It very well may be false, it's not the first time newspaper report bullshit and hoaxes.
Please point us to the article you read that debunks it.
"No!!! You cannot use our own tactics against us! It's not fair!!!" Commie crybully scum…
California Republicans are defending their use of ballot “drop boxes” as a legal form of “ballot harvesting” after California’s Democratic state election officials sent them a cease-and-desist letter demanding that they stop using them.
On Sunday evening, the Orange County Register reported that unsanctioned ballot drop-off boxes — many of them marked “official” — were appearing throughout the state, often at “local political party offices, candidate headquarters and churches.”
Jordan Tygh, a regional field director for the California Republican Party is directing voters to FAKE mailin dropoff locations.
"Doing my part and voting early,” Jordan Tygh wrote in the now-deleted tweet. “DM me for convenient locations to drop your ballot off at!” pic.twitter.com/c7OUHlrWiG
— Luis Baynes (@LuisBaynes) October 12, 2020
On Monday, California Secretary of State Alex Padilla and Attorney General Xavier Becerra wrote the California Republican Party (CRP) a “cease-and-desist” letter ordering them to stop using the drop-off boxes.
In a statement, Becerra warned the CRP:
“Misleading voters is wrong, regardless of who is doing it,” Secretary of State Alex Padilla said. “Political parties and campaigns can engage in get out the vote efforts, but they cannot violate state law. The unofficial, unauthorized drop boxes in question violate state law and jeopardize the security of voters’ ballots. State and local elections officials have worked tirelessly to provide voters multiple safe, secure options to return their vote-by-mail ballots. These unauthorized drop boxes are a disservice to elections administrators and a disservice to voters who deserve to cast their ballots with clarity and confidence.”
However, Republicans counter that all they are doing is follow the “ballot harvesting” law that Democrats themselves passed.
In 2016, Democrats legalized the practice — which is considered illegal in most other states — of allowing third parties to collect and deliver mail-in ballots from voters. The “third parties” can literally be anyone, including political party operatives, and do not need to register or pass any kind of background check. There is also no limit to the number of ballots that can be “harvested.”
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) tried to legalize the process nationwide in her coronavirus stimulus proposals.
The practice caught Republicans by surprise in 2018, when Democrats used “ballot harvesting” as part of their successful effort to flip seven Republican-held congressional districts. Hundreds of thousands of ballots were reportedly delivered to polling places.
Early experiments at “ballot harvesting” by asking Republicans directly for their ballots did not work, as Republicans tend to mistrust strangers with their ballots. (Democrats reportedly use the same agents to register the voter and to collect the ballots.)
Republicans appear to have settled on a new method: using drop-off boxes at Republican offices or otherwise friendly locations.
California officials say the drop-boxes violate a state law requiring ballot harvesters to identify themselves by signing the mail-in envelopes.
The GOP disagrees.
State Republican Party spokesman Hector Barajas pointed Breitbart News to a new law passed by the Democrat-dominated state legislature in 2018 that specifies that “a ballot shall not be disqualified solely because the person authorized to return it did not provide on the identification envelope his or her name, relationship to the voter, or signature.”
Barajas also argued that any kind of receptacle can be used by law to store the ballots that a “ballot harvester” collects.
In a statement to Breitbart News, Barajas said:
“There is nothing in any of the laws or regulations cited in that advisory that indicate private organization drop boxes are NOT permitted. The regulations cited apply to Registrar of Voters only.
“The Democrats amended the law to remove all of the restrictions on WHO can harvest ballots and provided NO rules about HOW ballots can be collected except that someone cannot be compensated per-ballot. The CRP’s program goes above and beyond, is less coercive and more secure than other methods of collecting ballots
“The way Democrats wrote the law, if we wanted to use a Santa bag, we could. A locked heavy box seems a lot safer.”
Barajas also pointed out that California officials had awarded a $35 million voter outreach contract to a consulting firm, SKD Knickerbocker, closely tied to Joe Biden’s presidential campaign (and referring to itself as “Team Biden” in company materials).
President Donald Trump tweeted about that controversy on Tuesday morning:
>>3591611>The GOP tricked Trump haters into spending money.
It's not true, you moron. You are taking two unrelated things and smashing them together to claim that there was some brilliant 4d chess move that "Owned the libs" but simple reason shows you're wrong. If you have an IQ higher than a brick you would see how stupid this is.
Let me break it down for you into small, easy to grasp chunks so even someone as retarded as you sees what the rest of us grasp as the obvious:
A) Yes, the left did troll Trump by ordering a bunch of free tickets to his rally then not showing up in the past. This is true but unrelated to what is happening now.
B) The GOP said they made 3,000ish sales of 5 dollar tickets to the event.
C) Over 2,500 people showed up for the event according to your article.
That's a perfectly normal average of people who buy tickets then don't show up for events.
For what you want
to be true to have happened kids from Tik-tok would have had to have signed up under fake names, the GOP would have had to use magic internet wizardry to track the fake information back to the real people, the GOP would have then had to illegally obtain their credit card or bank information, and charge them the 5 dollar fee.
That is the series of events that needs to have happened for your conspiracy theory to be true. The GOP would have needed to hack bank and credit card accounts on a MASSIVE international scale so they could "Own the libs"
YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON IF YOU BELIEVE THIS IS TRUE.
>>3591618>GOP complains of voter fraud>Proceeds to commit election fraud when they find none
>South complains of voter fraud & partisan lunacy in unincorporated states>Invades Kansas when it becomes clear they don't have the numbers there, commits most egregious act of voting fraud in history, commits murder, torches opposition printing presses, and attempts to defeat votes by the tip of the bayonet
Every fucking time with conservatives.
Also, the so-called "Ballot Harvesting" law comprises an appointed person or persons collecting ballots from their community - they're basically a neighborhood advocate, saving 30 people the trip to the ballot box; the people who utilize them trust them, and they also serve as an identifiable link in the chain of communication between composition of the ballot and its reception with the vote counters, so that when one decides to check their vote status (say, here: https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/ballot-status
), they'll be able to ask their advocate 'hey what happened'.>>3591619https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billCompareClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB1836
That provision no longer applies, dudemyguy. Whoops!
This is like saying, "Dressing up and pretending to be a cop is a felony but it's fine if I do it because people dress up as sexy police officers on Halloween."
The crime isn't just that the GOP is harvesting ballots with no chain of custody, the crime is that they are marking them as if they are official ballot drop off boxes. They are impersonating the law.
Like everything else conservatives do, you took a easy job with simple rules and you fucked it up because you are God damned morons to your core. Your party's ability to fail at the most mundane of tasks is AMAZING.
What shoe is it?
Do you admit that the intent is to rob people of their votes?
What you are doing is not the same thing. Your argument is like saying, "I think all taxation is theft so it's ok for me to dress up as a tax collector and con people out of their money."
We are being honest. We are using the system in accordance with the law.
You are criminals who are lying too and scamming people.
Sorry, but "being honest'" and "Democrat" doesn't belong in the same sentence.
We're done playing nice with you lying, treasonous, DoubleSpeak scum.
Cool, I'm ready to fire upon any number of you enslaving, fascist, blowhard subhumans.
When a liberal says "democracy", what they mean is demagoguery and social engineering to get their way regardless.
When conservatives talk about democracy, they mean it in the context of a republic, where the rule of law goes above the rule of any people.
The rule of law is based on the idea of natural law, or that which can be rationally and objectively defined. It is without argument the best principles that we have found so far. In arguing for cultural, moral, and ethical relativism the liberals are literally arguing from a position of anti-reason and subjectivism, which is why their idea of democracy is so twisted to mean "anything I want, however I can get it."
In fact, every modern democracy is based on the principle of the rule of law, which ensures that democracy works in the first place. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_law>every person is subject to the law, including people who are lawmakers, law enforcement officials and judges. In this sense, it stands in contrast to tyranny or oligarchy, where the rulers are held above the law.
If the rule of law is broken or compromised, tyranny and oligarchy results regardless of democracy, because the rulers are no longer bound to respond and respect their voters and they have no greater moral or legal obligation to represent them - only to be elected by them by any means. The trick is that the rule of law doesn't work unless you assume natural law:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_law>According to natural law theory, all people have inherent rights, conferred not by act of legislation but by "God, nature, or reason."
In contrast, liberalism (leftism) is based on legal positivism, which is the idea that all laws and indeed morals are made up by humans, and therefore arbitrary "social constructs". It means moral judgements cannot be defended by rational arguments. This makes the system of government a circular argument: right and wrong have no meaning, only popularity and power matters, and power leads to popularity. That is, incidentally, how fascism works.
To sum it up, liberal (leftist) democracy means fascism because its ideas are fundamentally based on the rule of the powerful. When you don't have an objective framework, one side can simply define the other party as being completely wrong on every count by coming up with a new subjective reality of their own. The only real difference to literal fascism is that the actual historical fascists admitted the fact and didn't try to pretend to be anything else. They embraced their nihilism, while the left is still pretending to be something else.
Conservatism is true democracy, because it starts from the belief that humans have definable rights, that there are right and wrong, that are independent of and cannot be overruled or re-defined arbitrarily by simple popular opinion. It is the idea that these rights and wrongs can be found through systematic scientific inquiry to politics and human nature, and observed through social experiments already made through history. These facts exist regardless of social popularity games, which is the very fact that enables democracy to work: when people have an objective framework of law and a common rational understanding of the role and limits of the government, they can then vote to make deals and compromises over the details and particulars.
There's a link to an article on liberalism at the bottom of the natural law article. Guess how I know you didn't read it?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism
>Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty, consent of the governed and equality before the law. Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support free markets, free trade, limited government, individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), capitalism, democracy, secularism, gender equality, racial equality, internationalism, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion.
All the stuff you're claiming in the name of "conservatism" is actually liberalism. Liberalism and lefism are clearly distinct. Also,
>When conservatives talk about democracy, they mean it in the context of a republic, where the rule of law goes above the rule of any people.
This is constitutionalism, which is liberalism. Like, who do you think wrote your constitution? God? A king? No, it was the people who cut the kings fucking head off i.e. liberals.
It's funny how the commies have subverted the very name of liberalism. They know that they can't win people over under their own banner.
Subversion is the one thing communists are actually good at.
Get fucked, your "culture" is the real degeneracy
No, what he's describing is classical liberalism, i.e. libertarianism, i.e. actual liberalism.
You're thinking of American "liberalism" which is just communism wearing the hollowed out skin of liberalism as a feeble mask. A mask which once had a noble name that they've managed to drive deep in to the ground where not even most conservatives remember that it once meant libertarianism.
>>3591637>what they mean is demagoguery and social engineering to get their way regardless…
The same thing can be said of conservatism the difference is that what the left wants is to improve the lives of everyone, including white people, where as the right wants to improve the lives of only 1% of America and fuck everyone else over.
Why do you think Mitch McConnel is refusing to pass any kind of stimulus package or Covid19 relief? Why do you think Trump said he wanted to sell Puerto Rico because it was full of dirty, poor people?
At the core of conservatism you are all cucks and racist suck-ups who want bring back the good old days of monarchy where birth-right is more important than anything else.
You want being white to validate you because you are such constant, unyielding, fuck-ups, who screw up every single thing you do, the color of your skin is the only thing you can point to as an indication of success.
The problem is, the rest of us don't give a shit what color you are. You're still a fuck up and a joke to us and you are dragging humanity down with your weakness.
>>3591638>According to natural law theory, all people have inherent rights, conferred not by act of legislation but by "God, nature, or reason." In contrast, liberalism (leftism) is based on legal positivism…
Bullshit! The entire purpose of the left is to guarantee equal rights to EVERYONE because we are all human and deserve basic human rights.
It's CONSERVATISM who wants to stratify who gets which rights, who is considered fully human and who gets the opertunity to be successful in life.
You keep claiming that if the left gets power it is going to do the things your side does every day and has done through-out all of history.
You ARE the monsters you are afraid of. You DO the things you claim we might do.
You are scum.
Nope, that's the libertarians. The left wants to equalize everything by stealing from those they deem privileged and giving to those they deem underprivileged.
Look at California right now, they want it make it legal to discriminate based on race again, because this time they're going to discriminate the right way.
Your ideology can not function without separating people in to groups by their race/sex/etc. Libertarianism doesn't give a fuck about those characteristics.
You literally could not be more wrong.
I refuse to call myself a "classical liberal". I'm a liberal.
If you push for something stupid like criminalizing using the wrong pronoun, you are not a liberal. If you think turning universities into "safe spaces" where dialogue that makes you uncomfortable is shut down, you are not a liberal. So on and so forth.
I keep posting pic related, but some of you don't get it. Liberals are centrists. Not necessarily the absolute center, but liberals cannot exist on either the far left or the far right. You go too far left, you get Stalinism. If you go too far right, you get Nazism. They both hate liberals.
Go be white somewhere else shortdick
>>3591667>Look at California right now, they want it make it legal to discriminate based on race again…
What paranoid delusion are you ranting about now?
>>3591680>White men are the biggest terror threat…
If you believe the FBI, Homeland Security, and Secret service, then yes, white men are the biggest terrorist threat in America.
There is a little-publicized group that has been around for a LONG time… since 1912. The Primary Model group.
For the record, the PRIMARY MODEL has picked the winner of 25 out of 27 elections since 1912, when presidential primaries were introduced. The misses are 1960, one of the closest presidential elections, and 2000, when the late count in Florida handed Bush the victory; still Al Gore wound up winning the popular vote. http://primarymodel.com/
They explain on their site the methods they use to have such a stunningly ACCURATE record of picking who will be President for the last 108 years!! They claim to be unbiased and are not influenced by the predictions of mainstream media. Their prediction methods are ingenious, check it out.
I'm so glad you asked. https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_16,_Repeal_Proposition_209_Affirmative_Action_Amendment_(2020)
>A "yes" vote supports this constitutional amendment to repeal Proposition 209 (1996), which stated that the government and public institutions cannot discriminate against or grant preferential treatment to persons on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin in public employment, public education, and public contracting.
California is now looking at legislation to make discrimination legal.
>California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation Wednesday that will require the boards of publicly traded companies based in the state to have at least one racially, ethnically or otherwise diverse director by 2021.
So you are FORCED to consider one's race/sex/etc when selecting them for leadership roles.
Racism, sexism, and all the other horrible isms are deeply engrained in leftism. Leftism can not function without judging people by their innate characteristics.
>>3591686>The Primary Model
Yeah, the primaries were nothing like any race in history this time. No system based on them is going to be accurate. Joe Biden won more than half of the states because the DNC forced everyone out of the race.
Trump ran pretty much unopposed because Republicans are afraid of his cult.
If that passes it doesn't mean they will be allowed to discriminate against minorities. Discrimination is prohibited by federal law.
What Prop16 passing does mean is that California would be allowed to use the same affirmative action programs other states are allowed to use to help minorities get access to schooling and government jobs.
Of course, to you, black people having success is discrimination against white people because you assume you and your racist friends are entitled to every good thing that happens in life so when a non-white finds any happiness you assume they are somehow stealing it from you.
You think you are owed everything.
>>3591692>at least one…
Hey, dipshit. If the company has all white-men for it's entire upper-management structure then discrimination has already occured. They ARE discriminating. This REVERSES that discrimination.
Complaining about this is like a bank robber complaining that the bank guards shot at them while they were robbing the bank.
For this law to kick in, the discrimination must have already taken place. You are bitching and crying because they are making a law that forces you to be LESS RACIST and yet you think we should treat you with respect and act like you are anything more than a pathetic white supremacist cuck?
Straw man. Not every one who isn't a liberal thinks like that. I were a mask when I go into stores and into work for example. >>3591697
So by minorities you mean… not Asian…. right?
And Asians don't forget Asians… A lot Affirmative Action legislation negatively effects the Asian population.
>>3591693>>The Primary Model>>Yeah, the primaries were nothing like any race in history this time. No system based on them is going to be accurate. Joe Biden won more than half of the states because the DNC forced everyone out of the race.
So Biden was artificially forced into the position of Front Runner, regardless of his popularity or votes.
I'm sure that primarymodel.com with 108 years of experience and 25 correct predictions out of the last 27, took that into account before releasing their 2020 prediction.
It doesn't have 108 years of predictions. It has 24. The man who compiled the formula - Helmut Norpoth - is still alive and retroactively declared his method the winner going back to 1912, but all it's based on is pendulum politics - people have a tendency to get sick of the party in power as they let their side get away with too much shit, so fuck it, maybe the other side's shit will undo some of the previous. And so on.
Now based on the incredible polarization of the electorate today, do you think it implausible that people are already sick of Trump's shit? The pendulum is absolutely capable of swinging in four years if the ruling party, in their corruption, is too arrogant, confident, and unconcerned with the public's approval toward it.
Further, Norpoth made his 91% prediction on March 2nd, the day before Super Tuesday - before that day, Bernie Sanders was the Democrat front-runner and Joe Biden was trailing in 5th. This dude didn't even know who Trump was going to run against, he had no clue if Covid-19 was going to continue to be a factor in November, RBG was still alive…there were a fair pile of variables unaccounted-for. He didn't care about these things - the only factor his model accounts for is the math behind the trend. That's actually kind of fair! It's not really a bad model in that context! But there are a lot of factors present in this election that haven't really been seen in about 160 years.
If non-whites were qualified, they would get hired. Obviously, non-whites are not qualified. Fix your falling down house before before worrying about whether I've cut my grass or not.
But no, you have to cry racism instead. Pathetic.
Nigger, how am I racist? I don't give a fuck what anyone's race is. You do. Your ideology revolves around race. You are the most racist person in this room.>>3591697
You look at the outcome, how successful a group is, then from that you infer that discrimination took place if there is any disparity between them and another group. You don't consider for a second if there are other factors at play.
If you consider a person's race as a factor when hiring him or her, then you are a racist. Leftists want to consider a person's race. Therefore leftists are racists.
Regarding the bakery, it is immoral to force someone to accept a commission by law. That is virtually slavery. If a gay person walks in and requests to buy a cake they see on display for sale in a bakery, they are entitled to that purchase. If a gay person walks in and demands that a baker make a cake to their exact specification, as any creator can turn down any commission.
Imagine if you could approach an artist and DEMAND that he or she draw anything you want.
>>3591643>All the stuff you're claiming in the name of "conservatism" is actually liberalism.
I know, but US liberals aren't actually liberals, which is why I have to add (leftism) when using the term.
US conservatives, aside for the neocons who are leftists who jumped ship from Democrats to Republicans back in the day, are trying to return back to liberalism, including constitutionalism and the rule of law. The neocons are kinda machiavellian assholes who don't really believe in anything.
>>3591658>what the left wants is to improve the lives of everyone
No. What the left wants is power to rule, so they offer you a sweet deal where the state acts as your housekeeper and makes decisions for you. The cost of all these nice things is simply the abandonment of the rule of law, which gives the state full unrestricted power, which results in an oligarchy and loss of fundamental rights.
> all cucks and racist suck-ups who want bring back the good old days of monarchy
If that were the case, conservatives would be all wearing the Union Jack and drinking tea. You're an idiot.
>>3591660>Bullshit! The entire purpose of the left is to guarantee equal rights to EVERYONE because we are all human and deserve basic human rights.
Except it cannot work that way, because if there are no natural rights, there are no rights at all. By arguing that law is a social construct, the left pulls the rug from underneath itself.
So yeah, equal rights to everyone: no rights at all. Everything you may do is up to the arbitrary choices of the ruling class, and there is no authority you may appeal to if the rules turn out to result in horrid tyranny or anarchy:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_positivism>"The fact that a policy would be just, wise, efficient, or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law, and the fact that it is unjust, unwise, inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it. According to positivism, law is a matter of what has been posited (ordered, decided, practiced, tolerated, etc.); as we might say in a more modern idiom, positivism is the view that law is a social construction."
But fear not! According to legal positivism, or rather because it cannot provide the imperative to do so, you don't actually have any obligation to follow said rules in the first place. The leftist society quite literally has to keep itself together by terror, because otherwise the people would form competing factions that come up with their own rules and their own definition of what "better for everyone" means.
Basically, the left is full of besserwissers who are all repeating, "It would be far better for everyone if I was the dictator.".
Everyone thinks they have the better idea, which is exactly why Republicanism shifts the highest authority away from the state and into the constitution, which defines the limits of popular democracy and state authority. The left really hates this, and does everything possible to find loopholes in the constitution (or simply break it), so they can do the things the constitution says is not in the proper role or authority of the state.
>>3591753>No. What the left wants is power to rule, so they offer you a sweet deal where the state acts as your housekeeper and makes decisions for you…
This argument might seem more legitimate if at this very moment Republicans weren't trying to force through a supreme court judge so they can legally overthrow the votes of American citizens and keep Trump in power if he loses both the popular vote and the electoral college.
Your party are literally setting up a dictatorship. Everything you are afraid the left might do, they are doing right now
and you're so fucking stupid you think it's a good thing.
The left wants to do SUPREME COURT PACKING.
Which means increasing the number of judges to 11, 13, 15 or whatevever it takes to get the Super Majority they want.
So shut the fuck up, asshole, whatever you accuse the right of, the left is trying to do ten times worse in spades.
>>3591785>The left wants to pack the court…
As a reaction to the fact that Mitch McConnell held up the nomination of a SCOTUS judge for almost two years so that they could force a republican on and now is pushing a judge through at the last second.
The court has already been stacked. The right has already cheated. Changing the rules to stop someone from being evil isn't evil, it's justice. Cause and effect. You cause, we effect.
I don't see anything like that actually happening.
I see it being speculated upon as a condition of bad-faith action, particularly concerning the confirmation of a prospective Supreme Court Justice at the end of a Presidency, and the GOP's hypocrisy unbound in their desperation to have that prospect confirmed in the face of the GOP's leadership oathing time and again that it isn't appropriate to do so [when a Democrat is President].
Whatever you accuse the left of, the right is provoking into action as they try to squash democracy, hoping that no one moves to regulate or reverse their bullshit.
Oh gawed that fucking guy.
>Hey look at me! I have a country accent so I speak Rural America. Hey Y'all! These liberals ain't so bad hyuck Hyuck.
Fuck that guy.
>Your party are literally setting up a dictatorship.
>Everything you are afraid the left might do,
Might do? MIGHT!? Eat shit bro. It's not what the left "might" do it's what they ARE currently and have been doing.
The President and the Republican party are trying to set up a dictatorship? HOW by existing? Because it seems every time the president does literally anything he's trying to "establish a dictatorship".
He's setting a dictatorship by doing his job? He's the president, a SCOTUS has died, he not only has the right, but the responsibility to fill that vacancy.
>>3591808>He's setting a dictatorship by doing his job? He's the president, a SCOTUS has died, he not only has the right, but the responsibility to fill that vacancy.
When that happened under Obama, McConnel blocked the new nomination until they had someone in office claiming the voters should get to decide because he was in the last 2 years of his term.
Trump didn't even have 2 months left in office when RGB died and McConnel is trying to rush someone into the seat now.
Why is it a "Lame Duck" presidency when a Democrat is in office but it's perfectly legit when it's a Republican?
Answer: Because Republicans are fascists and all they care about is getting more power. They don't care about the rules, the nation, the people, or even doing their job. They just want more power because they want to be dictators at their very core.
You're just Nazis. That's who you are. That's who you have always been.
OH WOW! REALLY?
The Republicans are Fascists?
I'm a Nazi now?
OMG! WOW! What an original well thought. How very compelling. I totally didn't know you were going to say that.
I've never heard anything like that! Wow you must be so very smart.
>>3591813>Answer: Because Republicans are fascists and all they care about is getting more power.
Name one power that Trump has consolidated. Come on, name one thing. "Fascists" and dictators will try to consolidate as much power in the federal government as possible. No wackjob leftist governor responsible for quelling riots was ever arrested. Not one single dissenter voice that hates Trump was "disappeared" or "committed suicide". All of it is in your insane power victim fantasies about "fightin' nazis". And it really is starting to morph into a legitimate fetish for people like you.
The fact that you can go spew your weirdo Russian backed socialist bullshit, which it is. "Fascist" as an insult is what socialists call each other and any government they don't like. Antifa is a Russian backed group, which is why you see them flying hammer & sickle flags. Sorry chump, you got played by the Russians. Literally you are Putin's cockholster.
You are making a bullshit argument. Just because Trump hasn't had any of his enemies executed yet
doesn't mean he isn't a fascist. He'll get there. Just give him time. https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/07/trump-demands-barr-arrest-foes-427389
Except that never happened under Obama.
It's not "everyone on Earth" calling conservatives Naxis. It's just you, and losers like Antifa. A fraction of a percent of the population. What were you saying again, Fascist?>>3591818>>Just because Trump hasn't had any of his enemies executed YET>>He'll get there, just give him time.
You mean like Hillary?
>>3591813>>Trump didn't even have 2 months left in office when RGB died and McConnel is trying to rush someone into the seat now.
Trump had 5 months left in office on his first term, he will be President until Jan. 20, 2021 on his first term.
Shall we keep cutting down your lies or have you had enough yet?
Yeah, Republicans have no right to complain about the politicization of either the Brett Kavanaugh or the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation hearings. Republicans are responsible for turning the appointments to SCOTUS into a partisan issue. Mitch Mcconnell literally refused to do his fucking job to hold a vote when Obama nominated a justice. If they had confirmed Obama's appointment, the court would have stayed balanced - a liberal would have replaced a conservative and then a conservative would have replaced a liberal this year. But no, the Republicans had to pull that ridiculous power grab stunt. But hey, it wasn't unconstitutional. And neither is packing the court. If the Democrats win and actually do pack the court (which is nothing but a rumor at this point), the Republicans would have no one but themselves to blame for instigating it.
Republicans: We can't vote on Obama's nominee, because it's an election year.
Also Republicans: This time is different, because the nominees are conservatives.
Lies and hypocrisy.
It's all about precedent.
If Democrats win and pack the court with more judges,
then when Republicans take power again they will do the same thing, and on and on.
You could potentially end up with hundreds of Supreme Court Judges, that's why it's a bad idea to even start it.
On a side note, why do you think WE haven't tried to pack the court with extra judges the last four years instead of just filling vacated seats?
>>3591830>On a side note, why do you think WE haven't tried to pack the court with extra judges the last four years instead of just filling vacated seats?
If by "we" you mean Republicans, it's because you know it's unpopular with Americans in general, which is why Democrats almost certainly won't do it. Your side is throwing a tantrum over a nothingburger.
>>3591813>They don't care about the rules
Funny you should say that. Are you aware that the Democrats changed the rules so that the senate could approve a judge with just 51% of the vote, when previously it was 2/3? They wanted to nominate more activist judges with less bipartisan support.
Now, call McConnel a hypocrite all you want, but he's one person. The Republicans could have just voted no on Obama's nomination, in fact I thought they did, didn't they?
It is the Democrats who vote to change the rules when it benefiets them. To give themselves more power while they have it, then they bitch and moan when the Republicans get in office and control the power they created.
Tell me, what powers does the fascist Trump have now that he didn't have when he first entered office. Fascists like to extend their powers, so what has Trump done?>>3591831
If it's so unpopular, why wouldn't they take the obvious popular answer and commit to not doing it? What is the plan for Biden to condemn it right before the election and say "Haha, I was only pretending to be retarded!"
>>3591835>What is the plan for Biden to condemn it right before the election and say "Haha, I was only pretending to be retarded!"
It's the Republicans who are "pretending" to be retarded. Biden has stated in the past that he is against packing the SCOTUS. In fact, he said again on Monday that he's "not a fan".https://www.npr.org/2020/10/13/923213582/biden-says-hes-not-a-fan-of-expanding-the-supreme-court
"I would not get into court packing," Biden during a Democratic primary debate. "We add three justices. Next time around, we lose control, they add three justices. We begin to lose any credibility the court has at all."This is all Republican bullshitting in an attempt to muddy the waters right before an election.
>>3591835>in fact I thought they did, didn't they?
You'd be wrong, but that's nothing new.
>>3591835>The Republicans could have just voted no on Obama's nomination, in fact I thought they did, didn't they?
No, they didn't. Moscow Mitch refused to even hold a hearing. He knew some of the Republicans would have voted for Garland, because Garland is a moderate. So he blocked them.
Well if that's the case, then why is it "the Republicans" who are hypocrites? Surely it is just McConnel who's the hypocrite, then.>>3591841
Biden's platform is one of non-commitment. It is schrodinger's platform. He implicitly supports the things you want and implicitly opposes things you dislike.
>I support the Green New Deal, wait no I don't. I want to ban fracking, wait no I don't. Packing the supreme court would be ridiculous, but I won't say I'm not going to.
He's a demented old man with literally no policy, who has how many decades in government that he avoids talking about because he tries to pretend he opposes everything he spent his life doing. It boggles my mind that anyone is voting for him.
>>3591869>Biden's platform is one of non-commitment. It is schrodinger's platform. He implicitly supports the things you want and implicitly opposes things you dislike.
That's because Biden is a Republican pretending to be a Democrat.
That's why Trump kept goading him into talking about left issues and when Biden said things like, "I beat Bernie Sanders" Trump thought he had won some big victory but no one on the left is voting for Biden because they like him. They are just voting to stop the fascist.
>>they are just voting to stop the fascist
Hillary isn't running.
The fact of the matter is someone had to give Moscow Mitch his power. Who do you think that was? His fellow Republican senators elected him to Senate Majority Leader. But I get what you're saying. Just because you elect someone and they later do something undeniably hypocritical, that doesn't make you yourself a hypocrite. Except we can compare what the Republican senators said then with what they are saying now:https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-every-republican-senator-has-said-about-filling-a-supreme-court-vacancy-in-an-election-year
Clearly most of them are hypocrites.
As for your Biden bashing, he's still a better candidate than Trump if only for the shear fact that he actually listens to experts. That's a big fucking deal. It's a big deal that Trump sides with Putin over what his own national security advisors tell him. It's a big deal that Trump downplayed the threat of the coronavirus and refused to wear a mask or social distance. It's a big deal that he kept holding big rallies, knowing people would die as a result. It's a big deal that he's so scientifically illiterate (actually anti science) that he thinks even for a second that nuking a hurricane is a good idea or injecting disinfectants might cure Covid-19.
Make-Up of the OLD USSR
Armenia / Azerbaijan / Belarus / Estonia / Georgia
Kazakhstan / Kyrgyzstan / Latvia / Lithuania / Moldova
Russia/ Tajikistan / Turkmenistan / Ukraine / Uzbekistan
NEW USSR is the UnitedSocialistDemoncratPropagandist
ABC / CBS/ NBC / CNN / MSNBC
NPR / PBS / NY TIMES / LA TIMES / WASHINGTON POST
TWITTER /RACEBOOK/ INSTAGRAM / POLITICO / WIKIPEDIA
DNC / HOLLYWIERD / 80% Colleges/ 80% K-12 / YAHOO
FBI / CIA / DOJ / DNI / DHS
You're just parroting a bunch of rumors that have already been debunked many times.
Go educate yourself, on something besides MSM.
Which of my statements has been debunked? I can back up all my claims.
Nearly all of them,
and no, you cannot.
Saying nuh-uh is not an argument. You got nothing.
Technically if Biden had 14.1 million views, and Trump had 13.5 million views, on cable/satelite, not including youtube or internet streaming views, Trump still won.
Remember that Biden supporters are largely concentrated in dense urban areas, while Trump supporters are largely suburban and rural. Thanks to the electoral vote pure numbers don't matter. Since if was a pure numbers voting system even if the entire country voted for Trump, and only NYC, and LA voted purely for Biden, Biden would win.
Trump policies appeal more to agricultural and manufacturing communities, which Biden's policies would totally fuck over. Biden's policies appeal more to the service, unemployed, and education industries, which are generally in cities. Biden's stance on wanting to raise minimum wage, provide universal to everyone in the country, have mandatory 0 net emissions, and significantly increase taxes on livestock ownership, would destroy the agricultural and especially the manufacturing industries. Both the companies and the workers would suffer, manufacturing companies tend to hire higher skilled blue collar workers who get paid more than minimum wage since they need to have education, experience, and perform more hazardous tasks than say a cashier or waiter. Biden's policies on wages and taxes would force to either take those skilled laborers and reduce their pay, or lay some off thus increasing their work load and making their total pay be worth less on a task by task basis.
Here in Ohio its basically just Columbus and Cincinnati that are blue, the cities, everywhere else is red. We've had a lot of economic expansion in the less densely populated areas. Since we're a swing state, the electorial here will almost certainly go to Trump, giving him a leg up. I'd say the same goes for Pennsylvania and Florida, since the polls rarely actually survey outside of the cities.
I don't know what its like in other areas, but while on the subject Biden's campaign strategy really sucks. Theres always at least one caravan of 2-3 cars with biden flags driving around town honking their horns, or a BLM / Biden flag waving group of 3-5 kids waving flags and honking those annoying air horns. We aren't a very big town so you can hear it just about everywhere and its really driving people away from going to restaurants and bars.
I live across a river, and a few blocks away from the down town area, and I can almost always hear that shit. My house is directly on railroad tracks, and even the trains are less obnoxious than Biden campaigners.
>>3592005>Trump appeals to farmers…
Farms have been in total collapse since Trump took office and started his trade war with China. He has done nothing but hurt farmers.
well considering that the democrat election office in town is actively calling people to volunteer to do it, yeah I believe it.
I got a call from them myself, since I volunteered with them when I was a democrat in my younger years, during Obama's first term.
my browser has been acting all kinds of wonky lately. It keeps deleting my user name randomly.
I have a hard time believing people are driving around a bumfuck town honking their horns and waving Biden flags. That too is Qanon level conspiracy nonsense.
We're technically a small city, but just barely. Its at least got it's name on the map. We've got around a 13k population.
Its not exactly bumbfuck nowhere, but its not like theres much to do here either. The town is basically owned by a hospital and several retirement homes.
>>3592017>I have a hard time believing people are driving around a bumfuck town honking their horns and waving Biden flags. That too is Qanon level conspiracy nonsense.
I suspect Steam saw one car with one flag or maybe a bumper sticker and that experience snowballed into a grand conspiracy in his mind that there is a team of professional horn honkers just going around annoying people.
A lot of the democrat activity probably comes from the local private college. Its got 6 fair size dorms, and a lot of the students aren't from the area. Its way too pricey for most locals to go to without some sort of epic scholarship.
We also have a community college that I went to thats stupidly leftist. Engineering students are basically attacked the second they walk out the engineering wing, which is basically the only place you can say anything safely that isn't a buzz word.
Then theres the tech school that I also went to thats typical right wing tech schooly. I only mentioned it to paint a better picture of the area.
No, its a thing. There probably aren't too many of them, they're just loud.
I put a new topper on my truck a few months ago that came with this weird american flag punisher skull sticker, and the tinting is on the outside for some reason, so to get rid of the sticker I'd have to replace all the tint… and I have a german shepherd.
Every time I go to the local dog park I have soccer moms and old hippyish guys try to start up arguments about why guns are bad, and I'm bad for apparently being a fascist nazi. Its annoying, I always lose the argument because I'm not really invested, I only own a small Reuger .22 revolver that I don't even have any ammo for, and my "huge vicious guard dog" rolls over in fear of chiwawas.
>>3592024>so to get rid of the sticker I'd have to replace all the tint…
Oh, if only there was some way to cover something that you don't want seen… some kind of advanced technology which lets you layer one image over another image and adhere it in place with a chemical bond.
Some kind of sticky paper that could be placed over the offensive, racist, image so no one knows it is there… if only such a thing existed…
thats the thing, I don't see how its offensive or racist at all. The only reason anyone would take offense is because I have veteran plates, so they probably think I kill people or something, and anyone who actually knows me knows that I can hardly be be bothered to mow my yard, let alone put together a murder stockpile, or do any militia shit.
inb4 2 lazy.
I pay some guy to mow my lawn once a week, but the only reason I don't do it myself is because I'm so bloody tall I have to hunch over to push the thing, and then I feel like shit until my back heals up when I have to mow it again.
>>3592040>I don't see how it could be offensive…
You haven't been paying attention to the news. The Punisher Skull is being used by white supremacist groups and cops who are proudly saying they should execute criminals without trial because the justice system doesn't work.
Some police departments even put it on the hood of the cars but were then forced to remove it because it's basically a symbol of terrorism.
It was made popular among U.S. soldiers who enjoyed shooting brown people.
People in the military would tell you that only the most unstable types would wear it.
It's the symbol for mass murderers and psychopaths which is appropriate since the character of Frank Castle is a mass murderer who kills anyone he thinks deserves it, even corrupt cops.
When cops use that logo, they are saying to the world that they don't care about the law, they will shoot anyone they damn well please and there is nothing anyone can do about it.
That's who the police are in America. WhiteISIS.
You forgot to include the source for your post.
Here you go.
im going to go out on a limb here and say thats bullshit. I see versions of the sticker with trump hair as bumper stickers for pro-trumpers all the time. If what you said was true, the media would eat it up.
I assumed and still assume that its along the lines of a "dont tread on me" thing. Really frowned upon, but mostly just a right to bear arms, and tree of liberty blood yada yada deal. Im not hard enough for all that to actually buy and place a sticker on the window, but not hard enough against it to go through the trouble of covering it with something bigger or re-tinting the entire thing.
The thing is going to look kinda white trashy one way or another, it came preloaded with a homemade welded allstrut roof rack (really well done), and the guy I bought it from lived in a trailer way out in the boonies and sold it to me and installed it for a whopping 50 dollars.
>>3592005>not including youtube or internet streaming views, Trump still won.
I saw the youtube viewcount yesterday morning. The Biden town hall had more views and likes.
>Trump policies appeal more to agricultural and manufacturing communities
his trade war got me laid off. I'm not exactly seeing the appeal of that.
>>3592082>>his trade war got me laid off. I'm not exactly seeing the appeal of that.
Think of it as being drafted to go fight the Chinese Commies while still staying at home.
You'e doing your part as a patriotic American, be proud of it.
>>3592082>his trade war got me laid off
And what was it that you do?
Sorry to hear that Trump got you fired but where one door closes another door opens.
I walked through that door into a new $12/hour work at home data entry job processing applications for Renter relief during the crisis.
Trump's covid incompetence got me a sweet gig.
Your post is wonderful.
Some of us are not sociopaths and actually enjoy helping people stay in their homes with their utilities paid but I can see how, for you
, that would be a nightmare job.
some top-tier cringe right there, fam