cancel reply
Posting mode: Reply

Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
name e-mail subject pw(deletion)
Post and go
Bump thread?

  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 5120 KB.
  • Javascript must be enabled for all of our addons to work.
  • Come chat and see that we're all a bit crazy on IRC!
  • Do not post any artwork from and/or
    Jeremy Bernal. This is now a bannable offense.

File: 96a6d62a60b810ed5d4a86f475500f7b.jpg - (41.10 KB, 350x399) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
42082 No.3508690
>it's somehow Zoe Quinn's fault that my wife divorced me after I had sex with a prostitute, women are always to blame
>people who pirate video games and run emulators are worse than Hitler. Heil Hitler!
>I don't have time to play video games, I have to make rant videos about things that upset me or else the world won't know to hate them too, MAGA
>Trump wants to ban games? Um, he still upsets the SJWs so let him....
>I listen to a dead music genre because it's for white people stuck in the past and I never left 1991
>video game companies owe me if I bought one of their games at a thrift store used
File: 08d8a21eee053ef9287c857bfd9ba952.png - (206.49 KB, 600x900) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

it must be really sad to be so committed to your low-tier shitpost that you have to post it on a dead furry drama imageboard after it fails to garner any attention on /v/

like, really sad.


Who are you, and why should I care?

File: democrat-tolerance.jpg - (74.07 KB, 1024x540) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


>so much for the tolerant left

Socially destructive forces aren't owed "tolerance".

captcha is unchode



This is the sort of narrative that was used around 1935 in Germany, labeling Jews as "Socially destructive forces".




So... Socially destructive forces should be given tolerance?



Why, its Leukemia, falling back to their cycle of tired, old shitpost/shitthreads, immediately recognizable because they seem incapable of ranting about or starting a topic about something that's outside of an increasingly predictable laundry lists of things they hate to an irrationally unhealthy degree.

People who hate Zoe Quinn check
AlphaOmegaSin check
Anti-piracy/emulator measures check
Trump double check

Also, ID:/2kWYCBK confirmed for Leukemia alt. This thread reads too much like them, and Leukemia's pretty much the only one here who mentions/still defends Quinn after all these years.

File: EX5v4.jpg - (96.03 KB, 934x550) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

He's metastasized to other boards, too.


OP is correct.

Die mad about the it. Preferably sooner rather than later.

>> 3508708

Who decides who is 'socially destructive forces'?

The ones who are most bound on uprooting the established social order and replace it with a clusterfuck of contrived 'social justice' rules, are currently living the delusion that whoever wants to upkeep that social order is 'socially destructive' - and not them.



>Who decides who is 'socially destructive forces'?

definitely not you fucking retards



And this is why Trump will be re-elected.


Because Rightwingers are retarded? Accurate.

File: 1391909480921.gif - (955.03 KB, 360x360) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

elon musk confirmed for gamergate

File: european people art.png - (163.08 KB, 709x426) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


Since you, being left-winger, are really too stupid to understand, let me explain like to a baby: No. Because left-wingers like you got so narcissistic they believe if the reality doesn't agree with their opinions, reality needs to be redefined.

Your fanatical conviction about own infallibility is why the whole world hates you - and will get rid of you.

It's just a matter of time until the rest of real people realize how you've hijacked the language and substituted meaning of a lot of derogatory words to become synonymous with "people who don't agree with us" and how you modified the meanings of words for various virtues to cover up your bigotry.

For example: let's have a closer look at your sample of "Diversity" and see just how narrow a group it covers. For example, all the diverse European people of art...


Nobody googles "European People Art" looking for pictures of white Europeans. They'd google "German People Art", "French People Art", etc. The most common combination that would include it would be "Black European People Art"

but then that's just an algorithm finding a pattern and doesn't involve a stupid conspiracy does it so we'd better just ignore that because really it's JEWgle trying to WHITE GENOCIDE

File: American Inventors.JPG - (101.65 KB, 1902x378) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


File: whitecouple.png - (133.13 KB, 847x368) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.
File: european history people.png - (113.66 KB, 695x185) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

And yet the actual anti-Semites/racists support Trump...


Eh, I'd qualify that as Black Metal or Death Metal.
For the weirdest twist in Christian Metal, go with Powerwolf - - in which they portray the Catholic Church as being controlled by werewolves. It's exactly as insane as it sounds.

And yet the sound can best be described (imo) as symphonic metal.

File: Thor_I_like_it.jpg - (9.61 KB, 229x220) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

I want to see "Black Metal Werewolf Catholic Inquisition: Blood and Thorns" as a netflix original series. Now.

It almost makes me wish I wasn't more or less satanic, so I could jog to it without feeling awkward.

Captcha: shiett


You must watch a lot of interracial porn to get that many mixed hits rofl.

File: Next level crowdsurfing Powerwolf.PNG - (2778.15 KB, 1337x751) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

This particular concert is pretty awesome -

About 29 minutes in, a guy in a fucking wheelchair is recorded crowdsurfing to the front of the audience.

File: PFlH.gif - (451.97 KB, 384x270) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

As much as I wanted to make some shitty comment over that pic, thats pretty cool i guess.

Kind of a shame that you rarely see that kind of general support among christians... out side of... metal concerts.... I'm so confused.


...again, they aren't exactly a Christian band. Their entire gimmick is that of the Catholic Church as if it were taken over by werewolves -
Their latest vid is "Demons Are a Girl's Best Friend" - - so yeah...

File: cuphead___the_devil___by_ironiadevil-dc0lfbj.png.jpg - (80.58 KB, 858x931) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

maybe a couple jogs... out of respect for my lost falconer play list.



>Real metal is satanic. Deal with it, snowflake godboys, stop ruining everything and changing it to suit your sensitive feelings.

I'm not so sure of this. Black sabbath, which pretty much was the start of metal always came off to me as really overtly Christ-heavy in it's themes and tones. The whole 'Evil people will go to hell for their crimes against the decency of ordinary working folk' blue collar fire and brimstone shit.

File: 6b0876e2-703c-40d4-8804-c627eb3d9cb6.png - (188.97 KB, 747x566) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


Loads of black people, and a single Jew. Hmm. Can't hate on Idris Elba though, damn good actor.

Ok, so its not just them. Something really wierd and overtly racist is going on. I keep getting similar results with various related search attempts - shitload of black people, with a sprinkling of Jews here and there.

This is next-level-tier racebait. What is Google trying to accomplish by being so blatant and brazen about such strong race favoritism? Clearly there's an algorithm at work here that needs tweaking, but the good part will be watching what their explanation for this is.


wow the conspiracy is real

File: DykePride AntiSemitism.jpg - (248.08 KB, 873x797) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


You know that antisemitism is only wrong if it's not the leftists who do it?


Pretty sure I called that out as being bumblefuck levels of stupid when it happened.

That said, I definitely have a few gripes with Israel as a nation and some of the actions it's taken - or more specifically, how the US keeps giving it an official pass for doing shit we'd otherwise condemn - but those are issues with their policies, not their people.


"This makes me feel threatened" is the new "It's against God's natural order!"
No need for reason, logic or any potential for harm, just raw 'hunch' is enough of condemnation.

I have no love for Israel's politics regarding Middle East. But this is the purest form of pointless stereotype-based antisemitism - the sort of intolerance the leftists claim to oppose. Simply, they tightened their definition of 'diversity' so much that a major part of the world is excluded. This is the new Aryan racial purity, except new sets of 'ubermenschen' and 'untermenschen' defined with a whole caste system with classes in bidding war of 'being the most systemically oppressed' replacing genetic purity.



>Real metal is satanic

is that why churches are usually made of stones



Those are some goddamn nice mental gymnastics to try to fit that shit into the narrative.. slow clap

File: laugh.jpg - (31.16 KB, 363x310) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

>>3508934 "This is the new Aryan racial purity"



"Bumblefuck levels of stupid"

Chicago? A major American city is "bumblefuck"?

Sweetie... no, sweetie. That's a progressive stronghold.


Laugh at your own lack of critical thought.

It's the paradox of intolerance of intolerance you're talking about. For example, John Rawls points out that a just society must tolerate the intolerant, for otherwise, the society would then itself be intolerant and effectively hypocritical. Nevertheless:

> "While an intolerant sect does not itself have title to complain of intolerance, its freedom should be restricted only when the tolerant sincerely and with reason believe that their own security and that of the institutions of liberty are in danger."

Keywords being "sincerely" and "with reason". It's not enough that your subjective identity politics define everyone else to be your enemy, becuse that effectively permits the same for everyone else and you arrive at an impasse where everyone claims priority and superiority of opinion just because they say so.

The left breaks this principle by effectively arguing absolute moral relativity, where your feefees supercede any rationality and argument. Otherwise their "positive liberty" wouldn't work - people couldn't have the absolute authority to dictate to others what is "good" and "bad".



File: YY88NoC.jpg - (64.48 KB, 964x455) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


>where your feefees supercede any rationality and argument.

as opposed to left-wingers who think things should not exist at all for anyone to enjoy because they personally disagree with them. Cocksucker.

You operate on hurt feelings, only using a book of lies to excuse it.

FTFY. Congrats, you projecting, cancerous growth. With one word change, you just described yourself and the progressive left to a T. Also, here's your "Book of lies".


Left-wing is so horrible...

Right-winger libertarian runs on platform of being nazi loving pedophile.


...holy fuck he's not kidding.

For a non Young Turks reference. That said, even the Libertarians told him to piss off, formally ejecting him from the party in February 2017. When you're so far right that even the Libertarians won't touch you, that's saying something!


>>3509054 "It's the paradox of intolerance...bLah blah idiocy continues..."

The only response to a rightwinger trying desperately to sound intelligent but failing miserably:

Honestly, you cretins always come across as if you you only discovered the thesaurus option in MS Word and are over using it in the hopes that it adds a digit to your puny IQ score.

Oh and for you idiot Trumptards, nearly 5,000 dead in Puerto Rico. Trump's tally was far, far lower than that. But of course you dolts still don't consider Puerto Ricans US citizens. Newsflash- they are, fucking idiots.


Yeah, and people had that shit figured out by 1945 -

Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.


That's exactly the paradox. Karl Popper didn't solve it - he simply re-stated it.

John Rawls was commenting directly on that. The problems begin when you pit two groups against each other, both claiming the other is being maliciously intolerant and refusing debate, and appealing to their right to not tolerate the "intolerant".

That's why the right to suppress other opinion by force only applies after you've taken a sincere and reasonable account of the situation. As such account cannot be made subjectively and unilaterally, this excludes leftist identity politics and calling everyone else nazis.

File: reading-is-for-faggots_o_57250.jpg - (55.19 KB, 550x575) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.


>Honestly, you cretins always come across as if you you only discovered the thesaurus option in MS Word and are over using it in the hopes that it adds a digit to your puny IQ score.

Oh how the rhetoric changes. This meme used to be satire of the right. Now it fits like a fist in the face for the left.


it's a satire of americans


Just witnessed a discussion between an asexual and libtards.

The discussion was about news of some businesswoman coming out of the closet as lesbian. On a general Japan news site. The asexual said he finds that sort of 'news' not newsworthy - a spam.

He's uncomfortable about the current liberal trend of stuffing sexuality into every facet of life, every domain, where so far it was topical and now must involve sexuality.

So, liberals started shitting it up, saying that news are bombarded with heterosexuality, like on TV. Surprise, he doesn't watch TV.

"But your friends must be discussing their spouses all the time." Nope, he's not friends with people who do.


Yeah, essentially calling a gay "prison gay."

"See a therapist!"

Yeah, like sending gays to therapy.

"You are a bigot and trying to justify your bigotry"

Is liking homosexuality mandatory? And someone's just encountered a new sexual minority and gets aggressive against it. Sounds like actual bigotry.

"Yeah, sure, straight white males are the victims"

What the fuck?

"You're just alt-right."

Again, bullshit.


In essence, Liberals encountering a person of a new sexual minority went about it roughly the way fundamental Christians from deep within the Bible Belt would go about meeting a gay.



>> as long as we can counter them by rational argument

Currently the rational arguments have been reduced to

"You're a bigot, I'm not talking with you"
"You're alt-right."
"People like you should be locked up"
"lol you literally have no idea what your talking about"
"this is bullshit."
"You're sick."

Somewhere in the process, the Liberals completely lost the ability to present a rational thought process; they assume their standards as axioms and defend them through throwing insults. They completely lost the actual philosophical thought process that lies behind concepts like 'diversity', 'discrimination', 'social justice' and replaced them with rigid, narrow definitions with no room to expand or adapt.

It's literally a cult with an immutable scripture. And anything that doesn't agree with the scripture is evil.

Take the concept of 'bigotry'. The dictionary definition is "intolerance towards those who hold different opinions from oneself." And yet, currently, to be 'not a bigot' you can't just tolerate opinions different than your own. You're required to change your own opinions to match the ones held by Liberals. You having a different opinion is not acceptable and makes you a bigot.


you can't counter anything with rational argument in the mass media age
style will always triumph over substance


And "reeeeeee" will triumph over "here's a proof."


BTW, case in point: >>3509029 >>3509032 >>3509105

Not even an attempt at rationality. Simply "it's wrong because we say it's wrong."



>Why, its Leukemia, falling back to their cycle of tired, old shitpost/shitthreads, immediately recognizable because they seem incapable of ranting about or starting a topic about something that's outside of an increasingly predictable laundry lists of things they hate to an irrationally unhealthy degree.

What's it like, being this delusionally retarded? ID:I6MX+2xH is not a difficult id to recognize.

And while we're on IDs, ID:wmpJNxZg shares a trait with wmp (windows media player) that he may not realize; he thinks he knows everything about everything and that everyone wants to know about it.

Actually this >>3508782
is why trump will be re-elected.


Interesting point. I wonder if Musk will take the red pill, or if he'll just find himself lost.


Completely unrealistic.

"Just let me try!"

Never. No Liberal would ever allow the attempt.

Also, their Hugh Hefner is made of styrofoam. Oh, and they don't go 'reeeee' nearly enough.

File: splain.jpg - (109.71 KB, 825x300) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.




Special keywords that mean "Danger! Rational thought ahead! Don't think about it; it's dangerous to cult integrity!"





>if you don't swallow Rightwinger bullshit you're being irrational!

Good joke.



Who says anything about "swallowing"?

Just consider critically, don't strawman, don't assume, learn the facts, verify the sources, and follow the logical conclusions like a civilized human should.

All you're being asked for is being open-minded; use critical thought and facts instead of prejudice and bigotry. Is this so much to ask for?


Leftism is based on irrationality and impossible demands masking as a social philosophy.

Seriously. Leftism as we today understand it is an offshoot from Romanticism, which was a counterpoint to the hard rationality of the Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution, against the newly emerging meritocratic societies where nobody had a god-given position or any sort of birthright to all the goodies. Against the very concept of Liberty itself where everyone is their own master and servant to nobody else.

Leftism is basically the answer to the question of: I want all the nice stuff but I don't want to work hard for it - how can I make other people do things for me while giving the minimum amout of effort back?

Then they went to great efforts to invent communism, socialism etc. to have the "society" (read: other people) do the work, and when that failed miserably the whole concept of leftism just collapsed back to childish "I wanna!" screaming veiled into the clothes of social justice.

It has a nice veneer of "good will", but scratch the surface and the irrationality of the Romantics comes through.


Mind you, social justice had a point 100 years ago - today nobody's starving on the streets because they're being exploited by robber-barons, except in the communist/socialist countries.

The left was originally against the idea of the welfare state, because it allowed for a peace between the working class and the owning class, and that wouldn't allow the leftists to take over the whole society. Then when communism failed they co-opted the idea, merged it with democratic socialism, and retconned it as their own invention, and now they're simply abusing the concept for their original purposes.

So, the left perverted the welfare state into a business: tax money from the owning class, use said money to buy votes from the working class, pocket the difference. To keep the charade going, the left simply allow the rich to exploit the poor and the working classes, so they'd have someone to point a finger at and say "See, this is why you need to vote for me!"

If you understand this, you see why it's impossible to have a rational conversation with the average leftist - when they think big government, they get dollar signs in their own eyes. If they're poor or working class, or of the idle classes that literally do nothing, the ulterior motive is getting the government shoveling them cash from the pockets of the rich. Alternatively, they're trying to wedge into the government themselves, to be able to wield that shovel any way they like.

That sort of greedy selfishness must be denied immediately or the whole game's up, so the leftist masks it with "Think of the minorities! Think of the poor! Nazi scum! You evil monster!".


Minorities are a fraud. White people are 1/10th the world's population. In white countries they should always be the majority. That's what everyone else does.


candidate for /r/badhistory
anyway read:
for why

>Against the very concept of Liberty itself where everyone is their own master and servant to nobody else.

is silly and why we drifted away from a narrow, essentially propertarian conception of liberty. (In victorian times liberals realised that "being your own master" doesn't mean anything if you're just going to die of cholera. The move away from Liberals being now-Libertarians wasn't some socialist perversion, it was a common-sense response to something directly before their eyes. Indeed, you might even say it was insufficiently romantic...)

Now away from Liberals.

>Leftism as we today understand it is an offshoot from Romanticism

There's a reason Marx purposefully went out to emphasise his position scientific socialism, precisely because he wanted to avoid a romanticised conception of how socialism would come about. I could go on, but rather than explain Marx I'd rather leave the issue open so people can reply to me with what they think Marx said and thought, revealing they don't have a clue in the process.


Everything Rightwingers believe is based on revisionism, historical ignorance and crackpot conspiracy theories.




oh golly I have been red pilled where can I pick up my gun and diaper and donald trump buttplug


Careful with that gun fetish, summerfriend.




You win all the prizes.


You couldn't win a prize if you were the only participant, pigfucker


Lack of tendies giving you the grumps, brah?


Lack of dad make you into a chantard loser?


read "13 rules for strife" by peter oborne


Not like it matters, even if you had a dad he wouldn't want trash like you in his life. What an embarrassment that would be.


What's the matter pigfucker, all out of cute little chantard memes to vomit back at me? Post one of your funny memes, that'll make you feel less like a hollowed out waste of flesh for a few seconds.

File: clues-upstairs.jpg - (54.33 KB, 610x448) Thumbnail displayed, click image for full size.

Delete Post []