cancel reply
Posting mode: Reply


Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
name e-mail subject pw(deletion)
Post and go
Bump thread?

  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Javascript must be enabled for all of our addons to work.
  • Come chat and see that we're all a bit crazy on IRC!
  • Do not post any artwork from sexyfur.com and/or
    Jeremy Bernal. This is now a bannable offense.
Flockmod!

File: giphy (2).gif - (1849.73 KB, 500x500) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
1894124 No.3496072

Huhhh .... why do I keep getting "String Refused" when try to post links or videos? Why are my strings getting refused?!

is any one else getting these?

No.3496073

It's what happens when you have a banned word in your post

No.3496090
File: 9eBh5a_s_400x400.jpg - (27.58 KB, 400x400) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
28240

>>3496072
HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA
HA HA HA HA HA

No.3496096
File: chenpleasekillyourself.jpg - (36.08 KB, 279x276) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
36950
No.3496097

It's because the overzealous nighttime Moddie has been entering more words into the ban blocker, tagging a bunch of threads 'this will not move up the board', and even deleting popular threads that are being commented on without explanation. In fact, I've never seen this level of censorship here since a few years back when another Moddie was doing that and Cho0b canned his ass for it. In fact I'm on the verge of complaining, and if enough others do Cho0b probably will do something eventually.
Moddie, here's some advice: Unless it's cp, Lulz should never be censored. The board is dying and you're going to run off the last few remaining users. If a thread is popular and keeps getting posts, then it shouldn't be censored. If a thread is not popular, then nobody will comment on it and it will eventually scroll off and die by itself. You should never freeze or delete a thread simply because YOU personally don't like it. That's not the spirit of Lulz.
KAY?

No.3496098

You can see this current Mod's heavy-handedness by looking at the number of pages listed at the top. Despite new threads being created, it only shows 26 pages instead of the usual 29. Over three whole pages of recent content wiped out simply because HE didn't personally like it.

No.3496100
File: Audience_Reaction.jpg - (316.89 KB, 1600x1067) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
324493

>>3496097

>"Cho0b probably will do something..."
No.3496102

>>3496097
The political threads are being locked for A REASON.
The Hirtes threads are being locked for A REASON.
Why?
They are SPAM, plain and simple.
The mod activity was absent in the past SEVERAL MONTHS because the mods DID NOTHING.
Whining about it won't get you any further.

No.3496109

>>3496102

If lulz didn't have drama, and politics, lulz would be dead. It's certainly not about the porn.

No.3496111

>>3496109
Lulz.net did just fine WITHOUT the politics.

No.3496112

>>3496111>>3496111

It's been politics for 3 years now, and before that, it was just furry politics. Instead of bitching about Hillary and Trump, it was bitching about Naylor for his randian bullshit, and cigarskunk.

You've got some crazy fucked up memory if you think we haven't always been wrapped up in drama and politics.

No.3496115

>>3496112
Furry politics
It's more like Furry drama, and Jay Naylor's art was spammed to death on here. You saw what happened to that CigarSKANK thread.

No.3496118

>>3496115

Let's be real tho. Cigarskunk was posted here because of his opinions, specifically, political opinions. He doesn't create anything of value, doesn't put out comics, isn't really a lulz cow. 100% it was his politics that created a witch hunty hate group that'd post him and his journal entries on any furry board that'd allow them to have a 5 o'clock hate.

If you don't think it was cigar's politics, you're crazy.

No.3496120

>>3496118
Go back to your $10 club, goon.

No.3496122
File: stop_liking_file.jpg - (124.84 KB, 321x360) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
127839

>>3496120

So well articulated, you must be very popular.

No.3496124

>>3496118

Ironically, we're being attacked by dedicated SJW individuals because they think we're all a bunch of Cigarskunks. To be lumped in with the likes of him.........how low.

No.3496125

>>3496124

Well of course, that is how it works.

1.) Force your way in.
2.) Bitch things aren't the way you like them.
3.) Seek jobs as moderators.
4.) Destroy community.
5.) Find something else to force yourself into because you killed the host.

Comics, games, tabletop, magic cards, you name it, they'll invade it.

No.3496131

What the FUCK is up with the mods/jannies on this site over the last year? Did some douche hit the big red "ban all IPs" button without care to see what they were actually deleting? Idiots can't do anything right. Instead of removing the last of Brave's old spam, and all of this nigger's spam (listed here >>3491746 and here >>3495033 [with IDs to ban here >>3495067], now including >>3495049 >>3495519 ID:726o30js, >>3495728 >>3495976 ID:02Gf8aWk, >>3496068 ID:AlWifEB0), you removed the following:

Random images thread:
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:thL4PVlKyeUJ:https://lulz.net/furi/res/3475384.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca

The second coming of paws.ru (this thread had some info I wanted in it, Google's cache doesn't have the rest, now its gone):
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:V8QQcXLO4UkJ:https://lulz.net/furi/res/3492098.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca

I believe this was humans x furry females:
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:JXwBLY4X8IEJ:https://lulz.net/furi/res/3490828.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca

3B "Has anyone checked on Ch00b? They legalized weed in California.":
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:bNFAi_JY0LcJ:https://lulz.net/furi/res/3489830.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca
Didja notice how all of 3Bs posts are gone? There were lots here for example >>3494324. I swear to god Ultros, if this is your doing again, you are a first class asshole and a terrible fuckin mod.

Prequel edit thread, if anyone saved the images from this please repost. wtf!:
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:YH2-JaO21a4J:https://lulz.net/furi/res/3493281.html+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=ca

Why in the sweet shit is anyone going to bother posting on this decrepit board, when we can't even be sure the threads we are following will be there when we get up the next day? The fuck's the point of dumping content here when there is a huge risk of it being removed because some of the mod staff here are incompetent buggers? CP may have killed this place, but dumbass mods and Choob's fumbling of getting the new board up and running (only eight months late, huh?) surely sealed the fate of this aging relic of a "furry" board. There is no real reason to come here anymore and I'm pissed because I used to like visiting here. Furry content? I knew smol wouldn't return with his dump threads. Lon's drawthreads? Toast. Edit threads? None in over a year. Other artists making content? Declining. Real furry drama? This place lags days/weeks behind social media. What we do have are people slow spamming the board like Brave (emo drama) and Hirtes(?) (clickbait shit and 10% stale furry news), and an endless amount of /pol/ shit which is drowning the site so badly you might as well rename /furi/ to /furpol/. Its bloody awful, at this point I'd be okay if Choob just closed the site and we were done with it. It served us well, but its over.

>>3496109

>If lulz didn't have drama, and politics, lulz would be dead.

Its on life support, has been for a few years now. It might as well be dead.

>>3496112

>it was bitching about Naylor for his randian bullshit, and cigarskunk.

Please, take me back!

>You've got some crazy fucked up memory if you think we haven't always been wrapped up in drama and politics.

But now the drama is mostly forced by one or three people (and the threads mostly flounder), and sure /pol/ was always here, but now that others left in droves it sticks out as being the only thing left. If I wanted to swim in an endless swamp of politics, I'd go on 4 or 8chan, not here.

No.3496134

>>3496131

Or Tumblr, Or facebook? If you haven't been paying attention, all social spaces are now political spaces. This is because they left has been heavily pushing the edict that the personal is political. Consciously, unconsciously, these are the marching orders.

Politics has absorbed all spheres of American conversation. Cant even enjoy superbowl commercials without pro/anti border ads.

No.3496135

I mean fuck, late night comedy shows aren't exempt whatsoever. Most of the jokes are "Trump" now. This is life. This is your world. Every rotten thing is political now. Enjoy!

No.3496138
File: identifyingarguments.jpg - (68.84 KB, 598x792) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
70497

>>3496122

No.3496140

>>3496131

>Why in the sweet shit is anyone going to bother posting on this decrepit board, when we can't even be sure the threads we are following will be there when we get up the next day?

Why the fuck are you still here, then?

It's almost like you've misunderstood the idea of imageboards and thought they're supposed to be like reddit.

No.3496141

>>3496131
Even wikipedia gets the point:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imageboard

>Imageboards, similar to bulletin board systems, are used for discussions of a variety of topics. The primary focus of imageboards, however, is directed away from text posts, and is instead placed on picture posts. The two share many of the same structures, including separate forums for separate topics, as well as similar audiences.** Imageboards are much more transitory with content—on some boards (especially highly trafficked ones), the thread deletion time can be as little as 10 minutes.**
No.3496144

>>3496125
/pol/ does the same shit, don't deny it

>>3496118
The man is a commission whore with no talent, he makes nothing, he bought his notoriety. Crying over his hurt feelings politics is all he has.

No.3496147

>>3496144
t. /leftypol/ user

No.3496149

>>3496134

>Or Tumblr, Or facebook? If you haven't been paying attention, all social spaces are now political spaces.

I'm not on Facebook and haven't used Tumblr in years.

>This is because they left has been heavily pushing the edict

There you go, baiting this thread to get derailed again into /pol/ shite.

>Politics has absorbed all spheres of American conversation.

Yes, I wish you Americunts would shut up about it.

>>3496135

>Most of the jokes are "Trump" now.

Like every prez before, get over yourself.

>>3496141

>Imageboards are much more transitory with content—on some boards (especially highly trafficked ones), the thread deletion time can be as little as 10 minutes.

You are entirely missing the point. And poorly trying to justify the mods sloppy behavior. We are talking about mods deleting threads FOR NO REASON, threads that were on point - furry related. Not the time it takes for them to sage off, which on this snailboard takes about 2 months, and that time continues to grow as more people leave.

No.3496150

>>3496149

>We are talking about mods deleting threads FOR NO REASON

Welcome to imageboard culture. Enjoy your ban.

No.3496151
File: rules.jpg.jpg - (188.34 KB, 680x794) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
192856

>>3496149
In case you have forgotten where we came from.

No.3496152

>>3496149
Though let me make a proper point

>Not the time it takes for them to sage off, which on this snailboard takes about 2 months

That's part of the problem of this board. The same threads sit on the front page for weeks on end, the same resident assholes argue the same endless wank, and if anyone new should stop by that's all they get. Nothing interesting, just the same entrenched idiots flinging shit at each other. Even if you like arguing, that shit gets old because it's literally just namefags fagging each other or talking about shit that is literally decades old.

Arbitrary moderation has always been a part of imageboard culture, and if the mods are bored enough to just delete threads for shits and giggles - all the better. Something happens - even if it's just you getting mad.

No.3496155

>>3496144

There are MANY furs who are comission whores and we don't discuss them here. We don't make anti-fan clubs for comission whores unless they're a lulcow, or they're conservative / rand-tards. Don't try to use his spending habits as justification, you just come off as jealous.

He never purchased notoriety. He was given notoriety because his political journal posts have pissed off snowflakes and they want him harassed, doxed, or silenced.

Meanwhile a dozen welfare sea cows buy up just as many commissions and do not end up on lulz.

And no, conservatives are markedly less neurotic in the social sciences. When we come into a space we feel unwelcome, we don't feel entitled to convert, pervert and destroy that space.

/pol/ did raids, not invasions. We never had the intent to stay, we just wanted the lulz and we left like vikings. Lefty /pol/ are the faggots that want to colonize.

No.3496169
File: f7926f78012af0c31ca33bf9a2b349740643e95531ec7cae6f62d21af9d8d2c0.png - (307.75 KB, 550x361) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
315131

>>3496152
Confirmed for shits and giggles

No.3496196

>>3496150

>Welcome to imageboard culture. Enjoy your ban.

Weak. There is no point to an imageboard, if you can't sustain discussion, because threads keep being removed left and right. Some of those lost threads were furry related. Not CP or spam or Bernal. Therefore, they should not have been removed.

>>3496151
Oh christ, what are you, 15?

>>3496152

>and if anyone new should stop by that's all they get.

I guarantee that no longer happens.

>and if the mods are bored enough to just delete threads for shits and giggles - all the better.

That is a shit attitude for you (and them) to have.

No.3496205

>>3496196

There are other image boards you can go to.

No.3496207

>>3496131

>Didja notice how all of 3Bs posts are gone?

Good, he's supposed to be banned anyways.

No.3496208

>>3496196

> There is no point to an imageboard, if you can't sustain discussion

The clue is in the name image board. Secondly, any discussion on imageboards has traditionaly been transient - water cooler gossip. That's the niche that imageboards were made to fill: other forums had the serious talk, imageboards are for posting pictures and talking crap.

The downfall of imageboards was when people like you started treating them like regular forums and holding up forts of discussion, trying to establish cliques and dominating the discussions/boards with your personal pet subjects. That's when everyone left, because there are far better websites for that.

No.3496216

>>3496196

>Oh christ, what are you, 15?

You're 35 trying to have "discussions" on a platform by/for 15 year olds. Maybe it's you who's in the wrong place?

No.3496244

>>3496205
Yes, there are. And everyone else realized this too, because the regular visitor count here since the start of 2015 has steadily plummeted.

>There are other image boards you can go to.

Probably t. polposter, who killed the host with spam, and their only retort to others bitching about it is "W-well, y-yknow there are other b-boards you can go to!". Right, uh-huh. The point I and others have made here is that with that attitude, you loose the masses and people do in fact leave, then the imageboard dies because its become a round-robin clique of the same five people talking about the same shit. This attitude worked out so well for 8chan, didn't it? "Don't like it, leave, make your own board." That's how you wind up with 30,000 boards and not nearly enough population to fill them. Dead on arrival boards.

>>3496208

>other forums had the serious talk, imageboards are for posting pictures and talking crap.

Are you seriously going to tell me that you have never had an articulate discussion on an imageboard? Yes, while much of it is shittalking and kiddies posting memes (depending where you visit), there are several boards with in-depth talk about various subjects. Again, your argument is weak.

>The downfall of imageboards was when people like you started treating them like regular forums and holding up forts of discussion, trying to establish cliques and dominating the discussions/boards with your personal pet subjects.

Look a little farther up my current post. That's what /furi/ has already become. But it wasn't because of me. I didn't spam /pol/ content that made the board look like a run down cul-de-sac of 'left' and 'right' posters flinging shit at each other. You guys did. It was allowed to build to a point where others left (however /pol/ content was not the only reason people left this board, as stated many times before), and now like you pointed out, this place has downfall'd when people like you started treating it like regular (pol) forums and holding up forts of (pol) discussion. There isn't just one general it overflows and spills all over the place, because every little snowflake has to start his or her own thread bitching about "this" or that" with regards to Trump and other politics.

I spent years dumping content into this place. Furry related shit and other stuff. My threads were like me posting to myself, hardly anyone took part. But you can best be damned sure the latest 3-4 /pol/ threads were fighting for the top spot on the first page as they were active non-stop. Non-stop on a board that's pretty much fuckin dead! What does that tell you? That tells you /furi/ is no longer a furry board. And I, like others, fuckin gave up trying to save it with other content. There is no point wasting my time trying to jump start a convo posting a ton of furry related stuff I want to talk about, because no one of worth is left to talk about it. I mourn the loss of 'once was' because for a time, /furi/ was unlike any other furry board. Now its just /pol/ shit, clickbait news links and that one fella slowspamming stuff "just cause".

>That's when everyone left, because there are far better websites for that.

Imageboards have been hemorrhaging users because of places like Tumblr, Twitter, Facebook, Instgram, and now Discord. In these times mods should be careful not to rock the boat too much on their respective boards, because people now have so many options readily available to them, they'll just say fuck it and leave. First gen users of boards grew up and moved on, and gen after sees them as antiqued Web 1.0 and hardly bother with them.

>>3496216
Its the fact you brought up that image that makes you look like a douche. "Yeah, w-well...here are da rulez!" runs away.

>Maybe it's you who's in the wrong place?

Another weak statement. You are probably in your late 20s or 30s, so by your logic you'd as well be in the wrong place. Unless you actually are 15.

No.3496299

>>3496244

>you loose the masses and people do in fact leave

So, does that mean you're not people?

No.3496301

>>3496244

>Are you seriously going to tell me that you have never had an articulate discussion on an imageboard?

Distortion of the point.

>But it wasn't because of me.

Yes it is. You're the one who's complaining when the board is actually moving as threads get deleted and people banned for making it srs bsns. Shit sticking on for months and months is the enabling factor because it attracts the shit people who turn slow moving boards into their forts of wankery.

>My threads were like me posting to myself, hardly anyone took part.

"Waa, nobody paid attention to me." Way to miss the point. Lurk moar.

>Imageboards have been hemorrhaging users because of places like Tumblr, Twitter, Facebook, Instgram, and now Discord.

Imageboards were a counterpoint to those social media bubbles, and the reason they started losing users is because the culture became too much alike with namefags and other wankers trying to claim the boards as their own autistic tantrum grounds.

>Another weak statement. You are probably in your late 20s or 30s, so by your logic you'd as well be in the wrong place.

When at the playground, play with the swings, build sand castles in the pit. If you get that point, it doesn't matter what your age is. If you're trying in vain to make a children's playground some sort of tea group bla bla, there are better places for that.

No.3496321
File: DVLKul1V4AAu3sY (1).jpg - (72.18 KB, 723x791) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
73910

Now, While you may not enjoy which string was added to the refusal box, I have personally noticed a decrease in automated discussion bots with it added. The string's addition was with robots in mind.

No.3496457

>>3496299
That makes no sense.

>>3496301

>Distortion of the point.

Avoiding the question.

>You're the one who's complaining when the board is actually moving as threads get deleted and people banned for making it srs bsns.

This is the second time I'm making this point: I am bitching about the mods deleting threads before they naturally died. Threads that were not in violation of any rules.

>Shit sticking on for months and months is the enabling factor because it attracts the shit people who turn slow moving boards into their forts of wankery.

Thank you, you perfectly described the lulz of the last couple of years. Nothing but political threads sticking around for months and months, enabling more shit /pol/ posters who have turned this slow moving board into their fort of polwankery.

>"Waa, nobody paid attention to me."

Yes, because I wasn't talking about politics or screaming nigger.

>the culture became too much alike with namefags and other wankers trying to claim the boards as their own autistic tantrum grounds.

There were namefags loooonnnnnnnnnnng before social media.

No.3496498

>>3496457

>That makes no sense.

It means, you forgot to count yourself in.

>Avoiding the question.

You had no question, you were simply pushing a strawman.

> I am bitching about the mods deleting threads before they naturally died. Threads that were not in violation of any rules.

There are no real rules.

>Thank you, you perfectly described the lulz of the last couple of years.

And you want more of it? There's no problem with threads being deleted, because they weren't supposed to stick around for months and months in the first place. If the board was healthy, they'd roll off the board pretty much randomly anyways.

You're not here to build a house.

>Yes, because I wasn't talking about politics or screaming nigger.

Still missing the point: lurk moar.

>There were namefags loooonnnnnnnnnnng before social media.

Still missing the point: lurk moar.

No.3496501

>>3496498

>It means, you forgot to count yourself in.

I didn't leave, I'm (for the time being) still visiting.

>You had no question, you were simply pushing a strawman.
>Gonna use my fancy /pol/ talk, that'll show him!

You brought forth a ridiculous argument that you had no in-depth convos on imageboards, and you have basically dodged the question I asked ever since.

>There are no real rules.

Oh okay, go post some Bernal or better yet CP, and get back to us on how you aren't banned and those aren't rules.

And you want more of it?
No, that is exactly what I don't want, but the /pol/ threads took over because most people left. People try to inject the site with other stuff as of late, but it ultimately fails because the /pol/ (and other bits of spam) took over. Only the /pol/ threads are active, people can't sustain any other type of thread, so they give up and leave because they don't wanna talk /pol/. Now you have a furry board where the main convo is /pol/ with the same few users who decided a backwater dogfucker board was the perfect place to spew their wankery. They were not alone in "killing" the host (the CP for a year did a good job of that), but they and the slowspam crew didn't make matters any better.

>There's no problem with threads being deleted

Yes, there is. Instead of targeting the spam and other stuff, mods took action at innocent threads that had a furry theme and nuked em. I mean how stupid can the staff get to remove that stuff but not the stuff that's hurting the board. Another reason people leave is dumbass mods. TGFB is a great example of over overzealous modding, and it, like this place, is a ghosttown of a board. TGFB would have died a few years ago had someone else not swooped in to save it. Save it for what? The board was dead anyway and Sage knew it, and he wanted out. I would not be surprised if Choob wanted out at this point, he can't even sustain the money these days to keep /furi/ online (periods of downtime at the beginning of the month signals "the rents not paid"), because no one is clicking on the ads, because no one is visiting, because most people left.

>because they weren't supposed to stick around for months and months in the first place.

That's what happens when you have a dead board and 30 pages. Lulz needed 30 pages years ago, but Choob introduced it much too late.

>If the board was healthy, they'd roll off the board pretty much randomly anyways.

They would roll of in order of last bumped, if the board was healthy they would be leaving in a few weeks, not a few months.

>lurk moar.

Is what you say when you can't make a good counter-argument. "Yeah whatever man just...lurk moar, k?"

No.3496636

>>3496501

>Oh okay, go post some Bernal or better yet CP, and get back to us on how you aren't banned and those aren't rules.

You mistake behaviour for a rule. The moderators are not bound, and rightly so, because otherwise all sorts of assholes would get litigious and the board ends up in an endless wank of "wut what's wagainst the wules!" Exactly like you're doing right now.

>You brought forth a ridiculous argument that you had no in-depth convos on imageboards

And that's the strawman right there. Stop pushing bullshit.

>Yes, there is. Instead of targeting the spam and other stuff,

Yeah, the "slowspam" you complain about, because it obscures your own attention whoring.

>mods took action at innocent threads that had a furry theme and nuked em.

"Look momma, I'm contributin"! - you're placing yourself as the authority of what is "innocent" and what is "spam".

>I mean how stupid can the staff get to remove that stuff but not the stuff that's hurting the board.

You're still complaining about mods deleting your own months-old threads that interested only you. There was probably a reason, like the threads devolving into crap or being taken over by you know whom, or they were just plain worthless anyhow. We don't know - we don't have to care. Just make another one, and see if it sticks.

>They would roll of in order of last bumped, if the board was healthy they would be leaving in a few weeks, not a few months.

You're avoiding the point: it's the same issue you're complaining about. Threads can vanish overnight, while you're whining that they should stick around for months. Why are you trying to argue this thing both ways? Are you confused?

>Is what you say when you can't make a good counter-argument. "Yeah whatever man just...lurk moar, k?"

There is no relevant counterpoint to be made when you don't understand the argument in the first place, and simply keep answering past the point.

You think your threads are valuable because "I'm not talking politics", which still isn't saying you aren't shitposting. You were also pointing out that namefags existed before imageboards which is a totally irrelevant. Yes they did, and so what? Imageboards were a counterpoint to regular forums where over time cliques of namefags come to dominate all discussion by naming and shaming and attacking other named users, which isn't possible on a (semi) anonymous imageboard. That's why imageboard culture is generally against namefagging, and why namefagging where permitted and tolerated by the board members in general will slowly turn any imageboard into just another tumblr, and the people go away.

No.3496652

>>3496636

>The moderators are not bound

By the classic three, yes they are. Bernal, CP, spam.

>because otherwise all sorts of assholes would get litigious and the board ends up in an endless wank of "wut what's wagainst the wules!" Exactly like you're doing right now.

I have not been the only person to say something regarding this incident and previous site issues with moderation - its just that I'm going back and forth with you and no one else is really chiming in.

>Yeah, the "slowspam" you complain about, because it obscures your own attention whoring.

Yes-yes, of course, all of my attention whoring contained in this thread. I'm not out there making 20 threads because of this issue. I even unclicked the bump box last time I replied because frankly we are getting no where and its tiring.

>"Look momma, I'm contributin"! - you're placing yourself as the authority of what is "innocent" and what is "spam".

Again, others have bitched about this (possible) Hirtes spam and Braves spam in the past. Some agreed it was too much. Along with all the /pol/ threads.

>You're still complaining about mods deleting your own months-old threads that interested only you.

I did not make those threads, however I'm usually pretty busy and hadn't yet gotten around to taking part in them. Others were interested, they were fairly sized threads. If I have to start saving threads here for the risk they may not be here in a few hours, far away from page 29, because some a-wall mod decided to go on a power trip, I would say the board as an 'issue'.

>There was probably a reason, like the threads devolving into crap or being taken over by you know whom, or they were just plain worthless anyhow. We don't know - we don't have to care.

If you check those caches they were on point and not derailed. You do not speak for everyone in that "we don't have to care", at least one person was looking for images from one thread that was unfairly nuked. Given the lack of traffic here, that original poster of the images may or may not be back in a while. No one would have to worry, if threads didn't vanish suddenly when no where near the last page.

>Threads can vanish overnight

Yes, on page 29.

>while you're whining that they should stick around for months. Why are you trying to argue this thing both ways? Are you confused?

My pointing out the threads stick around for so long is because of the declined userbase here. Less new threads equals slower board. In fact I've noticed new threads on the first page now sit for hours before they even get one reply. That was never the case a few years ago.

>There is no relevant counterpoint to be made when you don't understand the argument in the first place, and simply keep answering past the point.

I understand things fine, to the point that we might as well agree to disagree because neither one is going to agree on the others point(s).

>You were also pointing out that namefags existed before imageboards which is a totally irrelevant.

No, I said there were namefags on boards long before social media existed, you misread.

>and the people go away.

There have always been namefags here. People left because of spam issues, notably CP, and that the site lacks alot of modern features and Choob fumbled the new dev board and gives off the large impression he simply doesn't give a fuck anymore. I mean why would he - this site idles here mostly empty of people now with a few posts per day barely moving the first two pages. I wouldn't be surprised if this place was gone come 2020.

No.3496750

>>3496652

>By the classic three, yes they are. Bernal, CP, spam.

That's still a different, irrelevant point. There are no rules to moderation - the moderators are not bound by a "law of lulz" which you try to appeal to, without realizing that none exists. The moderators do what they feel is the right thing to do, or just whatever they please, and that's how it has always worked.

>I have not been the only person to say something

Yes, and you're part of the horde of shitposters who try to appeal to the non-existing rules to argue why they should be exempt of the rules they themselves just invented, in their own favor. You see where the problem is?

>Again, others have bitched about this

The threads which you decree as spam aren't really a problem. Just use the threads that interest you, and the rest falls off the board. The problem is that you aren't making threads that interest you, because your interest in making threads is attention whoring instead of just making interesting threads, so you whine that others are getting the attention instead of you. See where the problem is?

>If I have to start saving threads here for the risk they may not be here in a few hours

Then the problem is that you're treating an imageboard as srs fucking bsns, and the problem is again you, and how you're trying to use the board as a forum instead of an imageboard.

>You do not speak for everyone in that "we don't have to care"

Yes I do. See the above.

>Yes, on page 29.

Again missing the point. In the old days when the board was more popular, and had less pages, a couple hours could push threads off the board and they'd be gone when you get back the next day, or not, and nobody complained. Except of course those who didn't understand the point of an imageboard and tried to use it as a forum. Mostly the namefags and attention whores who wanted to keep their own threads and names up on the front page.

>I understand things fine

From your own point of view, which is in misunderstanding of what imageboards were/are about.

>No, I said there were namefags on boards long before social media existed, you misread.

That is still completely irrelevant to the point, and "social media" has always existed.

>There have always been namefags here. People left because of spam issues, notably CP

No, that was just the killing blow. Before that, people were complaining that the namefags, especially a few particular namefags, were taking over the board and filling it up with their drivel.

>and that the site lacks alot of modern features

Like the catalog, which is just another way of making an imageboard act more like a forum and allow people to shut themselves in their bubbles and ignore other users. These features were in part a counter-move to namefagging, but in themselves they were killing the imageboard by making it too much like every other social media site out there. They were taking the fun out of being a public shit-shooting arena.

>I mean why would he - this site idles here mostly empty of people now with a few posts per day barely moving the first two pages. I wouldn't be surprised if this place was gone come 2020.

Then go. Don't look back. Why are you still here? All your complaints and suggestions are simply pulling it deeper in the same hole.


Delete Post []
Password