cancel reply
Posting mode: Reply

Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
name e-mail subject pw(deletion)
Post and go
Bump thread?

  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Javascript must be enabled for all of our addons to work.
  • Come chat and see that we're all a bit crazy on IRC!
  • Do not post any artwork from and/or
    Jeremy Bernal. This is now a bannable offense.

File: foxpervert.jpg - (60.94 KB, 1280x720) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
62407 No.3447011

Won't be returning to Faux "news," according to CNBC.

Another old pervert kicked out at Faux.

File: nobody-fucks-with-freedom-morning-wolf-pack-god-bless-18826456.png - (123.67 KB, 500x572) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

it didn't have to take this long. shoulda just murdered him.


nice /pol/ blog post


Funny that those crazy trumpists are still screaming its all FAKE NEWS while calling everyone liberal liars.



They aren't crazy, at least the vast majority of them.
Fucking STUPID, but not crazy.



At least republicans can clean house. Your "I'm glad for white suicides" guy and "I'm here to shut down white people" gal, and your "I'm black!" Shawn King and Rachel Dolezal and Lena "Used my kid sister's pussy as a purse" Dunham all still working and embraced.


Your president raped his wife and is breaking the Emoluments clause every single second. Get cancer.


Couldn't have happened to a nicer creep. Good riddance.



Republicans still worship Joe McCarthy, a drunk who had a closeted corrupt fag as his chief aide.

They still worship Saint Ronnie, who committed treason with Iran.

And they now have the most corrupt President, who makes even Tricky Dicky look honest.


Bill O'Reilly is a shitload more visible than any of them, as evidenced by the fact that two of them you couldn't even come up with the names for.



Who? Who the fuck are you talking about? Why do leftists always have to bring up ancient people to prove some point? I mean, do you really obsess over these ancient, hasbeen politicans?

I've never heard of anyone bring up these people outside of American Dad and insane lefties with huge chips on their shoulders. (Didn't get you trust fund payment this month?)

File: perplexed-globalist.jpg - (25.08 KB, 428x321) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


>Why do leftists always have to bring up ancient people to prove some point? I mean, do you really obsess over these ancient, hasbeen politicans?

idunno, why do you?


Hilarious coming from a group that tries to blame even the weather to Obama.



What does the White House's valet for the last 8 years have to do with anything?


Ronald Reagan is an "ancient hasbeen politician", LOL.

Trump can't bring back the draft soon enough for today's kids.


>>3447288 drafting is unconstitutional unless the country is at war its unnecessary and theres allready a system in place to lure people into joining its called money though the system never has the obligation to pay if the soldier dies cept basic services which is cheaper than draft.


Pointing the hypocrisy of the blame game.





Ann Coulter.

As to Mccarthy and the rest of today's GOP, just look at writers at WND and NewsMax, and Breitbart.
They use outdated spy files to "prove Mccarthy ot it right."



So? It means "false."

Perfect description of the Titty Tabloid King's right-wing propaganda network.


Not all of them, but some of the ones that do have enough clout to edit the textbooks in his favor -
Other changes seem aimed at tamping down criticism of the right. Conservatives passed one amendment, for instance, requiring that the history of McCarthyism include “how the later release of the Venona papers confirmed suspicions of communist infiltration in U.S. government.” The Venona papers were transcripts of some 3,000 communications between the Soviet Union and its agents in the United States.

And as the saying goes, "Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it".


No-one really denies there were Communist spies operating in 50s America -- the US had agents operating in Russia; why wouldn't the Russians do the same?

People go on about the Verona transcripts, but nowhere do the Verona transcripts implicate the likes of Charlie Chaplin or Jules Dassin or Dalton Trumbo -- innocent film-makers whose careers were ruined after they were accused of being spies and subversives.

(Note also that in 1952 the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that movies and movie-makers were protected by the 1st Amendment, regardless of their ideology.)

99% of what was called "Anti-Communism" in 50s America had nothing at all to do with actually catching spies, and everything to do with using unconstitutional means, including rabble-rousing, kangaroo courts and loyalty oaths, to stifle and intimidate dissent.


Exactly - but some conservatives still use it to give a pass to McCarthy by virtue of "He was just overzealous!" at best, or even going so far as to say that it prevented Soviet spies from gaining a strong foothold here.


nobody cares about two of those people and more white people should kill themselves. I already posted this but I guess one of you free speech hating pussies got triggered.


Bill Oreilly is a neocon, or at least was a neocon. He seems to have learned his lesson about why military intervention in the middle east is a mistake. The jews in the republican party however still have the same philosophy and agenda about foreign policy. Still, never agrees with Oreilly and never liked him for being a kike puppet.



McCarthy was an opportunist, he was facing a difficult re-election due to his setting a new record for missed votes in the senate, due to his heavy drinking.
So he went in front of a woman's group in West Virginia, pulled a number out of his ass and waved around a piece of paper, saying it was a "list of commies in the State Department."
McCarthy's fall was so hard even NIXON refused to see him in the 1956 Presidential election.
The far-right bastards who say "He was just overzealous," have no idea what McCarthy's accusations did to people.
Today, McCarthyism is used even by conservatives to denote wild, unsupported accusations.

And Bullshit O'REALLY? finally got his ass handed to him out the door.
Another opportunist who was even worse than McCarthy.

File: 1njxkn.jpg - (57.40 KB, 500x500) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


>>Your president raped his wife and is breaking the Emoluments clause every single second. Get cancer.

Cuz a bitch never made a sob story to win divorce payola. Emoluments? Motherfucker, if he was actually impeachable, they'd jump on that shit so fast that Donald Trump would be in jail and out of office within days.

Nah, what you have is a bunch of journalists trying to interpret legal opinions that are not even tested in court. Are you a lawyer? Is a journo interpreting a lawyer, a lawyer? No and no.

You want me to believe this bullshit when every fucking week the WaPo, NYT and HuffPo have a new scoup on how to out Trump?

You think buzzfeed is real news? How retarded are you.



At least none of these people are alive, well, and working in politics today. Under any normal circumstances, laughing about suicides of people based on race and gender would get you out of politics for life unless you were in the "Evil" party, like a Nazi.

Pretty bad when you have a literal rapist who DID pay out payola, who DID use lawyers to silence victims, who DID get shamed for abusing power dynamics to get intern blowjobs, and that motherfucker is front and center to represent your candidate as a surrogate.

But keep telling yourself that republicans don't clean house.

File: arya.jpg - (63.51 KB, 960x728) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


> they'd jump on that shit so fast that Donald Trump would be in jail and out of office within days.

Except the republicans currently are not even trying to hid their bullshit. Its a scratch my back and ill scratch yours. Each group ripping apart what they need (including that juicy DOF budget increase).

You can bet that Trump will get impeached once they get what they want from him.

I do not see Trump cleaning the swamp at all. He just did bring new mud.


I don't care for the term "neocon" because the Republican party is damn near a hive mind anyway. Gay rights and women hurt their feelings and blowing up their enemies is always somehow justified no matter the civilian casualties or the aftermath.

They want to fight ISIS? The same group they created through their complete stupidity if "fighting" Al-Queda? This should be good. If they ever do wear the group down, the damage done in the process will only force more Arabs to hate America and form an even bigger group in response. Siblings of dead casualties, sons of mothers caught in blasts, that's what recruits new members.

At this point it's become Christians VS Muslims.



You deserve your name, you lying cumrag.

File: 1492452935360.jpg - (51.90 KB, 484x602) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


Obama funded ISIS in the vacuum of pulling all our troops out, Sick Hillary's failed Libya "reset" and years and years of funding various "rebel" groups in Syria by senile old GOP folks like McCain and Graham in order to set up an islamic religious state.

That's "Nation Building" under Obama and Hillary, but don't worry, they got a ton of cash from the Islamics.

Wahabi Saudis were Hillary's #1 campaign and "charity" donors. They're the same ones that fund ISIS.

>The Clinton Foundation has accepted tens of millions of dollars from countries that the State Department — before, during and after Mrs. Clinton’s time as secretary — criticized for their records on sex discrimination and other human-rights issues. The countries include Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait, Oman, Brunei and Algeria.


Considering most of the backbone of ISIS are ex generals of Saddam Hussein who were left by the new "coalition government" by Bush's invasive forces.. I dont think it was entirely Obama's fault.
Bush went all in witouth a real plan and Obama got the shit to clean up that included the "Arabian Spring". Which was trying to set up stronger secular governments while removing any western influence, puppets and manipulators (of which USA is extremely guilty of doing this all the time).



That doesn't make sense as a reply. Are you that badly flustered?


your "mentally challenged republican bootlicker" gimmick is pretty hilarious. it'd be pretty fucked up if someone actually thought like you. keep it up.



Aww, no actual argument in the face of reality. There there, cupcake, one of these days I'm sure WaPo will actually have something besides riding Trump's dick to increased clicks and paper sales. :)

I know, I know. The resistance is real. Free college. There there, shh, shh, shh.


hahaha, nice. got to put a few more "keks" and "cucks" in there to be more convincing. maybe go download a couple of those "autistic screeching" pics and you'll be good.



You're just made because reality smacked you in the face and you haven't got an argument. If they had him on something, they'd use it. In a heartbeat. I swung in, smacked you with that, and shattered your little heart... Trampling all over your hope, not because I hate you, but because I want you to rejoin us in reality.

Really dude, they rushed to market with that billy bush pussy grabbing tape. What on earth do you think would restrain them from using anything new? Anything impeachable? Why isn't the television media talking about this stuff, and why is it relegated to website print media?

Because Blackmail?
Because Money?
Because what they have isn't damning enough?

There's no beautiful tomorrow for you, no front page story about the end of president Trump from some scandal.

All you can hope for is assassination and some hidden criminal activity.

If and when that happens, remember, you still have Mike Pence as next in line... who by all measures, is worse. Smarter, better able to handle the government sharks, and ten times the bigot you think Trump is.


lol perfect

File: x_lon_trump_151126.jpg - (890.14 KB, 1920x1080) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.



nice, but could be better. seriously, autistic screeching is the new hotness. work up some more material then meet back here tomorrow.

File: e26.gif - (1920.75 KB, 480x270) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


How about triggered snowflake screeching?


Saw the funniest segment on ABC news yesterday.

Trump was making all these grandiose promises, about what he'd do in his first 100 days.he made all those promises while campaigning.

Now? Nothing but excuses and blaming everyone (including Obama and Hillary) for his own total fuckups and accomplishing nothing.


that's retarded


That looks like a True American Patriot(tm) after his NFL team lost and he's balls deep in beer.

File: Tucker-Carlson-Tonight.jpg - (70.07 KB, 600x394) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

And he's being replaced by someone who's drawing in millennials and gen Z's. The left is fucked in the culture war.



Tucker Carlson is a bigger ass than O'Reilly.
Face it, the only thing that will really "clean house" at that corrupt right-wing propaganda outlet is to shut it down.



How's that been working out the last 20 years?


In the end, O'Reily succumbed to the same old temptations. He was rich, popular, and had the power of the press. This made him feel he was in some part above everyone else and he made stupid infantile hormonal mistakes and one of them was assuming he's universally attractive. Any of you get soaked in the limelight long enough, you'll think exactly the same way. He got called out and kicked out because he let his dick do the thinking when it came to women. I'm a conservative and frankly believe he got what was coming too him. In the end, he'll be replaced. Cronkeit was replaced, Rather was replaced, they all get replaced. No one is irreplaceable and time buries everything. Give it about nine months and it will be, "O'reilly who?"


Speaking of, he's completely skipping the White House Correspondent's Dinner in favor of holding a fucking campaign rally in Pennsylvania -
Coincidentally, the hosts for the dinner are Woodward & Bernstein, the writers that brought down Nixon.


You just described Trump

I guess that is a constant with the right wing extreme of the republican party.
I still remember those crazyos of the tea party.
They even look sane level compared to Trumpists.



I could have given you a recipe for beef ravioli and youre so fucking wound up over Trump, you'd think it was his secret manifesto for bringing back slavery. Jesus, you crackpots are worse than the tea party. At least they organized into a relevant political movement. All you whining liberals do is get on a soapbox and bitch about how bad Trump is and remain irrelevant and ineffectual. No wonder you lost the last election. Oh, by the way, November 2016 called, Trump won.



Or Bill Clinton, who used intern's vaginas as cigar humidors



Putin pays you pretty well.


Well we'd work for Shareblue but the benefits package that Putin offers is outstanding.



Step down from correct the record.



Agreed. Just ask the Clintons. They made some pretty good bank from Putin.

Guess we know who the real Putin puppet is now.



The funny thing is that if I was working for the Russians? I'd have a lower likelihood of mysterious death or suicide by gunshots to the back of the head compared against anyone close to the Clintons. :p



>Guess we know who the real Putin puppet is now.



It's funny how everything liberals are throwing at the independents, libertarians, conservatives, etc, is all shit they're guilty of. It's a hilarious game of projection at this point.

I mean really, anything you have as a beef with Trump I could probably judo back to a worse example among the democrats, the clintons, or their chaired officials.

>>Foreign money~!

Oh look, the russian reset, the uranium one deal that followed, and big donations to the Clinton foundation and the Obamas. Whoops.


Like the idea of a no-fly-zone?


You mean like the anti-white and anti-male bigotry that's allowed to fly in universities? Or hitting Christian groups with the IRS and justice department on just about everything?

>>Sexism! Being mean to some one is being mean to all women!

Tell me that again as you guys call Ann Cultor terrible shit, and make fun of Sarah Palin's kids and her as their mother.

>>Rapist! Misogynist!

Can't think of anything worse than a guy that wants to smoke pussy cigars, freshly covered in Monica's vaginal slime. Or those 8 other interns he fucked around with.

>>Big money, big banks, 1%!!!

So uh, you forget who licks goldman ball sachs? That's right, Hillary!

>>Whitehouse for sale! Office to make money!

Mhm. Tell me again about the Clinton foundation, speaking fees, and all that?

>>He'll suck as a president because his own party is divided against him!

Say hello to the Bernie Sanders situation.



Oh, bonus bigotry. Super predators comment, and former President Obama, and former president Bill Clinton, both basically saying the exact same shit Trump did about the wall.

On top of that? The wall was already law, with Senators Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders all voting yes for it... It just never got built because no funds were ever allocated.



That's a lot of words no one is going to read

File: 1308079089001.png - (64.72 KB, 350x338) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


Sure. But you took the time to grab all post ID numbers.

File: men-can-play-this-game-too_cleavage.jpeg - (72.64 KB, 500x414) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

And on the same topic, one of Ronald Reagan's sons defended O'Reilly -
Hot Choclare[sic] used to be a compliment on your looks today it is called sexual harassment..@oreillyfactor
If women are going to wear low cut dresses that show cleavage don't be harassed when we men look.Or shld we sue for sexual arousal?
Pic related to the second claim, because holy shit that's juvenile.


Watching conservatives pretend Russia is a paradise is cute

>homosexuals killed
>government instructs the people what to think and how to behave
>government controls the media, even entertainment, music is under strict watch to only contain "approved" content
>rich people are respected, the poor are seen as little more than slave labor to be used and abused

On second though I can see why they think that.



Are you sure you didn't mean "blue states" there?

Seems like the most gays/trannies get killed in blue cities, where brown people are essentially slave labor (California), where there's huge pushes by the governments to spread their correct message.

>Gosh Caleb, did you hear about that tranny that got stomped to death downtown?
>No Meghan, News says that immigrants might not pick our artichokes for $2 an hour, and they'll just rot! No artichokes Caleb!
File: chicobo-bubble-butt-rider-Cum-version.jpeg - (169.11 KB, 980x700) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


>Still bitching at the Uranium deal money when in reality it never touched Clinton. One of the most Fake bullshit stories since the Rep's famous "Pizza Gate".

But hey! I guess its ok to change your entire country foreign policy towards another country as long they approve the registration of the Trump Brand (in china).

>The No Fly zone

The no fly zone bullshit and claiming Hillary would create WW3 is a mot point. Considering how Trump flipfloped and now is face first in the military and their contractors/builders assholes and now bombing Syria (which he criticized Obama for.. ) and killing who knows how many civilians while blasting Assad about the hypothetical "here we draw the line" bullshit.

>Tell me that again as you guys call Ann Cultor terrible shit, and make fun of Sarah Palin's kids and her as their mother.

Both of these persons are against the woman advancement. Ann Coulter would probably defend a rapist if her political career would grow. Nothing to do with Sexism. They are the worst examples of the republican mindset. No different from O'Reilly and many other tea partiers/hard core republicans.
Palin's is a special case, particularly on how she complained about the "correct family values" and her spawns ended breaking exactly these "valued" family rules.
No difference from that republican representant who was very violent against gay stuff, yet he was found soliciting sex in an airport bathroom stall.

>Can't think of anything worse than a guy that wants to smoke pussy cigars, freshly covered in Monica's vaginal slime. Or those 8 other interns he fucked around with.

The big difference would be CONSENT and AGREEMENT.
O'reilly assaulting women is hugely difference in having an out of wed consenting relationship). And I have yet to heard officially that Lewinski was assaulted.

>So uh, you forget who licks goldman ball sachs? That's right, Hillary!

As opposed to Trump who licks the saggy balls of anyone who benefits him?
Or outright changing the policy of a country to benefit his brand?
Or change full country wide rules to benefit a special group of friends while damaging it for everyone (like the EPA and probably the net neutrality next.)

>Mhm. Tell me again about the Clinton foundation, speaking fees, and all that?

Clinton is a foundation. Trump is a huge corporate businessman with many companies with interests that constantly conflicts with the presidency. See the difference?

>Say hello to the Bernie Sanders situation.

Only thing I agree with you. Clinton's group were dirty scums who sabotaged Bernie.

File: C9DbwS6VwAENnSP.jpg - (98.26 KB, 1000x718) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


Speaking of millennials.
Whats sup with news companies now posting a lot of "studies" against the millennials?
The cycle of blame is repeating. Now the bitter old hags of boomers are blaming millennials for all the downfalls the older gen created.

File: 1492300884.eldiman_caballero-marica1.jpg - (210.67 KB, 853x1280) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


>you'd think it was his secret manifesto for bringing back slavery. Jesus, you crackpots are worse than the tea party.

Trump? nah, he just wants money.
There are some crazy republicans who indeed would be happy to go back to the 60's where they hang minorities with no fear of being hunted down by justice.


Far, far, far less time than your sperging meltdowns, I'd wager.


And I have yet to heard officially that Lewinski was assaulted.
As liberal as I am, even I can consider that Lewinski may have been coerced due to the inherent power dynamic at play - that said, you still have a point that she consented to what happened, while O'Reilly's coworkers didn't.
As you pointed out, this happens with every generation. "Flappers" in the '20s, Rock & Rollers in the '50s, Hippies in the '60s/'70s, Gen-X in the '90s, and Millenials now.

File: bill-clinton-and-victims-of-clintons.jpg - (85.92 KB, 900x387) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.



>As liberal as I am, even I can consider that Lewinski may have been coerced due to the inherent power dynamic at play
>President says suck me off and let me jam a cigar into your vagina or you lose your job
>President also has a papertrail a mile long of sexual assault complaints, and out of court settlements
>Only president with his own Wikipedia page detailing his [known] sexual assaults:
>Maaaaaaaybe sexual harassment
>GFF also voted for the Rapist President's wife, who covered up, demeaned and lied about his "Bimbo Eruptions"

Ol' Billy Boy southern hillbilly was lookin' pretty nervous when Trump brought his victims to his wife's debate. But they're just bimbos, right? I mean, that's what Hillary called them. Stupid bimbos trying to seduce ol' backwoods Bill cuz he had power and money?


Oop, another allegation from Friday - - though this time against Hannity, the guy slated to take over O'Reilly's slot.


>President says suck me off and let me jam a cigar into your vagina or you lose your job
Except Lewinsky herself has never said this. Fuck, even the Washington Times (basically the conservative counterpart to WaPo) admits that much - - in spite of the scare quotes in the headline.
“Sure, my boss took advantage of me,” she wrote, excerpts published on USA Today’s website stated. “But I will always remain firm on this point: It was a consensual relationship. Any ‘abuse’ came in the aftermath, when I was made a scapegoat in order to protect his powerful position.



>>Watching conservatives pretend Russia is a paradise is cute
>>On second though I can see why they think that.

So uh, sorta like how liberals pretend Islam is feminist. How the Hijab is a good thing. How FGM is a right? Yeah, once again, you fucks are projecting.



She said it herself, she was taken advantage of.

This is why there is a belief that even if you feel you consented, it doesn't count. Like when you're under the influence of drugs, or when it's a mentor/teacher/professor over a student. ((Depends heavily on country. America allows this at large, but some states have rules against it.))

Feminists in general see any case of a boss going after an intern to be fucked up, and it's one of those things I'm inclined to agree with.

Bottom line, she did say she was taken advantage of.

As the other poster points out though, Monica is the exception. The other people Bill went after and DID rape, did coerce, did threaten, did have lawyers go after and did have his wife call bimbos, those are all still real.



>GFF standing up for the utterly stereotypical "Good 'ol Boy" network.


What do you expect? I already pointed it out before. You can't attack a democratic woman without being a sexist, but fuck republican women because they're gender traitors.

You can't attack a democratic sexual predator, but that good ol boy network? Well, that's entirely republicans!

All this guilting, all this "You should be ashamed" pearl clutching that republicans fall for? That only applies to them. Democrats do not hold themselves or their base to these standards of behavior.

File: KICK-THE-ILLEGALS-OUT-3.jpg - (311.58 KB, 697x671) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

this is sickening, who gives a shit about these bobbleheads. just distractions from the real problems.

>sorta like how liberals pretend Islam is feminist

Since when has ANYONE thought that? They're more misogynistic than Adam Baldwin. Islam is what /pol/ would be like if they had actual power and weren't a containment board.

Which they will never have so long as /pol/ is infested with non-white mongrels who play with action figures.



It's okay, I know you don't go looking for craziness.



But as it continues to smell of greater and greater amounts of bullshit, I can't help but notice.


dude you sound like a little bitch right now. really embarassing



As opposed to a hypocritical one? :3

It's all about gender equality, and not a power game, right?


i think only the stupidest cave-dwellers on the entire planet are conned into thinking the republican party will do anything but organize elaborate grifting schemes

File: 1491926656.alectorfencer_keepdragononaleashweb.jpg - (717.28 KB, 1205x853) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


>sorta like how liberals pretend Islam is feminist.

What the fuck are you smoking?
At the minimum they want Islam women to have the same rights as their western counterparts.



I posted two examples already of people trying to assert that Islam is feminist, that the profit was feminist. I can definitely provide you with more. Would you be satisfied with 5 sources, on liberal news websites? Or would that still be cherry picking or some other buzzword denial?

I definitely have a crop of results purely from all the apologia that came out from having that Islamist woman being a big part of the international women's march... You know, the one that said to other women on twitter that she wishes their clitoris were gouged out?


Dude, stop having a meltdown.



Right, sourcing is a melt down. Kay.


stop being a retarded child rapist first


Hey! Here's the end quote of one of your sources! Thanks for only reading the title!

"It is time for Islam to liberate women fully and do so upon the example of Muhammad and the authority of the Quran that holds compassion and mercy as the first and foremost attributes of Allah."

And the biggest 'Islam Is Feminist' is an actual Muslim speaker who is advocating for Sharia Law and is someone that no one is taking seriously.

If anything, it is a criticism of Western Feminists of why they don't fight for the rights of women who ARE oppressed in these nations because that is way more important than their first world problems here at home.



"It is time for Islam to liberate women fully and do so upon the example of Muhammad and the authority of the Quran that holds compassion and mercy as the first and foremost attributes of Allah."

This is, once again, you slow fucking retard, asserting that the religion is inherently feminist and that it's followers just got it wrong. You fucking numpty idiot.

Further, compassion and mercy? LMAO. What was it that was going to happen to the man who gave Muhammed, the orphaned prophet, money for his armies, and mentored him, and was a good man?

Oh yeah, just hold his feet to the hottest fires of all eternity... because he wasn't a believer of Allah. Forever. Seems merciful against an otherwise good man, right?

Also LMAO at "No one takes her seriously." Sure. Sure they don't. It's not like they've got sexist Islamist adherents working in social justice, banging on at universities, and running women's marches. Or that they're putting the pictures of their faces on shirts and signs... but no one takes any of these people seriously. Nope.

First they don't exist, now they're just not credible. Which is it?


That sounds as funny as the joke campaing to bring Cony as president


Yeah, that one comes off as something of an anti-sex feminist, while others ("Third Wave" feminism, iirc) tend to see sexual behavior as something that every woman should be able to determine for herself. If a woman wants to fuck a lot of guys, that's fine - if a woman wants to fuck nobody, that's fine too.

But yeah, your first link falls flat on its face as the author says right out of the gate "The prophet Muhammad would be appalled by how current Islamic Fundamentalists are treating women under their control. This suppression is done in the name of Islamic Law, known as Sharia. But the current suppression of women is shaped by cultural and history. It has little basis in the Quran and it is certainly not consistent with anything we know about what Muhammad taught or how he treated women."


Shut up, Autismtome.


t. islam apologist who has never read a line of the quran

Delete Post []