Trump will win the 2020 election in November. The [Democrat] party is finished.
Quit with the witch hunts you dumb nigger.
The "republican" aka "slave whipper" party, is done for
>#BLM from everyone who is in favor of censorship and witch hunts
Fuck off, niggers.
>>3580310>Republican party is finished.
[They never thought she would lose]
>blm in the twitter profile
>blm in the handles of the replies
Into the trash it goes. OP is a faggot.
You just keep sucking on the special toy inside Freehaven's Happy Meal box Furfag.
Fix your flaky voting system and you won't have this debacle to know who won what or not.
That would require the cooperation from the people that directly benefit from the broken system.
Sounds like a bunch of fake furries trying to out-clout one another.
You mad bro?
Guy could have just gone "PEDO ALERT !! : ONE TENTH OF JAPAN PORN ARTISTS" It would have been just as effective.
>>3580305>actual cub porn
As opposed to fake cub porn?>actual children
???>>3580370>literally 4000 images>waaaah why won't people pay attention to this breaking news
>>3580438>being mad at drawings>Calling out a pedo
These things are equivalent on twitter.
And it's amusing to see this much seething from a person that draws porn of a loli goat anime.
>>3580438>Calls out cub artists on Twitter.>Refuses to go after real pedos because PC nonsense.
Dat Fortune cookie!
I'm brewin up muh boner!!!!
i do not respect the lives or opinions of those who are unable to discern the difference between fantasy and reality.
That's because you are a drama whore.
MCR Fan | Edge Lord |ANTI ζ | Goat Daddy | Can furries just stop being Pedos/Zoophiles?? #fursuit #BLM | Asexual
He a drama whore
he can't draw
he can't get sex
he can't make a fursuit
he has no skills
this is the way he is trying to popular
Don't worry Anon I'm sure Pata is doing better without Twitter. >>3580505
But i agree, zoophiles must be killed.
Almost a fifth of the fandom are self-identified zoophiles.
Factoring in sampling bias and the shame element in such a sexually repressed society, could be anywhere from a third to a tenth.
If you know what's good for you, mind your own damn business.
You can't spell assume without ass.
Why is it that the people who callout artists for drawing stuff they don't like are always non-creators?
That, and people who are the loudest voices in these witch hunts tend to have a lot of skeletons in their closet.
show me one
have a different culture over there, its
I can't think of any names off the top of my head right now but I remember that the guy who showed furry porn in art class (oh, the irony!) spoke out against cub art and cub artists on his Twitter.
>>3580723>people who are the loudest voices in these witch hunts tend to have a lot of skeletons in their closet.
LMAO, there's your typical pedo deflection logic:>Me getting off to pictures of cartoon children doesn't make me a pedo. In fact, you are the pedo for calling me out!
How do you call that fallacy again?
if I jack it to a horror movie, does that make sick fuck, yes but its don't make me a serial killer. if you RP vore or micro stomp fetish does that make you a killer of real people or animals ? no its make believe, do you have any strange fetishes, like having slaves or a sex duegon. if you do by your logic is real;
Kill yourself moralfags.
A pedophile is someone who is attracted to children.
In your analogy, a person who jacks off to a movie involving children (even cartoons) would be considered a pedophile. A person who actually goes out and fucks children is a called a child molester.
I can see them being called pedos, but still its just drawings. call out an artist for making drawings that you dislike is still being an asshole, if it your copyright and is costing your money it would get it but some japanese dude making cartoon dogs fucking is not that big of a problem in the world
this kkatman every female is a superhero that cant get hurt, "
Dr. Hourglass enjoyed paying tribute to the classics of villainy.
Unfortunately for our heroine, Wavedancer, while her immunity to damage would make this merely unimaginably painful, her other superpowers – walking on water and controlling fish – weren't proving helpful in her attempts to escape.
the artist that created this claim to be a girl and is from all accounts strange, does she/he have basement full of skulls, probably not, he/she is just a weird person like all of us on here let people be strange to each there own
But it's true. Not long ago, a notorious anti on Twitter was exposed for sharing actual CP in a bunch of Loli/Shota telegram groups to frame those communities. Those people are hungry for attention and drama and they will do anything for it. >>3580733
Honestly, I can imagine Goatman lurking on Lulz. A lot of those anti-shippers, loli-crusaders or whatever you want to call them, are moles on Kiwifarms or browse imageboards to stir the drama.
ITT: Just a reminder, OP is a faggot.
"I literally cannot stop choking on cocks" - OP
Death to all pedophiles.
OP is doing god's work.
No, you're just causing trouble where there was none. You pathetic fuck.
You know what horrifies me the most? There are still furs who use Facebook in 2020.
People still using facebook either don't care that they're being harvested and manipulated for Zuck's lulz, or they're incapable of understanding such.
Facebook's service is a sweet addictive thing that destroys your ability to see it for the problematic thing it is.
Well said. Although I have doubts that services such as Twitter are actually better in that regard.
Eventually we'll ditch all those commercial shit services and use a truly distributed social network. Social network centralization is the cancer that is killing our civilization.
In FB/Twitter you are the product, not the user.
Run your own social server like with Gab for example and be done with the insanity of letting FB/Twitter know who you are, what you do, what you think and believe, where you are going daily, etc.
If real baddies get in power, think how easy it'll be to target key individuals in the opposition with FB/Twitter database. Identify instantly what people to watch or suppress or even disapear. Chinese government style.
the asshat is doxxing a minor now, this guy is going to banned https://twitter.com/That_Demon_Goat/status/1278508118067105792
>>3580988>Death to all pedophiles.
reported to FBI for threatening the president's life
>>3581018>Notice how all those high-profile cub artists are also huge right-wing dipshits?
Name 5 (inb4 list of "literally who")
>fighting free speech with free speech
I don't see the problem.
Black people do not exist.
Off the top of my head:
Isn't an arist>RoaryRacoon
Is a centrist liberal, unless you are one of those retards who view bothsidism as a fascist dogwhistle or something>Kekitopu
Draws WWII-themed Lolis. That doesn't make you a right-winger>Zaush
Hated by SJWs doesn't mean right-wing
Zaush was a huge Hillary supporter.
drawings are not real, if i draw a picture of a naked boy it don't come to life and suck me off
It amazes me that here on the Internet its almost impossible to get to google without tripping over an actual IRL pedo, yet you people choose to piss your time away harassing artists that haven't even broken the actual IRL law. I mean if you want to make the world a better place your efforts would be spent more effectively on an almost unlimited number of issues.
But that would require actual work, not sitting in front of your computer complaining about non-issues the world doesn't care about in between fap sessions.
AFAIK Kekitopu is from Venezuela. They had a meltdown on Twitter a few weeks ago, ranting about commies and how much they hate them.
In other words, you don't know any.
because touching real kids while wearing a fetish costume is pure, while touching yourself to imaginary "kids" is naughty
it's only logical
What exactly do you mean by a "moralfag"?
What is that exactly, everything you are not?
Bet that works out great for you in life not being one, LOL
Japan have furry hybrids already, that guy draw from live cub models posing.
The Japanese have much more advanced gene manipulation technology.
sorry I did not get the joke, I was thinking of 3d modeling
Twitter needs to be shut down just to keep morons like this from having any "power"
What is this drama about? I searched Twitter and apparently he cheated on an FTM tranny for another trans person. How does that make him a sexual predator?
Btw, I find it hilarious that we are back in those times in history where people can destroy their lives just for being massive sluts.
Don't put your cock into crazy, anon.
>>3581316>Never have I seen a furry go up in flames as badly as him.
LMAO Who is Kero The Wolf?
Beez Zabinski= 3B
He knows what to drown himself in.
Nah. 3B is a known cub fan and pedo. I'd be really surprised if he was actually Beez Zabinski.
could you please stop copypasting from farcebook?
The ass in OP's post sounds like a pedo-zoophile with a guilty conscience. The ones who rage the hardest about a thing, usually turn out to have the most skeletons in their closet about a thing.
I'm all for zoophilia as long as nobody's forcing the animal. Probably any sane furry whose brains haven't been polluted by desert religions should come to that same conclusion. Nothing wrong with a bit of interspecies romance. And yes, animals CAN consent, they just do it differently, stop saying they don't, you're factually wrong if you do. And no, imho it's not even a bad thing if you train them to do sex acts, as long as they don't come to physical harm through it, their minds are not as introspective and overcomplicated as ours, it doesn't bother them cause animals are not as fussy and prude about it as us, that's human culture.
As for pedophilia, not my problem, dunno, the age of consent laws are in general okay as they are for all I care, I don't approve of putting 17yos dating 16yos on that dumbass sex offender registry that you guys got over there, but other than that, simply not my problem. It's the police's problem.
I dont care if it's a 13 year old dating another 13 year d born on the same day. It's still makes them both pedophiles and they both deserve prison.
The age of consent is 14 here, and we're doing just fine. Abuse statistics are much better than the USA and I can't remember any politician or organization calling for a raise of it.
Personally, I think 14 is much more in tune with the development of human sexuality.
I think culture plays a role as well. In our country, kids have mandatory sex ed in 4th and 6th grade and we make sure to teach them about consent and safer sex.
>>3581732> animals CAN consent, they just do it differently, stop saying they don't
How can you consent to something that you don't even comprehend?
Animals can consent in their own context, for what sex between their own species means to them. Human involvement is different - you're abusing their limited understanding to trick them into performing you sexual favors in a relationship that goes far beyond what they ever bargained for. The second issue is, in the lack of proper communication between such unequal partners, YOU are unable to RECOGNIZE true consent from simple training and reinforcement.
Nearly all dog owners for example fail to recognize their pets real emotions and instead project their own opinions on the animal. People interpret their animals according to what they WANT to see. See for example: https://www.hillspet.com/dog-care/behavior-appearance/do-dogs-feel-guilt-or-shame>The study found that not only were dog parents unable to accurately tell whether their dogs had messed up, but as with the other study, both guilty and innocent dogs acted ashamed only when their owners assumed they had misbehaved and spoke to their dogs accordingly.
That's because dogs do not understand what their owners mean. They have simply learned to respond in a way that makes the owner stop bugging them. Act guilty and it pleases the owner who now thinks that they've got the message. Same thing goes with "consenting" for sex: when the animal is given two options to either go willingly or be harassed until they go willingly, they quickly learn to go willingly. The owner sees this process as a dialog between themselves and the dog, and thinks that the dog finally agrees rather than just being bullied into it - but all the while the animal had no real means to say "No" in a way that would not offend their owner. Dogs have been bred to not rise against their owners, so they'd rather compromise their own well-being.
>>3581736>Abuse statistics are much better than the USA
Just because you don't count doesn't mean there isn't abuse. You simply refuse to see it as such.
I never said that there was no abuse at all and I wasn't talking specifically about crime statistics. Making assertions about a statistic is pointless if you take the dark figure of crime into account.
No, or at least I don't remember anything like that. We encourage teenagers to make their own decisions.
Sure, there are certain constellations which are socially unaccepted, for example, if a guy in his 50s dated a 15yo girl, but nobody would care if a 17yo dated someone in their 20s.
Kill yourself. Both of you.
The age of consent is 14 where you live?
How do you have internet in Somalia?
>>3581748>I never said that there was no abuse at all
Neither did I. What I said was, you don't count as abuse what in the USA does count as abuse, so you're claiming superiority because you refuse to see the problem.
If you removed the age of consent entirely, then your abuse statistics would be even better.
It would be interesting to know who's in the wrong here. Do I refuse to see a problem, or is the society in the US just making a problem out of nothing by blanket labeling certain relationships as "abuse"?
>>3581743>>How can you consent to something that you don't even comprehend?
Nonsense. Animals comprehend sex just fine. They may not know its function, but they know that it's pleasurable. Animals (including humans) have evolved to find sex pleasurable, because the animals that didn't got out-competed.
>>for what sex between their own species means to them.
Inter-species sex is VERY common. Jesus christ have you never been on a farm?
>>you're abusing their limited understanding
Abuse is a human concept. Animals are not this fussy about sex. I already explained this. You either didn't read my comment or are literally too fucking stupid to understand the argument.
>>in a relationship that goes far beyond what they ever bargained for
Me eating any animal that crosses my path is also fair game.
Not being eaten by a superior life form that doesn't owe the animal shit, and being provided free food on top of it in exchange for occasional sex sounds like a fair deal towards an inferior creature to me.
Humans are the apex predator on this planet, deal with it, faggot.
That study only proves dogs are dumber than most owners would want to think, therefore a greater care for their sentience and thoughts being unnecessary. Are you trying to disprove your own argument?
14ish is the legal age here too, but I think dating anyone under 16 is stupid. Cause teens are stupid. Just cause it's legal doesn't mean it's a good idea.
Hell, I wouldn't date anyone under 20. Cause their brains are full of bullshit.
>>3581831>Do I refuse to see a problem, or is the society in the US just making a problem out of nothing by blanket labeling certain relationships as "abuse"?
Yes, you are the problem.
USA has a higher age of consent to stop incidence of grooming kids and teens by older men, and it also has romeo&julia laws (depending on the state) to provide for a sliding window so you don't go to jail just because one partner is past the age of majority. There is not actually any single age of consent. It is judged case-by-case.
Your version an on/off deal where a person is arbitrarily free game after they hit 14, which means lots of pedophiles get to legally groom and molest what is essentially just kids, and you don't recognize this as a problem since it's legal. When it is legal, you don't record the incidence (lower abuse statistics), so people don't have the perception of a problem.
>>3581850>Abuse is a human concept.
And you are a human. You're making an argument out of nihilism - that because you can, it is allowed. Guess what that makes you? A terrible human being.
We as a society define certain rules and ethical standards depending on your role relative to the animal. If you are growing animals to eat, you're allowed to kill them provided you don't cause them any unnecessary pains or stress - and this is a point where we actually want to get better all the time. More ethical treatment of production animals is a goal, with the ultimate aim of not having to eat animals at all, so you cannot use it to justify your sexual abuse of animals by a "two wrongs make a right" argument.
If you grow animals for entertainment (pets), the rules are stricter, and failure to adhere means a breach of trust relative to the society that permits you to have your pets. Even if you make the argument out of nihilism that says "I'ts just an animal", you forget that the same argument allows everyone else to punch your teeth in and put you in jail because ethics don't apply.
>>3581850>That study only proves dogs are dumber than most owners would want to think, therefore a greater care for their sentience and thoughts being unnecessary.
Great intelligence is not a requirement for the ability to suffer. In fact, simpler animals are more likely to suffer at the hands of human handlers who just don't understand them because of the great gulf between cognitive abilities, and our tendency to antropomorphize everything. The argument can be made that keeping pet animals is cruel in and of itself.
The problem only goes away when you consider animals that are so simple they have no sentience - no meaningful sense of self - because philosophically at that point you cannot say anyone is suffering. Chicken for example are more like biological robots - you can literally chop one's head off and leave just the brainstem, and it keeps on acting like a chicken because after being bred as a production animal for such a long time they've literally lost all higher brain functions. They just eat and shit.
It's also ironic that the social contract is what allows you the right to fuck animals in the first place - provided that you find a gap in the law that lets you get away with it. In the state of anarchy you would be lynched.
> being provided free food on top of it in exchange for occasional sex sounds like a fair deal towards an inferior creature to me.
That's because you're an abusive cunt. You think you're allowed to take what you want as long as you give back some token "compensation", which is the same logic as justifying human slavery by saying "Hey, they get free board and food. That's a fair deal towards an inferior creature".
I've never understood how you can own a pet, and fuck it without being a sociopath. There's a reason people talk to their pets bbn in "baby talk." Its because like myself we kinda look at our pets as psuedo children.
I like beastiality hentai, and the occasional zooschool, but the idea of actually fucking my dog makes me sick. Fucking your pet is on the same level of depravity as fucking your kids.
Sorry my misspellings kind of took away from that, I have major scarring on my hands and they dont like touch screens too well.
>>3581873>>Guess what that makes you? A terrible human being.
Your subjective opinion, disregarded.
>>We as a society define certain rules and ethical standards
Your and other people's subjective opinion, disregarded.
>>If you are growing animals to eat
I'll grow them however the fuck I want.
>>where we actually want to get better all the time
Your subjective desire, I don't give a shit.
>> by a "two wrongs make a right" argument
It's not a "two wrongs make a right" argument, it's an "these creatures DON'T HAVE THE ABILITY TO FUSS ABOUT SEX AND RELATIONSHIP THE WAY HUMANS DO. To them it's penis in whatever they can stick it, it feels good, that's enough for them.
>>If you grow animals for entertainment (pets), the rules are stricter
Fuck your rules, stop me if you can.
>>the same argument allows everyone else to punch your teeth in and put you in jail because ethics don't apply
There's a reason why human rights are called "human". Only applies to our species. Animal "rights" are as arbitrary as how desirable that animal is as food. There's no standard, just people's feels and fucking bullshit pretense at morality. Get a fucking kid if you want something to care about.
Great virtue signal Steam.
>>Great intelligence is not a requirement for the ability to suffer
The "suffering" would be an intellectual one, if they were capable of understanding human ways of thinking. But they don't so there's no suffering to speak of. At least if you fuck something big enough to take a human penis.
>> The argument can be made that keeping pet animals is cruel in and of itself.
Personal opinion, don't care what you find cruel you dumb hippie.
>>Chicken for example are more like biological robots
Nah. They're not that dumb. A fly is a biological robot, chicken do know some stuff. You didn't grow up on a farm you clueless city dweller, you wouldn't know. And yet chicken are tasty. I literally do not give a shit how intelligent they are, not my species, fair game for me to eat.>>3581882
Work animals are essentially slaves and that's perfectly fine. The only reason you can't do it to people is cause people are sentient and introspective. They can suffer from slavery. Animals are literally too dumb to realize they are our slaves.
You're arguing entirely on emotion and "wouldn't it be nice if" pipe-dreams. Reality's brutal, if this would be 40K BC we'd both bite living animals' heads off and call it a good day. Good luck with your "suffering-free" utopia. >>3581888
Great virtue signal Steam.
First, I ask why consent matters. They do not have human rights. Does a horse consent when you ride it, or make it pull a cart? Does a cow consent when you milk it? Do dogs or livestock consent when we breed them with eachother. Do animals consent when they literally eat eachother alive in the wild?
Consent is irrelevant. We exercise our power over them all the time.
The question is, does sex cause distress or physical harm to an animal. I don't believe it inherently does.
PETA is not wrong in that all animal ownership is on some level selfish and thus immoral, but what's typically agreed upon: if we adequately care for animals by 1. reducing their stress as much as possible while 2. promoting their additional happiness, then it's morally okay to enjoy their resources, be it emotional company or their body in the form of food and other supplies, consent not withstanding. Just as animals can be domesticated and socialized to assist in maintaining that relationship, so too can we extend that logic to playing with their genitals, provided that the moral responsbility of those two priorities are still being maintained.
Imagine your life being so pathetic that you have to attempt to call artists out as pedophiles to have any relevancy in life.
The image in question.
Hardly cub in my mind.
See my new recently created sites (xxx tube and porn toplist). I need your opinion about them. Also I hope you will find them interesting and in this case you can bookmark them. http://web-xxx.site/ http://elvira.website/
If it's cub? Fuck it.
If it's not cub? Fuck it.
It's a drawing on paper, or a collective of data in a file that mimics such as well.
But hey, if we're going to judge people on fantasy things, can we sentence like half the world's population to death for being serial killers in video games? or for reading novels that places the reader into the shoes of a rapist?
Might as well just kill all the humans, just to be safe.
Jesus what a pathetic cunt. Sick of all these Twitter mobs and callout posts. These sad people think they have power. Fuck that.
>Miles DF has also drawn NSFW of Roxanne from goof troop. Who is 12 to 13 years old.
14. She's 14 at the time of A Goofy Movie. So fucking what. I was 14 at the time the movie came out, and I've dreamed of her ever since.
Twitter & Cancel Culture needs to be reeled in somehow.
Also, honestly, its ironic that we've got people crusading against artists for imagined & poorly defined pedophia, on a platform that largely defends, shields, and permits ACTUAL Pedophiles.
Disregard that I suck cocks. Didnt realize this wasnt on FA.
Regardless, take a look I guess?
wow what an attention whore, he cant drawing, or make anything so he throws money to get stuff made. no one cares so he launches a crusade to rid the fandom of drawings and zoos. claim to be asexual while having a boys dick in is his month
look the problem here is real kids and drawing are different, if draw a picture of me having a 3 foot cock that cums gold does not make it so, I wish peaple would get that drawings are not real. cartoons are make believe. its like everyone forget that drawings are not real and they cannot create real things.
Block them! Report them! Don't let them attend our conventions!
Keep the minors in our fandom safe.
Nice clout chasing attempt, btw thanks for giving me new artists to follow!! :3
>>3583996>sexualization of children
If you found the children in Big Mouth sexy in any way, that is a YOU thing. None of those children were drawn to be anywhere CLOSE to sexually appealing.
You're a freak.
FYI: Child beauty pageants are almost exclusively a southern-conservative thing.
It's your people, country-boy, who have been trying to nationalizing pedophilia for decades. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1471&context=etd
>>3583996>If you criticize me being a pedo it really means that you are a pedo!
There you have your typical pedo delusion.
Nice Try, Trumptard, but pedophilia in its core is a right-wing ideology.
Sexual attraction towards children is not a political ideology. Neither the left, nor the right, has a monopoly on it.
How can you not see what's going on?
I watched the first few episode we have this gross looking "Hormone monster" saying the most inappropriate things to children imaginable, at one point they even drew the kids dick, they're constantly putting these kids in sexually compromising situations & I'm the freak for pointing this out?
I'm the pedophile for pointing out that it's not okay to have kids on stage in strip clubs?
Lactacia is literally standing there next to a gay naked guy with his dick hanging out & I'm the pedophile for not being okay with that? >>3584008
I'm on not board with child beauty pageants either, but at least they're not standing there on camera next to a naked guy. Does any remember the cross dresser who tried to start an LGBTQQIP2SAA no parents allowed pool party? You'll defend that, but act like I'm the Pedo for saying
"HuH! Hey this is not okay, I'm seeing a trend here & I really think we should do something about it."
What's wrong with it? Are your fefes hurt?
>>3584161>Does any remember the cross dresser who tried to start an LGBTQQIP2SAA no parents allowed pool party? You'll defend that…
No, we don't defend that. No one defends pedophiles. You keep acting like people on the left are okay with people fucking kids but no one is.
This whole evil plot that you think is happening is just in your head.
What is really happening is a few freaks are acting freaky and people on the right are pointing at it for shock value.
You are telling each other these grand conspiracy theories about satanic pedophile cabals and left-wing plots to brain wash children but it's just you, being crazy, like always.
There is no conspiracy.
There is no plot.
There is no cabal.
You are delusional.
Pedophiles like Poly see a picture of a fully clothed child with their legs spread and gets turned on so he assumes that it's just as arousing for everyone else. They think that everyone else is as turned on by children as they are.
They get upset that these "pornographic images" are being shown in public.
It never even occurs to them that to the rest of us there is absolutely nothing sexual about a child.
They assume we all think and feel like they do and then further assume that we are all okay with people being turned on by these "pornographic images" because they keep seeing them in popular media.
They never even stop to consider that maybe, just maybe, it's them who are the freaks, not the rest of us.
And according to these people…
A Show where a "hormone monsters" says the most lewd stuff imaginable to children.
If you see anything wrong with teaching kids in elementary school how to use a strap on and insert a dildo into your ass.
If you see anything wrong with a no parents "youth all-bodies" adult pool party hosted by an adult drag queen…
*you're* the pedophile.
You're fucking making excuses to rationalize what you know is wrong.
This pretty far removed from kids in a bathing suite in a god damn sears catalog.
This why I don't listen liberals any more…
This Kind of shit right here. We fucking trust you people.
You see shit happening right in front of your faces and then fucking LIE.
And people are starting to wake up.
I just posted a picture of it!
IT'S LITERALLY RIGHT HERE! >>3584256
What in the fuck is wrong with you?
No, you didn't, you fucking moron.
You posted images of high-school kids in high-school sex education class.
THESE ARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL KIDS.
I don't know why I expected you to know the difference between High school and elementary school. It's pretty obvious no one in your family ever made it past the fourth grade.
It's not something the should be taught in public schools.
The kids may not be in kindergarten, I'm not sure how old they are.
but they still kids & this is still a public school & you are still acting like all this is fine.
>>3584298>It's not something the should be taught in public schools.
Where are they gonna learn it then? From you? Teenage pregnancy is a real thing because single-parent households are more often than not incapable of raising children properly, if at all. Teaching abstinence is a fool's failed dream because hormones gonna horm no matter what.
>but they still kids & this is still a public school & you are still acting like all this is fine.
It IS fine because consider the much costlier and unwanted baby alternatives to sex education for sexually mature public school students.
Yes, everyone is acting like teaching high school kids to have safe sex is fine, you know why? Because if we don't they will screw around anyway and end up getting pregnant or hurt.
There is a reason that conservative states have the highest teen pregnancy and highest STD rates of any states in America. You don't train your kids to use their dicks responsibly.
You morons think we defiantly need to train kids how to use guns safely in school but GOD FUCKING FORBID they learn how to use a condom! You southern culture is stupid beyond words.
You and all your kind are dragging humanity down. You are the dead weight of humanity. It will be so nice when Covid19 wipes you all out because you refuse to wear masks.
>>3584287>A Show where a "hormone monsters" says the most lewd stuff imaginable to children.
Again, this is only a problem if you are such a fucking retard that you let your children watch a show which is CLEARLY and EXPLICITLY for adults.
It is not our job to parent your kids. If you look at a TV-MA show which is blocked from the kids access on Netflix who's first episode is entitled "Ejaculation" and expect it to be wholesome fun for the kids that is YOU BEING STUPID that's not society's problem. That's a YOU problem.
This isn't a "safe sex" lesson… this a teacher with a fucking strap on.
& we don't honestly know how old these kids are, only that their older kindergarten, first or second grade.
I learned about safe sex in high school & middle school myself. They taught us about the reproductive system, gestation, male and female genitalia, the birthing process, how STD's are contracted, how to practice safe sex, where to get tested if you'd had sex & concerned about it, birth control pills, condoms…. all of that…
Hell in high school we even had a cross dressing day.
At no point was it nessecary for the teacher to bring out a box of sex toys and show to put on a strap on or how to shove dildos in to our ass. >>3584302
Okay so you can at least admit that is explicit & is for adults…
About kids in sexually explicit situations & this doesn't present any red flags to do you? Apparently not
>>3584304>We're supposed to putting colonies on the moon, we should be aiming to become a galactic civilization.
How are we suppose to do that? Mitch McConnel won't even bring any bills to a vote.
He's just refusing to do his job. Even Trump is sick of it. Trump passed an executive order to forbid HUD and the other housing agencies from eviciting people. He's trying to order the IRS to not collect payroll taxes but the legality of that is questionable.
They have had 10 meetings, not with Democrats, but with other Republicans, and can't get anything done.
The GOP is actively refusing to do its job in the middle of a pandemic with a massive economic collapse happening and the only reason I can think of them just refusing to work at all is that they really, really, want Trump to lose.
The Democrats are BEGGING them to give voters money that would make Trump look like a national hero and they just won't do it. They are trying to sink Trump. It's the only logical explanation.
He's also ordering insurerers to cover pre-existing conditions which, you know, was already part of Obamacare but it's good to see that he at least realizes it's important.
>>3584303>About kids in sexually explicit situations
It's a show about puberty. If anything, it's gross and weird. At no point whatsoever is it sexual unless you are a deviant pedophile freak. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you've never actually watched it.
The show isnt really all that bad. Maybe for kids pre 12, but honestly it's better to learn about STDs and horrific porn through cartoons then that *one guy* we all knew in middle school.
I mean it's better than how I was brought up, where when you looked at someone attractive you got beaten and kept out of school until your eyes healed up.
No I watched a few episodes with some Furry friends awhile back.
They kept telling me,
"Oh don't be such a prude, It's a funny show. It's just a show about puberty I don't see what the big deal is. It gets better. Just give it a chance."
I gave it a chance. It didn't get better… it only got worse. Every episode seemed like it was worse than the one prior & I decided & Yyyyeaaaahhh…. I'm not watching this anymore.
if you like cub/loli art then you are a phedophile, if thats right then:
If you like action/horro/slasher movies then you are a psicho and a murderer.
If you like Yiff then you are zoophile
good lord, if you like gangster movies/series then you are a criminal, makes a lot of sense to me, lets ban all that, movies, games, series, art, books, anything that show "illigal" acts in a fictional world or we gonna turn all the ppl in the world in criminals, hurry, lest BAN EVERYTHING!!!!
If you jerk off to the drawn picture of a child, chances are high that you might be a pedophile to some degree but hey, that's totally fine. Educated people know the difference between pedophilia and pedosexuality.
>>3585185>If you like Yiff then you are zoophile
ok let's not pretend that this one isn't true though lol
got any other interesting picks saved on your hd? something..*licks lips*..youngggeeerrrrr……?
got any other interesting picks saved on your hd? something..*licks lips*..youngggeeerrrrr……?