cancel reply
Posting mode: Reply


Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
name e-mail subject pw(deletion)
Post and go
Bump thread?

  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Javascript must be enabled for all of our addons to work.
  • Come chat and see that we're all a bit crazy on IRC!
  • Do not post any artwork from sexyfur.com and/or
    Jeremy Bernal. This is now a bannable offense.
Flockmod!

File: DionysiusAdminOnlyInfo.png - (2336.35 KB, 954x3014) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
2392418 No.3486076

So let's see if Lulz is talking about any relevant to today.

Oh, no?

Well, just keep hammering your dicks to cub shit.

No.3486078

OH SHIT IT'S THE NAZIS!!!!

No.3486081

Better than rightwingers, hammering their dicks to actual child molesters.

But only if they're "good Christians".

No.3486084

What are they raiding?

No.3486091
File: saul.png - (88.88 KB, 817x118) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
91010

OwO what's this?

No.3486093

>>3486091
Looks like some good advice... from a Jew, these nazi fuckheads~

No.3486097

They diddu erryfing wrong, they're bad boy furs. :3

No.3486100
File: stoppedreadingtheretreeko.jpg - (18.13 KB, 250x272) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
18561
>Dionysius
No.3486104

But where is anal rape initiation? What do the veterans gain if they don't get to ejaculate in some fresh member boypussi?

No.3486106

Needs more alcohol and poppers. Perfectly idealized men need alcohol and poppers.

No.3486125
File: IMG_20171125_135402.jpg - (20.36 KB, 755x566) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
20846
> Furry troll group
> Membership Fee
> Furries paying membership fees
> Trolls paying membership fees
> FURRY TROLLS PAYING MEMBERSHIP FEES
No.3486130
File: burnpaw.gif - (8.49 KB, 194x256) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
8697

So what's their purpose? That is quite vaguely and poorly defined here, maybe it was spelled out clearer elsewhere.

minors... do not behave themselves
Nor do a great many young adults, especially if they want to be perceived as "bad boys".

C: Ownership of a fursuit
So they can hide their faces / prove they can afford to blow $2000 or 200 hours' labor on such a thing?

*post-apocalyptic... with an emphasis on the trappings of traditional masculinity... and brotherhood in the face of adversity from a common enemy."
So a bad "BOYS ONLY" club that wants to play Fallout: Mad Max with no minors and no women in their ranks.

8 "Our mission is to provide a place for furries who are tired of the fandom's bullshit to be the beasts they were meant to be."
That's either "the wild", or the zoo. This is just more bullshit. Beasts do not behave themselves either.

No.3486171

The furry bad soy boys.

No.3486172
>Incorporation as an LLC in the state of Colorado with a copyrighted name...

Someone really ought to beat them to this.

No.3486231
File: socialistlosers.png - (1505.91 KB, 1001x718) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
1542054

Looks like the early stages of mission creep.

No.3486284
File: 1350531474.smelly_smells.png - (258.76 KB, 900x800) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
264969
>membership fee

Just fuck off.

>100$ year

Get gassed.

>attendance of a furry con

Well, hold on, let me get a fursuit first.

>ownership of a fursuit

Bitch, I'm trying. I need to get my emigration shits in order first.

>sponsorship of another member

Oh, get bent, elitist shithead.
(Foxler talked to me like 5-6 times in private. Does that count?)

Well, if this goes through then it's been fun while it lasted, I guess.

No.3486322

Ahh yes, the proposal that was leaked and paraded around as if it's the final idea.

You degenerates are really reaching with this.

No.3486345

>>3486322
muh literal nozzies

No.3486348

>>3486130
oh I forgot a beaut there:

"red armbands... associated with an organisation and ideology they have been conditioned by schooling and Hollywood to revile."

What does that tell you about the author of the statement? Smells a lot like Nazi sympathiser.

Riiight, they've been conditioned into thinking the the Nazis were worthy of our utter contempt. It's not like any voluminous documentation of the history of their atrocities shaped their opinions, they were carefully taught.

No.3486359

All you need to do is encounter a fuckin' Nazi to realize that they're all retarded white trash embarrassments who need a series of hard kicks to the face.

No.3486366

Why did they pick that arm band pattern in the first place?

No.3486375

>>3486366
because sie waren konige

No.3486511

>>3486366
The arm band is somethign they picked up from the Japanese, who have been using armbands as troop identifiers for a long time(and they're still used in schools and offices to this day in Japan). The symbol is one of the Hindu symbols of power, specifically the symbol of deconstruction (counterclockwise swastika) before the symbol of recreation (clockwise swastika0.

No.3486526
File: mysides.gif - (817.49 KB, 400x398) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
837111

>>3486076

>new armbands with "Denver Broncos" team colors
No.3486585
File: 222c3b7c96908ace60ff678188adba9c--zootopia--disney-art.jpg - (53.08 KB, 600x600) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
54356

>>3486322

>unironically says degenerates
No.3486591
File: dd08427d48f0fe1aa497a1bc392561ea.jpg - (265.31 KB, 700x694) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
271676

>>3486585
It's a good, effective word, rolls off the tongue like no other.

No.3486607
File: 1318989252_anyare_bored_or_angry__.png - (473.24 KB, 900x701) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
484598

>>3486348

>>Smells a lot like Nazi sympathiser.

You gonna call out all the fucking c̶o̶m̶m̶i̶e̶ ̶s̶y̶m̶p̶a̶t̶h̶i̶z̶e̶r̶s̶ LITERAL FUCKING COMMUNISTS on your political side?

Didn't fucking think so.

I'm done with calling out actual NatSocs, I don't even care any more. Maybe a good fascist stomping is what the elitist fucking left nowadays needs, because they are genuinely destroying western civilization.

Just so you have a point of reference of what an actual Nazi is. Cause when your fucking people unironically call me, a left-wing libertarian (according to the political compass anyway, centrist according to me cause I don't take the "left-wing" label anymore) a "nazi", it's time to admit that your side needs to have their bullshit detectors recalibrated. You're tripping on your own ideology you losers.

No.3486615

>>3486607

>a left-wing libertarian

A left wing libertarian is basically a walking contradiction.

>(according to the political compass anyway, centrist according to me cause I don't take the "left-wing" label anymore)

Centrism means you're just picking and choosing arbitrarily without a coherent idea of what you're doing and why. Most of the time people who are sitting on the fence call themselves centrists because they don't know whether to agree with the left or the right, alternating between what sounds like a good idea on any particular day, which leads to bonehead bonkers politics that tend to reverse themselves constantly.

See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRPcssq-7Us

No.3486617
File: 1311499798.sweatshirt_coobie.jpg - (82.08 KB, 960x1280) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
84053

>>3486615
Authoritarian vs. libertarian
Left wing vs. right wing
I don't see the contradiction of being a left wing libertarian.

Maybe you're thinking of Ancap people. I'm a minarchist at best, but there are some areas where I think that the government should implement socialist-ish policies (infrastructure, education and healthcare would be the main ones, some worker and environment protecting policies also).

>>Centrism means you're just picking and choosing arbitrarily without a coherent idea of what you're doing and why.

I have a very coherent idea of what I want from the future.

A technology-rich future, with the utmost focus on science and education, preferably a democracy, where the Western Civilization retains complete cultural supremacy in Europe and North America, socially liberal, but heavy on defense, a well armed population that will make invading impossible and will keep the governments accountable to their people (imo interventionism should be abolished forever and the Military should be trimmed down to only managing mass-destruction weapons and missile shields and perhaps heavy artillery and air and naval forces, a standing army of ground troops shouldn't be necessary in the West), immigration from non-European, non-East-Asian countries heavily restricted (but you can get in if you have exceptional skills), introducing the gold standard again and getting the banks under our control again (by force if necessary), eliminating all Abrahamic religions from the West and banning them forever for being utter fucking cancer (Christians will hate me, but it's for the best, if we really need religions, we can revive our native European ones), we should maintain very friendly relationships with East Asia and people of European descent are not allowed to fall into minority status in European lands and some of the former European colonies.

And I will pick and choose whatever issues from the left and from the right happen to help me get there. This is what I want, and I piss on typical left-wing and typical right-wing ideologies.

No.3486619

>>3486607

>implying there's something wrong with actual communists
No.3486622
File: is this marine serious.png - (14.04 KB, 300x275) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
14373

>>3486619
Except for the fact that their entire fucking ideology is based on false 18th century beliefs of how primitive human societies would have organized themselves.

And therefore making communism impossible to achieve in practicality because it needs reprogramming human minds to be in a way that they just aren't, which can't be done, because humans aren't blank slates and instincts and genetically ingrained behaviour do have a word to say in how humans organize in society (a human society without even the most basic of hierarchies is flat out impossible), therefore the next best thing is keeping the entire population in line under a strict dictatorship and oppressing everyone.

I really hate to trot out the old "I was born in a communist country, and it sucked..." on this board again for the 5th time this week but jesus fuck, you people just won't give it a fucking rest.

No.3486623
File: 1334098304.thiscrispykat_nazi_related_-_does_zuh_general_have_to_cut_a_schweinehund.jpg - (1098.42 KB, 1985x1205) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
1124777

And no, I'm not saying a National Socialist dictatorship is any more preferable than a Communist dictratorship...

...but keep enabling politicians to send us more Muslims and Africans in our homelands and we'll get there.

You fucking people asked for this with your "we're so super super civilized that we're above national self-interest, we'll just take in the whole 3rd world in and it definitely won't backfire in our faces spectacularly."

No.3486637

>>3486623
If the imperialists had allowed Communism to spread, there would be no "third world". Africa and the Middle East would be culturally advanced, educated and liberalized. Religious extremists and greedy pigs throughout the region would be summarily executed by local worker's parties.

And you would be here today sobbing about how the fascinating and beautiful cultures of Islam and the African people were cruelly destroyed by the mean commies. Oh, how awful, surely things would have been better if we Capitalism into those regions and allowed their precious culture to flourish. If only Communism hadn't made them all into highly educated secular liberals.

No.3486640
File: tumblr_inline_p0m5zpelwR1tbi2yz_540 (1).png - (197.29 KB, 328x463) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
202024
> Every time people shit on Raiders

"COMMUNISTS!!!"

No one's talking about Communism, fuck off you trolling con killing pieces of whiny little shits. :)

No.3486641

>>3486617

>Authoritarian vs. libertarian
>I don't see the contradiction of being a left wing libertarian.

Then you either don't understand what leftism is, or you don't understand what "liberty" means.

Protip: the leftist understands liberty as the power to control your living environment in an active sense (positive liberty), which makes them naturally authoritarian - only, the authority is bestowed to an abstract "society" instead of any individual. According to the leftist, mere freedom from something (negative liberty) is not sufficient - you actually have to have the ability to boss others around, and the leftist dodges being called authoritarian by arguing that this sort of liberty is not personal but collective, arguing that the individual is free as an inseparable part of a society because they have the power of self-determination through the state. I.e. the left is about the hegemony of the state, or in the absence of a state such as in left anarchism, the general mob which takes its place.

That in practice always means that authority is bestowed on a small group or more typically a single individual who inevitably end up running the state or the mob, so the practical libertarian cannot be a leftist. The idealist libertarian may be so, but they would be living in a la-la-land.

No.3486642

>>3486617

Now, there are of course some confused people such as libertarian socialists who argue that private ownership of the means of production should be abolished because it stands in the way of voluntary cooperative mode of economy, but they can only practically institute such system through the power of the state, which contradicts their basic point. Again, they assume that people can be made to voluntarily agree with socialism, which is an oxymoron.

>I have a very coherent idea of what I want from the future.

No, you have a wish list, not a coherent idea of what should actually happen to make it so.

>And I will pick and choose whatever issues from the left and from the right happen to help me get there. This is what I want, and I piss on typical left-wing and typical right-wing ideologies.

So you will pick and alternate between contradicting arguments based on whatever gets your way in the moment. That doesn't make you a centrist, that makes you a machiavellian asshole. It is literally the art of tyranny.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machiavellianism

>Machiavellianism is "the employment of cunning and duplicity in statecraft or in general conduct".
No.3487131

>>3486622

>"I was born in a communist country, and it sucked...

Romania sucked even before that.
And after that.

VC: cug

No.3487561
File: tumblr_nq2hl9tmtg1uyvbolo1_1280.gif - (450.40 KB, 1200x1000) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
461213

>>3486641
You are probably confusing "Libertarian" with "small l libertarian".
But the confusion is understandable. I did go out of my way to not capitalize it, but I suppose that wasn't enough.

Yes, that's the way left-wing people see things, they do want to boss other people around "for the greater good". I suppose I would too to some extent, but at least I wouldn't pretend it's not authoritarian.

>>3486642

>>not a coherent idea of what should actually happen to make it so.

Sorry for not being a millionaire 150IQ genius that can take his desired future world and write a proper manifesto for it and then start a political party to get shit done.

And to be fucking fair here, MOST people in politics have barely a fucking clue what they need to do in order to make things so. I'm sure most people responsible for the shit situation we are in think they are good people doing what's best for mankind, only that the actual outcome and what they initially wanted are worlds apart. There are genuinely hateful people at work also though. On both sides. I don't even pretend to be a good person. I am everything that I appear to be. You can take that as you wish.

>>That doesn't make you a centrist, that makes you a machiavellian asshole. It is literally the art of tyranny.
>>"the employment of cunning and duplicity in statecraft or in general conduct"

How am I being duplicitous by openly and publicly stating what I want to achieve and by supporting people on a case-by-case basis in order to do so?
And since when is being cunning a bad thing? Most people in politics must be on some level, otherwise they wouldn't be in politics.

Also you are fundamentally misunderstanding what I am about. I never had the intention to want to change the world through politics. I could be happy with playing videogames, watching anime and jerking it to furry, but leftist nutjobs started attacking and infiltrating everything that means something to me. And I can't get on board with right wing politics, because it doesn't work together well with the kind of world I'd like to live in.

This is my only solution to being stuck between two political sides that would both equally help and hurt me in large amounts. I can do nothing else but this.

No.3487579
File: 35817252.png - (191.91 KB, 600x800) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
196519

>>3486640
Well Deo is a self-proclaimed commie, she started it
and most of the drama came from her side

I have no regrets

No.3487584

>>3487561

>You are probably confusing "Libertarian" with "small l libertarian".

That's just semantic special pleading. The question about libertarianism falls on the same positive vs. negative liberty schism, between libertarianism and left-"libertarianism", which makes the question rather like the point about agnosticism: you either believe or you don't regardless of what you decide to call yourself.

>And to be fucking fair here, MOST people in politics have barely a fucking clue what they need to do in order to make things so.

Which is exactly why they should rather shut the fuck up until they can at least articulate some philosophical basis for what they're attempting to do - even if it's simply "Because I want it" (which is frankly the most honest statement), because so many people are holding labels like left/right/centrist as a mask for their self-ignorance and to hide their real agendas. If you're going to be a selfish bastard, be a selfish bastard honestly, and then we can come to deals.

The problem is that people like you are instictively aware that "I want it" is not a sufficient reason, so they use duplicity and masking - to cheat the debate.

>How am I being duplicitous by openly and publicly stating what I want to achieve and by supporting people on a case-by-case basis in order to do so?

But that's not what you said. You said you would pick any issue from the left and right to achieve what you want to do. Those issues would be contradictory because of the differing fundamental philosophies of the left and the right, so you will up first defending case A by argument B, and then immediately negating B to defend case C. It's doublethink, hypocrisy and dishonesty. Take for example, equality under law vs. progressive taxation for social justice; you have to compromize one.

Also, you lied by claiming you're a centrist, and then immediately admitting that you're just hop-scotching between any argument that would aid your personal goals.

No.3487585

>>3487561

>This is my only solution to being stuck between two political sides that would both equally help and hurt me in large amounts. I can do nothing else but this.

What you can do is to to realize is that neither side is actually doing what they say they are doing. They aren't operating on the ideologies they claim to represent. There isn't a left and a right, but two special interest groups that use slightly different masks to drive their own self-interest without regard or adherence to the philosophies they claim to support.

It's not politics, it's theater.

No.3487591
File: Shootacatintheface.png - (42.42 KB, 640x447) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
43438

>>3487584

>>That's just semantic special pleading.

Allow me to define my terms, so you KNOW what I SAY when I SAY it.
"libertarian" = the opposite of authoritarian in every way
"Libertarian" = ideology flavor ranging from minarchist to anarcho-capitalist

>>Which is exactly why they should rather shut the fuck up until they can at least articulate some philosophical basis for what they're attempting to do

You will never get people in politics to shut the fuck up, what a futile endeavour. Politics is all about not shutting up.

>>people like you are instictively aware that "I want it" is not a sufficient reason, so they use duplicity and masking - to cheat the debate

What would be a sufficient in your book anyway? The greater good? Sorry, I'm not delusional enough to think I'm striving for that, you keep saying "people like me are duplicitous", but I state what I want clearly. It's not my fault if people don't pay attention to what I say and they end up helping me achieve my goals because they thought I was standing for something else. There's literally nothing more I can do about it, I'm not going to shove a 10 page disclaimer + manifesto in the face of everybody who ever agrees with me on a political issue.

>>You said you would pick any issue from the left and right to achieve what you want to do. Those issues would be contradictory because of the differing fundamental philosophies of the left and the right, so you will up first defending case A by argument B, and then immediately negating B to defend case C. It's doublethink, hypocrisy and dishonesty.

Your mistake is assuming I think in ideology. I don't believe EVERYTHING one side says is absolutely the opposite of EVERYTHING the other side says. In fact it's laughable how more similar the far left and far right get the more extreme they get. Nazism = Nationalism + Socialism + Property rights if of the right race, Communism = Internationalism + Socialism + No Property Rights for anyone. Big fucking stinking difference.

>>Also, you lied by claiming you're a centrist, and then immediately admitting that you're just hop-scotching between any argument that would aid your personal goals.

Allow me to define centrist. I see it as a political place to be in where one doesn't line up neatly with both the left or the right. Of course you think that's a binary choice so you will perpetually fail to wrap your hear around this concept.

>>3487585

>>It's not politics, it's theater.

Tell me something I don't know.
Also while at it, do tell me where I can find Real Politics™. I'm damn fucking curious.

No.3487593
File: CUxMdWjUkAAQfFB.jpg orig.jpg - (153.65 KB, 1024x768) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
157339

Forgot to fill in name, >>3487591 is me

No.3487676

>>3487591 I remember we used to play this in computer lab in 4 and 5 grade.

No.3487677

>>3487676

Played it in computer lab in my 7th. Great game, really made you think.

No.3488044
File: hipstershades.png - (138.69 KB, 410x510) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
142018

>>3487676
So you're about 35 I guess.
I used to play this at a relative when I was like 6 on a 286 PC. I really enjoyed it.

No.3488063

>>3487591
What game is that?

No.3488065

>>3488063
The (Even More!) Incredible Machine


Delete Post []
Password