I guess when your dick is that pencil thin you have no choice but to bumfuck dogs lol
worms on live in that mans balls.
why is there so many bestiality people now a days ?
They're probably aren't in the sense that there are more now, it's just that society allows it more so you see it more.
It's like kiddy diddlers, that used to be a condemn you to hell thing, now you have people pushing it towards legality. There aren't more of them, it's just more "acceptable."
This sort of shit is why the idea of an unmoderated image board is a failure. Just people shitting up worthwhile threads because they can.
This thread was doomed as soon as it fell out of lightofheaven's shit-caked asshole.
OFF TOPIC ART DISCUSSION GOES HERE
Hijacking this thread for all off-topic discussion from the regular art thread.
Original thread https://lulz.net/furi/res/1544.html
People can always agree to self-moderate. While complete anarchy is also bad, moderators tend to be shit in general, not just in our fandom, cause they get drunk with power and start micromanaging what you can and can't post if you don't keep them on a leash. That's when the fun stops and you feel like you have to walk through a minefield. A good example of a minefield used to be fchan.
And sorry for derailing the initial thread. If only I had thought of separating them sooner.>>3576412
Because you became a furry. 18.5% of furries self-identify as zoophiles given the right to anonymity. I'd say, what the hell were you expecting given the amount of animal dick?!>>3576413
Things that make other humans or animals suffer should never be legal. But anything that harms nobody (other than maybe yourself) should be legal.
Bestiality can be harmful in some situations.
Pedophilia is always harmful because it involves creatures that are physically (and almost always also mentally) sexually immature. That's why it can't ever be legal.
However, it gets trickier when you get into the mid and late teens, because you have sexually mature people with a sex drive that are presumed to be mentally immature for sex, or at least a power imbalance of age that should is unfair to be exerted on a minor. 15-16 sounds like an okay age to be "legal" imho.
They say trolling is a art.
>>3576423> What's the bump limit btw?
500 I think.
Uh, in hindsight yes, he will delete it. Well not that we're saying anything too important, so it probably doesn't matter.
We do need an off-topic art thread though. This one, or another one.>>3576428
So you're saying a moving picture can under no circumstances be art?
I've heard some pretty broad and ill-thought out definitions of art, such as "that which elicits an emotional response." Presumably, a work that evokes disgust or revulsion would qualify then.
No, it's not. Being an asshole to real living things, animals or people, is never art.
But I wasn't being an asshole to living things though.
And I wasn't the one who made the living things into non-living things either.
Good point, that pretty much throws out the window guro art. Just cause one has a negative emotional response doesn't mean it's not art.
In my opinion ART IS SKILL. If your work is in any way distinguishable in terms of skill from what the average person can accomplish, it's art.
And art is also creativity in terms of novelty or complexity of idea (even if your skills to see it through are inadequate).
>>3576554>And I wasn't the one who made the living things into non-living things either.
You are being an asshole to us by posting your disgusting behavior.
Just stop. Keep it to yourself.
Sculptures aren't made from disgusting rotting corpses.
Stop posting this shit. You are repulsive and no one here wants to see it.
Please post lots more of this wonderful art form.
You ever heard of taxidermy?
Yes, and it's disgusting. There is a reason it's the stereotypical past time of serial killers and back woods hicks. If you do it, you are human trash.
How about leatherworking? How about cooking meat? I hope you're a vegetarian.
You sound like a contemporary middle class bitch.
Can you pose the fox like this except facing the other direction so that his now-useless sexual organs are fully exposed for all the universe to see? Some say aliens have technology so advanced they can see us from out there, so why not give them something interesting to look at.
It's a female. Turning her around would not produce the desired effect.
Clayton used to collect the skulls of animals. Whether he killed them or salvaged roadkill was determined to be inconclusive since he went into hiding.https://en.wikifur.com/wiki/Clayton
How's come the actual hole in a dog's anus and many other mammals is a horizontal slit and in humans it's vertical?
Fox is ok, and raccoon is nice. But my vote is for opossum pie!
Creampie, that is.
Isn't that raccoon in the middle Nurse CoCo, from Doctor Lollipop?
smitty has made a bunch of CoCo art
the mans a herohttps://e621.net/posts?tags=smitty_g
because humans stand vertically and dogs (and almost all mammals) stand horizontally you absolute retard
human anuses also aren't vertical theyu are perfecly round
I have a question…
Say there's a pic I really like and want to animate it and post it somewhere. It's a commissioned pic, so I ask the artist and commissioners permission to post.
The artist gave me the ok, but the commissioner for some reason told me no. The commissioners male character is a basic black rabbit with some sparkledog coloring and no other features that make him unique. He dosn't own rabbits.
Would I be the asshole if I just recolored the male rabbit and posted it anyway?
The commissioner doesn't own the art if it's posted publicly. If they wanted people to see it so badly, it's free to use if not for profit.
Who owns the art is determined by the agreement between the artist and the commissioner, so you'd only need the permission from whichever one owns it from a legal standpoint.
From a moral standpoint, I'd call you a bit of a dick if either of them asked you not to, but whether you care about their feelings is up to you.
I'm not being paid for it. I did it entirely out of love for the piece. The artist gave me the ok but said I should ask commissioner too.
The female character is owned by Disney. It's self-insert rule34.
Guys you're posting in the off-topic thread.
I sunk the other one.
yes, you'd be a dick to at least the commissioner who doesn't feel comfortably having his character get animated in ways he may not want toe to act or move.>>3579058
Why would you not flip the canvas to detect the error before you go on to coloring? If you are prone to drawing lopsided characters and anatomy, you got to make the horizontal flipping a part of your progress.
As long as it is scribbly sketchlines, you are free to lasso-select whatever seems of and then resize, squish and rotate until it looks passable both flipped and unflipped.
I check it every time, sometimes catch some real bad tilted sketches. (getting less frequent thankfully \o/ )
That's why I'm going to draw my own bunny in his place. If the faggot dosn't like it, too bad. I offered him free art first.
>>3579068>detect the error before you do coloring
Ah, that's one of my many problems. I can't really see what I'm drawing until it's been drawn. Besides, at that point it was about four or five hours of drawing, but only twenty or so minutes of coloring. Also all of the colors are on different layers, so it's not that big of a deal.
I like the arts you do. Maybe take time to co.promise between old arts and new arts you are doing to find error detection? Learn from mistakes you are already have?
Your anatomy continues to improve. You are scaling the heads and bodies better. The legs are the same length and you are creating the illusion of volume with the light properly.
Maybe you just can't see the improvement because you are are looking at it every day as it incrementally happens? Compare a modern drawing to a year ago or two years ago, see how they have evolved?