cancel reply
Posting mode: Reply


Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
name e-mail subject pw(deletion)
Post and go
Bump thread?

  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Javascript must be enabled for all of our addons to work.
  • Come chat and see that we're all a bit crazy on IRC!
  • Do not post any artwork from sexyfur.com and/or
    Jeremy Bernal. This is now a bannable offense.
Flockmod!

File: 071637bf6.png - (130.97 KB, 275x191) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
134110 No.3503022

apparently tacklebox/tacklebawks/karrpfish had a secret separate cub account but someone at FA found it and stirred up a moralizing crowd to browbeat him into taking it down

anyone got an archive?

No.3503023

"sure sure I will separe my cub and normal account EVEN WHEN MY STYLE IS VERY RECOGNIZABLE and create a bias charatcer thats anti cub so I can get double popularity"
you go all the way or no.

No.3503024

>>3503023
t. seth-iova

the account was twitter.com/karppfish apparently, if that helps anyone find an archive of it

No.3503025
File: 1595791.jpg - (104.15 KB, 838x1200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
106649

the only one i could find

No.3503026

http://archive.is/ta3m6

Someone made an archive of the account featuring the offending tweet

No.3503027

But FA doesnt allow cub.

No.3503033
File: Screenshot_2018-04-14-02-58-07~2.png - (264.43 KB, 1080x1371) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
270780

The level twitter is going is insane

No.3503039

>>3503026

Just 18 tweets, joined April 2018. It looks like the account only had one hour of activity during its entire lifetime, i.e. freshly created just prior to this incident happening. Hardly some "secret separate cub account".

I'm sure there's a story to this shitposting and it most likely involves alcohol and letting his friends play around with his phone.

No.3503049
File: Capture.JPG - (94.51 KB, 881x680) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
96775

Something which shows how out-of-control the socjus crew have gotten in the furry fandom, is that for this one pretty tame IMO picture that tacklebox has drawn, he's now being accused of being a practicing pedophile(!).

That is an incredibly heavy accusation to make, and yet these people are hurling it around so lightly!

I suppose that if you're a socjus type and think that video games with too many white people in will turn you into a member of the KKK it makes sense that looking at a cub picture will turn you into a paedo.

No.3503050
File: 513f9181455a3762ac8167ef6231c7e8.png - (384.59 KB, 887x676) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
393818

Oh, thank doge. I love the taste of freshly-roasted furry artist in the morning. You expect me to feed off that rotting Zaush carcass forever?

The more positive and quality contributions they made to the fandom, the sweeter and more tender the meat. Arghnom

No.3503054
File: fuck_this_i'm_walking.png - (567.05 KB, 750x530) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
580659

>>3503033

This is happening for a while now, people destroy other people's lives just because they drew some cub art, or drew something related to Nazi's, or said something (as a joke) that goes against "muh diversity", or whatever else.
New-gen furries are fucking insane and fucked in the head, even worse than the people they try to fuck over...

No.3503057

>>3503049

Kingdom Come: Deliverance

A game about 15th century Bohemia where the team had a historical society help with creation decided not to include PoC in their game as they believed through the assistance of the society not to include them.

So of course all the socjus folk freak out over how this isn't inclusive and tons of drama...

Anyway I didn't know this and one day im talking about how I'm enjoying the game on Twitter and WOAH full blast from the crowd I'm a dirty KKK loving Nazi who hates everything PoC because HOW DARE I SUPPORT THESE FOLK?

Furries. Ugh.

No.3503058

>>3503057

Whoops, still waking up

They chose not to include PoC because it would be against the historical accuracy they were striving to accomplish, and that's it.

They provided tons of arguments/facts/reasons against PoC existing in that geographical area at that time but hoo boy the crowd doesn't like to be told that.

No.3503059
File: giantcreeps.png - (10.53 KB, 931x157) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
10786

>>3503022

No.3503061

>>3503059
Jesus what the fuck are they expecting? I mean how can you be anywhere near the fandom and not automatically be a creep yourself? It's a fandom centered around sexualizing/fetishizing animals and children's cartoon characters. A fandom centered around artists and people that dress up in animal costumes to have sex in. Most creative people, period, are freaks and weirdos, in the fandom it's almost a requirement of entry.

No.3503063
File: rita sees faggotry through her telescope.gif - (1790.17 KB, 300x225) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
1833129

>>3503061

No.3503064
File: finnick_elephant_2_copy_by_silverfox5213-d9wjdf7.jpg - (204.65 KB, 1000x707) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
209557

>>3503059
Poor baby...

Where are his parents?!

No.3503065
>one picture

I want my money back

No.3503070

>>3503061
tbh I've never liked how furry confirms everyone is a creep.
yes, i know everyone i've shaken hands with has used that hand to masturbate, probably to one form of ridiculously obscene pornography or another, but in the moment i'm shaking their hand that's not on my mind. I'm thinking "if his business card is better than mine, I'm going to be very upset. Fucking Paul Allen." Furry changes all that, because right there directly on their profile there's porn, or under the same username they've been talking about porn. It's totally open, so when I meet them I'm thinking "oh yeah, it's the guy who likes foxes with skyscrapers for boobs. If he wants to shake hands I'm going to touch his masturbation hand", and it's not even that I'm squeamish - fuck it, I'll jack him off, I'll stick my hand in a vat of his piss just to prove a point: I don't care about the physical hygiene of the thing but it completely breaks nice illusions we have about people, white lies we tell ourselves. He's no longer my artist friend in the blue shirt, he's the skyscraper boob fox masturbator. He sits with his trousers down and he masturbates, and he looks ridiculous.

I mean, I guess it's the same with politicians. They're all serious boring statesmen until it turns out they like getting prostitutes to whip them silly, then they're ridiculous figures even if that's a comparatively vanilla fetish in this brave new world. The image we have of them as almost asexual figures evaporates, and the world is worse for it. Instead of the comfortable lie, we have to confront the ugly reality: Our parents had sex, everyone is a ridiculous fleshy blob addicted to sex, and when you're only imagining them having sex it's not so bad, but once you have it confirmed or admitted bluntly that's quite different. I'd rather just continue with the fantasy that nobody has sex or views pornography except anonymous internet dwellers.

No.3503071

>>3503070

You must live quite a sheltered life. Well, at least you likely won't have to worry about the big bad scary sex monster ever infiltrating your life, eh?

You seem like the type of person who would be unhinged if your S/O masturbated behind your back.

No.3503074
>furry
>morals
No.3503075

>>3503071
I'm not sure what depraved part of California you hail from where sheltered people masturbate vague acquaintances and shrug at the notion of sticking their hand in a vat of someone else's stale piss. (Oh who am I kidding, it's SoCal and the rich tech nerds there make "the aristocrats" jokes redundant.)
It's not that sex is bad. Let me draw an analogy: It's like fursuiting. A lot of fursuiters will go back to their room to take the suit head off if it gets too warm, because once you've seen the character headless, the magic is broken. It's not completely broken, but if you've never seen the suit headless - you've only seen the full suit, or the suiter in normal clothing - it's much easier to buy into the idea that the character is there in front of you, rather than a guy in a costume. It's not a completely rational process, but it's still just part of how we think. Showing off your porn tastes in public on your main profile or one easily linked to it is the sexual version of taking the suit head off.

It has some link to the old notion of a distinct private and public life, really. That's the one area I'll concede my thinking is ridiculously outdated. (i.e. I still believe in such a distinction, rather than the preferred "finding your true self" approach of the modern anglosphere.) The old upper class used to be full of gays and adulterers even when that sort of thing risked severe legal and social penalties, but so long as you kept it in your private life who's to care? A few rumours might float around, but unless it's confirmed "in public" it's nothing actionable and people would politely look the other way unless they loathed you. Now public figures would be met with howls of laughter if they tried to deflect a question about adultery with "I don't talk about my private life in public.", and ironically I'm pretty sure that's going to make it harder for people to be their "true selves" in the long-term.

No.3503078
File: terratimberwolf.png - (78.04 KB, 587x605) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
79917

Why am I not surprised TerraShitterWolf had something to say about this?

No.3503080
File: ggggvvg.JPG - (120.68 KB, 908x833) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
123580

Of course someone has to try and turn this into a feminist thing:

https://twitter.com/PinkiePoshArt/status/985184383433953281

It's noticeable searching on twitter for people tweeting about this how a lot of them are young women (plenty of them having "he/him" in their profiles of course) who are deeply immersed in online social justice and toxic identity politics and who are obsessed with policing social media: who you can and can't follow, what you can and can't like and they will block and shun anyone who steps out of line: Social media has kept them stuck in high school indefinitely.

One thing about twitter is that you can see who you're following who is also following someone else. So if you were to go to tackleboxes twitter account you can see who you're following who is also following him, and I've seen people saying that they're messaging everyone they follow who also follows tacklebox to demand that they unfollow him or else I'll block you.

The furry twitter scene really does seem to, amazingly, make FA look better by comparison, because on FA the focus is much more on submissions rather than just tweeting a lot.

There are furries who have a lot of followers on twitter who don't draw, write or even commission, they just tweet a lot and they are usually socjus types constantly spreading toxicity.

No.3503081

We regret to inform you that milkshake duck is not a meme

No.3503083

>>3503078

>I have no interest in networking with people who...

there is no good way to interpret that tweet. either someone refers to socialising for pleasure as "networking", or someone's treating furry as a way to make business contacts. either way humanity ended long ago.

No.3503084
File: 1419461890046.png - (580.69 KB, 640x480) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
594631

>>3503080

>I've seen people saying that they're messaging everyone they follow who also follows tacklebox to demand that they unfollow him or else I'll block you.

hopefully cooler heads will prevail and most artists who receive those kinds of messages will lol and continue on with their lives

all the faggots bitching about this are probably more concerned about making a scene and drawing attention to themselves rather than actually giving a fuck about what an artist draws. 'look at me im socially relevant! you know that Bad Thing that everyone hates? i hate it too, im doing my part!!'

the outrage and unfollowing of an artist are just concessions theyve convinced themselves will justify all the energy they pour into their public tantrums.

No.3503085
File: terraxlando.png - (965.66 KB, 585x1871) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
988837

they're going after Lando now too lmao

No.3503092

>>3503058

>They chose not to include PoC because it would be against the historical accuracy they were striving to accomplish, and that's it.

POCs? Accuracy? Thats a stupidly big excuse.

Because I'm pretty sure that black people and gays existed since the dawn of humanity.
Claiming that the everyday putting zero POC.

Theres plenty of pictures that show black people in Europe and other zones. They didn't magically vanish to make "accuracy".

That's almost as lazy as the Mass Effect constraints regarding female Turians.
It was just a damn limit of resources. Problem solved!

No.3503094

>>3503075
There are two distinct issues at hand, there: first, should there be a distinction between public and private life? And second, if so, what should be allowed in public vs. reserved for one's private life.

Fewer and fewer people these days would agree, for example, that LGBT people should have to keep their sexualities private. It would be unhealthy, and they aren't harming anyone as long as they aren't doing anything explicit.

No.3503095

>>3503085

Only now?

Lando might be a damn nice person and draws amazing. But some of his content is definitively cub like and past the grey line.

Still, only now?

No.3503101

>>3503095
Yeah he's been around for years and they're just now hearing of him I guess.

No.3503104
File: d5e.jpg - (15.74 KB, 271x294) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
16116

you know ive thought about something for a number of years now:
are SJWs their own worst enemies?
like that batman movie "You either die a hero, or live long enough to see yourself become the villain."

they bitch and moan and preach about tolerance and acceptance
they stamp their feet and make a scene about how the rest of the world should just get over things they may not understand because it doesnt affect them
they talk so much about how freedom of expression shouldnt be suppressed

and yet here they go all hivemind and vilify the fuck out of someone who literally did nothing but draw a picture. jumping to extreme assumptions and conclusions about a person with no evidence other than what they "feel is right" in their own heads with no regard to anything outside their own little fragile reality. its some serious circle-jerk/hugbox/echo chamber bullshit

sounds pretty fucking conservative if you ask me

No.3503107

>>3503104
To this day, there are a bunch of frothing morons screeching about an imaginary pizza-based conspiracy to traffics children through a non-existent basement.

Seems as though one side really began this whole moral panic.

No.3503109
File: implying.gif - (2739.67 KB, 400x225) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
2805426

Look what I found lol

https://screenshotsfordays.tumblr.com/

This world has literally gone completely insane.

>"Omg this is CP / bestiality !!!"
>a real life baby is probably getting raped to death right now, but OMG HE DREW A FICITONAL NON-REAL-LIFE-EXISTING UNDERAGED CHARACTER BEING FUCKED BY A FERAL ANIMAL, HOW DARE YOU YOU PEDOPHILE RAPIST SCUM, I CONTACTED THE FBI AND I'M GETTING YOU FIRED FROM YOUR JOB!!!
>literally all furry porn is in one way or another bestiality, no fuck off with your "but they're anthros and they have human genitals" bullshit excuses
No.3503111
File: ohnoes.jpg - (48.89 KB, 960x540) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
50066

>>3503107
my point was more that sjws are becoming their own kind of nazis and policing thoughtcrimes that dont fit into their world view

maybe this highlights the fact that theres a subset of the population who get entirely consumed by the thought of any possible crime against children, whether theres any basis in reality or not. from the staunchest of bible-thumping republicans, to the most unique special snowflake sjw, lord help you if you draw a picture. im not defending actual pedophilia in any capacity but theres a fuckin difference between fantasy and reality

>>3503109
jesus fucking christ how stupid can people be

No.3503112

>>3503104
It's debatable if the pic he drew is even cub. But don't worry, they're still outraged that he liked and retweeted a few cub porn pics.

>>3503109

>funnily enough it is extremely traumatic sorting through hundreds upon hundreds of sources of abusive porn that’s being normalised.

As they say this with their dick in their hand.

No.3503116
>waah why aren't you tolerating kiddie diddlers?

Fuck off. You don't deserve acceptance, you deserve prison.

I hope they arrest Milo and Roy Moore soon. But Drumpf will probably pardon them, he's defended pedo trash for decades.

No.3503117
File: 10004056.jpg - (143.86 KB, 719x684) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
147310

>>3503111

Well no shit but that doesn't excuse /pol/ doing the same

>anyone who doesn't side with us 100% is a liberal SJW

They call GW Bush a liberal, dumb motherfuckers demand that 100% viewpoint.

No.3503123

To the young folks leading the crusade (because I know a few of you are here and will direct the others to this post, tyvm).

Some bullet points.

What you're doing will not:
• bring justice to the one(s) who hurt you
• elevate your standing in the greater furry community or any other community you're part of
• exorcise your own personal demons, or all that guilt
• remove or even lessen those confusing, scary fetishes inside you that you're trying to repress while you pretend you're virtuous
• make up for that failure of a relationship
• fool anyone when your true motives are painfully apparent
• shame anyone, in fact it'll probably have the opposite effect
• get anyone fired or arrested or ostracized
• have any impact on the state of the furry fandom
• have any impact on the deep inequalities in our society

Here's what's going to happen. You will continue your little witch hunt for now, and hurt some of the people you've targeted (while most of them ignore you). Perhaps a few of them might even deserve it, though not for the reasons you wave around. And then, you'll age out of your twenties. Like all the idealistic young rebel generations before you, life and practical everyday reality will grind you the fuck down. Slowly, subtly, like an iceberg. Then, a decade later, when you're a bit fatter and a lot more fatigued and a lot more mediocre and ugly, you'll wonder why you wasted so much time on this. You'll wonder where your fire went. Perhaps even a few of you will finally be honest with yourselves. And meanwhile, the furry fandom will be no different. New faces will spring up to wear the old masks, and someone else will take up the pointless moral crusade, with some new twist on it to fit the zeitgeist of the times.

No.3503124
File: I6MX+2xH.jpg - (81.16 KB, 482x361) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
83112

>>3503116
nobody is tolerating kiddie diddlers you idiot

its a matter of recognizing that theres a dichotomy between the artwork and the actual act of pedophilia, much like the separation between the animal dicks in furry smut that you look at when you masturbate and the fact that you (hopefully) dont fuck animals

oh but you "dont like animals in real life" yeah well maybe people who draw cub shit dont like children in real life either, gasp!
or maybe youre lying to yourself and the world because youre ashamed of yourself and need to take it out on other innocent people as a distraction

>Drumpf

how cute, you actually took up john oliver's call to arms to unironically call the idiot-in-chief by his original family name. look at you, much progressive wow such edge, fighting the good fight
and whos excusing /pol? whos even talking about /pol/? this is about sjw retards in an unjustified libelous crusade against an artist for simply drawing a picture..

>>3503123

>inb4 people futilely try to argue against you despite knowing its the truth

vc: inane
how appropriate

No.3503126

>>3503124
dat filename

No.3503127

>>3503025

This is cub?

No.3503138

>>3503033
This is fucking pathetic. People need to quit with all this "let's ruin people's lives over art" bullshit. I'm more appalled by that garbage than I ever would be someone drawing cub.

No.3503139

>>3503085
Okay, wow, even more psychopaths. Here I thought I'd seen the worst of it. "Moral" people are insane.

No.3503144

So is there any actual evidence he's a pedo? Or are people just in arms because he drew something on the cub side?

No.3503146

He is just your general "pop-fur" dickhead. The only thing "special" about him is that he draws furry pron (and kiddy furry pron so it seems), with a particular habit of publishing half-finished drawings (feet and hands most be unknown to him. Nothing of real value would be lost if he gtfo. Can be easily replaced by someone with more talent and preferably with a better attitude.

No.3503147
File: laughinggirls.png - (490.09 KB, 449x401) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
501848

>>3503144

>Or are people just in arms because he drew something on the cub side?

given the current landscape of bandwagon victim-complex sjws do you really even need to ask that question?

>>3503146

>He is just your general "pop-fur" dickhead.

being popular doesn't make you a dickhead by default.
your insecurities are showing

of all the popufurs, ive never heard a single thing about this dude or even seen him have any presence at cons or in other public circles. you sure you didnt just make up some narrative in your head?

>with a particular habit of publishing half-finished drawings
>feet and hands most be unknown to him

uh oh an artist didnt draw a picture exactly how you wanted look out theyre a piece of shit

No.3503149

>>3503147

totheneedywhiteknight.jpg

Oh! but he is a dickhead. I found out after interacting with him. Of course, since the genitalia is the only thing that matters to you in a drawing it is understandable to see your lack of perspective and how you rush towards assumptions. Hopefully, he is paying you somehow, otherwise, you look quite pathetic defending someone that don't give a shit about you whatsoever.

No.3503150
File: burn1.png - (951.69 KB, 747x888) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
974530

Someone set fire to their tacklebox art print.

No.3503151

>>3503149

>random psycho socially inept furfag confused and insulted when he receives cold response from artist whose work he uses to masturbate

news at 11!

No.3503152
File: OMGNOWAILOL.gif - (423.32 KB, 300x225) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
433481

>>3503150

>pay money to Tacklebox
>receive goods
>sets it on fire

Who's the fucking retard here??

No.3503153

>>3503150
Why would you fucking do that? How fucking stupid are these people?

No.3503154
File: f46c35b1ec1201f2a513d9289fba505d.jpg - (2622.81 KB, 1748x1748) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
2685760

The insane thing about the whole situation is that the fucking image is the least cubiest image I've ever seen! It looks like a normal faggy twink boy dog, not even remotely cub looking except that he's got short limbs. For fucks sake, I've seen corgi characters that have the same proportions and nobody says it's a cub! What!? People cant be short and young looking anymore?!

now if he drew an image like the one i just posted it would be an entire different story

No.3503155

Just a reminder, those holier than thou types on specific borderline rabid crusades against something specific are quite often the ones that get caught doing the things they claim to be above.
Tends to be no good sides in social outrage, mob mentality and all.

No.3503156
File: 5dye0yg4k1lz.png - (388.47 KB, 622x653) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
397796

>>3503154

lol i know right. Why the hell are people so butthurt? Like, why not go after people who draw actual super young cubs n stuff?

No.3503157

>>3503149

"anyone that doesn't have the same inane qualms with someone is a white know"

furries on Twitter are the fucking worst lately, the moralism parallels the moral panic with the comic book industry but on a microscopic scale. I think the furries that get themselves whipped up into this frenzy generally don't also realize their community is absolutely miniscule in comparison to most things, and that this constant race to crab-in-a-bucket someone that draws something you don't like just fractures our already tiny fandom.

I wonder, as someone in their mid 20s, how I have such a massive moral disconnect with people less than 5 years younger. What the hell happened?

No.3503159

>>3503157
By the time you reach your 30's, you'll probably have discovered that internet drama and subcultures are very small and insignificant. Or you'll remain in a state of arrested development until you die, I suppose.

No.3503161
File: 23af5000d98e8bb0f9a98f373c54fac6--christmas-cats-photo-shoots.jpg - (47.38 KB, 564x380) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
48517

>>3503157
All the people who gave a shit about common sense moved on with their lives from furry, forums and imageboards. So you have a bunch of kids running around with no one to keep em honest. And you are alone.

No.3503162

>>3503156
if youre being sardonic its lost on them

>>3503157

>What the hell happened?

maybe you had a slightly thicker skin in your developmental years? maybe youre able to reflect on yourself as an individual and dont shy away from self-critique? maybe youre able to separate fantasy from reality? maybe youre able to understand the concept of personal responsibility? you didnt drink the koolaid?

>>3503159

>arrested development

perfect description of loudmouth sjws who havent developed the coping skills to deal with the small hassles of day to day life

No.3503163

>>3503162
Young leftists are full of spit and vinegar. Eventual disillusionment inevitably makes them more sensible, turning them into progressives or communists instead.

No.3503174
File: triggered.gif - (766.67 KB, 253x234) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
785073

>>3503163
"young" is the key really. i still consider myself liberal and im in my 30s, ive done my crazy shit and made it through reasonably intact (aside from an inhibiting sense of insecurity that i do recognize as a product of my environment and the choices i made over the years)

ive worked with all kinds of different people, encountered plenty of differing perspectives in the process. eventually you realize the majority of people are just trying to get through their day unscathed and whatever differences you may have are usually blown out of proportion by the media and your own imagination. OR if you can believe it theyre able to recognize that those differences arent worth some kind of crusade or confrontation

this sjw wave over the last 10 or 15 years isnt entirely unfounded, its not unreasonable to ask people to have more consideration for other marginalized groups. but too many selfabsorbed attention whores jumped on board, theyve built their entire identity around one single thing and refuse to grow as individual people. it diminishes their message and makes them look crazy or stupid or obsessive or all of the above

the irony with this tacklebox thing is its that same mentality, that idea that a person is only and resolutely the thing that they present to the world. he posts a character of questionable age and liked a couple cub pics? theres no other possibility, he has sex with children! no other consideration and likely the same lack of critical thinking throughout a lot of the rest of their lives

No.3503176

>>3503174
Drink dulls a man's intellect; you will forgive me if your comment is more thoughtful than I can currently provide a sufficient response to. I shall endeavor to respond sometime later, but I may not care at that time. This is an image board, after all.

No.3503212
File: 1519144572700.jpg - (259.62 KB, 808x1212) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
265846

Draw rape? Clearly you are a serial rapist in the making!
Draw vore? Clearly you are a Dahmer-esque psychotic just waiting until you can kill and eat your first victim!
Draw snuff? Another serial killer in the making.
Draw furry? You're obviously just a closeted zoophile.

This is all just prude moralfagging and social media powermongering. If these people weren't furries they'd be claiming the latter.

No.3503236
File: the_snow_leopard_by_direct_evul-d2o3iai.jpg - (45.05 KB, 600x508) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
46134

>>3503176

You don't have to make shit up about why you're tired of trolling with this communism garbage meme.

Look, we can do like AA. I'll go first, and then you can do it too:

I was never for one moment seriously putting my real reputation weight behind white survivalism and border-nationalism earlier this year on lulz (and on/off several years before that, minus the pics).

I don't even have time to keep up a storm meme like that. That's ok, it's healthy: Your time is more precious than you give it credit for. You weren't born to be back-alley lulz trash (raccoon). You're a human being.

Although it's 100% true SAGA is a great cover artist and there are ridiculous double-standards against whites, I live in Canada and I couldn't survive 1 day without a Pedro, Jihun, Sanjay, or Wolfie54345 fulfilling one of my basic needs.

But I thank doge every day I was born with an ability for rational thinking, and didn't swallow the local fluorokoolaid and go full retard right off the bat (meaning: full liberal or distributing the local communist party flyers; yes that's a thing here; no, no one votes for it).

See? It's ok. Now you:

No.3503237

The same furries bitching about this shit are the same furries that are secretly fapping to this shit. When are furries going to accept that they're sick freaks that love to beat off to artistic dog dicks, snuggle fuck with fursuiters and gather in overpriced hotels to do the top two?

No.3503238

>>3503022

The same furries bitching about this shit are the same furries that are secretly fapping to this shit. When are furries going to accept that they're sick freaks that love to beat off to artistic dog dicks, snuggle fuck with fursuiters and gather in overpriced hotels to do the top two?

No.3503247
File: Tackleberry.jpg - (24.18 KB, 480x405) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
24763

Police Academy 2 - ( The best of Tackleberry )
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADihvSIsIik

No.3503252

>>3503174
tbh this lack of critical thinking is a good thing for the people displaying it. if you don't ever think critically and take people at face value you're much more likely to conclude they're good people until they do something that superficially hints they're bad people. In particular it's more likely to make things that are interesting but almost certainly fake (looking at you otherkin) believable, rather than have you constantly weighting the probability between someone being who they say they are, or just lying because they think plausible deniability is on their side. though a lot of them don't even think that - the best liars are those who delude themselves, but liars they remain.

once you start realising everyone on the internet is a bit of a bastard with something to hide or otherwise completely boring. there's nowhere to go. you'll never trust them, and you'll never put any of yourself onto the internet under a username for fear of annoying the wrong person and having to dump everything. the internet is a minefield overseen by snipers - the only way to enjoy it is to run straight through like a retard and hope god's on your side. (or to own it and watch other people go boom, i guess.) If you slow down and try to think what path you're going to take, you're already dead.

>>3503236
but what do you do instead? that's the key question.
i've always known the newspaper selling communists are a bizarre cult, and that selling newspapers is about the single least likely way to bring about communism that exists on this planet. i'm also not a communist, but that's beside the point. the same critical thinking that makes it blindingly obvious they're wasting their time quickly leads to the realisation of how powerless you are as an individual and how likely it is you'll leave no long-term legacy behind. this is especially true in politics, but generalises almost everywhere you might want to change things.

that's not to mention how boring life gets when you're too smart for obviously insane conspiracies, pseudohistory and magical thinking that make life fun.

These statement(s) have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This post is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.

No.3503253

>>3503212

>This is all just prude moralfagging and social media powermongering.

You're denying the obvious because it doesn't suit your narrative. IF a person is drawing rape, vore, snuff, there's a high probability they are fucked up in the head. The major difference to pedophilia is that the treshold to actually assaulting and raping or murdering someone over a sexual fetish is very much higher than grooming and diddling kids. You can't kill someone just a little.

On the same token, in furry there's actually two main "streams". Those who draw porn of CARTOON animals, and those who draw porn of cartoon ANIMALS. There's not even much of a sliding scale between the two styles.

You can pretty clearly spot the difference for the particularities of anatomy where the veiny dog-cocks and fortune cookies come out, and at least when the artist draws feral porn; you can easily tell who's boinking their dog.

You think someone drawing pokemon porn is going to fuck the family cat?

No.3503254

>>3503252

>the same critical thinking that makes it blindingly obvious they're wasting their time quickly leads to the realisation of how powerless you are as an individual and how likely it is you'll leave no long-term legacy behind. this is especially true in politics, but generalises almost everywhere you might want to change things.

The same critical insight, taken one step further, makes it blindingly obvious why this is a very good thing - why non-control is better than control.

Because a society where individual people can influence matters in a significant way is a society where inevitably stupid people, evil people, will do it. That little fact is why progressivism/liberalism is always dangerous to itself, because if it manages to change the society, it has already sown the seeds of its own destruction at the hands of people who would undo and pervert the system for their own ends using the very same system of politics that enabled the liberal/progressive to apply their changes.

Point in case: when the socialists and communists started rabble-rousing and playing the populism game in early 20th century Germany, the Nazis hijacked the game by playing it better.

That's why leftism, socialism, communism, liberalism etc. whatever you decide to call it; change-ism and "fix-society-now"-ism, is doomed to fail. The society can only change by a sort of slow cultural evolution where the people themselves grow to understand and accept and do the necessary. They cannot be made to do the right thing.

No.3503255

>>3503254
And also note, when progressivism/liberalism takes power and starts to protect itself from anyone else using the same methods against them, it becomes hypocritical and turns totalitarian/fascist.

So be careful in fighting your monsters, lest you become one yourself.

No.3503256

>>3503236
If the drinks I had last night were made up then why do I currently have such a hangover? In what universe would someone lie about something as mundane and uninteresting as having a few too many drinks?

No.3503257

>>3503254
I'd take the absolute chaos that comes with being empowered over the absolute pointlessness that comes with the status quo, tbh. Bored of the world unite, you have nothing to lose but your backlogs!
It doesn't help that society is already run and controlled by stupid people, not because they've been empowered (social media mobs are a sideshow.) but because they're the largest market, so they're pandered to by smarter/richer/more powerful people. Nobody believes in improving humanity anymore, certainly not on an aggregate (meaningful) level. Nobody is going to make something people don't want but ought to have and try to shove it down their throats when they can make something people do want but that degrades humanity merely by existing, not when they'll be paid thirty times as much for the latter.

Politically it's actually quite a blissful position to take. It's just rather lonely, because everyone else is busy exploring pizza shops for dungeons, hounding people on twitter or hawking newspapers detailing their positions on foreign policy while they couldn't even take over a parish council.

No.3503258

>>3503253

>IF a person is drawing rape, vore, snuff, there's a high probability they are fucked up in the head.

That might be the stupidest thing that anyone has ever said. If you actually think this way, you're the one with a problem here.

No.3503259

>>3503257

>I'd take the absolute chaos that comes with being empowered over the absolute pointlessness that comes with the status quo

1) It isn't necessarily, or likely to be, you who ends up empowered. Of course you may hop on a bandwagon and pretend you're in control.
2) That's a false dilemma. The alternative of an oligarchy is not a pointless static society. You just have to direct your politics in a different way. If you want to change something, you need to convince other people that the change is necessary, rather than shove it down their throats by government action.

No.3503261

>>3503258

>>IF a person is drawing rape, vore, snuff, there's a high probability they are fucked up in the head.
>That might be the stupidest thing that anyone has ever said.

If you think that's stupid, you must be incredibly naive, or one of those people who fantasize about rape and murder and justify it to themselves by thinking "oh, I'm harmless, I would never, therefore everyone else is too".

>If you actually think this way, you're the one with a problem here.

While there can be smoke without a fire, the old wisdom is still a better heuristic than assuming no problems despite obvious signs.

No.3503262

>>3503261
You need a serious reality check.

No.3503263
File: 16397762413_3d117da7eb_b.jpg - (180.50 KB, 1024x682) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
184830

>>3503256
Mental gymnastics are an olympic event, my friend.

Alternatively, maybe you really did get hammered, but then do you need me to speculate on the reasons for that? Get some theanine+caffeine+taurine, accent on the theanine part.

No.3503264

>>3503262

>You need a serious reality check.

Then check me. Show me why I'm wrong.

No.3503265

>>3503262
Or, let me put it this way: there's a difference between a butcher who likes his job, and a butcher who jerks off to his job.

People who draw rape and murder for a fetish aren't alright in the head, and denying that would require some incredible mental gymnastics. Whether these people pose a real risk to society is a different question, and that depends on how fucked up they are.

But the fundamental problem is the same. These people should be in a psychiatric evaluation and therapy instead of being asspatted on social media and told they're awwwright.

No.3503267

This is just the new acceptable way to bully, harass, demean, and destroy people in the fandom. I mean, it's not surprising that there's a lot of dumb SJW types that want to impose their wrongthink rules and gatekeeping on anyone and everyone they decide to get outraged over, but the sheer lengths most of these people will go to ruin lives and livelihoods over some fictional animal art should tell you just how unstable they are.

It's also funny how many of the people getting the most outraged on Twitter either draw or get lots of art of gore, vore, rape, ect. They see no moral problem when it's fictionalized violence or animal rape, but the moment cub porn gets mixed in they're reeeeing like conservatives in the 50's advocating for sex for conception in the missionary position only. They can't see the irony that half of them drool and froth over dog and horse dick in art but would (hopefully) not want to diddle an animal IRL. But if you draw cub? Oh, you're an "acting pedophile" and "unsafe". Get real.

No.3503268

>>3503265

I think it's more telling that you can't tell the difference between fantasy and reality. Do you really think people that draw or commission their furry characters in vore or rape art are going to actively go out and kill/rape people in the real world? We have -so- much evidence of all these furries getting ousted as rapist murderers to go off of, don't we!

I'd say the people with the real disabilities are the ones freaking out over obviously harmless sexual fantasies-- imposing their beliefs on others and deciding how and what a person feels towards subject matter. Like saying Tacklebox views kids in some predatory fashion because he had the audacity to draw a single cub picture. It's nice that you can put those internet detective glasses on and determine some stranger's desires better than they can because of a single picture of a possibly underaged dog person. You should put those mind reading powers to better use though.

No.3503269

>>3503095
>>3503101

What's so surprising about that? They see how easy it is to whip up a lynchmob on Twitter that will blindly call someone a pedophile because they drew a cub once or twice. If you knew there was an army of clearly angry, bitter, unstable holier-thans hungry for more blood and waiting for the next target, why wouldn't you send them after someone you've got an axe to grind?

These people get off on this. Outrage culture is breeding this kind of adult-baby in droves. These people are going to be running the fandom in the next ten years at this rate, so best start removing herm/shemale/cuntboy from your mental dictionaries and make your sparkledogs extra sparkly for when the furry SJW morality police come for your fetish of choice next. And don't you dare get caught following anyone accused of wrongthink (even if it was before their wrongthink was brought to light) or you're just as doubleplusungood as they are!

No.3503270

>>3503084

Most of the artists I see tweeting about this are just getting mad they're getting hate or blocked before they knew that Tacklebox was a garbage-person-that-diddles-fake-kids-apparently. They're more than happy to throw him under the bus to appeal to their friends and colleagues in the drawing of doggy and horse dick, and to the frothing talentless SJWs that make up their twitter audiences.

Half of them reek of jealous has-beens or never-have-beens, eager to make posts that urge people to follow the "right" kind of artists. Like themselves of course! Because fuck talented artists that draw something they don't like-- they don't deserve success or livelihoods like -they- do with their shit tier, overpriced sparklecanines and edgy 420 hipster foxcats.

It's not hard to spot the green-with-envies mixed in among the mob here and there.

No.3503271

>>3503259

>It isn't necessarily, or likely to be, you who ends up empowered. Of course you may hop on a bandwagon and pretend you're in control.

empowering individuals by definition empowers individuals. I've been coy about the mechanism by which you do that, but that definition doesn't change.

>That's a false dilemma. The alternative of an oligarchy is not a pointless static society. You just have to direct your politics in a different way. If you want to change something, you need to convince other people that the change is necessary, rather than shove it down their throats by government action.

No individual can do such a thing. You know what the end result of trying is? It's SJWism. That's bottom-up activism for you. At best you get the government to change policy. What, you think you're going to convince people not to get upset about cubs/fap to cubs by tweeting out rational arguments for and against it?
If you want to change anything, give up and get drunk. Sure everyone remembers MLK, but who remembers the distributists?

No.3503272

>>3503252
damn dude you sound like a miserable human being, i bet youre a blast at parties
its like youre an autistic cynic, you simultaneously see the worst in everyone and refuse to accept anything outside your two explanations of 'ulterior motives' or 'oblivious to the world'

i dunno where or when life did you wrong, but i can at least agree that yeah for the most part everyone is a little fucked up.

No.3503273

>>3503253
almost literally everyone you face during the day has fleeting or repeat thoughts about all kinds of fucked up shit, but that doesnt mean theyll act on it.
years ago i had a supervisor that drooled over every pre-teen girl that walked past him. he was just average intelligence, not some paramount of humankind. i called him out and even said "dude you have a daughter, wtf" and his reply was basically 'i aint gonna do anything to them, i can look, a man can dream. ill protect my daughter from people like me.' even normal people can recognize that they can mentally indulge in somthing without actively engaging in it

>The major difference to pedophilia is that the treshold to actually assaulting and raping or murdering someone over a sexual fetish is very much higher than grooming and diddling kids.

thats not the point, its a matter of people separating the thought from the act at all. rape, sex with animals, murder, assault, pedophilia, theyre all illegal, theyre all frowned upon in a civil society. if someone is gonna do any of them, then yeah obv theyre fully fucked up, and theyll find a way to do them.

>You can pretty clearly spot the difference for the particularities of anatomy where the veiny dog-cocks and fortune cookies come out, and at least when the artist draws feral porn; you can easily tell who's boinking their dog.

still just implying everywhere, yeah you can make assumptions, but then youre making assumptions everywhere and it becomes too easy to no longer exercise critical thinking

even dumb people deal with cognitive dissonance in their lives about illegal and fucked up things. some ppl are held in check by fear of god, some ppl are held in check by fear of legal or social ramifications, and some people actually recognize the harmful effects that their actions might cause and are able to separate their desires from their reality

>>3503265

>These people should be in a psychiatric evaluation and therapy instead of being asspatted on social media and told they're awwwright.

until someones 'dangerous impure thoughts' interrupts their ability to function in society or harms another person. slow your fuckin roll nurse ratchet, not everyone who doesnt fit your ideal little Acceptable Person box needs to be fucking institutionalized and reprogrammed.

No.3503274

>>3503261
You're coming off as retarded, so you're clearly retarded. Right?

No.3503276
File: that fucking smiley.png - (280.58 KB, 813x802) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
287319
>when you preach for government-mandated tolerance, love, and acceptance of all sexes and the 273 genders that you invented in your room but you won't accept a sexual orientation that actually exists and dates all the way back to the stone age

hypocrisy should have a picture of the furry fandom in the dictionary

No.3503279

>>3503272
I'm a blast at parties thanks to man's oldest friend (booze)

>refuse to accept anything outside your two explanations of 'ulterior motives' or 'oblivious to the world'

I don't recall explaining anything with obliviousness, nor anything that would hint I use only those two explanations.
Though between "a furry did something manipulative" and "a furry did something because they're an idiot", you do explain a lot of fandom behaviour. :^)

No.3503291

>>3503271

>empowering individuals by definition empowers individuals. I've been coy about the mechanism by which you do that, but that definition doesn't change.

You can't assume you're going to win by definition.

>No individual can do such a thing.

That's the point. If it's only an issue to some individual, then it's not important enough to matter. If it's an issue to many people, then naturally the many people will open a debate and demand change.

No.3503292

>>3503268

>I think it's more telling that you can't tell the difference between fantasy and reality.

The question is rather, do the people who draw rape and murder tell the difference between fantasy and reality, and how can we be sure?

>Do you really think people that draw or commission their furry characters in vore or rape art are going to actively go out and kill/rape people in the real world?

Some portion will, but that's besides the point. The original argument was that pedophilia is comparable to these other fetishes, and they're "alright" so pedophilia is alright as well. I was merely pointing out that no, these other fucked up fantasies aren't alright - these people are sick too.

The fundamental point about morality is that we can't judge the morality of something by the outcomes, but rather by the intent. A failed murderer is no less immoral than a successful murdered. A person who fantasizes and wants to rape another is not being moral simply because they never find the opportunity.

I also pointed out that the threshold to murder and rape is greater than the threshold to diddle kids, which means fewer people with violent fantasies are going to commit them. There's far fewer opportunities where they could get away with it.

No.3503293

>>3503273

> i called him out and even said "dude you have a daughter, wtf" and his reply was basically 'i aint gonna do anything to them,

That's what he would say regardless. Do you think any pedophile would go "Hmmm... You're right. I'm probably gonna rape one of them eventually."

>even normal people can recognize that they can mentally indulge in somthing without actively engaging in it

Yes, but that's besides the point. The question is, do they care enough? When the dick says yes and the brain says no, the lower your moral character the more likely the dick wins. Then it's just a question of opportunity.

No.3503295

>>3503291

>You can't assume you're going to win by definition.

Are you short?

>If it's an issue to many people, then naturally the many people will open a debate and demand change.

In those circumstances, either they're ignored as irrelevant individuals or they're an oligarchy.

No.3503298

>>3503279

>the only way to enjoy it is to run straight through like a retard and hope god's on your side.
>If you slow down and try to think what path you're going to take, you're already dead.

sounds pretty one or the other to me

and i bet youre that boozer at a party that ropes people into tedious tryhard philosophical conversations, proud of yourself at how well youve caught their attention when in reality theyre a captive audience because they dont want to be rude and just bail and do something else or theyre also drunk af and dont even know whats goin on in the first place. drunk wisdom always seems profound, but the only one who ever got it right was bukowski. anyone who pats themselves on the back for how awesome they are at parties is usually the cringeworthy friend that everyone tries to keep at bay.

but what do i know, maybe youre different on the internet than in real life. WAIT can that actually be??? can people seem like one thing on the internet but really not be like that in person? preposterous!

No.3503300
File: new-words6a.jpg - (85.21 KB, 660x504) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
87250

>>3503292

>The question is rather, do the people who draw rape and murder tell the difference between fantasy and reality...

unless theyre chris-chan levels of retard, yeah im pretty sure its safe to assume they can.

>and how can we be sure?

you cant until they actually do something, until theres certifiable proof rather than just assumption and accusation. how can i be sure you arent plotting to track me down and murder me? i cant, i have no way of knowing whether you are or arent, for all intents and purposes you could be longterm plotting my demise and waiting for that one fateful opportunity to end my existence. do i sit here in constant fear and paranoia about something that is a possibility? or do i go about my life as usual because its wildly unlikely and not a probability.

>The original argument was that pedophilia is comparable to these other fetishes, and they're "alright" so pedophilia is alright as well.

other way around. i think the original argument was that these other fetishes are comparable to pedophilia, in that none of them are "alright" but since most normal people can recognize the separation between imagination/fantasy vs actually engaging in the act, thats why its absurd to go on a witch hunt over one of them and ignore the shit out of the others.

>The fundamental point about morality is that we can't judge the morality of something by the outcomes, but rather by the intent. A failed murderer is no less immoral than a successful murdered. A person who fantasizes and wants to rape another is not being moral simply because they never find the opportunity.

sure, but until someone actually does something that hurts another person, that judgment should be withheld. that is the point where people need to be fucking adults about things and say 'you know what thats messed up, but i dont have the capacity to parse or comprehend that in a way im comfortable with, so im gonna steer clear'
further to that, since you cant know intent until theres an "outcome," you have to give at least partial benefit of the doubt and assume there is no intent or it is not the worst case scenario that you assume

>>3503293

>That's what he would say regardless.

yeah well he hasnt acted on it and he doesnt. hes a rational person and hes not consumed by the thought of young girl snatch every waking moment of his life, hes an average person and a pretty decent guy. as unsavory eh sounds, its all just stupid chatter. president fucknut would say "lockerroom talk," and as much as i hate to defend him, hes got a point. i work with a handful of people at my current job, theyre all rednecks to one extent or another, and ive heard the most fucked up shit over the years, but none of them are people who have or would actually act on the things they say and joke about

im not saying its not awful talk, but the average person isnt so preoccupied with self and social censorship, and theyre able to separate things.

>The question is, do they care enough? When the dick says yes and the brain says no, the lower your moral character the more likely the dick wins.

not everyone shares your struggles.

No.3503303

>>3503292

>and how can we be sure?

Do you just live in a constant state of paranoia?

No.3503307
>outing and shunning pedos

Implying that's a bad thing. I hope they will go after the scat fetishists next.

No.3503315

>>3503025
Was expecting something... more cublike? This looks more like a 17 y/o Asian.

No.3503317

>>3503303

>Do you just live in a constant state of paranoia?

Do you just go out for a walk in a ghetto at night because you assume all the people around you are nice?

Recognizing that insane people can't be trusted isn't paranoia. It's just being pragmatic.

No.3503318

>>3503300

>unless theyre chris-chan levels of retard, yeah im pretty sure its safe to assume they can.

I'm not. For example, what is known of pedophilic offenders is that they tend to act more frequently under stress. The person knows what's wrong, but then they get a "weak moment" and throw their morals out of the window. Then they adopt beliefs and rationalizations that exonerate them from any wrongdoing, and whoops, you've got a newly made child molester.

People aren't consistent in their behaviour as the situations change. Someone may tell you "I would never!"... just wait a while and they do.

No.3503319

>>3503318
sure okay dude lemme know how long it takes before you cant help yourself and youve molested your dog

No.3503320

>>3503300

>but since most normal people can recognize the separation between imagination/fantasy vs actually engaging in the act, thats why its absurd to go on a witch hunt over one of them and ignore the shit out of the others.

And to that point I already answered: It's much more difficult to find opportunities to commit rape/murder or even think you could get away with it. It is also very difficult to rationalize rape/murder as permissible in civil society. The rapists and murderers mainly come out in situations of conflict, where some people are branded "fair game" due to enmities.

Meanwhile, pedophiles have a much easier time finding victims, offending multiple times, getting away with it for long periods of time and rationalizing their actions as non-harmful, or even permissible. They have a much lower threshold to act.

Remember NAMBLA? Can you imagine a similiar organization to legalize rape?

No.3503322
File: incredible_stretch_of_the_imagination.png - (106.40 KB, 640x273) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
108949

when everyones pedo then no one will be

No.3503323

>>3503319

>sure okay dude lemme know how long it takes before you cant help yourself and youve molested your dog

Can you honestly say you would never ever do it? Under no circumstances? Gun on the forehead and do or die? I would call you a liar.

Then simply consider that for many people, much less than a gun to the head will do. Much, much less.

No.3503326

If anyone ever wanted to question why Stalin and Churchill turned Germany into rubble, here it is.

Let nazis be nazis long enough and they all come out of the closet as pedophiles. Why do you think alt righters love anime so much?

No.3503327

This has evolved into the DUMBEST fucking thread I've ever seen on this site

Jesus Christ

No.3503329
File: arrest_capcom.jpg - (12.49 KB, 480x360) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
12790

>>3503323
loooool calling other people crazy and fucked up yet youre putting me in a hypothetical situation of someone with a gun to my head being forced to fuck a dog

what the fuck is wrong with you? if anyone needs to be locked up or committed i think its pretty fucking obvious who mate

>>3503327
same and im almost embarrassed to have contributed

No.3503330

>>3503317
Which has nothing to do with art. You're a fucking moron and should die.

No.3503352

>>3503329

>what the fuck is wrong with you?

No, what the fuck is wrong with you? You're dodging the point trying to excuse pedos and dogfuckers.

A normal person, which I assume you are, wouldn't fuck a dog unless their life depended on it. A "moral zoophile" on the other hand just needs a bad week at work and a few shots of gin, and the peanut butter comes out.

"fuck the rules, come here lassie. See, he's consenting!".

No.3503362

>>3503352
You're fucking insane. You're doing everything you can to come up with bullshit reasoning here. It's not even a matter of faith in others, you're just a paranoid fuckhead. You're the one that's going to snap by having a bad day.

No.3503363
File: equilibrium_ec_10_label-r8fa4f0564a6c4c9698b0b29bda671f2e_v11mb_8byvr_260.jpg - (7.23 KB, 260x260) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
7407

the future twitter furries want: "this post is rated EC-10 for Emotional Content"

v:lawster

No.3503367

>>3503352
jesus christ dude youre a fucking psycho

>A normal person, which I assume you are, wouldn't fuck a dog unless their life depended on it.

i doubt you assume anybody is a normal person. what is this the next Saw movie? i guess if my options were "get murdered" or "fuck a dog" id have to try and screw the pooch? with your eschewed sense of moral reasoning i think youre the last person to be talking about "normal people." i also dont think a gun to someones head is a reasonable measure to gauge a someones actions

if someones life depended on it, or if there were literally no consequences to any actions, anybody would probably do anything . is that what you want to hear? and by that logic, everyone is preemptively guilty of being a rapist a pedo an animal fucker a murderer you fuckin name it. that includes you too so lets just lock everyone up and turn them into robots so they play nice and nothing bad ever happens. who the fuck are you, mustapha mond?

but this is the real world, there are consequences to everything whether overtly external or subtly destructive. thats the point of all of this stupid discussion, its possible for regular-ass everyday people to have thoughts and fantasies about fucked up things but not act on them. and because of that its unfair to jump to extreme conclusions about shit just because youre a paranoid idiot. everyone has intrusive thoughts in some capacity or another, regardless of severity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intrusive_thought
http://www.shalanicely.com/thoughts/aha-moments-from-imp-of-the-mind/
https://www.amazon.com/Imp-Mind-Exploring-Epidemic-Obsessive-ebook/dp/B002I1XS5I

for some people its fleeting, for some it can be persistent and they can find a harmless outlet to entertain those thoughts (you dont even have to talk about furries drawing animal smut or cub stuff, it could be your neighbor joe who has a penchant for always watching gorey movies, or your coworker helen who reads abuse erotica), and for a small number of them they dont have the faculties to deal with it and either give in and hurt someone else or themselves and hopefully get arrested and receive some kind of help or appropriate punishment.

No.3503368
File: this_guy.JPG - (6.99 KB, 236x300) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
7155

>>3503352

>A "moral zoophile" on the other hand just needs a bad week at work and a few shots of gin, and the peanut butter comes out.

if you projected any fucking harder theyd hire you as a piece of classroom equipment, stay away from the gin

vc: kawner
as in go sit in the fucking kawner and think about how stupid youve been

No.3503370

>>3503352

this just in: socjus people don't belong near dogs

v:wag

No.3503373

>>3503367

>and by that logic, everyone is preemptively guilty of being a rapist a pedo an animal fucker a murderer

No. That's your strawman.

>>3503362

>you're just a paranoid fuckhead.

Wake up and smell the coffee. The reason I don't hang out with the local furries is because I know some of them screw their poodles, they've said so themselves, and one of the older ones tried to diddle me when I was still underage. Even on this board, you got people who tell you they were molested as children, and try to advocate for pederasty, post CP etc.

It's not paranoia when it's real.

No.3503375

>>3503367

> its possible for regular-ass everyday people to have thoughts and fantasies about fucked up things but not act on them

Of course it is, but that's not the point. The point isn't about some random dude having a fleeting thought, but zoophiles, pedophiles, who have a fucking paraphilia about it.

The question is, why the moral crusade, and the answer is: because they're horrible people who should be in psychiatric treatment or jail. People who treat them like normal human beings see no evil, hear no evil, until they do evil and then it's all "oh, I did not see this coming!"

Yes you did.

No.3503377

>>3503373

>Wake up and smell the coffee. The reason I don't hang out with the local furries is because I know some of them screw their poodles, they've said so themselves, and one of the older ones tried to diddle me when I was still underage. Even on this board, you got people who tell you they were molested as children, and try to advocate for pederasty, post CP etc.

Then why didn't you try to get them vanned instead of yelling aimlessly at a dead board?

No.3503380

2018's "think of the children" is just as idiotic as 1988's "think of the children", responsible parents are plenty capable of protecting their children from dangerous people online if they'd only give half a fuck to actually monitor what they're doing. This added step of going after porn only punishes people that have a kink for the fantasy.

The danger of this line of thinking is it can be used to attack basically any media a moralizer doesn't like. Is something online too sexy? Kids can see it, and can be used ""to groom"", whatever that means, so we better get rid of it.

Think, if only adults could see cub porn, and magically anyone cognitively underdeveloped couldn't, would you still have a problem with it? If not, then your problem isn't with the art itself, but with children's access to it, in which case I'd recommend advocating for better parenting instead.

No.3503381

>>3503373
You have more problems than any pedo, apparently.

No.3503395

>>3503375

There is no such thing as psychiatric help for a pedophile in any western nation (except Germany) without a criminal conviction. The very act of disclosing one's pedophilia to their physician/counselor/psychiatrist/psychologist demands that they report their patient to the authorities. Failure to do so means they're complicit if their patient ever does something illegal and it's discovered that they WERE seeking counseling for it. The mental health professional risks at the very least the loss of their professional license, and at worst, a criminal conviction themselves.

And sure, they're horrible people. But a horrible person who KNOWS that they're horrible and takes steps to control that part of their nature is far more adjusted for society than most college students.

No.3503398

Tacklebox's Twitter is now locked down for some reason.

No.3503428

>>3503373

get help instead of making shit up on a dead board

No.3503459
File: 1112476581.png - (28.49 KB, 565x337) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
29175

remember, if you're against hundreds of people getting painted as monsters by 18-20 year old brats and 26+ year old manchildren, you're a monster too!

No.3503463

>>3503459
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhvfZ-TGIU8

No.3503464
File: carl.jpg - (871.53 KB, 1600x1036) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
892442

i cant wait for the impending collapse of this whole sjw bullshit. i wanna see it fall implode and watch them tear each other apart like rabid, gaudy, ugly animals

you ask a lady if she needs help with something? youre a sexist pig
you accidentally misgender someone because you didnt intrinsically know they were really a quadgendered hermaphroditic dragonkin? somehow youre the asshole
you draw some funky fantasy smut? youre automatically a pedophile or a rapist
how long before you get booked on assault charges because you made eye contact?

they are literally becoming the rigid socially constrictive authoritarian fascist figures they claim to hate so much. and with young conservatives and the alt-right being a bunch of retarded weebs with no sense of irony, i wouldnt be surprised if the two sides somehow find a common ground in their pursuit of controlling how everyone else thinks and acts

it isnt even about tacklebox at this point and im willing to bet that shit was just a handful of keyboard cowboys who got butthurt over something trivial he did or didnt do. decline a commission, too busy to chat at a con, jealous of his ability, who knows, but the fucking hugbox militia was all over him like stink on shit in the blink of an eye when there were plenty of other easier targets

No.3503468

>>3503464

they're bringing up sibe now that tacklebox neutralized his social media presence. they fucked over some dude for a drawing, and are only now going after the guy who tried to prey on kids in real life. it really shows their priorities.

v:cheatness

No.3503494

>>3503468
oh i know, i peeked down the twitter rabbithole before i went to bed last night (those people are way the fuck crazier than i imagined). them going after sibe will be fuckin hilarious because the man has practically no shame and way thicker skin than half of twitter combined. hes been laying low for a while, he hasnt actually done anything in ages has he? what are they gonna do, mount a crusade against someone that everyone else already knows about?

speaking of priorities and twitter rabbitholes, i found some other rando pointing out that tacklebox used pics of a dog online as reference for a character he was drawing:
https://twitter.com/Cryotee/status/984996163442135040

>I don’t understand the furry world and the wanting to be one part but I have to tell the people who aren’t Zira fans. He IS drawing Zira, the marks in the right spots and everything. Zira is a famous internet dog. He’s basically trying to ruin her innocent reputation.
>The. Guy. Drawing. Zira. In. Pornographic. Ways. Could. Damage. Her. Reputation. Why. Can’t. You. Understand. That.

someone is legitimately freaking out because a dogs internet "reputation" could be tarnished. its so absurd that i dont even know what to say. at least a few people in that mess are rational

>I feel like calling people pedophiles for drawing art of fictional animal people undermines the seriousness of the actual act/crime.

i gotta stop coming back to this thread, this whole thing is a hilarious trainwreck, its hard to look away

No.3503495

>>3503494

Twitter outrage culture is a kabuki theater full of sound and fury. These people do it to bump up their own presence, gain follower count and maybe bring attention to their own mediocre artwork.

In other words, it's virtue signalling about the issue-of-the-week for attention.

No.3503498

it fucking rules how mad y'all are

No.3503499

>>3503498

>y'all

hi twitter trash, being mad at people who ruin lives over literally nothing is called having a brain. but hey, you got your follower count so I guess you're on cloud 9.

No.3503500

>>3503499
LOL ALL THE DRAMA MADE TWITTER CRASH
OOH THOSE HYPOCRITES ARE SMASHING THEIR KEYBOARDS THAT THEY LOOSE THEIR PRECIOUS ARGUMENTS

No.3503501

>>3503499

>hurrrrrr buuuuuuuuh ffffffffguuuuh

wow, damn, totally owned!

No.3503505
File: good.png - (55.95 KB, 587x485) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
57294

>>3503022

No.3503508

>>3503501

>utter lack of self-awareness

imagine my shock

No.3503509

>>3503508

>hurrrrrrrrrrrrr
No.3503513

>>3503498
>>3503501
>>3503509
A clear sign that people who live their lives limited to 140 characters per thought (more recently 280. I better mention that before they rush to correct me in lieu of having any kind of rational argument otherwise) have no capacity for intelligent discussion, and instead resort to babbling and tantrums like the children they are.

No.3503524

This is why we can't have nice things

No.3503526

>>3503513
I was about to say this. You can always tell that twitter (tm) lack of intelligence when their response is something along the lines of "ffffarrttttttt", because they can't internalize the idea that someone doesn't think exactly the same as themselves.

No.3503542

>>3503526

>faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaart
No.3503549

>>3503542

thanks for proving our point, twitter faggot

No.3503550
File: tumblr_niawkjJD811u5firdo1_540.jpg - (36.51 KB, 540x449) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
37390

What I like about all this is that since they've jumped the gun on the situation, they got to lay all their cards on the table to bring Tacklebawks down, yet they have no solid proof if it is him or not.

Worse since he locked his account, which to them in their language means they feel their worst fears about him is true to them, yet Tackle could just be looking his account because this drama is unwarranted or that no matter what they said to them will not quell the angry mob.

No.3503600

>>3503550

and since it's all circumstantial bullshit and an artstyle vaguely like his (newsflash, no one has a copyright on sticking big eyes on a dumb dog face), they really have nothing and just look insane.

No.3503610

>>3503505

OH NO YOU DIDN'T BELIEEEEVE HIM DID YOU, I'D HAVE TO RUIN YOUR LIFE TOO!!!

No.3503615

>>3503459
I guess it's true about becoming the enemy you fear. This reads like any nutball Evangelical calling out to find those secret fags...

No.3503616

flogging a dead horse at this point its no surprise these people are idiots. i regret even thumbing through some of the twitter outrage, and im honestly surprised how many people are blatantly against porn in general.

like there were people unironically whining about even "regular" furry porn. i dunno if thats part of this new self-identity bullshit or not, people who identify as "asexual" or whatever? i missed that whole boat im just some cis male scum so i have no clue about their unique little categories. i can understand maybe not liking porn yourself but i guess that means you have to hate anyone and everyone else who consumes or creates

its fuckin burned furs all over again

No.3503617

>>3503616
I've never seen an "asexual" furry account that didn't stretch credulity to breaking point.
Yeah buddy, I'm sure you commissioned 40 pictures of a wolf lady's butt for completely non-sexual reasons. I believe you.

No.3503618
File: notsureif.jpg - (367.40 KB, 1285x745) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
376216

and this random chick (or dude? if they say theyre trans but also a lesbian does that mean they were biologically a guy but identify as a girl and prefer women? does that mean they dont like other trans women? has the distinction become so jumbled and misused in their weird little world that labels have effectively lost all meaning anyway?)

>Psychotic spectrum.

oh okay

are they fishing for some kind of attention by having six degrees of separation to all the drama somehow? ooh rrgh, i blocked this person because my shitty ex is dating them. my ex is TRANSPHOBIC, it couldnt possibly be because i was too much crazy to handle or because i transitioned from being a guy when i was dating someone that isnt into women

masturbating to disney characters is bestiality
and then the best

>my paranoia around a callout isn't because I have any secrets it's just I've seen ppl get shit on for stuff that is so ridiculously out of their control you know

yeah i think we all know

No.3503619

>>3503617
right? btw im gonna need those ladywolf butt pictures for further inspection

No.3503621
File: DbBJTXrVAAA9NXZ.jpg - (122.39 KB, 1898x936) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
125332

i don't generally believe the "these people are just attacking what they're ashamed of jerking to" line, but lol

"male, muscular, underage characters" well that sounds like fellow crusader @frecklethefox

No.3503636

>>3503621

that twitter account is protected now. lol

No.3503637

Oh hey
>>3503618
I knew this fag. Orgonongirl is Tybalt Maxwell aka Taylor Plourde. Canadian and certifiably insane.

Captcha: jig

No.3503657

>>3503618
Getting off to Disney is beastiality now? Oooookay.

No.3503660
File: 1500306105.joelasko_peg_full.jpg - (397.74 KB, 850x1083) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
407283

>>3503618

whacking it to Disney chars = beastiality

Is this the logic people use when they say that Furry is full of dogfuckers? Because that's how you make Furry full of dogfuckers.

By that logic, I've been hopelessly committing animal abuse unto myself to dog people for over 25 years.

No.3503661
File: 1521994974.drakefenwick_popularity.jpg - (304.51 KB, 949x1280) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
311820

>>3503660

And before dog people, there was "Mama Bear". Guess that adds "bearfucker" to the list of crimes. Much more impressive sounding than it actually is.

And before that, a certain cute mousey engineer. What would that constitute? Bestial Sizeplay?

Some days, I see someone making such rediculously huge blanket statement generalizations such as this, and I gotta wonder "How in the everloving hell do people air such striking stupidity out into the world?"

Sadly, the answer all too often is "very easily".

No.3503663

>>3503637

>I knew this fag. Orgonongirl is Tybalt Maxwell aka Taylor Plourde. Canadian and certifiably insane.

Reveal all to us.

No.3503680

>>3503549

>faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaart
No.3503689

>>3503663
Taylor Plourde, aka Manna Plourde aka Elyssia Plourde aka Tybalt Maxwell aka jesus this guy has gone through a lot of names. Lives in Ontario somewhere last I knew. He always came across as really weird before he went trans and after he just got weirder. Before he went tranny he was into hyper. Hyper cocks, mainly. He fancies himself a poet/writer. His writing is weird and stilted just like his personality.

No.3503699

>>3503660

>Is this the logic people use when they say that Furry is full of dogfuckers? Because that's how you make Furry full of dogfuckers.

No, its when they literally draw their characters fucking a non anthro character, aka full blown zoo/feral.

No.3503705

>>3503680

so do you have any evidence yet aside from "this dog looks kind of like an anime tacklebox drew once" or are you still up shit creek on that?

No.3503706

>>3503699

maybe they find Pongo or Perdita hot as fuck, but Fluffy irl just isn't attractive, because art is art and real life is real life.

twitter fags can't separate fantasy and reality. they're the ones who should be on the watch lists.

No.3503717
File: call_the_aspca_quick.jpg - (260.53 KB, 818x818) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
266778

and even then its regardless cause at the end of the day its still just a drawing

<--- look at this shit
it doesnt matter how fucked up you think it is
it doesnt matter how fucked up you think the artist is
it doesnt matter how fucked up you think anyone who likes the pic is
what you think does not matter
it is just a drawing
it is not real

No.3503724
File: Racist+bears_56d92b_3346029.jpg - (95.64 KB, 568x735) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
97937

>>3503022

If someone would just risk it and post 2 pics on Twitter or whatever social media site with a question.

"Which of the 2 pictures do you find the worst?"
There's 1 drawn picture with a cub getting fucked.
There's 1 picture of an actual real life 5yo getting fucked.
If ANYONE even SLIGHTLY considers the drawing the worst of the two or if they say "both are just as bad!", they should get fucking shot.

I'm pretty sure if a child had to choose they would rather have a drawing of a cartoon animal with a dick up its orifice instead of an actual real-life dick right up their own ass.

The fact these witch hunts are suddenly happening now of all times, makes me want to think everyone is just trying to appeal to the current general "SJW" crowd, without thinking of the consequences or even about what they're doing...
They just assume the worst and blindly go with it, thinking they're bettering the world while they're just making it worse... All for a like and a retweet.

No.3503945

>>3503022

Bumping because I love the drama this has caused, also, lets start calling out other furry artists that draw questionably aged art. Shiuk being one of them.

No.3503946

>>3503945

"I can't tell the difference between drawings and real kids" - ID:7OWSGsjI

No.3503949
File: Page - 10.jpg - (57.55 KB, 535x700) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
58933

The guy who commissioned it likes corgis and is Japanese. Some Japanese guys look super young. For fucks sake I keep on getting mistaken for a 14 year old when I'm 29 years old! It's not illegal to look young you SJW retards!!!!!!!!!!

No.3503951

>>3503949

For fucks sake I keep on getting mistaken for a 14 year old when I'm 29 years old! It's not illegal to act young you SJW retards!!!!!!!!!!

FTFW.

No.3503959

>>3503724

>If ANYONE even SLIGHTLY considers the drawing the worst of the two or if they say "both are just as bad!", they should get fucking shot.

Neither of the pictures are bad - they're just paper or data. Objects can't be evil. Just like guns don't shoot people, child porn doesn't abuse children - people do.

It's the people who are bad, and making a comparison between drawn CP and real CP, you're fundamentally comparing whether one pedophile is better than another, like comparing whether robbing a store with a fake gun is better than robbing a store with a real gun.

Irrelevant question: they're both pedophiles, or robbers.

No.3503962

>>3503959

> robbing a store with a real gun.

The one with the fake gun actually robs a fake pretend-store he'd set up in his own garage and stocked with wares he had legally purchased.

No.3503964

>>3503959
The difference between the two pictures is that a real child has been exploited in the photograph whereas the drawing has not brought harm to anyone.

>you're fundamentally comparing whether one pedophile is better than another, like comparing whether robbing a store with a fake gun is better than robbing a store with a real gun.

No, it's comparing someone who thinks about robbing a store vs someone who has actually robbed a store.

No.3503971

>>3503959

so you're saying Minority Report is the best world to live in ever and thought crime is real crime, then

No.3503974

>>3503971
A pedophile who consumes CP in any form is still a pedophile, and only a naive person thinks they wouldn't offend a real child if given the opportunity and no fear of consequences.

The fake CP can be even more dangerous, because it's operant conditioning: the more you fap over something, the more you train yourself to like it, so the whole thing's just reinforcing the pedophilia by telling stories about how the children really want it.

No.3503976

>>3503964

>No, it's comparing someone who thinks about robbing a store vs someone who has actually robbed a store.

The person who views the CP hasn't necessarily made it, so your comparison is false.

A pedophile is a pedophile. If you use the same analogy, both are planning to make an armed robbery. One just thinks they'll get away with it if they use a fake gun instead of a real gun.

And once they're caught planning the robbery, which is a crime in itself, you're the bleeding heart liberal who's going "It was just an airsoft gun! He dindu nuffing!"

No.3503984

>>3503949

tbh you have a good point. When I was younger I had a furfriend who was Korean that was 19 but looked 15 or younger at times.

Semi-weird when he wanted to bang, had a <3" dick, and had a thing for calling me a daddy-type.

No.3503985
File: this_conversation.jpg - (56.15 KB, 400x398) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
57498

>>3503976
Thinking about a robbery and planning a robbery are two different things.
Fantasizing about murder and planning to murder someone are two different things.
Imagining sex with an animal and planning to have sex with an animal are two different things.
Thinking about sex with a child and planning to have sex with a child are two different things
Aren't you sick of being retarded? How dense can you be?
Are you overcompensating out of guilt for something you won't admit? How deep is that hole you're digging?

It IS possible for someone to be sexually attracted to these things, and not actually partake in them. I guarantee you almost anyone you pass in a given day has desires that they consciously do not act upon, whether or not those desires are illegal.

Real child porn involves a real child, a drawn picture does not. Creator vs viewer is irrelevant when both the artist or the audience are targets for the lynch mob.

Nobody is saying pedophiles aren't fucked up, but until they are indulging their fetish in a manner that has harmed an actual child, they haven't done anything wrong. You can call them a pedo if it makes you feel better, but until a real child is involved, the only thing they're guilty of is being fucked up, and merely being a fucked up person is not a criminal offense.

And don't drag more politics into the mix, it's bad enough you want to police people's minds.
You're an idiot, clear as day, you have been determined to openly cement this fact for everyone here to see.

No.3503994

>>3503974

yeah we get it man you can't tell the difference between fantasy and reality and are projecting harder than IMAX. you and the twitter crew can go back to your bad social media site.

No.3504022

So, you watch a Criminal movie? Some guys planning a huge heist, going through it? You enjoyed watching them drive away with a truck of gold?

That apparently makes you a thief.

No.3504025

so where's this supposed cub porn?

don't tell me I brewed up this boner for nothing

No.3504030

>>3504025 see >>3503025

>he fell for the commies' autistic screeching
No.3504031

>>3504030
Comrades have better things to worry about than anything in this thread.

No.3504035

>>3504030
I see a corgi. Is it supposed to not be proportioned like one?

I mean, is this cub porn too?
https://img.lulz.net/src/no%20homo%20NO%20HOMO.jpg

No.3504041

>>3504035
Neither of them seem cub to me either but that doesn't stop the progressives in their digital jihad.

No.3504063

>>3504041
Progressives are too busy worrying over labor rights from the FDR administration to care about furry porn drawings.

No.3504080

>>3504063
You'd think that, but yet here we are.

No.3504086

>>3504080
Progressives have fled imageboard by now. And who can blame them?

No.3504118
File: barkinparker.jpg - (77.35 KB, 500x500) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
79203

>>3504035
yeah, it's supposed to be corgi/shiba hybrid, as seen from the commissioner's twitter profile which has this doggo in the banner.

nothing in tackle's art itself suggests it's a cub. all the accusations stem from the "secret cub account" nonsense.

my bet is that the karppfish account was created in a bar on someone else's phone. tackle has previously tweeted he's had bar sketch nights with friends, drawing art together and having some beer. there was also one screenshot posted which was clearly sketched by tackle using some mobile phone drawing app, why would he do that if he was at home on his own computer? clearly he was somewhere drinking with his friends.

right before corgi/shiba thing got posted, there was some other totally random picture posted. maybe the phone's owner was showing how to post image from an external source, after which tackle posted the art piece.

there's a fair chance tackle didn't retweet those cub pictures on the account, but he knows who did and doesn't feel like throwing his friends under the bus just to save his own skin. thus the silence. there's no evidence he's into cub himself, but he certainly has friends who are.

No.3504144
>there's no evidence he's into cub himself

even if he was. so what?

>he certainly has friends who are.

which is enough for a witch hunt. sad times

No.3504145

>>3503946

Embracing pedophilia, yeah, you're apart of the problem.

No.3504149

Sophist bullshit like this
>>3504144

...isn't going to trick me. You're right. I DO want a witch hunt. I'm glad to see pedophiles hunted down. You will earn no sympathy from me by complaining about how unfair it is. All the time you spend defending yourself on the internet would be better spent finding good hiding places.

No.3504161

>>3504149
Let me know when it changes from thought crime to real world child abuse and I'll give a shit. People can whack it to whatever fictional material they want. Fictional children should have no rights in real world society. People should be free to think, say, and look at whatever they want.

No.3504165

>>3504149
just remember you have nobody to blame but yourself when the fascists and the puritans start hunting you down for whatever illegal or immoral thoughts you have

"oh but [X/Y/Z] isnt illegal or bad?"
give it time faggot. this is how it starts, who knows where it will end

No.3504193

>>3504149

>You're right. I DO want a lynching. I'm glad to see niggers hunted down. You will earn no sympathy from me by complaining about how unfair it is. All the time you spend defending yourself in the south would be better spent finding good hiding places.

I mean, you really set yourself up for this.

No.3504194

>>3504165
Remember to have no morals or ethics lest the fascists get you by the nose.

No.3504276

>>3504145

nah, I'm just not retarded as fuck to think that a drawing can hurt someone you fragile piece of shit.

No.3504277

>>3504193

>comparing black people to pedophiles

Wow that's pretty racist.

No.3504278

>>3504149

"I don't like fascists" - wayne brady

"I want to lynch people who draw a character with big eyes because it could be a cub character" - also wayne brady

you fucking commularper piece of shit.

No.3504294

>>3504277

>comparing

Since it flew so easily over your pin-head, see >>3504278

Or don't. You're free to be as reactionary as the people on twitter.

No.3504298

>>3504277
Yeah, and totally apples to oranges.

Skin color is genetics, so once you kill all the blacks there will be no more of them. Pedophiles, however, are like 1:500 of population and there's no known genetic link, so you can't weed them out of the gene pool.

Abuse survivors have a slightly higher chance of turning into pedophiles, though, so perhaps we should start by killing all the abused children.

No.3504320

Word on the street, ya boi ICEman and a few other mongers from the VA / DC area are heavily involved in CP / Cub / Diaper stuff...

No.3504345

>>3504320

Well, after ICEman's HIV scare, I imagine his avenues have suddenly become rather limited...

No.3504347

>>3504298

> Pedophiles, however, are like 1:500 of population and there's no known genetic link

Pedophilia appears to be accompanied by a combination of genetic defects, so if you start screening for babies with genetic faults that lead to lower IQ, facial deformity etc. you tend to kill two birds with one stone.

https://www.alternet.org/are-some-men-born-pedophiles-new-science-says-yes-sexologists-say-not-so-fast

>The MRI brain-scan surveys found that pedophiles often have IQs in the low 90s
>The physical traits were “present before they conducted their offenses
>The MRI data led to another striking finding, Cantor said—one that comes from his team as opposed to reanalyzing others’ data sets—that pedophiles have less of the connective tissue that sends electrical signals between areas of the brain. Several regions of the brain become activated when a person is sexually stimulated, he said, but in pedophiles that “wiring” between these regions is skewed or operates differently.
>“No area of the brain is the sexual center,” Cantor explained. “In theory, what it looks like is the thing that goes wrong is there is a problem, not in the sex centers, but in the network that is responsible for identifying what in the environment is a potentially sexual object.” He said, “This is a metaphor. It is as if there is a literal cross-wiring and when a person perceives a child in the brain, instead of triggering the nurturing instinct, it is triggering the sexual instinct… That is a very helpful way, so far, that explains the data.”
No.3504357

>>3504347

ah yes it's only the Aqualungs and Hobo Joes and Quasimodos of the world who want to rape your kids, never priests and coaches and teachers in schools from the shittiest public ones to the top private schools in any given nation. be a good shill and let the elite have their bacha bazi while you go off chasing people too stupid to wipe their ass let alone get away with nabbing a kid.

No.3504359

>>3504357

> be a good shill and let the elite have their bacha bazi while you go off chasing people too stupid to wipe their ass let alone get away with nabbing a kid.

I don't understand your point. Pedophilia is a mental disorder that has biological causes and social causes. Someone with an IQ of 90 isn't "too stupid to wipe their ass". They may not be the brightest bulb in the box, but these people do end up in schools and kindergardens, and as priests and the other places all the time, especially if they also happen to be sociopathic because they have no problems lying and and cheating their way up to the top.

The point is, pedophiles seem to have their wires crossed like people with synesthesia, who see the number 6 as green - in the same way, the pedophile sees a child as a sex object, and the lower the intelligence of the person the more likely they don't understand this is faulty perception.

No.3504369

>>3504320

can confirm, @KaitoRedPanda is one of those peeps in the DC / NoVA pedobear clique.

No.3504390

>>3504347

> Pedophilia appears to be accompanied by a combination of genetic defects, so if you start screening for babies with genetic faults that lead to lower IQ, facial deformity etc. you tend to kill two birds with one stone.

Thanks for that chain of logic, Joseph Goebbels.

No.3504395

>>3504347

>so if you start screening for babies with genetic faults that lead to lower IQ...

then we would have never been graced by your autistic walls of text

No.3504415

>>3504320

Wait, iceman degenerated into CUB/Diaper? oh wow..

No.3504448

Let me tell you a little secret, lulz.

Lots of artists draw cub porn, or ferals, or other controversial subject matter. Perhaps more than you might suspect. Maybe even a few of the artists you (blindly, naively) worship. And let's be honest; whether you love it or hate it, you obsess over it either way whenever it's unearthed. Even if it repulses you, you still feel compelled to look, like the people on the highway who slow down traffic for half a mile because they just have to see the overturned car and the body. I could speculate as to why some of you feel so compelled to repeatedly seek out something that allegedly repulses you, but you'd never be honest anyway.

However, thanks in part to this board and in part to others, many of the artists who once would have been more open about it have now learned to keep it carefully restricted to small circles they know they can trust. You're not on the inside track anymore, because most of you don't have any chill, you don't know how to ask nicely, and you just can't help spreading and reposting everything because you think everything absolutely has to be out in the open. Many of you also can't help being two-faced about it. Certainly this recent Twitter mob hasn't stopped anyone from drawing that kind of material, but in some cases it is going to be even harder for you to dig up now.

I know you don't like coddling artists' egos. To refrain from doing so is your choice, but in the end it sometimes means you don't get to have nice things.

No.3504453

>>3504390

>Thanks for that chain of logic, Joseph Goebbels.

You don't have to kill them, just fix the defective genes.

But consider. What is more cruel: giving birth to pedophiles, schitzophrenics, assburgers and howling retards who will suffer for a lifetime and/or make other people suffer, or abortion?

No.3504455

>>3504448

>However, thanks in part to this board and in part to others, many of the artists who once would have been more open about it have now learned to keep it carefully restricted to small circles they know they can trust

That's great. It means we don't have to associate with people who wear their pedophilia on their sleeves anymore. It's the least you can do as a pedophile. Jerking off to pictures of children is never going to be socially acceptable, and trying to pretend otherwise just harms everyone around you.

It also means that the pedophiles are having a harder time networking together to arrange for actual child abuse, because they can't reveal themselves to just anybody. The argument of "it's just fantasy" allows the pedophiles to use things like cub art as calling cards, because it offers plausible deniability.

As we treat cub art like we treat actual CP, that option goes away and finding other people to share your "hobby" with becomes quite a bit more riskier. If we give them the plausible deniability, it's like saying "Don't mind the smoke alarm. If you can't see the flame, there's no fire."

No.3504462
File: rf2015 diaper guy.png - (505.24 KB, 577x814) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
517367

I love the irony of these situations given everyone involved wants to fuck anthropomorphic animals

But any artist that draws hypersexualised cubs is probably not interested in any childlike aspects, otherwise they wouldn't be drawing them with footlong cocks and ahegao expressions in the first place. >>3503025 is a bit well-endowed and self-aware for a "child", there's far worse material drawn by western cub artists.

w/r/t babyfurs versus lowkey cub artists, which group is going to behave themselves better when out of the house and congregated in an intimate setting?

No.3504478

>>3504455

>is never going to be socially acceptable

Wait and see. Eventually your crazy bullshit will lose. It always does.

No.3504483
File: pic_related.png - (4.84 KB, 559x172) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
4954

>>3504359
>>3504453
>>3504455
ffs give it a rest you thickheaded idiot. We get it, we know you like children, and it's pretty obvious somewhere along the line you've been shamed and brainwashed into preaching its evils against all reason and rationale because you can't reconcile your fetish in the face of trying to be a "normal person."

as long as you're not touching actual children, nobody gives a fuck about your childish, pseudo-intellectual "knowledge" on what does and does not make someone a pedophile.

vc: fap
how fuckin appropriate

No.3504563

>>3504455

"The argument of "it's just fantasy""

the venn diagram between eugenicists and SJWs gets closer to a perfect circle

No.3504576

>>3504345

Whoa, wait, what? I didn't hear this.

No.3504582
File: C2vz_o7UAAAlTTm.jpg - (175.25 KB, 831x1200) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
179453

>>3504478

Sad to say but you're wrong and the perv is right. Not having pedophiles is a very recent thing historically speaking. Just like hating gays is a recent thing. In most cultures marrying under-age kids was normal until a few hundred years ago and guys fucking guys was considered macho. Not all cultures but a lot of them.

Maybe pedos will stay taboo but we've had them for a very, very long time in human history. It's going to be hard to overcome that as a society on a real long term basis.

No.3504583

>>3504582

We had murdering gays, raping captives and slavery too. Past prevalence isn't a reason to preserve exploitative barbarism.

Fuck human nature. Our higher level thinking and defeating our lust for quick/easy short term wins is how we stopped being hunter gatherers. Defying our nature, evolving faster than genetics through culture and social contract, that is what has us on top.

No.3504586

>>3504583

>thinking we're on top
No.3504591

>>3504576

We had a thread on it some time ago. Something along the lines of ICEman having an online freakout about getting tested for HIV and the results possibly.....not going his way. I don't recall if the method of transmission to him was mentioned or nailed down, or if he knew who allegedly gave it to him, but I wanna say it was within the past year.

No.3504594
File: married_to_children.jpg - (46.80 KB, 367x500) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
47926

There's no pedo problem in oh, so advanced, tolerant and cultural islamic countries.

No.3504610

>>3504594
Sikhs wear turbans, not Muslims. Big difference between the two. Don't confuse them.

No.3504613
File: 3b_in_real_life.png - (345.97 KB, 872x616) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
354277

>>3504610

>thinks brown people are worth differentiating

lol

No.3504623

>>3504610 Wearing turbans is common among Sikhs, including women. The headgear also serves as a religious observance, including among Shia Muslims, who regard turban-wearing as Sunnah Mu'akkadah (confirmed tradition).

No.3504771

Apparently some guy from Maryland named Neoki is heavy into Diaper / Cub play as well. Oh the joys of going to FurFag parties on Friday.

No.3505080

Youre not wrong about Mr. Wiles, he does have Oral Herpes.

>>3504771

Whoa. Neokai is into Diaper and Cub? I guess he Tokyo Drifted into that one


Delete Post []
Password