so this nutbag faggot monk who lived his life trying to convince the world that we all need to cooperate and respect each other decided to go out like a drama queen by lighting himself on fire to show that even the most peaceful and altruistic causes may need their martyrs

i repeat he set himself on fire to be a martyr

also, irony? air pollution over one burning body? you do realize thats hardly a drop in a bucket right? or are you one of those people who uses a snowball to argue that climate change isnt happening?

Probably more than you'll ever do for any cause.

admit you're envious OP, burning yourself to death is a pretty metal way to commit suicide

and at least this guy got in the news, unlike mass shootings that are so common that they are no longer newsworthy

>>3503301

That monk was a fucking loser too.

If your religion/philosophy is telling you to kill yuorself, then maybe it's time for you to find a different religion/philosophy.

>>3503286
It was obviously his inner white male Christian patriarchy that was oppressing his queerness that caused this.
Ban free inner-speech! Rightwinger Nazi scum get out of our psyches!

holy shit this gave me the dopest idea for a suicide.
the human joint.

What a literal faggot, lol

It would have been better if he had started setting white trash and other rightwingers on fire. That would have been a truly powerful statement, and he would still be alive to carry out his work.

>>3503366
No, he took the way better road, killing himself because he knew he was gay liberal leftist commie trash. Follow his example.

>>3503372

>implying being gay is bad
>implying being liberal is bad
>implying being leftist is bad
>implying being a communist is bad

Lol out loud XD
But srsly kys thx

>waah gay people exist, they hurt my feelings, I hate them so much, they have no right to breathe the same air I do, how dare they even exist, baaaaw

Fuck off, you sound like an SJW. The bible is bi-bullshit.

>>3503366
Are you SUUUURE you're in favor of moderation?

If you're absolutely certain you're in favor of moderation, please come to the IRC channel and state
"I am in favor of moderation."

>>3503382
>>3503376
And you've proven again that you really are trash.
You really truly are.
No FEEWINGS hurt here, I'm laughing at you.
But maybe it's not your fault, so sorry you had shit parents and teachers.

>>3503393

>rightwingers calling normal people trash

If rightwingers don't hate you then you must be doing something wrong

>>3503376

Why did the Soviet Union, China, and other Socialist countries lock up, execute, or otherwise "Disappear" homosexuals?

Oh that's right, like Islam, socialism doesn't do faggot shit.

They'll USE faggots to advance their agenda, but like liberals, faggots get the bullet too in leftist, socialist governments.

So there's that to look forward to.

>>3503411

>>3503387
Make me a mod. There will be moderation.

We will also begin autoplaying L'Internationale for everyone who visits the site.

>>3503444

You're either a dedicated troll, or woefully unaware of just how unappealing you are.

You're almost not even worth responding to, but that point is fast approaching.

>>3503444
I'd rather we autoplay New Junk City from Earthworm Jim

>>3503453
I am extraordinarily appealing to people who aren't trash.

>>3503286 Well... Air... is kind of big deal. There are a lot of dumb things to protest. But air pollution is something we need pay attention to and work to reduce. We should all want for cleaner air & water. The irony is here that if we don't take air pollution seriously we could all burn.

So is he dead or just horribly maimed?

>>3503366 If he did that he would be in prison... Wishing death & fire on people you disagree with is what crazy people do. It's what radical coocoo birds do.

>>3503376

>implying being straight is bad
>implying being conservative is bad
>implying being rightest is bad
>implying being a capitalist is bad

Lol out loud XD
But srsly kys thx

>>3503382 I think it's more so that the "progessive" alphabet soup community are becoming progressively more obnoxious and invasive than it is "hurting his feelings".

>>3503453 So why do you want to be a mod? So you make /furi/ another haven for your pc marxist cryptofash orwellian agenda?

>>3503482

>image

ah yes bet the creator of this was out protesting when the ex-USSR dynamited lenin statues in-between shoehorning quotes from 50-years-dead communist veterans of the Spanish civil war into contemporary affairs.

>So why do you want to be a mod? So you make /furi/ another haven for your pc marxist cryptofash orwellian agenda?

Yes.

>>3503454
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUWtfbjZ5-Q
but its gotta be the extended Sega CD version

>>3503482
It was about slavery. It shouldn't be preserved.

>>3503482 Funny about records being preserved.

The Smithsonian Institute and National Archives have a kind of crowdsourced project where volunteers are transcribing hand-written notes into digital searchable text. I've started working on some, so far I've been doing civil war era notes from North Carolina mostly pertaining to transportation of freedmen.

They could use more volunteers if you can deal with 19th century cursive.

>>3503504

>Complains about slavery
>Thinks Gulags are a good idea

>>3503551
Not a valid comparison. Slaves didn't do anything to deserve it, while a gulag is essentially just a kind of prison that people could be sentenced to. That's like saying "if you believe in freedom you must also oppose imprisoning anyone for any reason."

>>3503552 Yeah but your reasons for gulaging people are fucking stupid.

For what? going to church? Thinking for their themselves? Crapping on communism? For not being ashamed of being white? For cracking a joke that wasn't "pc"?

Fuck your Marxist Bullshit!

>>3503552

Well said comrade! How can anyone even suggest gulags were state-sponsored slavery? Those Siberian mines and rail lines built themselves, with a little volunteer assistance from convicted homosexuals, intellectuals, land owners, political dissidents, and Jews! We even rewarded them with free holes in the ground once they got too tired to keep digging!

>>3503607
Kulaks, actually. And the holes in the ground weren't free. They dug those themselves.

This taught them a valuable lesson about hoarding grain when their fellow workers were starving to death.

>>3503665

>ussr and modern russia
>the same thing

How embarrassing for you.
Cap is frowner.

>>3503666 Not embarrassed at all actually. If anything I'm embarrassed because I used to protest with the left. I supported the left and bought into all its horse shit. I'm embarrassed because it took this election to finally wake me up to how embarrassingly irrational and violent and overall bonkers the left really is. How passive aggressive, bossy, stuffy, and pompous they are, and when their manipulative douche bag tactics fail to get them their way they get directly aggressive.

Pretty sure modern Russia isn't all that fun to live in either. The point is it's a Russian national flag. PERIOD

Even if it's not the same flag as the current one. It is a Russian flag... The same country you're screeching that Trump colluded with. I mean if you're for socialism if you're for communism and a such a huge fan of Russia... Wouldn't you WANT the president to collude with them?

I mean NO ... THAT is embarrassing... To carry a Russian national flag (even if it's not the current one) and screech about how Trump is a Nazi for supposedly colluding with, is an embarrassment to your movement.

It's like you've trained your brain to accept things don't just don't make sense or stack up to critical thinking and explain it with PC liberalist mental gymnastics. The fact that I used to hang out with people like you is what is embarrassing to me.

>>3503672
The left doesn't want your kind. Glad to be rid of you! :)

>>3503672

>I used to protest with the left

Nope.

>I mean if you're for socialism if you're for communism and a such a huge fan of Russia... Wouldn't you WANT the president to collude with them? I mean NO ... THAT is embarrassing... To carry a Russian national flag (even if it's not the current one) and screech about how Trump is a Nazi for supposedly colluding with, is an embarrassment to your movement.

Well look at it from the other side: If Russia is indeed still socialist/communist instead of the creeping nationalist oligarchic filth that it appears to be, shouldn't YOUR ilk want nothing to do with it?

But then, this isn't about communism or socialism or capitalism; anyone in the workforce knows that the current state of U.S. capitalism is a fucked up joke, that the post-FDR marriage between socialism and capitalism is the best our country ever had it; what this is actually about is that the prevailing narrative is that Putin is OurGuy (despite the fact that Russia's population is 15% Muslim compared to Sweden's 6% or England's 5%) and that he helped the POTUS win the every-four-year-football-game. The mechanisms of corruption and how this sort of horseshit would've flown with the Founders doesn't matter to you anyway, because you don't identify with the citizens of the United States.
Your heart lies with your dead, worthless Confederacy and the aristocracy that failed.

>>3503665
That second image is quite literally a false flag.

Aufy can you source your images better in the future? Any time you spread something false, you damage everything else you try to say.

>>3503683
That's why the left doesn't want him on their side. It's to our benefit to have him making rightwingers look like idiots.

>>3503672

How do you know they arent waving it ironically as in protesting that the US is becoming a Russian bastion?

>>3503683 "False Flag" ?

Even if that is a picture of a confirmed infiltrator

There are literally pictures all over the internet of them waving just about every communist flag you can think of & no I seriously doubt every single one them is just some clever troll who thought he'd be sneaky. These people are fucking lunatics who worship destruction.

They're brain washed humorless zombie hoards of Marxist busybodies.

I didn't "Make this up". These people are literally on the streets promoting communism and beating people up.

You're false flag accusation is fucking bogus. Lick my balls!

>>3503733
Continue to use staged images then. You try to help a guy, sheesh.

>>3503735 The image was "staged" ?

As if there aren't enough actual photos of them carrying communist Russian flags already someone felt the need to "stage" it.

If you can prove this you should have done it already. I'm curious though what you're waiting for. So this was "staged"?

okay? You know this how?

was this staged?

or this? These are just Nazi's staging photos trying to make Antifa look bad? This isn't real either? Didn't really happen?

Or these guys? Also staged... Just more Nazi's in disguise?
It's not hard to find actual photos of actual Antifa carrying actual Soviet flags.

The very idea that someone would feel like they needed to "stage" Antifa carrying Soviet flags because there just isn't enough footage is fucking laughable. However, I wouldn't put it past the realm of human stupidity.

So back to your "False Flag" accusation. Link us the full story on this fucking idiot who decided there wasn't enough Antifa waving Communist flags so he decides he's got to "pretend" to be an Antifa with Russian flag.

This should really be interesting.

>>3503746
Short answers:
Staged/Fake
Staged/Fake
REAL Congrats you found a real one, this photo was taken at the Boston Ralley, where a poorly planned counter-protest was put together on Reddit.

Aufy, my friend.
Twitter is not a source.
Youtube is not a source.
Reddit is not a source.

If you wonder about an image, Go to https://images.google.com/ and slide that image right in there. It will try to find web pages that contain the image. If the image can ONLY be found on le reddet, twitter, and/or youtube and is only referenced by a few forums, It's likely staged, fake, or photoshopped.

>>3503765 Once again... you're simply stating that they're fake without actually providing anything to back up what you're saying.

I didn't ask you "Can you do the same thing you just did in the last post?"

I asked you "can you tell us how you know these are all staged?"

1 out of 3? yeah that's better than FUCKING ZER0 which is where about where you're at right now.

1 out of 3 to your ... FUCKING NOTHING... is still a victory.

>>3503787
Tried even teaching you how to use an image as a search term on google man.

You do you, was just trying to help.

>>3503792 "Trying to help" he says.

https://imgur.com/gallery/nFd7S

Latest leak from e3

>>3503795

>PUBG2

THE FIRST ONE ISN'T EVEN OUT OF BETA YET, HACKERS EVERYWHERE AND VEHICLES RANDOMLY FLYING INTO ORBIT KILLING ITS OCCUPANTS REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>3503792

>Tried even teaching you how to use an image as a search term on google man.

"Google it" is not an argument or evidence.

You do have to show it's fake if you claim it's fake, because telling someone else to prove it for you would allow you to call yourself right regardless. You could never be shown to be wrong because you can always claim the other person didn't look hard enough, and this is why shifting the burden of proof is a fallacy of argumentation.

That being the case, all Aufy has to do is say: "I did look, and I didn't find the evidence you claimed, so you're wrong and Antifa is real." - after all, if the burden of proof is on the opponent, then it's your burden to prove that he didn't look hard enough.

>>3503794
Stalin killed 2/5 of USSR population. Elderly and children included.

100 million in 100 years.
USA does that in 5 years. Including its own people.
3 if you count "abortion = murder"

>>3503794

>somehow their other madman is worse than OUR madman. CHECK MATE LEFTISTS!

That argument is beyond retarded.

>>3503823

>all where madmen..

Now imagine if Trump was allowed to ruled like Putin or Kimg Jong Un...

>>3503930 The point is they were all murders and they were all socialist.
We all know Hitler was a mad man but I just don't understand why Stalin is glorified as some humanitarian, a hero, a paragon of human rights when his reign killed even more people than Hitler.

It's just doesn't make sense. Then your rebuttal isn't even a real one. Your not even making counter-argument you're just calling me names.

"So stalin killed more people? So what! You're dumb! Ya retard!"
I mean... that's how people argue in kindergarten!

>>3503845 I'd be very curious to see where you're getting this information.

broke: comparing raw death tolls
woke: comparing deaths as a percentage of population
bespoke: comparing deaths weighted by GDP per capita to work out the monetary value of those who died.
>>3503941

>Stalin is glorified as some humanitarian, a hero, a paragon of human rights

I'd like to live in your fantasy world tbh.

>>3503948 You do! You already live in my world. It's called the real world. I may have exaggerated to some extent with that statement but not by much.

The death toll isn't enough for to believe that Nazism and Communism
ARE BOTH HORRIBLE!?

What part of that is "broke"?
What part of that is so hard to believe?
Why do I even have to explain this?
This should be Obvious!

Unless those numbers are flat out & completely wrong,
Unless you can come up & show me what so great about living in Stalinist Russia, Mao's China Or Hitler's germany
then YEAH I still have a valid point to your FUCKING NOTHING.

Follow the leader, bitch.

>>3503845

>USA does 100 million in 5 years.

Is this a prediction?

>>3503941

Mass Murders or psychopaths aren't exclusively based no socialism. Its just that once they controlled a socialist dictatorship made it easy for them to murder a ton.
They used socialism as a tool.

Other examples that aren't exactly socialists, yet not always mentioned because their victims were not always their own population:

King Leopold II
Hideki Tojo
Saddam Hussein
Benito Mussolini
Mullah Omar

Other interesting factors is the number of population these countries had.

Both Russia and China had huge populations at the moment of the massacres.

US forces for example, massacred Natives in the millions. but who cares right? just how many tried to discredit or sink the information about slavery. And these murders weren't specifically of a single person, but a group.

Others were indirect deaths like Starvation..

>>3503941

> Stalin is glorified as some humanitarian, a hero, a paragon of human rights when his reign killed even more people than Hitler.

You're confusing Stalin with LENIN.

Stalin was the madman, Lenin was the man of ideas who was pretty much betrayed by Stalin and transformed his idea of shared government of the people by the people to a dictadorship.

King Leopold just cut some niggers hands off, that doesnt count

I'm really sick of seeing of these people defending communism.
They have invaded lulznet, they're trying to ruin America, free speech, science, education and pretty much everything in general.

Antifa are dangerous obnoxious lunatics. I'm sick of them!

No one likes Nazi's either, but their actually making them more popular by obsessing over them. They were irrelevant losers. Now there public enemy #1. Now being even vaguely conservative can get you labelled as a Nazi.
I've never feared being attacked by Nazis, but now just being even a little patriotic can get you labelled a Nazi? That's fucking absurd!

Free speech is what lead to the civil rights movement being successful, its what led to women rights, gay rights, and now that they have these rights these leftist liberal nut cases want to shut it down?

Groups like Antifa are a fucking menace.

>>3503982

>>3503983
Ancaps cause Communists to die of embarrassment.

>>3503983

>>3503982

>Free speech is what lead to the civil rights movement being successful, its what led to women rights, gay rights, and now that they have these rights these leftist liberal nut cases want to shut it down?

Stupid and wrong. Britain's race-relations are-and-were a million miles ahead of the US's and the UK has never had any sort of guarantee or protection on free speech. Homosexuality was legalised UK-wide in 1982 (1964 for England and Wales) versus 2003 for the USA. (Lawrence v. Texas, prior to this it was illegal in 14 states.)
free speech is not and has never been essential for a functioning society. for so long as tedious speech is protected as free speech, there will be no merit to that freedom.

>>3503989
Ancoms (unlike Ancaps) actually do all that co-op, shared labor, do-it-yourself sort of thing. They're very fond of setting up little communes in the middle of nowhere.

The only trouble is that they're Ancoms, and nobody wants a bunch of goddamn Ancoms everywhere.

>>3503993 The UK? Yeah. And they are totally wimpy and now Islam is handing them their ass. They're also are protesting to ban all knives because people still get stabbed.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUep-4v_M9k

You love Freedom of speech when it's you doing all the speaking. Burning the flag, marching the streets wearing pink pussy hats, lecturing 1st graders on gender studies, making obnoxious PSA's about why not getting married and just fucking the occasional drifter is rad.

But then, any time anyone challenges your limited dogmatic narrative you're ready to just pull the plug. A society can function without it, sure. It can function without many things. But Freedom of speech is essential for a society to grow. It's something worth standing up for.

>>3504002

>But Freedom of speech is essential for a society to grow

no you're thinking of sex

>>3504003 I don't mean simply in numbers.

>>3503993

>free speech is not and has never been essential for a functioning society.

You forget that free speech automatically exists in a pluralistic society because no faction alone has the power to shut the others up. In order to prevent anyone from speaking, everyone must agree to it, which is practically impossible since everyone finds it a threat to running their own politics.

>>3504008

>In order to prevent anyone from speaking, everyone must agree to it

I'll pass that on to Albert Pierrepoint.

>>3504009
Well, technically you can, by corruption and other chicanery, but the question was about the constitution and whether a society explicitly needs free speech.

In a pluralistic society, free speech exists inherently because of the balance of terror. If someone is trying to suppress speech, the others will gang up against them.

In a society where one faction has managed to monopolize political power, you need to have free speech in law.

>>3504002
Those faces say it all.

Also, seconded. Britbongistan (and Cuckada) are fucked.
Freedom of speech is ESSENTIAL.
"Hate speech" is free speech, even if people hate it. In fact because people hate it, it is exactly what the amendment was for. Nobody cares about non-controversial speech. Doesn't matter if it's commie rhetoric or far-right stuff, you gotta let people speak and let the ideas compete against each other.
Also you can't have the first, third, fourth, fifth etc without the SECOND. This is where Europe went wrong. This is why our populations are so defenceless against government abuse. UK is also even stupider cause it doesn't actually have a proper constitution. Even Eastern European countries have proper constitutions that can't be changed without a citizen vote.

>>3504131

Hate speech ceased to be "speech" when their words are inciting to evil action.

Even fi you have "free of speech" it doesnt work the way you think it does retard. Including Yelling FIRE!

Any private company can tell you to shut the fuck up and remove you from premises.

Also something that idiots online seem to forget.. that the US constitution doesn't apply to the world.

>>3504198

Dipshit.

Nothing more. Just that you're a dipshit. That line of thinking is just as bad as the "I panicked so I murdered the trannie" defense or the "Jesus made me do it" defense.

People are responsible for their own actions. Stop acting like people need a Hilter to behave like Hitler. You're already doing it.

>>3504205
Scum like you don't care about "muh freeze peach" when it's someone on the left being suppressed, no matter how flagrantly "free speech" is violated. Therefore, "free speech" has become a one-sided tool for the far right to use as a cudgel against normal people. Therefore, "free speech" no longer has any value or meaning.

It's high time we started silencing rightwingers with pride. Just shut them all the fuck down, and have a good laugh when they cry about it.

>>3504131

>Freedom of speech is ESSENTIAL.

essential for what

>>3504198

>Even fi you have "free of speech" it doesnt work the way you think it does retard. Including Yelling FIRE!

"There is freedom of speech, but I cannot guarantee freedom after speech."
-Idi Amin

"There ought to exist the fullest liberty of professing and discussing, as a matter of ethical conviction, any doctrine, however immoral it may be considered. The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others."
-John Stuart Mill

Inciting violence or panic, lying to people, libel/slander etc. may be punishable offenses, but these can never be criminal offenses because of the freedom of speech, which means the state can't do shit to you for saying things, although someone might sue you for damages in a civil court.

Even hate speech falls under 1st amendment protection unless you're directly commanding people to break the law. That's because by outlawing certain opinions as "hate speech", the government would be granting itself unwarranted powers that would undermine democracy by enabling the state to define what opinions are permissible in general.

>>3504209

>essential for what

For democracy. One cannot have a democratic society where one half of the people is threatening the other half with violence for speaking their minds.

Canada's autistic idea of "free speech" is more popular within the country than you might think. It looks a little like this:

"Hey, I love free speech as much as the other guy, but only for LIMITED free speech. I mean, we need to strike a balance, right? Now here's a list of things I personally feel should be banned. Item 1 of 165,854: calling people fat online when they're just a little husky..."

>>3504208

>Scum like you don't care about "muh freeze peach" when it's someone on the left being suppressed

The left is already trying to suppress free speech. You're trying to make the mind-bending argument that we shouldn't be suppressing people who try to undermine and overthrow all the principles on which our societies are built.

Your argument in kindergarden terms: "You're not allowed to hit me back! Na na na!"

>>3504219

Queue Aryanne pictures

>>3504213
You sure didn't mind when it was "the sjws" getting silenced. But now reasonable people agree that fucking Nazis should be shut down and scum like you won't STFU about the pweacious fwee speeks.

>The left is already trying to suppress free speech.

>the left

>>3504223

>nazi

sorry, but the National Socialist German Workers' Party hasn't existed since the end of WW2.

>>3504239

>Who could be behind this post?