cancel reply
Posting mode: Reply

Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
name e-mail subject pw(deletion)
Post and go
Bump thread?

  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Javascript must be enabled for all of our addons to work.
  • Come chat and see that we're all a bit crazy on IRC!
  • Do not post any artwork from and/or
    Jeremy Bernal. This is now a bannable offense.

File: 001.jpg - (9.58 KB, 220x229) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
9808 No.3505576

So someone please explain to me why Inkbunny hasn't been partyvanned yet.

File: D2SG.gif - (975.29 KB, 500x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

I would but we've already established you lack the distinction between imaginary things and real things.


They have a firm policy "No humans in any sexual situations".

What's the police gonna do? Pedo laws don't cover animals.

File: 108632_SherlyKaru_1255813898.jpg - (139.52 KB, 702x496) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


But quite a few pics of obviously underage human character in sexual situations with the naughty bits just barely censored or cut off. I'm not sure how well this would hold up in the court of law, especially given that links to the actual content are also usually right there as well.

File: DRWyfsiWkAIucNx.jpg - (48.51 KB, 703x502) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Then report them, coward. Come back when you have a conviction.

This isn't twitter. This isn't tumblr. Only faggots run around crying about perceived crimes hoping to raise some pitchforks. Do you see a crime? Report it. Here's a site

File: 1195491_zooshi_babysitter3-ink.jpg - (408.73 KB, 920x1034) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


You seem to have mistaken me for OP/someone who gives a shit. I use IB all the time. I'm just pointing out the flaws in logic here. That and trying to turn this into a cub thread.

File: 1428644781968-3.png - (625.27 KB, 1440x1080) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


That works too.

>So someone please explain to me why Inkbunny hasn't been partyvanned yet.

Perhaps you should explain why you think that they should have been.

I know we're in the trump-era, but we don't go around arresting people who haven't committed any crime. Yet.

File: 7bd541e55f3972a26511781b833653f2.jpg - (79.21 KB, 508x800) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Drawing a picture of someone robbing a bank is not a crime. Drawing an imaginary creature having sex is not a crime in the USA although in some countries it can be. Since it isn't a photograph but art of an imaginary creature, obscenity laws don't typically apply as it is "erotic art" and not considered pornography (in the US) and as long as websites have such content walled off behind a "Must be 18+" notice, they are golden.

File: 68107038 - 1.jpg - (2304.59 KB, 2484x3110) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Because regardless of how much SJWs scream otherwise, drawing non fictional creatures and saying they are underage isn't illegal.

Fun fact, age of consent doesn't apply to animals.


Because it pisses you off, OP. :)



File: GCFsY-oe.png - (54.75 KB, 468x468) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Same reason why this place hasn't been "Party vanned"

Because thought crime isn't a thing that's punishable in most places.

I don't like cub or loli anymore you than you do dude. But DAMN scro, you can't just go around having people arrested because of you "disapprove" of their kinks.

Among other kinks cub stuff is posted here all the time & it kinda makes me cringe when I see it, but bitching about it doesn't make you a better person. It just makes you virtue signaling jackass. If that kind material bothers you so much why complain about it here?

File: knsll.jpg - (253.31 KB, 850x496) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

They're cartoons. They're not real.




Examples? Anthro animals don't count as 'human'. And as I browsed IB quite a bit, I think I only saw some 'Link in the description' placeholders linking to off-site images (e.g. on Pixiv)




Spanking your children is illegal
Molesting your children is legal

>>Liberal logic
>Roy Moore
>Trump's friends he still defends

Sounds totally liberal to me.


loli/cub art is just used as a loophole for pedos, nothing more. Face it, you like underage kids, you are a pedo, plain and simple, the definition makes no distinction between real or art. That's like denying you're gay/bi because you only masturbate to artwork of men.

This is the level of stupid I expect from people who claim Chris Hansen stages his show. Aww, baby's mad because it was mostly white hetero men who showed up? Yeah, must be totally set up because what's presented hurts your feelings.

America is also a nation where rich people legit propose 10 year prison sentences for fucking piracy, yet wouldn't dare suggest the same for child abuse. It also protects pedos hard despite the good people hating it. R Kelly's latest proof he fucked a kid? Tossed out. Roy Moore proven to fuck teens? Why bother to prosecute when Drumpf would merely pardon him? Michael Jackson was PROTECTED by the music industry, to the point they damn near cost Gene Simmons his career when he called the man a pedo, now Gene's a good Jew going along with his Israeli masters and kidding MJ's butt.



take your pills.


stop touching kids

File: DSX80NVUEAAN__8 (1).jpg - (146.14 KB, 1200x1160) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


Off topic. That's not what the OP asked. The OP asked "[Why hasn't] Inkbunny been partyvanned yet."

Partyvan in this case refers to an old repeated idea on 4chan in which the FBI, in order to cleverly ensnare the often criminal user of 4chan, would present themselves in the disguise as one who was presenting a mobile party for users of 4chan when in reality, they were the FBI making an arrest.

So in other words, the OP, or "Original Poster" in this case, is asking why the Administration of or even large numbers of the members of the web community "InkBunny," known for not restricting depictions of underage anthropomorphic animal cartoons, has not been contacted or arrested by the FBI, with the strong implication that they ought to.

This precludes any debate or assertion about the moral acceptance of the consumption of questionable, but altogether fictional media, and instead asserts that the web community "InkBunny" is guilty of crimes and should therefor be arrested and tried for these crimes.


But why am I replying, OP is a (1) and done poster anyway ¯\(ツ)

File: 1524823823146.jpg - (22.56 KB, 552x424) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

ImO the community that demonizes a thing is the one responsible for that things existent abundancy, meaning its soley their fault it is and soley the source of its continual detriment onto them, sort of an what goes around comes around, or you poked the wasps nest and by consequence, made yourself susceptible to the risk. The risk being that you make yourself a voice for those who are essentially haters deep down who seek nothing more than to penalize a person for in all honesty his own sexual identity of which most likely is not his fault. I realize its his being a difference to the offending gender class, but when its a dominant thing so to is the grammar protest it but those in charge are simply in a power struggle for the top of the pecking order, right or wrong or grammatically incorrect it may be. SO who gives a flying shit, also its techincally not their server so its not their business (question mark) But I guess since porn has a chemical effect on people you need the fucking D.E.A. for it.


because the first amendment exists and protects freedom of expression, which includes art, and inkbunny deals in drawings, not cp. why do you hate freedom OP?

Spanking your children is illegal
Molesting your children is legal
    >>Liberal logic

>>3505695 Here's an idea for preventing children from being both spanked and/or molested; Stop reproducing.
Let's face it, an unborn child has no ability to consent whether he or she want's to be here or not.

As an added bonus, future pedos won't exist either.


Do we actually have a case where it has been specifically stated that underage/cub art is exempt from the PROTECT Act or general obscenity laws? I really don't think hearing some neckbeard saying "Yeah. BRRRUUUUUUUUUUUP! FART I'd think Chippettes porn is okay cuz the cops prolly never heard of 'em" is sound legal precedent.

File: Strawman.png - (378.20 KB, 664x628) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.




>specifically stated that underage/cub art is exempt from the PROTECT Act

The PROTECT Act itself makes such an exemption.

(11) the term `indistinguishable' used with respect to a 
depiction, means virtually indistinguishable, in that the
depiction is such that an ordinary person viewing the depiction
would conclude that the depiction is of an actual minor engaged
in sexually explicit conduct. This definition does not apply to
depictions that are drawings, cartoons, sculptures, or paintings
depicting minors or adults.''.

Notwithstanding that "minor" legally means a "member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive and who is under the age of eighteen years" (yes, they're that oddly specific when it comes to the law), so "cub porn" could never be construed to be "child porn" and you'd have a hard time convincing me that you couldn't distinguish shotas/lolis from actual children.

File: strawmanDebate.jpg - (104.99 KB, 1280x720) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.




Due to recent unknown changes to the obscenity law which states the "minor" depicted doesn't have to exist, this argument was thrown out the window.


The way I see it, there are two possibilities.

One possibility is that people have tried to get Inkbunny and/or artists on it busted, and all the attempts have failed.

The other possibility is that no one has ever tried, which given how much it's been discussed, paints you all as the weakest, most passive pussies on the fucking planet.


Their host only cares about legally-binding complaints. A couple copyright claims is all that gets through.

File: backpedal.jpg - (233.14 KB, 607x746) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

he's super not wrong tho lmao


The only people defending pedophiles are rightwinger garbage. Because rightwinger filth are fucking monsters who will defend anybody... As long as the people they're defending are also rightwinger garbage.


From the first link in your image

>No reasonable reader could construe [the Salon article] as pro-pedophilia.

Is that what you intended?


It doesn't matter. He has a convenient image and an agenda, so the facts aren't relevant. That's how his kind operates.


whoa whoa whoa
cool your jets lorena bobbitt
just thought it would be interesting to note that a little no name lefty published some UNCOMFORTABLE and GROSS stuff about pedos on a progressive and inclusive website.

I agree that Salon is not pro-pedo, which is why they deleted the pro-pedo article. Still, how do you let something like that slip through lmao

hay sweety, adults are talking now.



>which is why they deleted the pro-pedo article

So I suppose you're not a reasonable reader.


Well, me an Salon, we're not exclusive no. I get around, a little breitbart here, a little CBC and BBC there. Sometimes if I'm really naughty I'll have the same story open in both HuffPo and Fox!



>i was only pretending to be an idiot

Don't get all huffy with me mister! If you want all your news from one place then go right ahead.

File: 51itYILW zL._SX466_.jpg - (11.89 KB, 466x466) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Because drawings aren't children, no matter how much they look like children to you.
Should owning this get you put in the sex offender registry?


Not directly.

>Because drawings aren't children, no matter how much they look like children to you.

That's a lousy apology and a cheap rationalization. A pedo is a pedo regardless, and why would anyone else look at child porn drawings?




make anime illegal while you're at it


Pedophilia isn't illegal. Child abuse is. The thought of harming a child is perfectly legal. It is the act of harming a child which is illegal.

Only acts can be illegal. Thoughts should never be illegal. It is impossible to live in a liberal democracy if you outlaw thought of any kind.


Anything can be outlawed.

>make anime illegal

People are allowed to make mistakes.



>>It is impossible to live in a liberal democracy if you outlaw thought of any kind.

You mean like persecuting 'nazi thought' in Europe? Are they not liberal democracies?


Yes. It is illiberal to ban even Nazi thought and speech. Allowing such speech is the very essence of having freedom of speech: the freedom to express, without consequence, ideas other people find reprehensible.

Europe is a pretty bad example of liberal values these days. They'll arrest you for twitter posts.

File: 4564654e.png - (721.44 KB, 938x704) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


Society needs a new medium between ban and free speech. A new category of ideas that we can shove shit in that is just stupid beyond words so people will know if someone talks about that shit they are morons.

File: 3BC_LOGO2.jpg - (18.08 KB, 578x549) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

A third category? Why don't we designate this category 3? Maybe we should add something to it so people don't confuse it with the number 3.. Now what could that something be...

File: C38NsymWAAAFjoa.jpg - (142.68 KB, 1280x1141) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


Nice! Can you upload a .png version so I can steal it?



>Thoughts should never be illegal


That is freedom of speech.

Maybe your retarded believes hold merit and people can learn from it, maybe they don't and it is explained to him why his beliefs would never work out and he can learn from it, but no one learns anything if you just lynch him for expressing his ideas and have him fired or thrown in jail. In fact, resorting to physical force like that in the face of an idea makes your own position seem incredibly weak. You are saying "I don't have an argument to counter that, so I'm just going to physically oppress you."

The only way to defeat speech is with speech. To use force is to admit intellectual defeat.

File: garuta_.DHCVfP0VoAE9lCv.png - (215.88 KB, 900x1200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

inkbunny is the only furry art gallery run professionally and not-for-profit

File: Wile_Z_Kitsune.DYylXncU8AEGN5q.jpg - (76.32 KB, 1024x698) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


>more people sourceposting

Did I die and go to heaven? What is this madness?

File: 11a1d56ceeb3b82c702037aaa71f8db2.png - (10.01 KB, 300x300) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Just use the filter function dipshit.
Also they don't allow humans in R18 so go figure.


"The only way to defeat speech is with speech. To use force is to admit intellectual defeat." I say, as they lead me to the guillotine. My greater victory is directly ahead of me.

Delete Post []