>People saying things you don't like so you want them to be silenced
You'd have a point if you actually had an opinion, instead of dribbling loose diarrhea out of your mouth. In order to claim the role of a socratic critic and a martyr for free speech, you actually do need to have a valid point. Otherwise you're just another crazy idiot raving on the street corner, and nobody has to listen to that.
Your shitposting always get debunked as false, misinformed or arbitrary and subjective, and your points as faulty argumentation or contradictory to your own opinions or generally accepted principles and facts - but you never admit being wrong or learn anything and just delete your thread and pop up with the same bullshit again a day later as if nothing happened. Whether it's art, maths, science, philosophy, politics, you consistently get it wrong on the very basic points or just don't know what you're talking about, ignore other peoples arguments and comments, make strawmans or project some crazy opinion on them and attack that instead, and argue even on the basic definitions of words and concepts to the point where you may even end up arguing that 1+1=3 because you just won't give up your false premises. When the person you're talking with gives up out of sheer frustration, you declare victory.
You don't even have any original ideas or causes - all you do is attach yourself like a leech to some popular issue or topic and start vomiting talking points to roleplay that you are the heroic champion of the underdog and the silenced, or an enlightened teacher of topics you barely understand. All you really are is a delusional, obsessive, unintelligent, autistic twat who gets off on annoying people because you think it's "justice" for the crime of not accepting your bullshit.