Math Thread.Those 2 donuts fucking eacher looking thing is the math monster I've mentioned before. Something about consciousness being an extension of the number line counting itself?Who cares. Any way, discuss math stuff.

Math Thread.

Those 2 donuts fucking eacher looking thing is the math monster I've mentioned before. Something about consciousness being an extension of the number line counting itself?

Who cares. Any way, discuss math stuff.

square root of your mom is pie! there ya go a mathematical sex joke

square root of your mom is pie!

there ya go a mathematical sex joke

Implying Aufism can understand math.

>>3476544>hurr duur huurr, look how bad 3b is by spamming the board.. so let me be an even bigger insufferable twat by spamming worse than 3b but this time with rick and morty themed shit.

>>3476544

>hurr duur huurr, look how bad 3b is by spamming the board.. so let me be an even bigger insufferable twat by spamming worse than 3b but this time with rick and morty themed shit.

Hurr durr I don't even post that many threads. Hurr durr hey guess what... I'm one guy! Wow! Can you believe it? Omg! Maybe Aufy isn't 90% of the posts on lulz.net like some of you like to make out. Hurrdurr I posted the math thread because there's actually a lot of really smart people here and math threads are healthy because they get mind working. They're engaging. Hurrdurr I don't even really fucking care that much one or the other. I don't have to like 3B. This thread isn't even about him it's supposed to be about math. We haven't had a math inawhile and I like seeing people discuss it. It's interesting stuff. No okay! I get it, I'm not really all that smart but I can at least try to understand it.

>>3476545your mom is so fat she's topologically homologous to a doughnut

>Aufy math threadSo, we can safely assume there will be no math?

>Aufy math thread

So, we can safely assume there will be no math?

>>3476793Of course there is no math at all!

>Let's talk about mathWe need to talk about parallel universeshttps://youtu.be/kpk2tdsPh0A

>Let's talk about math

We need to talk about parallel universeshttps://youtu.be/kpk2tdsPh0A

>>3476793>>3476795No no you're right. See I was hoping I would post this thread and you guys on your on accord would just start mathing it up over here but that wasn't very realistic and really if I'm going to post the math monster, I should probably expound upon it further. It's it's it's a big intimidating masturbating all contianing double donut used for interdeminsional and or long distance travel or some other shit. It huants me and I don't know why. Just just I dunno gimme few minutes here I just got home from work and I need to straighten the place up some but but but yeah I'll I'll try explain it a little better. Just gimme a minute okay.

Ahhhhh! 'hic' At the point of singularity it is both one thing and no thing. Mathematicaly represented as a 1 dimensional line segment value of x where x= 0/0

Ahhhhh! 'hic'

At the point of singularity it is both one thing and no thing. Mathematicaly represented as a 1 dimensional line segment value of x where x= 0/0

>>3476827So far meaningless bullshit math. What's your question? Are you asking if zero is everything or nothing? What it the nature of infinity? Or are you just trying to make yourself look intelligent? Hint: It isn't working.

>>3476827

So far meaningless bullshit math. What's your question? Are you asking if zero is everything or nothing? What it the nature of infinity? Or are you just trying to make yourself look intelligent?

Hint: It isn't working.

>>3476827 x is the variable here. So what is x, if x= n/0?x ... is then a 1 dimensional value of x repersented by a vertical mathematical line called an asymptote. These asymptotes occur at 4 out of 6 of the 6 trigonomic functions at regular intervals of π /2

>>3476827 x is the variable here. So what is x, if x= n/0?

x ... is then a 1 dimensional value of x repersented by a vertical mathematical line called an asymptote. These asymptotes occur at 4 out of 6 of the 6 trigonomic functions at regular intervals of π /2

>>3476834>So what is x, if x= n/0?x is meaningless. Dividing n into pieces of size 0 (this is what n divided by 0 means) is meaningless for any value of n, including 0 itself.

>>3476834

>So what is x, if x= n/0?

x is meaningless. Dividing n into pieces of size 0 (this is what n divided by 0 means) is meaningless for any value of n, including 0 itself.

x

n

0

Everything can be and understood through numbers.

>>3476838You know how your mother told you not to stare into the Sun? She should've also told you not to drill holes in your skull.

We we we we're all numbers /furi/ !Listen to me /furi/ ! We're all interval equations of existence moving through time! God is real! But he's a she he she she! It's messed up /furi/ but it's how things are! The universe, universes! They're aware /furi/ ! Existence is the product of the number line counting itself /furi/ ! I'm just some guy /furi/ but this thing it explains everything! I'm trying /furi/ It's not easy! But nothing worth doing ever is!vc: joy

We we we we're all numbers /furi/ !Listen to me /furi/ ! We're all interval equations of existence moving through time! God is real! But he's a she he she she! It's messed up /furi/ but it's how things are! The universe, universes! They're aware /furi/ ! Existence is the product of the number line counting itself /furi/ !

I'm just some guy /furi/ but this thing it explains everything! I'm trying /furi/ It's not easy! But nothing worth doing ever is!

vc: joy

>>3476841https://youtu.be/JB3v3bDba5g Try having an original thought.

>>3476841

https://youtu.be/JB3v3bDba5g

Try having an original thought.

The YT Channel "Numberphile" has a good treatment as to why doing things like dividing by zero isn't going to get you anywhere (as well as other things like 0 raised to the 0th power).https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRRolKTlF6QAnother video handles why it is accepted that 0!=1.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mfk_L4Nx2ZI

The YT Channel "Numberphile" has a good treatment as to why doing things like dividing by zero isn't going to get you anywhere (as well as other things like 0 raised to the 0th power).https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRRolKTlF6Q

Another video handles why it is accepted that 0!=1.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mfk_L4Nx2ZI

We need to review the different types of numbers. If a number can be imaginary, could a number also ever at any point become greater than a zero dimensional point value?

K so... got to get up for work soon. Need to recharge my batteries. Tune in this evening.

>>3476884 A number can certainly REPRESENT a non-point value. Quantum mechanics does this sort of thing a lot with its wave equations. Also the phrase 'imaginary number' is kind of an unfortunate nomenclature. It implies that they're somehow 'fake' numbers. They are something we need to make math operations like powers, roots and logs 'closed' (Well, we need complex numbers which in turn need 'imaginary' numbers).What do I mean by 'closed'? Closed mean that if you have one type of number, then do a math operation on them, you get that same type of number as a result. A counter-example would be division and whole numbers .. Take two 'whole numbers' A and B, perform a division A÷B and your result is not necessarily another whole number therefore division is NOT closed under whole numbers. -- All math operations however ARE closed under complex numbers.

>>3476884 A number can certainly REPRESENT a non-point value. Quantum mechanics does this sort of thing a lot with its wave equations.

Also the phrase 'imaginary number' is kind of an unfortunate nomenclature. It implies that they're somehow 'fake' numbers. They are something we need to make math operations like powers, roots and logs 'closed' (Well, we need complex numbers which in turn need 'imaginary' numbers).

What do I mean by 'closed'? Closed mean that if you have one type of number, then do a math operation on them, you get that same type of number as a result. A counter-example would be division and whole numbers .. Take two 'whole numbers' A and B, perform a division A÷B and your result is not necessarily another whole number therefore division is NOT closed under whole numbers. -- All math operations however ARE closed under complex numbers.

>>3476884 If you propose some kind of new 'non-point' number that's outside the realm of 'complex' numbers, and you invent some kind of operation that creates and deals with such a number, then I guess you've invented some new kind of mathematics.William Clifford did something like this with his Clifford algebra where you get things like quaternians and octonians. Strangely, quaternians are quite useful in computer graphics.

>>3476884 If you propose some kind of new 'non-point' number that's outside the realm of 'complex' numbers, and you invent some kind of operation that creates and deals with such a number, then I guess you've invented some new kind of mathematics.

William Clifford did something like this with his Clifford algebra where you get things like quaternians and octonians. Strangely, quaternians are quite useful in computer graphics.

>>3476884That kid looks like he has 3 fingers on that hand.

I don't entirely understand it. I guess if I never talk about it I never will.

>>3477264

>>3477264Hey bro, I found your final form!http://timecube.2enp.com/

Hey bro, I found your final form!

http://timecube.2enp.com/

>>3477276 It's not a cube, it's some kind of toroidal form. A form that contains all things, everything that ever was, is, or shall be.

Huhh... let's just say the circumstances in which I was first exposed to this monster are classified. Any ways huhhhhh I guess that it begins with the concept of expansion, advancedment, and that mathematics is basically the foandation of all things. When we first start counting we learn about regular positive numbers. When we first start counting we don't even have a concept of them being positive. They are just numbers.Even though they exist as mere concepts they help us understand our reality. Geometry is the part of mathematics dealing exclusively with spacial concepts. Algebra and arithmetic deal exclusively with values and variables. However all things are connected.The first version of the number line comes in the form of a geometric ray. All the points from zero on up indefinitely. We are then exposed to the concept of negative numbers and the ray becomes a geometric line. Then we explore that there is also imaginary and complex numbers. What began as a ray is now a certified geometric plane. So thus far we at least established the number line in fact not just a line. We already see it's a plane.

Huhh... let's just say the circumstances in which I was first exposed to this monster are classified.

Any ways huhhhhh I guess that it begins with the concept of expansion, advancedment, and that mathematics is basically the foandation of all things. When we first start counting we learn about regular positive numbers. When we first start counting we don't even have a concept of them being positive. They are just numbers.Even though they exist as mere concepts they help us understand our reality.

Geometry is the part of mathematics dealing exclusively with spacial concepts. Algebra and arithmetic deal exclusively with values and variables. However all things are connected.

The first version of the number line comes in the form of a geometric ray. All the points from zero on up indefinitely. We are then exposed to the concept of negative numbers and the ray becomes a geometric line. Then we explore that there is also imaginary and complex numbers. What began as a ray is now a certified geometric plane. So thus far we at least established the number line in fact not just a line. We already see it's a plane.

>>3477378 The basic components of creation tend towards a toroidal form of some sort. One thing orbiting another thing. Atoms, energy fields, solar systems, galaxies for example.

>>3477379https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0r27kOw2rw

>>3477379

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0r27kOw2rw

This was the cartoon I working that inspired me to make this thread.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tlHQOKMHGA&sns=emHow do you make something imaginary into something real? This video covers the process.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tlHQOKMHGA&sns=em

How do you make something imaginary into something real?

This video covers the process.

I just just 'bluuh' just saw it one day okay...in... like... some kind of a vision. Since I don't fully understand yet what this thing is or how entirely it works, or what it's used for or how to use it... I'm not sure exactly what Rick would say... so I have yet to make a secondary panel for it.I got tired of it looming around like some kind of howevering alien device and not knowing what the fuck I was looking at. So... I've been trying to harness the power of Rick to some extent in order to figure it out.

I just just 'bluuh' just saw it one day okay...in... like... some kind of a vision. Since I don't fully understand yet what this thing is or how entirely it works, or what it's used for or how to use it... I'm not sure exactly what Rick would say... so I have yet to make a secondary panel for it.

I got tired of it looming around like some kind of howevering alien device and not knowing what the fuck I was looking at. So... I've been trying to harness the power of Rick to some extent in order to figure it out.

>>3477643These are theoretical numbers not expressions of probability that manifest themselves as actual particles to make up actual matter. If you want to extrapolate it to some theoretical expression of the manifestation of matter then maybe it means we could create matter by assembling 1/5th the particles of the substance and the universe would do the rest. It would lend credence to the holographic universe theory or the simulation theory if we discovered that the universe has an auto-complete function.

>>3477643

These are theoretical numbers not expressions of probability that manifest themselves as actual particles to make up actual matter. If you want to extrapolate it to some theoretical expression of the manifestation of matter then maybe it means we could create matter by assembling 1/5th the particles of the substance and the universe would do the rest. It would lend credence to the holographic universe theory or the simulation theory if we discovered that the universe has an auto-complete function.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUvTyaaNkzM&sns=gpCalculus had always been kinda a mystery to me, but this video series really clears things up.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUvTyaaNkzM&sns=gp

Calculus had always been kinda a mystery to me, but this video series really clears things up.

I dunno I'm just fuck'n around. I just really like this character.

- dis + share + furi+ flash + oekaki - All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.